WBE 08 - VLC Comparison

67 %
33 %
Information about WBE 08 - VLC Comparison

Published on March 19, 2008

Author: schwier

Source: slideshare.net

Description

This paper compares some features of formal and non-formal virtual learning communities. The paper was presented at the IASTED - WBE 08 Conference, Innsbruck, Austria, March 15, 2008

A comparison of formal and non-formal virtual learning communities Richard A. Schwier Dirk Morrison Ben K. Daniel Paper presented at WBE 08 IASTED Innsbruck, Austria March 17, 2008

Richard A. Schwier

Dirk Morrison

Ben K. Daniel

Paper presented at WBE 08 IASTED

Innsbruck, Austria March 17, 2008

Purpose extend what we have learned about VLCs in formal learning environments to how learners in non-formal learning environments will make use of VLCs to enhance informal learning

extend what we have learned about VLCs in formal learning environments to how learners in non-formal learning environments will make use of VLCs to enhance informal learning

Formal Contexts Learners grouped in classes Taught by teachers Curriculum defined by institution Often part of a graduated system of certification

Learners grouped in classes

Taught by teachers

Curriculum defined by institution

Often part of a graduated system of certification

Informal Contexts Learner-organized and directed Less systematic/ planned Sometimes marked by unintentional or serendipitous learning

Learner-organized and directed

Less systematic/ planned

Sometimes marked by unintentional or serendipitous learning

Non-Formal Contexts Include features of formal contexts - externally organized, supported Include features of informal contexts - learner self-directedness, independence within a structured domain e.g. webinars, PLE, optional elements in a course

Include features of formal contexts - externally organized, supported

Include features of informal contexts - learner self-directedness, independence within a structured domain

e.g. webinars, PLE, optional elements in a course

Formal VLC

Non-Formal VLC ?

Comparison - Catalysts Formal VLC Non-Formal VLC Strong teacher presence, with directed discussion and deliberate strategies employed to engage learners with each other. Teachers may not be as directive, and learner engagement will rise or fall based on how compelling the perceived need is to communicate.

Comparison - Emphases Formal VLC Non-Formal VLC Institutionally or centrally defined. Most formal VLCs emphasize communities of ideas, although other reasons for participating may motivate individual members. Defined by individuals and interest groups. Non-formal communities are typically designed with particular emphases in mind, and participants congregate based on shared interests, but outcomes are individually defined.

Comparison - Identity Formal VLC Non-Formal VLC Teachers can articulate the focus or purpose of the community, and outline the requirements and rituals associated with membership in the community. Participants are typically known to each other. Participants may wish to remain anonymous or to protect their identities. Fictitious identities may be used to guard identity in some non-formal settings, yet participants can be encouraged to engage each other in authentic ways.

Comparison - Participation Formal VLC Non-Formal VLC Participation can be encouraged or made compulsory as part of the formal requirements of the learning environment. Fewer external controls over individual investments and outcomes translate into greater control by learners about their own levels of participation.

Comparison - Technology Formal VLC Non-Formal VLC In formal learning environments, it is critically important to provide support for learning how to use communication features of the technology-based system used by the group. In non-formal settings transparency and ease of use are paramount. Participants will find alternative loci for learning if the technological context for learning is awkward or difficult.

Comparison - Learning Formal VLC Non-Formal VLC In formal environments, an instructor will often remind participants of externally imposed learning intentions, and intervene when interaction drifts too far away from the defined learning focus. Non-formal learning environments may articulate central purposes and goals, but learners will adapt them to satisfy individual purposes.

Comparison - Trust Formal VLC Non-Formal VLC In a formal VLC, an instructor will often spend a considerable amount of energy trying to build trust among participants and between the instructor and participants As informality increases, the development of trust may become more elusive, as participants choose to trust or distrust other participants based on episodic experience or perception of individual attributes of others.

Conclusions comparisons are speculative - guide an empirical and narrative research agenda actual differences a function of how a learning leader chooses to operate with a group any give class may include formal, non-formal and informal learning environments important for educators to learn how to support non-formal learning within formal environments

comparisons are speculative - guide an empirical and narrative research agenda

actual differences a function of how a learning leader chooses to operate with a group

any give class may include formal, non-formal and informal learning environments

important for educators to learn how to support non-formal learning within formal environments

Conclusions research needs to identify shared and unique characteristics of non-formal VLC, identify the relative importance of characteristics, & understand social and pedagogical implications need for narrative data from participants about how they experience non-formal learning and SDL, and what their social networking means to them as learners

research needs to identify shared and unique characteristics of non-formal VLC, identify the relative importance of characteristics, & understand social and pedagogical implications

need for narrative data from participants about how they experience non-formal learning and SDL, and what their social networking means to them as learners

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

Class B Licensee 2011-2014 MBE/WBE Spend Comparison

Class B Licensee 2011-2014 MBE/WBE Spend Comparison LICENSEE 2011 2012 2013 2014 ... WBE 14.08% 14.73% 14.38% 16.08% Total Spend $4.5M $4.4M $3.9M $3.5M
Read more

Mplayer vs VLC- Which One is Better? - Wondershare

VLC vs MPlayer, which one is better? This article includes a detailed comparison between these two popular media players.
Read more

Class B Licensee 2014 MBE/WBE Spend Comparison

Class B Licensee 2014 MBE/WBE Spend Comparison LICENSEE 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr
Read more

Media Players : VLC vs Windows Media - YouTube

Media Players : VLC vs Windows Media Nixie Pixel. Subscribe Subscribed Unsubscribe 205,436 205K. ... 08. ProgrammingKnowledge 308,049 views. 5:08
Read more

KMPlayer vs VLC Media Player | Softonic - Tutorials ...

KMPlayer vs VLC Media Player. You've probably noticed by now the large number of good, free video players available. We've decided to compare contenders ...
Read more

Comparison of Glue Pens - YouTube

Comparison of Glue Pens CraftTestDummies. Subscribe Subscribed Unsubscribe 31,084 31K. ... 14:08. Schell Fabian (babytweetums) 17,973 views. 14:08
Read more

Screencasting Tools Comparison | Comparison tables ...

Screencasting Tools Comparison Business > Webmaster ... 2012-08-07 21:54:08: 0 no ... Too many. see https://www.videolan.org/vlc/features.html: Yes: 0 no ...
Read more

VLC Vs MPC-BE With MadVR : Screenshot Comparison

VLC vs MPC-BE with madVR. VLC 1920x1080 (2.6MB) MPC-BE with madVR 1920x1080 (3.8MB) Views: 27453 Added: 24.08.2013 3 years ago #1 ...
Read more

Head to Head: Can UMPlayer overthrow VLC media player ...

Head to Head: Can UMPlayer overthrow VLC media player?. VLC media player has long been the de-facto media player for just about every audio and video ...
Read more