advertisement

Turning the Table on Turnitin

50 %
50 %
advertisement
Information about Turning the Table on Turnitin

Published on July 4, 2008

Author: stephan

Source: slideshare.net

Description

Student perception of plagiarism detection software
advertisement

Turning the table on Turnitin®: The Student Perspective Dr Stephan Dahl Middlesex University Business School Published as Dahl, Stephan: Turnitin®: The student perspective on using plagiarism detection software, Active Learning in Higher Education, July 2007, Volume 8, No. 2, 173-191

Background Increased concern over plagirarism in academia, especially “copy and paste” - steadily increasing (Underwood and Szabo, 2003) - tidal wave of academic dishonesty (Wood,2004) A lot of work plagiarised 38% & 40 % Hansen, 2003 33% Szabo, 2004 75% Eagle & Hunt, 2005 Business students more prone to plagiarism (Smyth & Davis, 2004)

Increased concern over plagirarism in academia, especially “copy and paste” - steadily increasing (Underwood and Szabo, 2003) - tidal wave of academic dishonesty (Wood,2004)

A lot of work plagiarised 38% & 40 % Hansen, 2003 33% Szabo, 2004 75% Eagle & Hunt, 2005 Business students more prone to plagiarism (Smyth & Davis, 2004)

Difinition Ambiguous definition of what is plagiarism: “anything where a student incorporates a substantial, unacknowledged amount of material derived from the work (published or unpublished) of another student or source is seen as plagiarism” (Plagiarism Advisory Service,2006).

Ambiguous definition of what is plagiarism: “anything where a student incorporates a substantial, unacknowledged amount of material derived from the work (published or unpublished) of another student or source is seen as plagiarism” (Plagiarism Advisory Service,2006).

Solutions Ideas to resolve the problem: - carrot: raising student awareness (Carroll, 2002) honour codes (McCabe, 2001) - stick: detection systems (Frey, 2001) punitive (Devlin, 2006)

Ideas to resolve the problem: - carrot: raising student awareness (Carroll, 2002) honour codes (McCabe, 2001) - stick: detection systems (Frey, 2001) punitive (Devlin, 2006)

Detection Originally standalone systems, used only to “search and scan” Online submission alternative to paper based systems Evolved into more complex systems: - Feedback tools - Collaboration tools - Peer-Review tools - Integration with VLEs

Originally standalone systems, used only to “search and scan”

Online submission alternative to paper based systems

Evolved into more complex systems: - Feedback tools - Collaboration tools - Peer-Review tools - Integration with VLEs

Criticism Lack of human judgment (Carbone, 2001) Storage of students’ work for profit and without alternative/consent Foster (2002) argues itself plagiarism “ Criminalisation” of students BUT…what do the students think of it all?

Lack of human judgment (Carbone, 2001)

Storage of students’ work for profit and without alternative/consent Foster (2002) argues itself plagiarism

“ Criminalisation” of students

BUT…what do the students think of it all?

Methodology Exploratory study 24 students on MA in Middlesex 22 Questions: 7 comparing Turnitin to paper-submission 7 feelings about originality reports etc 3 confidence about referencing etc 4 overall confidence/impression

Exploratory study

24 students on MA in Middlesex

22 Questions: 7 comparing Turnitin to paper-submission 7 feelings about originality reports etc 3 confidence about referencing etc 4 overall confidence/impression

Statement Strongly Agree Agree Undicided Disagree Strongly Disagree Average “ I find Turnitin easy to use” 45.8% (11) 45.8% (11) 4.2% (1) 4.2% (1) 0% (0) 1.67 “ I find Turnitin a convenient way to submit my assignments/coursework” 50% (12) 41.7% (10) 4.2% (1) 4.2% (1) 0% (0) 1.62 I find Turnitin more convenient than handing in my work at the student office 70.8% (17) 20.8% (5) 8.3% (2) 0% (0) 0% (0) 1.38 I prefer handing in paper assignments 0% (0) 8.3% (2) 16.7% (4) 45.8% (11) 29.2% (7) 3.96 I prefer getting my feedback electronically rather than on a paper based coursework front sheet 25% (6) 50% (12) 16.7% (4) 4.2% (1) 0% (0) 2.00 I prefer to see my grades electronically on Turnitin rather than on a paper based coursework front sheet 33.3% (8) 50% (12) 16.7% (4) 0% (0) 0% (0) 1.83 I would prefer it if more modules would use Turnitin for submitting assignments/coursework 37.5% (9) 50% (12) 8.3% (2) 4.2% (1) 0% (0) 1.79

Statement Strongly Agree Agree Undicided Disagree Strongly Disagree Average I like to see my originality report 20.8% (5) 62.5% (15) 12.5% (3) 0% (0) 4.2% (1) 2.04 I find the originality report easy to understand 12.5% (3) 50% (12) 29.2% (7) 8.3% (2) 0% (0) 2.33 I am afraid that I may be accused of plagiarism based on the originality report although it is not true 25% (6) 37.5% (9) 20.8% (5) 12.5% (3) 4.2% (1) 2.33 Turnitin makes me unsure about what materials I can quote or use in my assignment 4.2% (1) 37.5% (9) 20.8% (5) 20.8% (5) 16.7% (4) 3.08 I get anxious about my originality score when I submit my work to Turnitin 16.7% (4) 29.2% (7) 16.7% (4) 29.2% (7) 8.3% (2) 2.83 I am happy that Turnitin makes plagiarism a lot harder 20.8% (5) 33.3% (8) 33.3% (8) 12.5% (3) 0% (0) 2.37 Turnitin makes me feel as if something is being done about plagiarism 29.2% (7) 33.3% (8) 33.3% (8) 4.2% (1) 0% (0) 2.13

Statement Strongly Agree Agree Undicided Disagree Strongly Disagree Average I would prefer to get more guidance about what plagiarism is 12.5% (3) 54.2% (13) 25% (6) 8.3% (2) 0% (0) 2.75 I am confident when writing a bibliography 8.3% (2) 29.2% (7) 45.8% (11) 12.5% (3) 4.2% (0) 2.50 I have read up about how I should reference something correctly after starting to use Turnitin 12.5% (3) 41.7% (10) 29.2% (7) 16.7% (4) 0% (0) 2.58 I feel confident about quoting other peoples’ works correctly 16.7% (4) 29.2% (7) 33.3% (8) 20.8% (5) 0% (0) 2.46

Statement Strongly Agree Agree Undicided Disagree Strongly Disagree Average Turnitin usually finds the sources I use for my assignments 4.2% (1) 54.2% (13) 33.3% (8) 8.3% (2) 0% (0) 1.96 Overall, Turnitin is reliable 16.7% (4) 70.8% (17) 12.5% (3) 0% (0) 0% (0) 2.50 Overall, Turnitin originality reports are accurate 8.3% (2) 37.5% (9) 50% (12) 4.2% (1) 0% (0) 2.04 I feel safe that my work will not get lost when submitting it via Turnitin 33.3% (8) 37.5% (9) 20.8% (5) 8.3% (2) 0% (0) 2.75

Some Interesting Points convenient/easy 0.668. convenient/more modules 0.517 easy to use/more modules 0.538 convenient/happy plag 0.663 BUT convenient/feedback elec 0.146

convenient/easy 0.668.

convenient/more modules 0.517

easy to use/more modules 0.538

convenient/happy plag 0.663

BUT convenient/feedback elec 0.146

More interesting points happy plagiarism/unsure quoting –0.545 unsure quoting/pref paper 0.517 anxious orig/pref paper 0.745 anxious orig/unsure quoting 0.713 read how to ref/originality rep. easy 0.571

happy plagiarism/unsure quoting –0.545

unsure quoting/pref paper 0.517

anxious orig/pref paper 0.745

anxious orig/unsure quoting 0.713

read how to ref/originality rep. easy 0.571

2 groups of students? Happy to see introduction of turnitin® & confident in referencing/citing Unhappy about turnitin® & lacking confidence in referencing & citing But are the latter “malicious copy & paste”-rs? (consistent with Macdonald and Carroll,2006)

Happy to see introduction of turnitin® & confident in referencing/citing

Unhappy about turnitin® & lacking confidence in referencing & citing

But are the latter “malicious copy & paste”-rs? (consistent with Macdonald and Carroll,2006)

Summary Students are generally happy about turnitin® There is no real “criminalisation” feeling Confidence in avoiding plagiarism must be improved: students appear are not malicious cheaters, but rather are confused about what is expected/how to cite etc Turnitin® potentially be a conduit for engaging students in citing/referencing?

Students are generally happy about turnitin®

There is no real “criminalisation” feeling

Confidence in avoiding plagiarism must be improved: students appear are not malicious cheaters, but rather are confused about what is expected/how to cite etc

Turnitin® potentially be a conduit for engaging students in citing/referencing?

Add a comment

Related pages

Turning the Feedback Studio on and off - Guides.turnitin.com

Turning the Feedback Studio on and off. Table of contents. ... all of the Turnitin users in your account will be using Feedback Studio by default.
Read more

Turning to Turnitin to Fight Plagiarism among University ...

Turning to Turnitin to Fight Plagiarism ... Turning to Turnitin to Fight Plagiarism among University ... Table 3 shows the percentage of the ...
Read more

Student QuickStart Guide - Guides.turnitin.com

Table of contents. Step 1 ... This Student QuickStart Guide will help you get started with Turnitin and will walk you through the steps for ...
Read more

Turnitin

Login to Turnitin. Email address . Password (Login to Turnitin) Would you like to create your user profile? Click here. Forgot your password? Click here.
Read more

ERIC - Plagiarism and the Internet: Turning the Tables ...

Notes the problem of Net-based plagiarism in student papers. Describes a solution that turns the tables by using the Internet: TurnItIn.com, an Internet ...
Read more

Concordia Online Education Knowledge Base - Turn It In ...

Turn It In Assignment Creation. ... Table of Contents. Turnitin File Creation. Using Turnitin. Turnitin (Tii) ...
Read more

Deterring and Detecting Plagiarism with Turnitin

Deterring and Detecting Plagiarism with Turnitin.com A Tip Sheet from ... number of institutions are turning to software detection services such as ...
Read more

Adele - Turning Tables (With Lyrics) - YouTube

From her latest album "21" Adele presents 'Turning Tables' © to XL Recording Ltd. 2010
Read more