The Origin of Life Made Easy debunk

80 %
20 %
Information about The Origin of Life Made Easy debunk
Education

Published on November 15, 2008

Author: nosson77

Source: authorstream.com

First of all my only real problem with the theory of evolution is the random part of random mutations (Although I think natural selection needs a little modification, sophistication, clarification and less importance) So here we go : First of all my only real problem with the theory of evolution is the random part of random mutations (Although I think natural selection needs a little modification, sophistication, clarification and less importance) So here we go We know that things that have a design and information don’t doesn’t get created by chance. So, for example a computer program wont get made by chance; self replicating or not, : We know that things that have a design and information don’t doesn’t get created by chance. So, for example a computer program wont get made by chance; self replicating or not, And if it was self replicating with random changes every so often with people copying and redistributing the programs they liked; it would either stay the same or get worse : And if it was self replicating with random changes every so often with people copying and redistributing the programs they liked; it would either stay the same or get worse How do we know this? because anything that evolves without planning and is just left to chance will always get more complex and less useful : How do we know this? because anything that evolves without planning and is just left to chance will always get more complex and less useful And that’s why cities without central planning and big changes get worse and worse and the same thing happens with companies that grow without planning and making infrastructural changes why? because it goes against the law of entropy : And that’s why cities without central planning and big changes get worse and worse and the same thing happens with companies that grow without planning and making infrastructural changes why? because it goes against the law of entropy But potholler54 makes it sound like its possible for random occurrences to make biological machines But he does this by confusing complexity with order, : But potholler54 makes it sound like its possible for random occurrences to make biological machines But he does this by confusing complexity with order, Lets make this a bit clearer The second law of thermodynamics states that left to random events the entropy (which loosely translates as chaos or lack of order) of a system will never decrees over time by chance events : Lets make this a bit clearer The second law of thermodynamics states that left to random events the entropy (which loosely translates as chaos or lack of order) of a system will never decrees over time by chance events So oxygen and carbon will make carbon dioxide because this is an increase in entropy and therefore an increase in complexity but a decrees in order. and the reverse is impossible : So oxygen and carbon will make carbon dioxide because this is an increase in entropy and therefore an increase in complexity but a decrees in order. and the reverse is impossible And in the same vain a fragile machine left to chance will fall apart because this is an increase in entropy and therefore an increase in complexity but a decrease in order, and the reverse is impossible : And in the same vain a fragile machine left to chance will fall apart because this is an increase in entropy and therefore an increase in complexity but a decrease in order, and the reverse is impossible (The reason why left to chance machines fall apart where as some molecules join together is because of the forces of attraction certain atoms have for each other and a machine made of magnets would also implode instead of falling apart) : (The reason why left to chance machines fall apart where as some molecules join together is because of the forces of attraction certain atoms have for each other and a machine made of magnets would also implode instead of falling apart) So the fact that molecules can come together by themselves and make something more complex doesn’t prove that machines can be made it proves that entropy will increase which proves that randomness CANT make machines : So the fact that molecules can come together by themselves and make something more complex doesn’t prove that machines can be made it proves that entropy will increase which proves that randomness CANT make machines Also if it is really the way potholer54 makes it out to be then why have scientists given up trying to make a living organism in the lab. they only need to make one step and they don’t have to wait for chance. So it seems that there are some big complications that are being left out of the story : Also if it is really the way potholer54 makes it out to be then why have scientists given up trying to make a living organism in the lab. they only need to make one step and they don’t have to wait for chance. So it seems that there are some big complications that are being left out of the story The other argument that DNA replicates and has small changes and the good ones survive is also flawed because at any point the random changes will cause the organism to deteriorate without out killing it and so even if a benefit does occur nevertheless the net gain is a minus just as the laws of entropy would predict : The other argument that DNA replicates and has small changes and the good ones survive is also flawed because at any point the random changes will cause the organism to deteriorate without out killing it and so even if a benefit does occur nevertheless the net gain is a minus just as the laws of entropy would predict Potholler54 says that if all these steps are possible without god then why do you need a god, the reason is that even if each step is possible by chance but is connected to a certain probability then those steps added together make it less probable which is why there is such a thing as the law of entropy : Potholler54 says that if all these steps are possible without god then why do you need a god, the reason is that even if each step is possible by chance but is connected to a certain probability then those steps added together make it less probable which is why there is such a thing as the law of entropy Because although its possible for two peaces of metal to attach to each other by chance the chance that many pieces of metal coming together just in the right way to make a machine is not possible, not because its theoretically not possible but because of the odds : Because although its possible for two peaces of metal to attach to each other by chance the chance that many pieces of metal coming together just in the right way to make a machine is not possible, not because its theoretically not possible but because of the odds

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

Debunk | Define Debunk at Dictionary.com

Debunk definition, to expose or excoriate (a claim, assertion, sentiment, etc.) as being pretentious, ... Word Origin and History for debunk Expand. v.
Read more

Debunking Evolution - problems between the theory and ...

Life's origin has been most ardently pursued by chemists ... Many people mistakenly think scientists have made life from chemicals in the lab, ...
Read more

Evolution of the eye - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The evolution of the eye has attracted ... wrote in his Origin of ... should be useful to any animal under changing conditions of life, ...
Read more

Origin of Life: Spontaneous Generation - Infoplease

Origin of Life Spontaneous Generation. Origin of Life. ... Early Earth Environment; It was once believed that life could come from nonliving ...
Read more

How Easy Is Evolution To Debunk - The Apricity Forum: A ...

The Apricity Forum: A European Cultural Community ... Help; Remember Me?
Read more

Science and Human Origins: Ann Gauger ... - amazon.com

Darwin's Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design Stephen C. Meyer. 4.4 out ... ACX Audiobook Publishing Made Easy:
Read more

Evolution Quotes - bevets.com

"The origin of life" Scientific ... Although he made only the cryptic remark in Origin -- "Much light will be ... Human beings are absurdly easy to ...
Read more

The Origin of Life : Creationism • Rational Skepticism Forum

Shouldn't be too hard to debunk, ... It is perfectly reasonable to postulate chemical reactions as the basis for the origin of life, ... made, " ...one not ...
Read more