advertisement

web 2.0, library systems and the library system

47 %
53 %
advertisement
Information about web 2.0, library systems and the library system

Published on June 19, 2008

Author: lisld

Source: slideshare.net

Description

The Web 2.0 environment is characterized by concentration and diffusion. Library services are not well matched to this environment: they are fragmented and difficult to mobilize in user workflows. This presentation analyzes this situation and suggests some directions.
advertisement

 

 

Credits Slide 1 . Picture of Sterling Memorial Library. Günter Waibel. Slide 9 . From avlxyz on Flickr. http://www.flickr.com/photos/avlxyz/2077892948/ . License: Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic Slide 10 . eBoy foobar poster. http://hello.eboy.com/eboy/wp-content/uploads/shop/EBY_FooBar_35t.png . Available from http://shop.eboy.com/. Slide 12 . Hugh MacLeod, Gaping Void. http://www.gapingvoid.com/widget.jpg Slide 15 . Bondi Bay. Sydney. Powerhouse Museum. On Flickr commons. http://www.flickr.com/photos/powerhouse_museum/2363539264/ Also at: http://www.powerhousemuseum.com/collection/database/?irn=30669 . No known copyright restrictions. Slides 21-27, 37 . Courtesy of Jim Michalko. Slides 30-32 . OCLC Slide 43. Courtesy of Janifer Gatenby.

Slide 1 . Picture of Sterling Memorial Library. Günter Waibel.

Slide 9 . From avlxyz on Flickr. http://www.flickr.com/photos/avlxyz/2077892948/ . License: Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic

Slide 10 . eBoy foobar poster. http://hello.eboy.com/eboy/wp-content/uploads/shop/EBY_FooBar_35t.png . Available from http://shop.eboy.com/.

Slide 12 . Hugh MacLeod, Gaping Void. http://www.gapingvoid.com/widget.jpg

Slide 15 . Bondi Bay. Sydney. Powerhouse Museum. On Flickr commons. http://www.flickr.com/photos/powerhouse_museum/2363539264/ Also at: http://www.powerhousemuseum.com/collection/database/?irn=30669 . No known copyright restrictions.

Slides 21-27, 37 . Courtesy of Jim Michalko.

Slides 30-32 . OCLC

Slide 43. Courtesy of Janifer Gatenby.

RANKIN IN WORLDCAT IDENTITIES Interlude

Interlude

 

 

Overview End User Access Management Digitised/ Digital Bought/ Physical Elctronic/ Licensed Special colls/ Archives Management

WEB 2.0 Part one

Part one

 

 

 

 

 

Then: Users built workflow around libraries Now: Library must build services around user workflow Discovery happens elsewhere Disclosure

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Facebook Google

 

Google Facebook LibraryThing

So … Concentration Diffusion Aggregation of data at the network level Descriptive Mining the clickstream: “Database of intentions” Social Network effects Syndication to many destinations A feed based universe Data APIs Widgets Mobilization in user workflows Encourage social participation

Concentration

Diffusion

Aggregation of data at the network level

Descriptive

Mining the clickstream: “Database of intentions”

Social

Network effects

Syndication to many destinations

A feed based universe

Data

APIs

Widgets

Mobilization in user workflows

Encourage social participation

LIBRARY SYSTEMS Part two

Part two

User environment Library & Network Resource Management environment End User Access Management Digitised/ Digital Bought / Physical Electronic/ Licensed Special colls/ Archives Management

User environment Library & Network Resource Management environment End User Access Management Digitised/ Digital Bought / Physical Electronic/ Licensed Special colls/ Archives Management Find It Get It Manage It Metadata Content

User environment Library & Network Resource Management environment End User Access Management Digitised/ Digital Bought / Physical Electronic/ Licensed Special colls/ Archives Management Find It Get It Manage It Metadata Content ILL/CIRC LINK RESOLVER SPECIAL SPECIAL ILS ERM REPOSITORY OPAC MetaSearch Website A-Z NextGen MARC DC EAD A&I XXX

Network level – website - workflow Difficult to ‘mobilize’ library resource into workflows A thin layer around complex legacy systems Stuck in the middle Concentration Diffusion Low gravitational pull? Little social dynamic Limited usage data

‘ Monolithic fragmentation’ Move to ‘concentrate’ at local level Single search environments Move to ‘diffuse’ at local level RSS, APIs , …. But … Have to manage presence at the local, group and global level

Move to ‘concentrate’ at local level

Single search environments

Move to ‘diffuse’ at local level

RSS, APIs , ….

But …

Have to manage presence at the local, group and global level

SYSTEMWIDE ATTENTION Part three

Part three

Remember …. I WAS ASKED TO BE PROVOCATIVE ….

Remember ….

Put another way... “ It is not necessary to change. Survival is not mandatory.” — W. Edwards Deming

“ It is not necessary to change. Survival is not mandatory.”

— W. Edwards Deming

A historic note: the good old days Move to group and global Cataloging and resource sharing A&I databases and electronic journals Logic of network environment suggests moving more …. Historic central actors British Library Document Supply Centre JISC ‘ group’ structures less well developed in UK than elsewhere.

Move to group and global

Cataloging and resource sharing

A&I databases and electronic journals

Logic of network environment suggests moving more ….

Historic central actors

British Library Document Supply Centre

JISC

‘ group’ structures less well developed in UK than elsewhere.

Network level services are heavily used, and in many cases are the first port of call for library users Increasing opportunities to build shared capacity, remove unhelpful redundancy, and aggregate data (cf government shared services agenda). Release time and resource to support specific learning and teaching needs of institution. Disclose resources into group and network level services.

… WITH VARYING DEGREES OF PLAUSIBILITY … So:

So:

Group Data? Knowledge base Aggregate usage data Resolver data Download data Database usage data Circulation … Shared catalog (cf OhioLink) Syndicate to global (e.g. Google Scholar and union catalogues) Switch to local for fulfilment Applications? Repository Search Institutional search (Primo, WC Local, etc) Metasearch Catalogue ILS???? Network effects: e.g. circulation and recommendation Shared selection CIRC <> resource sharing

Data?

Knowledge base

Aggregate usage data

Resolver data

Download data

Database usage data

Circulation



Shared catalog (cf OhioLink)

Syndicate to global (e.g. Google Scholar and union catalogues)

Switch to local for fulfilment

Applications?

Repository

Search

Institutional search (Primo, WC Local, etc)

Metasearch

Catalogue

ILS????

Network effects: e.g. circulation and recommendation

Shared selection

CIRC <> resource sharing

Group The collective collection? Competition for space and ongoing cost a concern Legacy print collections (cf UK RR) Storage Preservation Access Physical delivery architecture The collective collection? Managing a licensed collection Ebooks Journals Preservation Access models

The collective collection?

Competition for space and ongoing cost a concern

Legacy print collections (cf UK RR)

Storage

Preservation

Access

Physical delivery architecture

The collective collection?

Managing a licensed collection

Ebooks

Journals

Preservation

Access models

Where data aggregation is beneficial More effective exposure in a web scale site ( metadata ) To attract users and social engagement Avoid redundant data management ( suppliers details, supplier suggestions ) Collective knowledge - tasks less complicated or more accurate ( serial prediction ) New knowledge via deduction or mining ( holdings count indicating rareness and popularity, supplier performance , enriched name metadata) Most effective management of links and imported enriched data Comparison of collections; facilitating the management of the collective collection

More effective exposure in a web scale site ( metadata )

To attract users and social engagement

Avoid redundant data management ( suppliers details, supplier suggestions )

Collective knowledge - tasks less complicated or more accurate ( serial prediction )

New knowledge via deduction or mining ( holdings count indicating rareness and popularity, supplier performance , enriched name metadata)

Most effective management of links and imported enriched data

Comparison of collections; facilitating the management of the collective collection

Global Discovery Registry (of institutions, services, collections) Electronic delivery architecture

Discovery

Registry (of institutions, services, collections)

Electronic delivery architecture

Local Interpretation of specific research and learning needs of institution Intersection of research/learning and information management Reputation management Disclosure to group and global levels Funding

Interpretation of specific research and learning needs of institution

Intersection of research/learning and information management

Reputation management

Disclosure to group and global levels

Funding

Management models Collaboratively sourced Centrally provided Third parties

Collaboratively sourced

Centrally provided

Third parties

HTTP://ORWEBLOG.OCLC.ORG Thank you Think local: Act local, group(al) and global.

Thank you

Add a comment

Related pages

Web 2.0, Library 2.0 and the Future for Library systems

Web 2.0, Library 2.0 and the Future ... What is Web 2.0? • Web2.0 is not a software package, ... Library 2.0 and the Future for Library systems
Read more

Library 2.0 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Library 2.0 is a loosely defined model for a ... hate speech and cyberbullying in the library system. ... patron as producer: libraries, web 2.0, ...
Read more

Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and Its Implications for Libraries

... installed in a library's system and coupled ... inventory systems and more on ... Web 2.0 and Its Implications for Libraries". Webology ...
Read more

Web 2.0 and folksonomies in a library context

Web 2.0 and library systems. ... Available at: http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/12/web_20_compact.html. Simon, 1996; H. Simon; Sciences of the ...
Read more

Open source systems bring Web 2.0 to special libraries ...

Prosentient Systems Department of Rural Health Sydney, Australia ... with library systems. The Web 2.0 phenomenon has combined with enthusiastic adoption
Read more

Monroe County (NY) Library System - libraryweb.org

The Central Library of Rochester & Monroe County has collaborated with Library Commerce Inc. to provide the public ... Monroe County Library System, ...
Read more

System Center Technical Documentation Library | App ...

Access docs for System Center 2012 and ... System Center Technical Documentation Library. ... can build manageable systems and ...
Read more

Enhancing Library Services with Web 2.0 functionalities

Enhancing Library Services with Web 2.0 ... Web 2.0 technologies, developed by the Panteion ... state-of-the-art Library 2.0 systems available ...
Read more

Integrated library system - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An integrated library system (ILS), also known as a library management system (LMS), [1] [2] is an enterprise resource planning system for a library, used ...
Read more