Urisa Be Spatial Bg 20090505

80 %
20 %
Information about Urisa Be Spatial Bg 20090505

Published on May 22, 2009

Author: gaspirc

Source: slideshare.net

Description

Presentation to URISA may 05,2009.

CSA S250 Standard MAPPING OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE Bob Gaspirc, OLS, CLS, OAEM Chair, CSA S250 Technical Committee Manager, Mapping Services. City of Toronto URISA - Ontario Chapter "Be Spatial'09" AGM Program and EXPO May 5, 2009

Key Goal – improve decision making You must: Be ready to produce utility “record” as evidence that an event, set of activities, or task occurred and was completed Have record containing relevant, factual, and timely data Be able to access and retrieve utility record Be able to to share, manipulate, analyze, distribute data Make and act on decisions using reliable and dependable utility map records

You must:

Be ready to produce utility “record” as evidence that an event, set of activities, or task occurred and was completed

Have record containing relevant, factual, and timely data

Be able to access and retrieve utility record

Be able to to share, manipulate, analyze, distribute data

Make and act on decisions using reliable and dependable utility map records

Why a Mapping Standard? Good records lead to informed decisions Codification of best practises Provides a technically neutral language Creates a consistent and repeatable approach to mapping and recording of facility information “ as per CSA S250” Promotes communication among utility infrastructure stakeholders and reduces infrastructure life-cycle challenges

Good records lead to informed decisions

Codification of best practises

Provides a technically neutral language

Creates a consistent and repeatable approach to mapping and recording of facility information

“ as per CSA S250”

Promotes communication among utility infrastructure stakeholders and reduces infrastructure life-cycle challenges

Expected outcomes Improved safety of company and contractor employees and the general public by decreasing utility hits/strikes Improved reliability and accuracy in the location of underground utility infrastructure mapping records and supporting data Lower cost in utility design life cycle by sharing accurate and complete utility records in a more timely fashion amongst all users (owners, municipalities, designers, contractors, locators, …)

Improved safety of company and contractor employees and the general public by decreasing utility hits/strikes

Improved reliability and accuracy in the location of underground utility infrastructure mapping records and supporting data

Lower cost in utility design life cycle by sharing accurate and complete utility records in a more timely fashion amongst all users (owners, municipalities, designers, contractors, locators, …)

Evidence of an event, activity, task As-built drawings, plans, sketches Circulation drawings, mark ups Design drawing Permit drawings, sketches Approved design drawing used for purposes of construction Field notes, locator notes, inspector notes, Digital representations of above

As-built drawings, plans, sketches

Circulation drawings, mark ups

Design drawing

Permit drawings, sketches

Approved design drawing used for purposes of construction

Field notes, locator notes, inspector notes,

Digital representations of above

CSA s250 – Mapping of underground infrastructure Standard needs to be: referenced and used within infrastructure design, construction, operation policies, practices, and procedures “ these” documents are needed to demonstrates the “legal test phases” to be met : establish the integrity and authenticity of the recording system; and Supports and “the reliability of the entry.”

Standard needs to be:

referenced and used within infrastructure design, construction, operation policies, practices, and procedures

“ these” documents are needed to demonstrates the “legal test phases” to be met :

establish the integrity and authenticity of the recording system; and

Supports and “the reliability of the entry.”

CSA s250: – Mapping of underground infrastructure Applying the standard to an organization’s business will not eliminate the possibility of litigation, but it will make the production of electronic records easier and their acceptance in a legal proceeding more certain. This standard is not intended to replace, reduce, or eliminate the “Call before you dig” requirements for field locates of buried utilities

Applying the standard to an organization’s business will not eliminate the possibility of litigation, but it will make the production of electronic records easier and their acceptance in a legal proceeding more certain.

This standard is not intended to replace, reduce, or eliminate the “Call before you dig” requirements for field locates of buried utilities

Improved decision framework Acts, regulations, by-laws, codes Results of court actions/decisions, other legal proceeding Enables Framework for collection, access exchange, and distribution Business policies, best practice, procedures, and operational requirements STANDARDS ISO 15489 - records management CAN/CGSB-72.34, Electronic records as documentary evidence standards endorsed for the Canadian Geospatial Data Infrastructure (CGDI) (DRM, metadata, web services etc) CSA s250 – Mapping of Underground Utility Infrastructure Technology neutral language Improves, enhances records management during design, construction, operation, retirement phase of plant

STANDARDS

ISO 15489 - records management

CAN/CGSB-72.34, Electronic records as documentary evidence

standards endorsed for the Canadian Geospatial Data Infrastructure (CGDI) (DRM, metadata, web services etc)

CSA s250 – Mapping of Underground Utility Infrastructure

Why a CSA based standard? Provides management framework for administering technical committee Acts a facilitator; provides neutral third party forum, process, and structure for developing a consensus standard Part of the National Standards System; accredited by the Standards Council of Canada

Provides management framework for administering technical committee

Acts a facilitator; provides neutral third party forum, process, and structure for developing a consensus standard

Part of the National Standards System; accredited by the Standards Council of Canada

Consensus based Standards are developed by stakeholders business Cooperative work through common interest in particular subject area consumer groups industry labour government environmental groups

business

Cooperative work through common interest in particular subject area

consumer groups

industry

labour

government

environmental groups

CSA’s Involvement in Civil Infrastructure More than 400 publications relate to civil infrastructure… Homes & Buildings Transportation structures Energy networks (electrical, petroleum, gas & alternative energy) Water, waste, & storm water management Industrial structures Communications structures Community, healthcare and recreational facilities

History and Background of Initiative No current mapping standard that addresses accuracy, process, and identification of underground plant Historically, high variability in the reliability, consistency & accuracy of mapping underground utilities The (Ontario and BC) Common Ground Alliance movement have introduced Mapping “Best Practices” for Damage Prevention Recent technological advancements allows for: Improved records capture (GPS, LIDAR, imagery) Better records storage (GIS, CADD systems) Enhanced access and sharing mechanisms Growing appetite to share utility mapping records Utility owners/operators already have internal standards

No current mapping standard that addresses accuracy, process, and identification of underground plant

Historically, high variability in the reliability, consistency & accuracy of mapping underground utilities

The (Ontario and BC) Common Ground Alliance movement have introduced Mapping “Best Practices” for Damage Prevention

Recent technological advancements allows for:

Improved records capture (GPS, LIDAR, imagery)

Better records storage (GIS, CADD systems)

Enhanced access and sharing mechanisms

Growing appetite to share utility mapping records

Utility owners/operators already have internal standards

Build Up to Development of Standard 2005 to 2006 Q3 – ORCGA Mapping Best Practices finalized and committee dissolved 2006 Q1 to Q3 – RPWCO gathered support to develop a mapping standard 2006 Q3 – RPWCO approached CSA to conduct a study on the viability of developing a new mapping standard 2006 Q4 to 2007 Q2 – Feasibility Task Force 2007 Q2 – Call for participation nationwide to become member of committee to develop new CSA standard 2007 Q3 – New CSA S250 Technical Committee established and kick off

2005 to 2006 Q3 – ORCGA Mapping Best Practices finalized and committee dissolved

2006 Q1 to Q3 – RPWCO gathered support to develop a mapping standard

2006 Q3 – RPWCO approached CSA to conduct a study on the viability of developing a new mapping standard

2006 Q4 to 2007 Q2 – Feasibility Task Force

2007 Q2 – Call for participation nationwide to become member of committee to develop new CSA standard

2007 Q3 – New CSA S250 Technical Committee established and kick off

Creation of a New CSA Technical Committee Technical Committee established consisting of subject matter experts, that also represent regional and end user interests. Mandate: The Committee shall be responsible for developing and maintaining standards related to mapping and recording of existing in-service underground utility infrastructure and related appurtenances below, at, or near grade and those that are either abandoned or that are reserved for future use.

Technical Committee established consisting of subject matter experts, that also represent regional and end user interests.

Mandate:

The Committee shall be responsible for developing and maintaining standards related to mapping and recording of existing in-service underground utility infrastructure and related appurtenances below, at, or near grade and those that are either abandoned or that are reserved for future use.

What is the mandate of a this consensus based standard? Mandate: The Committee shall be responsible for developing and maintaining standards related to mapping and recording of existing in-service underground utility infrastructure and related appurtenances below, at, or near grade and those that are either abandoned or that are reserved for future use. Chair Associate Members CSA Project Manager Public Review / Enquiry User interest General interest Carriers Regulatory Authority Voting Members:

User interest

General interest

Carriers

Regulatory Authority

Committee Matrix Interest categories Min Max UI User Interest 4 7 GI General Interest 4 7 CA Carriers 4 7 RA Regulatory Authority 4 7

Interest categories

Min Max

UI User Interest 4 7

GI General Interest 4 7

CA Carriers 4 7

RA Regulatory Authority 4 7

Purpose of CSA 250 standard “… is to specify the mapping requirements of records that provide the identification and location of underground utility infrastructure This standard is intended to promote the use, and drive the advancement of mapping records, during the planning, design, construction, and operation of an underground utility”

“… is to specify the mapping requirements of records that provide the identification and location of underground utility infrastructure

This standard is intended to promote the use, and drive the advancement of mapping records, during the planning, design, construction, and operation of an underground utility”

1.1 Scope “This standard specifies the mapping requirements for the recording and depiction of underground utility infrastructure, and related appurtenances at or near grade” This standard applies to proposed existing, abandoned in-place, retired, or reserved for future use, underground utility infrastructure

“This standard specifies the mapping requirements for the recording and depiction of underground utility infrastructure, and related appurtenances at or near grade”

This standard applies to proposed existing, abandoned in-place, retired, or reserved for future use, underground utility infrastructure

Committee Meetings Held Thus Far October 2007 (Toronto) - Kick-off and member training session December 2007 (Mississauga) – Lifecycle of plant February 2008 (Mississauga) – Content development April 2008 (Mississauga) – Content development June 2008 (Vancouver) – Content development September 2008 (Mississauga) – Rough outline review November 2008 (Mississauga) – 1 st reading of draft January 2009 (Calgary) – 2 nd reading of draft Teleconferences as required

October 2007 (Toronto) - Kick-off and member training session

December 2007 (Mississauga) – Lifecycle of plant

February 2008 (Mississauga) – Content development

April 2008 (Mississauga) – Content development

June 2008 (Vancouver) – Content development

September 2008 (Mississauga) – Rough outline review

November 2008 (Mississauga) – 1 st reading of draft

January 2009 (Calgary) – 2 nd reading of draft

Examples of Recent Committee Discussion… Terminology –characteristics of a record Authenticity – what it purports to be Reliabiity – trusted as full and accurate representation of the fact Integrity – complete and unaltered Useability – can be located, retrieved, presented, and interpretted Developing a methodology to qualify the level of reliability of mapping records information that is collected and used to depict the location and attributes of utility infrastructure Quality levels envisioned to be as per ASCE 38-02, Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data

Terminology –characteristics of a record

Authenticity – what it purports to be

Reliabiity – trusted as full and accurate representation of the fact

Integrity – complete and unaltered

Useability – can be located, retrieved, presented, and interpretted

Developing a methodology to qualify the level of reliability of mapping records information that is collected and used to depict the location and attributes of utility infrastructure

Quality levels envisioned to be as per ASCE 38-02, Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data

Examples of recent committee discussions … Feature description and symbology Common symbology and attributes to be used to graphically represent utility infrastructure and its associated attributes Municipal utility coordination How will data get shared? What data needs to be shared? How do changes get communicated?

Feature description and symbology

Common symbology and attributes to be used to graphically represent utility infrastructure and its associated attributes

Municipal utility coordination

How will data get shared?

What data needs to be shared?

How do changes get communicated?

Map record accuracy N/A No information available related to spatial accuracy 0 Relative Accurate to within +/- 100cm in the xyz projection coordinate system and referenced to an accepted geodetic datum within a 95% confidence level 4 Relative Accurate to within +/- 30cm in the xyz projection coordinate system and referenced to an acceptable topographic or cadastral feature within a 95% confidence level 3 Absolute Accurate to within +/- 30cm in the xyz projection coordinate system and referenced to an accepted geodetic datum within a 95% confidence level 2 absolute Accurate to within +/- 10cm in the xyz projection coordinate system and referenced to an accepted geodetic datum within a 95% confidence level 1 Geodetic Reference Description Spatial Accuracy Level

TC - Challenges & Observations Need to remind ourselves of the benefits of having a standard Need to maintain interest in the standard by committee members and all stakeholders Need to assess how the standard will be embraced and then sustained Definitions: relative, absolute, content, accuracy, depth of cover, elevation

Need to remind ourselves of the benefits of having a standard

Need to maintain interest in the standard by committee members and all stakeholders

Need to assess how the standard will be embraced and then sustained

Definitions: relative, absolute, content, accuracy, depth of cover, elevation

Improved reliability and accuracy in the location of underground utility infrastructure mapping records & supporting data Improved safety of company & contractor employees and the general public by decreasing utility hits/strikes Lower cost in the utility design life cycle by sharing accurate & complete utility records in a timely fashion amongst all users (municipalities, carriers, contractors, designers, consultants, locators…) Expected Outcomes

Improved reliability and accuracy in the location of underground utility infrastructure mapping records & supporting data

Improved safety of company & contractor employees and the general public by decreasing utility hits/strikes

Lower cost in the utility design life cycle by sharing accurate & complete utility records in a timely fashion amongst all users (municipalities, carriers, contractors, designers, consultants, locators…)

What does it mean to me> Once CSA S250 is published, stakeholders may: Ignore it Use standard to support their records management frameworks Voluntarily modify internal practices, processes, systems to meet or exceed standard formally mandate implementation of all or part of CSA standard in regulatory/legislated framework

Once CSA S250 is published, stakeholders may:

Ignore it

Use standard to support their records management frameworks

Voluntarily modify internal practices, processes, systems to meet or exceed standard

formally mandate implementation of all or part of CSA standard in regulatory/legislated framework

Next Steps - Timeline for Publication Complete rough outline June 2009 Enquiry (public review) stage – Fall 2009 Approval by CSA Technical Committee – Winter 2009 / 2010 Ready for publication – Summer 2010 CSA “S250” – Mapping of underground utility infrastructure

Complete rough outline June 2009

Enquiry (public review) stage – Fall 2009

Approval by CSA Technical Committee – Winter 2009 / 2010

Ready for publication – Summer 2010

Questions? Thank-you!

Add a comment

Related pages

Urisa muni giscmm-draft-questionairre - Documents

Urisa muni giscmm-draft-questionairre. Muni. URISA News July/August 2009. ... Urisa Be Spatial Bg 20090505. Muni SF - Digital Strategies. What Muni Costs.
Read more

Spatial Data Infrastructures in Bulgaria: State of play 2010

Title Spatial Data Infrastructures in Bulgaria: ... (www.bagis.bg) was created in the ... UNSDI United Nations Spatial Data Infrastructure URISA Urban and ...
Read more

Gis Pro | LinkedIn

... Energy Solutions at Spatial Energy, ... Co-Editor at URISA News ... Data Quality Analyst - On secondment from AMEC at QGC - A BG Group Business ...
Read more

Spatial Data Infrastructures in Bulgaria: State of play 2011

Spatial Data Infrastructures in Bulgaria: State of play 2011 ... EC-INSPIRE: Spatial Data Infrastructures in Europe: State of play Spring 2010 Bulgaria
Read more

AN EMBEDDED CODER FOR MULTISPECTRAL IMAGE COMPRESSION ...

... URISA, Ecole Sup´erieure ... Bg denote the in-put ... the spectral and spatial redundancies simultaneously both during the transform and the coding ...
Read more

Access to local GIS data | Spatiality

SR_spatial tweets “The self ... Access to local GIS data ... GA_googleAddAttr("Origin", "other"); GA_googleAddAttr("theme_bg", "9c9fa5"); GA ...
Read more

Top 25 Gis Pro. profiles | LinkedIn

Gis Pro. Articles, experts, jobs, and more: get all the professional insights you need on LinkedIn
Read more

Google

Advertising Programmes Business Solutions +Google About Google Google.com © 2016 - Privacy - Terms. Search; Images; Maps; Play; YouTube; News; Gmail ...
Read more