The Limits of Prior Restraint

67 %
33 %
Information about The Limits of Prior Restraint
Education

Published on January 31, 2009

Author: dkennedy56

Source: slideshare.net

Description

How far can the press go? From Schenck v. United States, to Near v. Minnesota, to New York Times v. United States.

The limits of prior restraint How far can the press go?

Sedition Act of 1798 • Alexander Hamilton (left) is accused of corruption by James Thomson Callender • Callender is imprisoned and fined • Callender later turns on Jefferson, his benefactor

The end of seditious libel • Sedition Act helps lead to Adams’ defeat in 1800 • Jefferson (left) lets Sedition Act lapse • Still, press is less free during wartime

Abraham Lincoln• Suspended habeas corpus to crack down on protesters• Ohio publisher Clement Laird Vallandigham banished behind Confederate lines• Censorship in effect

Schenckv. United States (1919)• Schenck charged with violating Espionage Act• Holmes (right) establishes a new standard: “clear and present danger”• Wartime is different

Gitlowv. New York (1925)• 14th Amendment extends First Amendment to the states• Holmes now takes a more expansive view of free speech• “Every idea is an incitement”

Whitney v. California (1927) • Brandeis (left) refines “clear and present danger” • A “serious” and “imminent” threat — an “emergency” • Brandeis sided with majority on technicality

Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) • Speech can be prohibited if “directed at inciting or producing imminent lawless action” and — • Is “likely to incite or produce such action” • Brandeis standard

Near v. Minnesota (1931)• Classic case defining the limits of prior restraint• History of case told by Fred Friendly in Minnesota Rag

The Saturday Press • Begun by Jay Near and Howard Guilford • Claimed Minneapolis was controlled by Jewish gangsters • Shut down after nine issues under state’s Public Nuisance Law

Near loses at state level• Argues that Public Nuisance Law violates the First, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments• Minnesota Supreme Court: “There is no constitutional right to publish a fact merely because it is true.”

Unlikely alliesRoger Baldwin Col. Robt. McCormick

Bad cases make bad law• Harry Chandler, head of American Newspaper Publishers Association, was reluctant to get involved• The Saturday Press was unsavory• Chandler feared a defeat would set back the cause of press freedom

Charles Evans Hughes• Chief Justice replaced Justice Sanford, author of Gitlow decision• Reaffirmed that the 14th Amendment incorporated the First Amendment

Weymouth Kirkland• “[E]very legitimate newspaper in the country regularly and customarily publishes defamation, as it has a right to in criticizing government agencies”• Akin to saying that seditious libel is the purpose of a free press

Justice Brandeis• “Of course there was defamation; you cannot disclose evil without naming the doers of evil”• “A newspaper cannot always wait until it gets the judgment of a court”• Isn’t this why we have a First Amendment?

Near wins, 5-4• Near fails to re-establish himself as a newspaperman, dies in 1936• Howard Guilford is assassinated by gangsters in 1934• Nevertheless, they contribute to the idea of no prior restraint

Key points of Near• Exceptions to the rule of no prior restraint – National security • Obstruction of draft • Disclosing movement of ships or troops – Obscenity – Fighting words (incitement)

Key points of Near• Exceptions to the rule of no prior restraint• Unprotected speech may be punished after the fact – William Blackstone – “Criminal” speech – Libel — certainly an issue with The Saturday Press

Key points of Near• Exceptions to the rule of no prior restraint• Unprotected speech may be punished after the fact• Minnesota’s Public Nuisance Law tantamount to prior restraint

The Pentagon Papers • Daniel Ellsberg provided them to the New York Times and the Washington Post • Federal appeals courts ruled against the Times and for the Post • Supreme Court takes the case

New York Times Co.v. United States (1971) • Supreme Court issues nine separate decisions • Government could prosecute after publication • Nixon tried, but was derailed by Watergate

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

Prior restraint - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Prior Restraint" on Findlaw "Prior Restraints and the Presumption of Unconstitutionality" ... Prior restraint; Propaganda; Purge; Revisionism; Sanitization;
Read more

Prior restraint | First Amendment Center – news ...

Prior restraints have arisen — and been struck down ... primarily because trial judges can limit the news media’s First Amendment rights when ...
Read more

Prior restraint - The IT Law Wiki - Wikia

A prior restraint, ... Prior restraints cut against the very ... The Supreme Court has made it clear that the First Amendment limits restraints that may be ...
Read more

Prior Restraints | Congressional-Executive Commission on China

Prior restraints are ... Flowchart Illustrating the Various Prior Restraints in China US Prior ... it is necessary to further limit the ...
Read more

Prior Restraints on Publication

This page includes materials relating to prior restraints and their ... prior restraint in ... to test the limits of the ...
Read more

Prior Restraint flashcards | Quizlet - Simple free ...

Vocabulary words for Prior Restraint. Includes studying games and tools such as flashcards. ... Case establishing limits of prior restraints of the press ...
Read more

Prior Restraint Law & Legal Definition - USLegal, Inc

A prior restraint is an official ... A prior restraint is an official restriction of speech prior to publication. Prior restraint refers to an ...
Read more