Traditional Psychology vs Social Constructionism

50 %
50 %
Information about Traditional Psychology vs Social Constructionism
Education

Published on January 16, 2014

Author: Evolots

Source: slideshare.net

Description

Here's a presentation on the two different approaches in research in Psychology and Social Psychology. I made these for my revision on a module I have at university.
Hope you find them useful :)

Leah Spasova Staffordshire University

Experimental/Positivism/mainstream psychology/ Constructivism Key words  Hypothesis  Experiment  Quantitative data  Questionnaires, Surveys  Top down  Objective  Observation of phenomenon  Random allocation of participants

Critical Social Psychology/ Social constructionism Key words  Research Q emerges from data  Qualitative data  Interviews/focus groups/language as data  Bottom up  Subjective views in context  Construction of ideas

Experimental social psychology Critical social psychology Informed by positivism • [Social] Psychology as a science • Hypothetic-deductive method Informed by social constructionism • Shared meaning • Importance of cultural/historical context Data collection methods are quantitative • Experiments • Surveys • Statistical analysis Data collection methods are qualitative • Interviews/focus groups/language as data • Discourse analysis Social identity is complex but • Stable • Can be measured • Part of our cognition Social identity is complex and • Fluid • Shaped by cultural/historical context Attitudes are • Stable • Hard to measure, but can be • Part of our cognition Attitudes • Don’t really exist as a stable cognition • Are not ‘in the head’

The many names Traditional/Experimental Social Psychology  Constructivism  Experimental  Positivism  Mainstream  Hypothetico-deductive  conventional psychology Critical Social Psychology  Social Constructionism

Constructionism Argues – We must Examine talk/language and – Consider/value  shared meaning & importance of context  Cultural context  Historical context – Conversation is the most important means of maintaining, – – – – – – modifying and reconstructing subjective reality. Reality is subjective and constructed ‘on the fly’ We are social beings and our actions/behaviours are meaningful To understand meaningful behaviour we need to interpret it Stop considering social psychology like a ‘natural science’ SC challenges biometrical reality and questions apparently self-evident and stable realities. Stresses multiple-meanings/interpretation

Advantages of Social Constructionism  Provides in-depth findings  Considers social environment and influences  Because of close researcher involvement, the researcher gains an insider's view of the field. This allows the researcher to find issues that are often missed (such as subtleties and complexities) by the scientific, more positivistic enquiries.  Qualitative descriptions can play the important role of suggesting possible relationships, causes, effects and dynamic processes.  Because statistics are not used, but rather qualitative research uses a more descriptive, narrative style, this research might be of particular benefit to the practitioner as she or he could turn to qualitative reports in order to examine forms of knowledge that might otherwise be unavailable, thereby gaining new insight.  Qualitative research adds flesh and blood to social analysis.

Criticism on Constructionism  Accused of being anti-realist, in denying that knowledge is direct       perception of reality, Craib, 1997 It doesn’t recognize objective reality, Bury, 1986 Not reliable/valid findings - The problem of adequate validity or reliability is a major criticism. Because of the subjective nature of qualitative data and its origin in single contexts, it is difficult to apply conventional standards of reliability and validity. Cannot be replicated - Contexts, situations, events, conditions and interactions cannot be replicated to any extent nor can generalisations be made to a wider context than the one studied with any confidence. Lengthy - The time required for data collection, analysis and interpretation is lengthy. Researcher's presence has a profound effect on the subjects of study. The viewpoints of both researcher and participants have to be identified and elucidated because of issues of bias.

About the Experimental  Focus on what makes individuals do what they do  Systematic creation of a hypothesis and subjecting it to an empirical test.  Experiments are conducted in an attempt to answer certain questions.  Control: This is the most important element because it enables the scientist to identify the causes of his or her observations.

Advantages of the Experimental     Can be replicated Reliability Validity Experiment variables can be controlled- through sampling and design  Precision - through quantitative and reliable measurement  Ability to produce causality statements, through the use of controlled experiments  Statistical techniques allow for sophisticated analyses

Disadvantages of Experimental  Because of the complexity of human experience it is difficult to rule out or control all the variables;  Because of human agency people do not all respond in the same ways as inert matter in the physical sciences;  Its mechanistic ethos tends to exclude notions of freedom, choice and moral responsibility;  Quantification can become an end in itself.  It fails to take account of people's unique ability to interpret their experiences, construct their own meanings and act on these.  It leads to the assumption that facts are true and the same for all people all of the time.  Quantitative research often produces banal and trivial findings of little consequence due to the restriction on and the controlling of variables.  It is not totally objective because the researcher is subjectively involved in the very choice of a problem as worthy of investigation and in the interpretation of the results. Source:http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/sociology/staff/academicstaff/chughes/hughesc _index/teachingresearchprocess/quantitativequalitative/quantitativequalitative

Social Constructionism Criticisms on Experimental – Social constructionists argue that positivist conceptions – – – – – of social are outdated European approach of universal group theories that can apply to any group European idea that group membership is a cognitive thing Positivism does not allow a focus on meaning/ interpretation and context -Reductionist Only simple responses can be given & the parameters are pre-set - No opportunity to explain response Complex, varied responses cannot be given

Why does the approach matter? Traditional Approach Research questions: The effect of X on Y The relationship between X and Y Critical Approach Research questions: How is X constructed? Measurement tools: Quantitative (reaction time, cognitive tasks, questionnaires) Measurement tools: Qualitative (discourse analysis) Outcomes: Numerical data Generalisable Outcomes: Talk No generalising intended

In a nutshell...... All we have to do is the RIGHT EXPERIMENTS to find out what’s REALLY GOING ON POSITIVIST Dr Zimbardo All we can do is examine how people CONSTRUCT their lives using LANGUAGE in the HERE AND NOW SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONIST Kenneth Gergen

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

Social constructivism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Social constructivism, psychology, ... Social constructionism; Social constructivism; Social Darwinism; ... Traditional knowledge.
Read more

Constructivism in psychology: Personal construct ...

I describe “personal construct psychology,” “radical constructivism,” and “social constructionism ... construct psychology ... traditional ...
Read more

Social Psychology as Social Construction: The Emerging Vision

Social Psychology as Social Construction: ... Traditional social psychology largely contented itself with ... An introduction to social constructionism.
Read more

Essentialism vs Social Constructionism - Scribd - Read ...

Essentialism vs Social Constructionism ... Traditional Copyright: ... Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Read more

Essentialism vs. Social Constructionism in the Study of ...

Essentialism vs. Social Constructionism Gangestad, S. W., & Buss, D. M. (1993). ... ality and Social Psychology, 53, 194-200. Irvine, J. M. (1990).
Read more

Social constructionism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Social constructionism or the social construction of reality ... Educational psychology. Social constructivism has been studied by many educational ...
Read more

What is Social Constructionism? | Grounded Theory Review

Tom Andrews University College Cork Abstract Social Constructionism has been instrumental in ... Craib, I. (1997). Social Constructionism as a Social ...
Read more

Social constructionism and the theory, practice and ...

Social constructionism and the theory, ... this makes traditional psychology inherently ... On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: ...
Read more

Constructionism and Constructivism - Changing minds and ...

Constructionism and Constructivism . Explanations > Social Research > Philosophies of Social Research > Constructionism and Constructivism. Definition ...
Read more

Social Constructionist Psychology – a Critical Analysis ...

Social constructionism has brought about a revolution in ... issues of reality vs. social constructions ... Social Constructionist Psychology ...
Read more