advertisement

RAPPORT 2013 DU DEPARTEMENT D'ETAT SUR LA DROGUE EN HAITI PART I

0 %
100 %
advertisement
Information about RAPPORT 2013 DU DEPARTEMENT D'ETAT SUR LA DROGUE EN HAITI PART I
News & Politics

Published on March 11, 2014

Author: Stanleylucas

Source: slideshare.net

Description

Chaque année au mois de Mars le Département d'Etat publie son rapport global sur le trafique de la drogue dans lequel figure Haiti. Dans ce rapport publie en Mars 2014 le Département d'Etat note les progrès réalisés en Haiti dans la lutte contre la drogue notamment le renforce de l'Unité de la Police Nationale d'Haiti pour lutter la drogue (BLTS), le passage de la loi sur le blanchiment de l'argent et d'autres mesures. Le rapport mentionne aussi qu'Haiti doit continuer a travailler avec agressivité sur ce dossier et fait des recommandations spécifiques.
advertisement

United States Department of State Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs International Narcotics Control Strategy Report Volume I Drug and Chemical Control March 2014

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Table of Contents i Table of Contents Volume 1 Common Abbreviations......................................................................................................................... iv International Agreements......................................................................................................................... vi Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Legislative Basis for the INCSR................................................................................................................2 Major Illicit Drug Producing, Drug-Transit, Significant Source, Precursor Chemical, and Money Laundering Countries................................................................................................................................5 Presidential Determination........................................................................................................................7 Policy and Program Developments ........................................................................... 15 Overview .................................................................................................................................................16 Demand Reduction .................................................................................................................................19 Methodology for U.S. Government Estimates of Illegal Drug Production...............................................21 Parties to UN Conventions......................................................................................................................27 USG Assistance .......................................................................................................... 33 International Training ..............................................................................................................................37 Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) ................................................................................................40 United States Coast Guard (USCG) .......................................................................................................42 U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)...........................................................................................44 Chemical Controls ..................................................................................................... 46 2013 Trends ............................................................................................................................................47 Precursors and Essential Chemicals ......................................................................................................50 International Regulatory Framework for Chemical Control.....................................................................50 Major Chemical Source Countries and Territories..................................................................................51 Significant Illicit Drug Manufacturing Countries ......................................................................................69 Multilateral Efforts to Target Methamphetamine Chemicals ...................................................................75 Major Exporters and Importers of Pseudoephedrine and Ephedrine (Section 722, Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act (CMEA) ..............................................................................................77 INCB Tables on Licit Requirements........................................................................................................82 Country Reports.......................................................................................................... 88 Afghanistan .............................................................................................................................................89 Albania ....................................................................................................................................................94 Argentina.................................................................................................................................................95 Armenia...................................................................................................................................................96 Azerbaijan ...............................................................................................................................................97 The Bahamas..........................................................................................................................................98 Belize.....................................................................................................................................................103 Bolivia....................................................................................................................................................107 Bosnia and Herzegovina.......................................................................................................................112 Brazil .....................................................................................................................................................113 Bulgaria .................................................................................................................................................116 Burma....................................................................................................................................................117 Cambodia..............................................................................................................................................121 Canada..................................................................................................................................................122 Cabo Verde ...........................................................................................................................................126 Chile ......................................................................................................................................................127

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Table of Contents ii China.....................................................................................................................................................128 Colombia ...............................................................................................................................................131 Costa Rica.............................................................................................................................................136 Croatia...................................................................................................................................................141 Cuba......................................................................................................................................................142 Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK or North Korea) .......................................................145 Dominican Republic ..............................................................................................................................146 Dutch Caribbean ...................................................................................................................................151 Eastern Caribbean ................................................................................................................................155 Ecuador.................................................................................................................................................158 Egypt .....................................................................................................................................................163 El Salvador............................................................................................................................................164 French Caribbean .................................................................................................................................168 Georgia..................................................................................................................................................169 Germany................................................................................................................................................172 Ghana....................................................................................................................................................173 Guatemala.............................................................................................................................................176 Guinea...................................................................................................................................................181 Guinea-Bissau.......................................................................................................................................183 Guyana..................................................................................................................................................185 Haiti .......................................................................................................................................................188 Honduras...............................................................................................................................................192 India.......................................................................................................................................................197 Indonesia...............................................................................................................................................202 Iran ........................................................................................................................................................205 Iraq ........................................................................................................................................................206 Italy........................................................................................................................................................209 Jamaica.................................................................................................................................................210 Kazakhstan............................................................................................................................................215 Kosovo ..................................................................................................................................................218 Kyrgyzstan.............................................................................................................................................219 Laos.......................................................................................................................................................222 Lebanon ................................................................................................................................................227 Liberia....................................................................................................................................................228 Malaysia ................................................................................................................................................231 Mali........................................................................................................................................................232 Mexico...................................................................................................................................................233 Moldova.................................................................................................................................................238 Montenegro ...........................................................................................................................................239 Morocco.................................................................................................................................................240 Mozambique..........................................................................................................................................242 Nepal.....................................................................................................................................................243 The Netherlands....................................................................................................................................244 Nicaragua..............................................................................................................................................247 Nigeria...................................................................................................................................................252 Pakistan.................................................................................................................................................256 Panama.................................................................................................................................................261 Paraguay...............................................................................................................................................266 Peru.......................................................................................................................................................269 Philippines.............................................................................................................................................274 Portugal.................................................................................................................................................278 Romania................................................................................................................................................279 Russia ...................................................................................................................................................280 Senegal .................................................................................................................................................281 Serbia....................................................................................................................................................282 Singapore..............................................................................................................................................283

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Table of Contents iii South Africa...........................................................................................................................................284 Spain .....................................................................................................................................................287 Suriname...............................................................................................................................................288 Taiwan...................................................................................................................................................291 Tajikistan ...............................................................................................................................................292 Thailand.................................................................................................................................................295 Timor-Leste ...........................................................................................................................................298 Trinidad and Tobago.............................................................................................................................301 Turkey ...................................................................................................................................................305 Turkmenistan ........................................................................................................................................309 Ukraine..................................................................................................................................................313 United Arab Emirates............................................................................................................................314 United Kingdom.....................................................................................................................................315 Uruguay.................................................................................................................................................316 Uzbekistan.............................................................................................................................................317 Venezuela .............................................................................................................................................320 Vietnam .................................................................................................................................................324

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Common Abbreviations iv Common Abbreviations APEC Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation AFRICOM U.S. Military Command for Africa ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations ATS Amphetamine-Type Stimulants CARICC Central Asian Regional Information Coordination Center CARSI Central America Regional Security Initiative CBP U.S. Customs and Border Protection CBSI Caribbean Basin Security Initiative DARE Drug Abuse Resistance Education DEA U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration DHS U.S. Department of Homeland Security DOJ U.S. Department of Justice DTO Drug Trafficking Organization ECOWAS Economic Community of West African States EU European Union FBI Federal Bureau of Investigation FIU Financial Intelligence Unit ICE U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ILEA International Law Enforcement Academy INCB International Narcotics Control Board INCSR International Narcotics Control Strategy Report INL U.S. Department of State’s Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs JIATF-S Joint Interagency Task Force South JIATF-W Joint Interagency Task Force West MAOC-N Maritime Analysis and Operations Centre-Narcotics

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Common Abbreviations v MLAT Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty MOU Memorandum of Understanding NIDA National Institute of Drug Abuse OAS Organization of American States OAS/CICAD Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission ONDCP Office of National Drug Control Policy SELEC Southern European Law Enforcement Center SIU Special Investigative Unit SOUTHCOM U.S Military Command for the Caribbean, Central and South America UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime USAID U.S. Agency for International Development USCG U.S. Coast Guard WACSI West Africa Cooperative Security Initiative Ha Hectare HCL Hydrochloride (cocaine) Kg kilogram MT Metric Ton

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 International Agreements vi International Agreements 1988 UN Drug Convention – United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (1988) UN Single Drug Convention – United Nations Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs (1961 as amended by the 1972 Protocol) UN Psychotropic Substances Convention – United Nations Convention on Psychotropic Substances (1971) UNCAC – UN Convention against Corruption (2003) UNTOC - UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000), and its supplementing protocols: Trafficking in Persons Protocol – Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime Migrant Smuggling Protocol – Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Air and Sea, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime Firearms Protocol – Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Introduction 1 INTRODUCTION

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Introduction 2 Legislative Basis for the INCSR The Department of State’s International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR) has been prepared in accordance with section 489 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (the "FAA," 22 U.S.C. § 2291). The 2014 INCSR, published in March 2014, covers the year January 1 to December 31, 2013 and is published in two volumes, the second of which covers money laundering and financial crimes. In addition to addressing the reporting requirements of section 489 of the FAA (as well as sections 481(d)(2) and 484(c) of the FAA and section 804 of the Narcotics Control Trade Act of 1974, as amended), the INCSR provides the factual basis for the designations contained in the President’s report to Congress on the major drug-transit or major illicit drug producing countries initially set forth in section 591 of the Kenneth M. Ludden Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2002 (P.L. 107-115) (the "FOAA"), and now made permanent pursuant to section 706 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 (P.L. 107-228) (the "FRAA"). Section 706 of the FRAA requires that the President submit an annual report no later than September 15 identifying each country determined by the President to be a major drug-transit country or major illicit drug producing country. The President is also required in that report to identify any country on the majors list that has "failed demonstrably . . . to make substantial efforts" during the previous 12 months to adhere to international counternarcotics agreements and to take certain counternarcotics measures set forth in U.S. law. U.S. assistance under the current foreign operations appropriations act may not be provided to any country designated as having "failed demonstrably" unless the President determines that the provision of such assistance is vital to U.S. national interests or that the country, at any time after the President’s initial report to Congress, has made "substantial efforts" to comply with the counternarcotics conditions in the legislation. This prohibition does not affect humanitarian, counternarcotics, and certain other types of assistance that are authorized to be provided notwithstanding any other provision of law. The FAA requires a report on the extent to which each country or entity that received assistance under chapter 8 of Part I of the Foreign Assistance Act in the past two fiscal years has "met the goals and objectives of the United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances" (the "1988 UN Drug Convention"). FAA § 489(a)(1)(A). Several years ago, pursuant to The Combat Methamphetamine Enforcement Act (CMEA) (The USA Patriot Improvement and Reauthorization Act 2005, Title VII, P.L. 109-177), amending sections 489 and 490 of the Foreign Assistance Act (22 USC 2291h and 2291) section 722, the INCSR was expanded to include reporting on the five countries that export the largest amounts of methamphetamine precursor chemicals, as well as the five countries importing the largest amounts of these chemicals and which have the highest rate of diversion of the chemicals for methamphetamine production. This expanded reporting, which appears in this year’s INCSR and will appear in each subsequent annual INCSR report, also includes additional information on efforts to control methamphetamine precursor chemicals, as well as estimates of legitimate demand for these methamphetamine precursors, prepared by most parties to the 1988 UN Drug Convention and submitted to the International Narcotics Control Board. The CMEA also

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Introduction 3 requires a Presidential determination by March 1 of each year on whether the five countries that legally exported and the five countries that legally imported the largest amount of precursor chemicals (under FAA section 490) have cooperated with the United States to prevent these substances from being used to produce methamphetamine or have taken adequate steps on their own to achieve full compliance with the 1988 UN Drug Control Convention. This determination may be exercised by the Secretary of State pursuant to Executive Order 12163 and by the Deputy Secretary of State pursuant to State Department Delegation of Authority 245. Although the Convention does not contain a list of goals and objectives, it does set forth a number of obligations that the parties agree to undertake. Generally speaking, it requires the parties to take legal measures to outlaw and punish all forms of illicit drug production, trafficking, and drug money laundering, to control chemicals that can be used to process illicit drugs, and to cooperate in international efforts to these ends. The statute lists actions by foreign countries on the following issues as relevant to evaluating performance under the 1988 UN Drug Convention: illicit cultivation, production, distribution, sale, transport and financing, and money laundering, asset seizure, extradition, mutual legal assistance, law enforcement and transit cooperation, precursor chemical control, and demand reduction. In attempting to evaluate whether countries and certain entities are meeting the goals and objectives of the 1988 UN Drug Convention, the Department has used the best information it has available. The 2013 INCSR covers countries that range from major drug producing and drug- transit countries, where drug control is a critical element of national policy, to small countries or entities where drug issues or the capacity to deal with them are minimal. The reports vary in the extent of their coverage. For key drug-control countries, where considerable information is available, we have provided comprehensive reports. For some smaller countries or entities where only limited information is available, we have included whatever data the responsible post could provide. The country chapters report upon actions taken - including plans, programs, and, where applicable, timetables - toward fulfillment of Convention obligations. Because the 1988 UN Drug Convention’s subject matter is so broad and availability of information on elements related to performance under the Convention varies widely within and among countries, the Department’s views on the extent to which a given country or entity is meeting the goals and objectives of the Convention are based on the overall response of the country or entity to those goals and objectives. Reports will often include discussion of foreign legal and regulatory structures. Although the Department strives to provide accurate information, this report should not be used as the basis for determining legal rights or obligations under U.S. or foreign law. Some countries and other entities are not yet parties to the 1988 UN Drug Convention; some do not have status in the United Nations and cannot become parties. For such countries or entities, we have nonetheless considered actions taken by those countries or entities in areas covered by the Convention as well as plans (if any) for becoming parties and for bringing their legislation into conformity with the Convention’s requirements. Other countries have taken reservations, declarations, or understandings to the 1988 UN Drug Convention or other relevant treaties; such reservations, declarations, or understandings are generally not detailed in this report. For some of the smallest countries or entities that have not been designated by the President as major illicit

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Introduction 4 drug producing or major drug-transit countries, the Department has insufficient information to make a judgment as to whether the goals and objectives of the Convention are being met. Unless otherwise noted in the relevant country chapters, the Department’s Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) considers all countries and other entities with which the United States has bilateral narcotics agreements to be meeting the goals and objectives of those agreements. Information concerning counternarcotics assistance is provided, pursuant to section 489(b) of the FAA, in section entitled "U.S. Government Assistance."

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Introduction 5 Major Illicit Drug Producing, Drug-Transit, Significant Source, Precursor Chemical, and Money Laundering Countries Section 489(a)(3) of the FAA requires the INCSR to identify: (A) major illicit drug producing and major drug-transit countries; (B) major sources of precursor chemicals used in the production of illicit narcotics; or (C) major money laundering countries. These countries are identified below. Major Illicit Drug Producing and Major Drug-Transit Countries A major illicit drug producing country is one in which: (A) 1,000 hectares or more of illicit opium poppy is cultivated or harvested during a year; (B) 1,000 hectares or more of illicit coca is cultivated or harvested during a year; or (C) 5,000 hectares or more of illicit cannabis is cultivated or harvested during a year, unless the President determines that such illicit cannabis production does not significantly affect the United States. FAA § 481(e)(2). A major drug-transit country is one: (A) that is a significant direct source of illicit narcotic or psychotropic drugs or other controlled substances significantly affecting the United States; or (B) through which are transported such drugs or substances. FAA § 481(e)(5). The following major illicit drug producing and/or drug-transit countries were identified and notified to Congress by the President on September 13, 2013, consistent with section 706(1) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107-228): Afghanistan, The Bahamas, Belize, Bolivia, Burma, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, India, Jamaica, Laos, Mexico, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, and Venezuela. Of these 22 countries, Bolivia, Burma, and Venezuela were designated by the President as having “failed demonstrably” during the previous 12 months to adhere to their obligations under international counternarcotics agreements and take the measures set forth in section 489(a)(1) of the FAA. The President determined, however, in accordance with provisions of Section 706(3)(A) of the FRAA, that continued support for bilateral programs in Burma and Venezuela are vital to the national interests of the United States. Major Precursor Chemical Source Countries The following countries and jurisdictions have been identified to be major sources of precursor or essential chemicals used in the production of illicit narcotics:

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Introduction 6 Afghanistan, Argentina, Bangladesh, Belgium, Bolivia, Brazil, Burma, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Egypt, El Salvador, Germany, Guatemala, Hong Kong Administrative Region, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Mexico, the Netherlands, Pakistan, Republic of Korea, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, and the United Kingdom. Information is provided pursuant to section 489 of the FAA in the section entitled "Chemical Controls." Major Money Laundering Countries A major money laundering country is defined by statute as one "whose financial institutions engage in currency transactions involving significant amounts of proceeds from international narcotics trafficking." FAA § 481(e)(7). However, the complex nature of money laundering transactions today makes it difficult in many cases to distinguish the proceeds of narcotics trafficking from the proceeds of other serious crime. Moreover, financial institutions engaging in transactions involving significant amounts of proceeds of other serious crime are vulnerable to narcotics-related money laundering. This year’s list of major money laundering countries recognizes this relationship by including all countries and other jurisdictions, whose financial institutions engage in transactions involving significant amounts of proceeds from all serious crime. The following countries/jurisdictions have been identified this year in this category: Afghanistan, Antigua and Barbuda, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, British Virgin Islands, Burma, Cambodia, Canada, Cayman Islands, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cyprus, Dominican Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Guernsey, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Isle of Man, Israel, Italy, Japan, Jersey, Kenya, Latvia, Lebanon, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Macau, Mexico, Netherlands, Nigeria, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Somalia, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Venezuela, and Zimbabwe. Further information on these countries/jurisdictions and United States money laundering policies, as required by section 489 of the FAA, is set forth in Volume II of the INCSR in the section entitled "Money Laundering and Financial Crimes."

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Introduction 7 Presidential Determination THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON September 13, 2013 Presidential Determination No. 2013-14 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF STATE SUBJECT: Presidential Determination on Major Drug Transit or Major Illicit Drug Producing Countries for Fiscal Year 2014 Pursuant to Section 706(1) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, FY 2003 (Public Law 107-228) (FRAA), I hereby identify the following countries as major drug transit and/or major illicit drug producing countries: Afghanistan, The Bahamas, Belize, Bolivia, Burma, Colombia, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, India, Jamaica, Laos, Mexico, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Panama, Peru and Venezuela. A country’s presence on the majors list is not a reflection of its government’s counternarcotics efforts or level of cooperation with the United States. Consistent with the statutory definition of a major drug transit or drug producing country set forth in section 481(e) (2) and (5) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (FAA), one of the reasons major drug transit or illicit drug producing countries are placed on the list is the combination of geographic, commercial, and economic factors that allow drugs to transit or be produced, even if a government has carried out the most assiduous narcotics control law enforcement measures. In addition, the law requires identification of any country on the list that has “failed demonstrably” during the previous 12 months to make substantial efforts to adhere to its obligations under international counternarcotics agreements and take certain counternarcotics measures as cited in section 489(a) (1) of the FAA. Countries found to have failed demonstrably may receive certain U.S. assistance only if the President determines that provision of such assistance is vital to the national interests of the United States, or if subsequent to the designation, the President determines that the country has made substantial efforts to meet the requirement. Pursuant to Section 706(2) (A) of the FRAA, I hereby designate Bolivia, Burma, and Venezuela as countries that have failed demonstrably during the previous 12 months to make substantial efforts to adhere to their obligations under international counternarcotics agreements and take the measures set forth in section 489(a) (1) of the FAA. Included in this report are justifications for the determinations on Bolivia, Burma and Venezuela, as required by Section 706(2) (B) of the FRAA. Explanations for these decisions are published with this determination.

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Introduction 8 I have also determined, in accordance with provisions of Section 706(3) (A) of the FRAA, that support for programs to aid Burma and Venezuela are vital to the national interests of the United States. Drug Producing and Trafficking Trends in Strategic Areas In addition to the listed countries, the following notable drug production and trafficking trends were observed in the preparation of this determination. Afghanistan Afghanistan is the world’s largest grower of illegal opium poppy and produces approximately 90 percent of the world’s illicit opium. Nearly all poppy cultivation occurs in the southern and western parts of the country, especially Helmand Province. Instability in these regions allows criminal networks, insurgent groups, and illicit cultivation and drug production to thrive. Most recently, opium production in Afghanistan declined in spite of an increase in the total ground area under poppy cultivation. The drop stemmed primarily from crop disease and poor conditions as some farmers growing illegal crops moved to less hospitable agricultural growing regions. Countering the opium trade remains an uphill struggle and a long-term challenge. Working with Afghan partners, international allies and multilateral organizations, the United States continues to support the commitment to establish effective and sustainable Afghan-led programs which are critical to Afghan security and regional stability. Afghanistan has continued to take greater responsibility to design and implement its own anti- narcotics programs. The government aggressively eradicated illicit opium poppy during the most recent growing season, as well as carrying out alternative livelihoods and demand reduction policies. To help stem the country’s growing domestic drug abuse, the United States has funded a scientifically based survey of urban areas to determine prevalence of use, including among children, and is funding more than 60 in- and out-patient drug treatment centers. The United States supports a wide range of other illegal crop control, alternative development, drug awareness and treatment projects, including training and treatment service delivery programs implemented through international organizations. As we approach the 2014 withdrawal of international forces from Afghanistan, the country requires continued international support. Even greater efforts are needed to bring counternarcotics programs into the mainstream of social and economic development strategies to successfully curb illegal drug cultivation and production of opium as well as the high use of opiates among the Afghan population. The Caribbean Criminal activity in Caribbean states, as a drug-transit zone for illegal substances, is of deep concern to the United States. United States-bound trafficking in cocaine through the Caribbean dramatically increased from five percent of the total in 2011 to nine percent in 2012. A central response to this threat by the United States and 13 partner nations of the Caribbean Basin Security Initiative (CBSI) which is designed especially to address citizen safety by fostering a wide range of crime prevention programs.

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Introduction 9 Although the problems are daunting, concrete results are being achieved through the support of CBSI, European organizations and the Organization of American States (OAS) Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission. Through CBSI, some 2,500 Caribbean police officers were trained in the Dominican Republic, a country which has undertaken an aggressive counternarcotics institution building program. Moreover, the United States is training thousands of Caribbean officials elsewhere in the region on fundamental subjects such as crime scene and homicide investigation. CBSI programs are upgrading the ability of Caribbean partners to investigate complex financial crimes, manage forfeited or seized assets, and prosecute criminals. A range of programs are building awareness, upgrading treatment facilities and fostering the creation of drug courts as alternatives to incarceration for non-violent offenders. The work of a violent crimes task force in St. Kitts and Nevis, mentored by U.S. officials, helped to reduce homicides in St. Kits and Nevis by 41 percent. Central America The seven Central American nations are considered major drug transit countries which significantly affect the United States: Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama. United States Government analysts estimate that approximately 90 percent of illegal drugs from South America destined for the United States are smuggled through the seven Central American countries and Mexican corridor. Of this amount, nearly 80 percent stops first in a Central American country before onward shipment to Mexico. The Central American Regional Security Initiative (CARSI), initiated in 2008, supports local government efforts to strengthen the rule of law, lower homicide rates, and deny traffickers safe haven. Under CARSI, U.S.-funded training, equipment and technical assistance provided to Central America has contributed to concrete success. The model precinct program in El Salvador, for example, has helped reduce the homicide rate by 70 percent in one crime-ridden community. The CARSI-supported program to create transnational anti-gang units is expanding their criminal investigative leads, especially against the MS-13 and M-18 gangs. These criminal gangs have significant drug trafficking and other criminal links in major U.S. cities. Anti-gang units in Central America led to a homicide arrest in Oklahoma City, the prosecution of felony extortions in Annapolis and the capture of one of the FBI’s top ten most wanted fugitives, a suspect who was arrested in El Salvador. Countries are also strengthening cooperation through the Central American Integrated System (SICA) to promote citizen security and other programs. Multilateral cooperation to stem the smuggling of essential and precursor chemicals from China used to produce illegal synthetic drugs in Central America is an important component of SICA’s mandate. This SICA undertaking is aligned with the growing abuse during the last decade of new psychoactive substances (NPS), the production of which is a growing problem in Central America. The illegal production of NPS is dependent upon access to a wide range of chemicals. Successful interdictions of unauthorized chemicals in Central America have created the urgent need for effective management and disposal systems. To support the overall effort, U.S. funding in 2013 and 2014 to the OAS Department of Public Security will help provide Central American

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Introduction 10 countries with the development of relevant infrastructure to properly process and destroy these illegally shipped chemicals. West Africa Although no West African country is currently listed as a major drug producer or transit zone, the region is a growing concern. The destabilizing effects of increasing drug trafficking in West Africa with direct links to transnational crime organizations based in Latin America pose a direct threat to stability on the African continent. The U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime estimates that cocaine trafficking in West Africa generates approximately $1.25 billion at wholesale prices in Europe. African leaders understand that growing criminal enterprises in their countries negatively impact national goals for peace and security. Participants at the 2013 Extraordinary Summit of the Economic Community for West African highlighted the need for cooperation to counter drug trafficking in the region. Such efforts by nations in the region are supported by the United States Government’s West Africa Cooperative Security Initiative, which will provide some $50 million in 2013 to combat transnational organized crime. Projects include, for example, anti-corruption training in Sierra Leone, support for a regional law enforcement training center in Ghana, and the development of specially trained counternarcotics law enforcement investigative units. Drug trafficking in West Africa is of particular concern to Latin America and the United States. Law enforcement investigations show that illegal proceeds generated by criminal activities in African nations flow back to the Western Hemisphere, bolstering trafficking organizations’ financial strength and ability to fuel the drug trade in producing and consuming countries, including OAS member states. You are hereby authorized and directed to submit this report, with its Bolivia, Burma and Venezuela memoranda of justification, under Section 706 of the FRAA, to the Congress, and publish it in the Federal Register. /S/ Barack Obama MEMORANDUM OF JUSTIFICATION FOR MAJOR ILLICIT DRUG TRANSIT OR ILLICIT DRUG PRODUCING COUNTRIES FOR FY 2014 Bolivia During the past 12 months, the Government of Bolivia has failed demonstrably to make sufficient efforts to meet its obligations under international counternarcotics agreements or to uphold the counternarcotics measures set forth in Section 489 (a) (1) of the Foreign Assistance Act (FAA) of 1961, as amended. Bolivia is the world’s third largest producer of coca leaf for cocaine and other illegal drug products. Bolivia’s ability to interdict drugs and major traffickers was seriously compromised by its 2009 expulsion of U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) personnel, harming its

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Introduction 11 ability to conduct counternarcotics operations and to cooperate on international illicit drug interdiction. Due to a lack of sufficient cooperation from the Government of Bolivia on counternarcotics activities, the United States Government determined it should close the International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs section at Embassy La Paz by the end of 2013. The 2012 United States Government coca cultivation estimate for Bolivia is 25,000 hectares, a 2 percent decrease from the 2011 estimate of 25,500 hectares. The United States Government estimate of pure potential cocaine production decreased 18 percent in 2012 compared to 2011. Nothwithstanding these incremental positive steps, the overall counternarcotics picture in Bolivia is negative. Bolivia has not maintained adequate controls over licit coca markets to prevent diversion to illegal narcotics production or closed illegal coca markets, and it failed to develop and execute a national drug control strategy. Unlike other coca growing countries, Bolivia has not implemented many of the UN-mandated controls over coca. Bolivia also withdrew from the 1961 UN Single Convention and re-acceded only with a formal caveat that Bolivia “reserves the right” to promote the cultivation and commercialiation of coca leaf products, contrary to Convention’s foundational premise to limit the uses of controlled substances to medical or scientific purposes. Given the substantial coca crops already grown in Bolivia, and the difficulty the country has had policing illegally grown coca and with diversion from licit coca markets to illicit ones, this reservation encourages coca growth and adds to the complication of distinguishing between illegally and legally grown coca. The United States remains concerned about Bolivia’s intent by this action to limit, redefine, and circumvent the scope and control for illegal substances as they appear in the UN Schedule I list of narcotics. The United States formally objected to Bolivia’s reservation to the 1961 Convention, one of the essential cornerstones of international cooperation in this area. Government of Bolivia policies and actions are not in line with international drug control standards. Such policies include Bolivia’s promotion of the idea that coca leaf can be used generally for commercial products, as well as its de facto allowance of 20,000 hectares of legal cultivation, 8,000 hectares over the 12,000 hectare limit set by the country’s own law. The European Union provided funding for the completion of a study to identify the amount of legal cultivation needed to support traditional coca consumption. The unwillingness of the Government of Bolivia to share this report in a timely way demonstrates its disinclination to be transparent with the international community. As a matter of policy, Bolivia does not encourage or facilitate illegal activity associated with drug trafficking. Senior Bolivian officials, however, have been arrested for facilitating drug shipments in recent years. These arrests have taken place both within Bolivia and abroad. The United States encourages Bolivia to strengthen its efforts to achieve tighter controls over the trade in coca leaf to stem diversion to cocaine processing, in line with international treaties; to protect its citizens from the deleterious effects of drugs, corruption, and drug trafficking; and to significantly reduce coca cultivation.

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Introduction 12 To diminish Bolivia’s appeal as a convenient trafficking venue for drug smuggling, further government action is required. Bolivia must improve the legal and regulatory environment for security and justice sector institutions to effectively combat drug production and trafficking, money laundering, corruption, and other transnational crimes, and to bring criminal enterprise to justice through the rule of law. While Bolivia continues to make drug seizures and arrests of implicated individuals, the Bolivian judicial system is not adequately processing these cases to completion. Bolivian law requires that an arrestee be formally charged within 18 months of arrest. An overwhelming majority of the incarcerated population in Bolivia, however, has not been formally charged in accordance with Bolivian law. The number of individuals who have been convicted and sentenced on drug charges in Bolivia has remained stagnant over the last several years and has not increased in proportion to the number of arrests. In accord with U.S. legislation, the determination that Bolivia has failed demonstrably to make substantial efforts to adhere to its obligations under international counternarcotics agreements and to take counternarcotics measures set forth in the FAA, does not result in the withholding of humanitarian and counternarcotics assistance. MEMORANDUM OF JUSTIFICATION FOR MAJOR DRUG TRANSIT OR ILLICIT DRUG PRODUCING COUNTRIES FOR FY 2014 Burma During the past 12 months the Burmese government has failed demonstrably to make sufficient efforts to meet its obligations under international counternarcotics agreements or to uphold the counternarcotics measures set forth in Section 489 (a) (1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961(FAA) , as amended. During this timeframe, however, it has undertaken political and economic reforms to address many of the United States’ longstanding concerns regarding governance, democratization and human rights. Given the government’s demonstrated commitment to reform and promising signs of action on future poppy eradication, it is in the vital national interests of the United States to grant Burma a national interest waiver for Fiscal Year 2014. In early 2013, Burma and the United States conducted the first joint opium yield survey since 2004. In addition, Burmese counternarcotics police are participating in counternarcotics courses hosted at the International Law Enforcement Academy (ILEA) in Bangkok. Burma remains the world’s second-largest cultivator of illegal opium poppy. A significant increase was noted from 2011 to 2012. Amphetamine-type stimulants have been produced for domestic consumption and export since the mid-1990s. These illegal narcotics produced in Burma are trafficked to neighboring countries, including Thailand, China and Laos. According to Burmese government statistics, officials destroyed 23,584 hectares of opium poppy in 2012 compared to 7,058 hectares in 2011. Burma has indicated its willingness to work regionally and internationally on counternarcotics initiatives, including with the UN Office on Drugs and Crime. In May, Burma pledged, with other countries in the region, to increase

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Introduction 13 cooperation in the fight against illegal drugs, which they agreed pose a significant threat to the region. Burma’s current counternarcotics performance, however, is not sufficient to meet its international counternarcotics cooperation obligations. The Burmese government needs to dedicate adequate resources to its counternarcotics efforts, increase illegal crop eradication, and redouble its efforts to obtain and maintain ceasefires with ethnic minorities who live in areas where illegal crops are grown. Pursuant to section 706 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2003, while Burma has failed demonstrably, this national interest waiver under the FAA allows the continuation of U.S. bilateral assistance programs to Burma, in addition to counternarcotics and humanitarian assistance which can be provided without a national interest waiver. MEMORANDUM OF JUSTIFICATION FOR MAJOR DRUG TRANSIT FOR ILLICIT DRUG PRODUCING COUNTRIES FOR FY 2014 Venezuela During the past 12 months the Venezuelan government failed demonstrably to make sufficient efforts to meet its obligations under international counternarcotics agreements or to uphold the counternarcotics measures set forth in Section 489(a) (1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), as amended. A national interest waiver for Fiscal Year 2014 for Venezuela permits support for programs vital to the national interests of the United States, such as democracy building. Venezuela’s porous border with Colombia, weak judicial system, selective and inadequate international counternarcotics cooperation, and permissive and corrupt environment make the country one of the preferred trafficking routes for illegal drugs leaving South America. As a matter of policy, Venezuela does not encourage or facilitate illegal activity involving drug trafficking. Individual members of the government and security forces, however, were credibly reported to have engaged in or facilitated drug trafficking activities. Nearly all detected illegal drug flights arriving in Honduras, the region’s largest center for airborne drug smuggling, originate from Venezuela. Moreover, the majority of detected illegal flights departing Central America and returning to South America land first in western Venezuela. Venezuelan authorities reported seizing 45 metric tons of illegal drugs in 2012, an increase of three metric tons from 2011, but an overall decrease of 18 metric tons compared to 2010. While Venezuela publicly reports such seizures, it does not systematically share the data or evidence needed to verify the destruction of the drugs. The country also published statistics on arrests and convictions for drug possession and trafficking, although no information was available on the nature or severity of the drug arrests or convictions. Venezuela is party to all relevant international drug and crime control agreements, including the 1988 UN Convention. Since ceasing formal cooperation with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration in 2005, the Venezuelan government has maintained only limited counternarcotics cooperation with the United States. Cooperation consists mainly of coordination of fugitive deportations from Venezuela to the United States and bilateral maritime interdiction operations. However,

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Introduction 14 Venezuela did not provide follow-up information to the United States on the drug trafficking organizations involved or the prosecution of the suspects as it relates to maritime interdictions. Venezuela’s limited international counternarcotics cooperation calls into question the government’s intent to uphold its international commitment to combat drug trafficking. Venezuela has not signed the updated addendum to the 1978 Bilateral Counternarcotics Memorandum of Understanding that was negotiated in 2005. In the context of increased cooperation within the region, Venezuela took some noteworthy steps, including continuing to deport fugitives to Colombia and other countries. In 2012, Venezuela deported to Colombia high-profile traffickers including Daniel “El Loco” Barrera Barrera, Jorge Milton “JJ” Cifuentes Villa, and in 2013, Juan Carlos Peña Silva. The Venezuelan government, however, did not take action against government and military officials known to be linked to the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC). In September 2011, the Department of the Treasury designated four senior Venezuelan government officials - pursuant to the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act - as acting for or on behalf of the FARC, in support of narcotics and arms trafficking activities. In 2008, also in accord with the Kingpin Act, the Treasury designated two other senior Venezuelan government officials as well as a third Venezuelan, a former minister of justice and interior, for materially assisting the narcotics trafficking activities of the FARC. Pursuant to section 706 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2003, while Venezuela has failed demonstrably, this national interest waiver under the FAA allows the continuation of U.S. bilateral assistance programs to Venezuela, in addition to counternarcotics and humanitarian assistance which can be provided without a national interest waiver.

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Policy and Program Developments 15 POLICY AND PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTS

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Policy and Program Developments 16 Overview Volume I of the 2014 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report provides an overview of steps taken during the previous year by the governments of nearly 90 countries to reduce illicit narcotics production, trafficking, and use. These goals have been a shared international obligation endorsed by nearly all governments for over 60 years, dating back to the creation of the 1961 United Nations Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. The Single Convention was a pioneering effort and its core principle – that no country can succeed alone in protecting its citizens against the threats of dangerous drugs – remains as true today as it was over a half century ago. International cooperation is essential, and the goal of protecting citizens from the consequences of harmful drugs is universally acknowledged by all governments. Despite occasional conflicting opinions over specific tactics, there is universal agreement over common goals: greater citizen security, honest governments untainted by corruption, and sustainable economic development safeguarded by the rule of law. The international community remains committed to this common vision, and has pursued common strategies to achieve these goals for several decades. It has always been an evolving process, and our tactics have never been static. The United States agrees with many governments and civil society observers that we must be open to new approaches and to testing our assumptions. Experience is a great guide, and most of the world’s governments are now preparing for the next UN General Assembly Special Session on Drugs in 2016. This preparatory process is an attempt to draw lessons from our experiences over the past decade and to identify what has worked, what has not, and what we might do better. The United States will offer the following broad lessons for consideration. First, reducing the threat of dangerous drugs cannot be the exclusive responsibility of law enforcement agencies. Educators, civil society, public-health professionals and the business community all have essential roles to play. In particular, much work remains to be done in reducing demand for dangerous and illegal drugs. In the United States, we have made significant progress over the long term, with overall drug use declining by nearly one-third over the past 30 years. Cocaine use has dropped even more, by roughly 40 percent since 2008. Domestically, the United States is committed to preventing, treating, and providing recovery support services for Americans with substance abuse disorders based on effective, science-driven public health interventions. Internationally, the United States will continue to share examples of effective practices with partners that face similar challenges, and will support capacity-building and training activities for service providers in drug prevention, intervention, treatment, and recovery. Next, we must focus on the criminal organizations that traffic the largest volumes of the most dangerous drugs. Prioritizing resources to target the most dangerous criminal enterprises is both strategically sound and fiscally prudent. The U.S. National Drug Control Strategy is committed to expanding innovative “smart on crime” strategies proven to help break the cycle of drug use, crime, arrest, and incarceration, while protecting public safety. The United States supports reforms to lower incarceration rates for personal drug use, such as the expansion of specialized courts that divert non-violent drug offenders into treatment instead of prison. The United States

INCSR 2014 Volume 1 Policy and Program Developments 17 also supports diversion programs that identify first-time offenders who have a substance-use disorder and provide community health services instead of a jail cell or arrest record. Reentry programs that help guide former offenders back into society, support their recovery from addiction, and help them avoid a return to the criminal justice system are also important. The United States will continue to share examples of these reform initiatives internationally, and provide advice and assistance to governments seeking to reform their own policies and institutions. Governments cannot overcome the threat of drugs by jailing everyone who chooses to violate the law through consumption or possession of illegal drugs, but they can and must cooperate to dismantle the large, multinational, multi-billion dollar criminal enterprises that dominate the drug trade in most countries. These modern transnational criminal networks have become more sophisticated, engaging in multiple varieties of crime, including trafficking in persons, environmental crimes and illicit trafficking in firearms. These activities produce hundreds of billions of dollars annually in laundered proceeds that distort legitimate economies, undercut sustainable development, and undermine democratic institutions. Targeting these transnational criminal enterprises requires strong and effective criminal justice institutions. All links in the criminal justice continuum – police, courts, and corrections – must be capable of effectively delivering justice and enabling international cooperation. If all links in this chain are not addressed, sophisticated criminal organizations will exploit the weakest link. The United States will continue to support the efforts of governments committed to the difficult but necessary process of reforming and strengthening their criminal justice institutions. These holistic reforms require long-term commitment and political will, but sustainable progress is possible, as evidenced by the achievements of countries such as Colombia, which has made remarkable strides in reducing the power and influence of drug-fueled criminal organizations that only a decade ago challenged the authority of the central government. Thirdly, the international community must also increase cooperation to prevent the abuse of prescription drugs and the spread of synthetic drugs. The production and use of synthetic drugs continues to expand to new markets around the world, and represent the most urgent drug control challenge for many of the countries featured in this report. A November 2013 study by the UN Office of Drugs and Crime (UNODC) estimated that methamphetamine is now the first or second most used illicit drug in 13 of 15 countries surveyed from the Asia Pacific region. Controlling the spread of these substances requires enhanced demand reduction and treatment efforts as well as effective cooperation with governments and private industry to prevent the diversion from legitimate industry of chemicals that are needed to produce illegal drugs. To advance these goals, the United States joined with the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) to sponsor a conference on December 2, 2013 that brought together over 100 technical experts and policy officials from 24 governments and international organizati

Add a comment

Related presentations

Cfbp barometre octobre

Cfbp barometre octobre

November 10, 2014

VITOGAZ vous présente: CFBP baromètre gpl carburant

Ata Escrita da 16ª Sessão Ordinária realizada em 16/10/2014 pela Câmara de Vereado...

Ata Escrita da 10ª Sessão Extraordinária realizada em 16/10/2014 pela Câmara de Ve...

Rx1 nasil kullanilir

Rx1 nasil kullanilir

November 8, 2014

Rx1 zayiflama hapi, kullanimi nasildir, yan etkileri var mi? yan etkiler var ise h...

Esposto del MoVimento 5 Stelle sul Patto del Nazareno

Slide Servizi postali

Slide Servizi postali

November 7, 2014

Slides per i servizi postali presentati in occasione dell'incontro azienda e organ...

Related pages

RAPPORT 2013 DU DEPARTEMENT D'ETAT SUR LA DROGUE EN HAITI ...

Chaque année au mois de Mars le Département d'Etat publie son rapport global sur le trafique de la drogue dans lequel figure Haiti. Dans ce rapport ...
Read more

Le rapport du Département d’Etat américain sur la ...

Le rapport du Département d’Etat américain sur la ... Il donne en exemple le dossier de la drogue de ... le rapport du Département d’Etat ...
Read more

2010.11 Rapport Du Conseil d'Etat Au Grand Conseil ...

2010.11 Rapport Du Conseil d'Etat Au ... Rapport du CE sur les postulats M. Bernhard pour un bilan de la politique cantonale en matière de prévention ...
Read more

Plus de 238 arrêtés, 2.200 kg saisis en Haïti dans le ...

... de la part des plus hautes autorités politiques du pays et a ... rapport, publié en 2013, sur la ... la drogue en Haïti reste ...
Read more

www.aujourdhui-en-guinee.com

CONAKRY-Le développement du trafic de cocaïne, qui a transformé la Guinée en une importante plaque tournante du narcotrafic en Afrique, met en péril ...
Read more

Haïti - axl.cefan.ulaval.ca

En janvier 2013, quelque 70 % des ... de la part du législateur. Mais ... peuvent néanmoins être traduits en créole. L'article 78 du Décret sur la ...
Read more

HAITI: PRIVATISATION DE LA TELECO : QUI PROFITE?

... de la plus grande entreprise d'Etat du pays, la ... contrôlent la part du lion du ... RAPPORT 2013 AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL SUR HAITI.
Read more

La part du Colibri - Pierre Rabhi - Documents

Découvrez cet auteur sur http://tinyurl.com/34pcerc. Découvrez cet auteur sur http://tinyurl.com/34pcerc. Docslide.us. ... Share La part du Colibri ...
Read more