advertisement

RDA & the New World of Metadata

55 %
45 %
advertisement
Information about RDA & the New World of Metadata
Technology

Published on February 25, 2014

Author: smartbroad

Source: slideshare.net

Description

Slides from the keynote of the 2014 AMIGOS RDA conference, presented virtually on February 20, 2014. The conference title "Is RDA on Your RaDAr?"
advertisement

RDA & The New World of Metadata Diane I. Hillmann AMIGOS Conference, Feb. 20, 2014 "Is RDA on Your RaDAr?"

What Is RDA? • You’re already familiar with the Toolkit and the ‘rules’ – You’ve heard about the problems with using the RDA instruction with MARC (maybe even tried it) – RDA as a standard includes both the instruction and the vocabularies • RDA as data has a very different model than MARC • MARC was originally designed to print cards • RDA was built around FRBR 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 2

This Transition is Hard • The transition is not just from AACR2 to RDA • It’s also about: – Different views of the world – Different data models – Different distribution strategies • Linked data is part of this transition • Re-thinking our basic assumptions is critical 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 3

Model of ‘the World’ /XML • XML (and MARC21) assume a 'closed' world (domain), usually defined by a schema: – "We know all of the data describing this resource. The single description must be a valid document according to our schema. The data must be valid.” – XML's document model provides a neat equivalence to a metadata 'record’ (and most of us are fairly comfortable with it) 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 4

Model of ‘the World’ /RDF • RDF assumes an 'open' world: – "There's an infinite amount of unknown data describing this resource yet to be discovered. It will come from an infinite number of providers. There will be an infinite number of equally valid descriptions. Those descriptions must be consistent." – RDF's statement-oriented data model has no notion of 'record’ (rather, statements can be aggregated for a fuller description of a resource) 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 5

Linked Data is Inherently Chaotic • Requires creating and aggregating data in a broader context – There is no one ‘correct’ record to be made from this data, no objective ‘truth’ • This approach is different from the cataloging tradition – BUT, the focus on vocabularies is familiar • Linked data relies on the RDF model 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 6

The New Data Management • Managing data at the statement level rather than record level • Emphasis on evaluation coming in and provenance going out • Shift in human effort from creating standard cataloging records to knowledgeable human intervention in machine-based processes • Extensive use of data created outside libraries • Intelligent re-use of our legacy data and redistribution of our data more widely 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 7

What’s Still New About RDA? New version of the vocabularies brings together all we’ve learned since 2008 New ‘branded’ namespace Commitment to synchronize Toolkit & Vocabs Optimized for the Semantic Web and linked data 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 8

Understanding The New RDA • What’s *still+ new about RDA? • How should we look at its current progress? • Is RDA what we need? Should we ‘wait’ for something that might be ‘better’? • How should we understand the interplay between RDA and technological changes going on concurrently? 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 9

Breaking News • The RDA Vocabularies now have an updated version, and a new namespace – Old RDA Vocabularies: RDVocab.info – New RDA Vocabularies: RDARegistry.info • Old element vocabularies never published; All new vocabularies are published • Value vocabularies remaining in the older namespace (for now) 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 10

2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 11

Ringing Changes • Why deprecate? – The RDVocab elements were never formally published, but they have been used – Deprecation is better than deletion in this space – Element sets are reorganized to simplify element names and better integrate relationships with other FRBR elements • else is new? – Verbalized element names (‘has’, ‘is’, etc.) – Explicit reciprocals – Different URI strategy 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 12

http://rdaregistry.info 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 13

Why GitHub? • GitHub is a widely used repository with tools that enable services and documentation to be created and managed more easily – In some cases, human readable and technical versions can be created automatically – Enables detailed version information to be managed by machines and viewed by users – Supports easily generated output for use by other systems and users 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 14

Constrained & Unconstrained Properties: What’s the Difference? • The FRBR ‘bounded’ properties should be seen as the official JSC-defined RDA basic Application Profile for libraries • Extensions and mapping should be built from the unconstrained properties – Unconstrained vocabularies necessary for use in domains where FRBR not assumed or inappropriate – Mapping from vocabularies not using the FRBR model directly to ones that do (and back) creates serious problems for the ‘Web of Data’ • Differences make vocabularies able to express library knowledge in the context of the Semantic Web 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 15

What’s Important About the New RDA? URI strategy optimized for multiple languages and both human and machine use Sets reorganized to bring the relationships into the element sets RDA enables data to be managed for both the closed world of library and local data and the open world of linked data [Image by Reed Sturtevant, FLICKR] 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 16

Big Challenges/Big Ideas • Records are still important but not as we’ve used them in the past – We might want to think about records as the instantiation of a point of view – News: traditional library data has a point of view • MARC required consensus because of limitations built into the technology – For any data in statements destined for the Semantic Web, we need provenance, so we know “Who sez?” 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 17

The OMR and Github Will Work in Tandem RDA Vocabularies on Github Open Metadata Registry * Easier updating of documentation and technical versions • More flexible management options (Vocabularies can be managed locally using a variety of tools) • Distributed version control • Issues management * Built in User Interface designed for humans • Detailed history info on all transactions • Downloadable options * Change feed * Limited notifications * Limited options for additional documentation 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 18

Download and view options 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 19

Available Technical Formats 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 20

2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 21

2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 22

Domains and Ranges are Classes 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 23

2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 24

Vocabulary Extension • The inclusion of unconstrained properties provides a path for extension of RDA into specialized library communities, nonlibrary communities and to better support local needs – Other communities may have a different notion of how FRBR ‘aggregates’ (For example, a colorized version of a film may be viewed as a separate work) – Non-libraries may not wish to use FRBR at all – Local users may have additional, domain-specific properties to add, that could benefit from a relationship to the RDA properties 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 25

rdau:isAdaptedAs rdau:isAdaptedAsARadioScript 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 26

rdau:isAdaptedAs rdau:isAdaptedAsARadioScript KidLit:isAdaptedAsAPictureBook Extension using Unconstrained Properties 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 27

rdau:isAdaptedAs rdau:isAdaptedAsARadioScript KidLit:isAdaptedAsAPictureBook KidLit:isAdaptedAsAChapterBook Extension using Unconstrained Properties 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 28

What’s our Distribution Model? We don’t know what you want, so choose! 2/20/14 We know more about what you want than you do. Here it is! AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 29

Libraries as Data Publishers & Consumers • Data from library ‘publishers’ should look like a supermarket—lots of choices, with decisions made by consumers – Right now we seem to be operating as Soviet bakeries – This is not what open linked data is supposed to be doing for us • "Be conservative in what you send, liberal in what you accept”—Robustness Principle 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 30

Where You Start Affects Where You End Up • Simple metadata is more useful as output than input – The ‘long tail’ of MARC’s lesser used properties was built up over decades and shouldn’t be discarded – It’s easier to dumb down than smarten up (and not as lossy) • Dublin Core and MARC are examples of starting simple and trying to add on – MARC 21 went well beyond AACR2 in its scope – Dublin Core successful as a common mapping (most schemas map to DC) but rarely sufficient by itself 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 31

Libraries as Data Publishers • If we want people outside libraries to use our data, we need to offer them choices • This strategy is supported by loss-less mapping of all of our legacy data – Not a pre-determined selection – Filtering best accomplished by data consumers, who know what they need • This requires a new strategy for managing the data – RDA, as a rich metadata model based on sound Library experience, is an excellent basis for this strategy 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 32

Libraries as Data Consumers • As aggregators of relevant metadata content – Developing methods to gather and redistribute data without necessarily re-creating OCLC – Modeling and documenting best practices in metadata creation, improvement and exposure – Application profiles important in this effort • As developers of vocabularies, exposing a variety of bibliographic relationships • As innovators (particularly as part of the cultural metadata community) using social networks to enhance bibliographic description 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 33

Mapping Legacy Data for Re-distribution • If we want data consumers to value our data, we should map it all – We can distribute limited ‘flavors’ as well, as we gain experience and feedback • Current crosswalking strategies are based on: – One-time, inflexible, programmatic methods that effectively hide the process from consumers – Assumptions that data must be improved at the time it is crosswalked, or never 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 34

What We Mean by ‘Mapping’ dct:format dc:format dct:extent unim:U215__a m21:M300 rdam:extent rdau:duration rdau:extent m21:M306__a rdam:extentOfText rdau:extentOfText rdae:duration isbd:”has extent” bibo:numVolumes 2/20/14 bibo:numPages AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 unim:U127__a 35

Will This Shift Cost Too Much? • We need to support efforts to invest in more distributed innovation and focused collaboration • It’s the human effort that costs us – Cost of traditional cataloging is far too high, for increasingly dubious value • Our current investments have reached the end of their usefulness – All the possible efficiencies for traditional cataloging have already been accomplished • Waiting for leadership from the big players costs valuable time with no guarantees of results 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 36

The Bottom Line • Our big investment is (and has always been) in our data, not our systems • Over many changes in format of materials, we’ve always struggled to keep our focus on the data content that endures, regardless of presentation format • We are in a great position to have influence on how the future develops, but we can’t be afraid to change, or afraid to fail 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 37

Thank you! Questions? Contact info: metadata.maven@ gmail.com Metadata Matters: http://managemetadata.co m/blog 2/20/14 AMIGOS RDA Conference 2014 38

Add a comment

Related presentations

Presentación que realice en el Evento Nacional de Gobierno Abierto, realizado los ...

In this presentation we will describe our experience developing with a highly dyna...

Presentation to the LITA Forum 7th November 2014 Albuquerque, NM

Un recorrido por los cambios que nos generará el wearabletech en el futuro

Um paralelo entre as novidades & mercado em Wearable Computing e Tecnologias Assis...

Microsoft finally joins the smartwatch and fitness tracker game by introducing the...

Related pages

RDA Toolkit

Designed for the digital world and an expanding universe of metadata users, RDA: Resource Description and Access is the new, unified cataloging standard.
Read more

The World of Cataloging - WebJunction

The World of Cataloging. ... Designed for the digital world and an expanding universe of metadata users, RDA: ... and maps a route through the new world, ...
Read more

RDA angst and the future of library metadata

RDA angst and the future of library metadata. ... In the complex world of library metadata, ... we'll be using new tools ...
Read more

Introduction to MARC, Metadata, and RDA - librarian.net ...

Introduction to MARC, Metadata, and RDA ... World book multimedia encyclopedia, ... RDA: An Interim Report on the New Cataloguing Code" ...
Read more

Resource Description and Access - Wikipedia, the free ...

Resource Description and Access (RDA) ... of his opposition to the new guidelines, claiming that RDA was poorly ... and metadata librarian, created ...
Read more

RDA for school libraries - Australian School Library ...

RDA is a new standard for metadata description of ... been adopted around the world, including Australia and New ... implementing RDA in libraries.
Read more

RDA: The Importance of Metadata (PDF Download Available)

23 RDA: The Importance of Metadata ... new foundations for big data analytics, ... and the World Data System. RDA members work at multiple scales
Read more

RDA Vocabularies: Process, Outcome, Use - D-Lib Magazine

... although it is independent of any specific metadata encoding. RDA also identifies a ... A Further Exploration of the Brave New World of Metadata, ...
Read more