advertisement

Radiation Risks

100 %
0 %
advertisement
Information about Radiation Risks
Health & Medicine

Published on February 20, 2014

Author: jameswheeler001

Source: slideshare.net

Description

Radiation Risks
advertisement

RADIATION RISKS

HISTORY • X-rays accidentally discovered by Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen in 1895 • Why the name? • But he knew they could penetrate the body

HISTORY • Roentgen’s discovery was a bomb shell • News papers and magazines provided interesting stories. • Advertisers associated their products with the term “x-ray” • Headache medicines, stove polish, golf balls, razors….

AD FROM 1896

PRODUCTION OF X-RAYS • X-rays are produced when rapidly moving electrons that have been accelerated through a potential difference of order 1 kV to 1 MV strikes a metal target. Evacuated glass tube Target Filament

NATURAL BACKGROUND RADIATION • • • • • Average 2.4msv per year Cosmic radiation from sun Terrestrial: soil, buildings, granite Body activity: potassium Radon gas is naturally occuring decay product of uranium and thorium • Skiing at high altitudes and airline flights • Return flight from Sydney to LA: dose 0.16msv

The Electromagnetic Spectrum Waveform of Radiation NONIONIZING IONIZING Radio Infrared Microwaves Ultraviolet Visible light Gamma rays X-rays 7

Difference between ionizing and nonionizing radiation • Energy levels: – Ionizing radiation has enough energy to break apart (ionize) material with which it comes in contact (knock off e-) – Non ionizing radiation does not 8

Types of Ionizing Radiation • Important in healthcare: • Diagnosing - X-Rays, PET Scans, Nuclear Medicine • Therapy - Radiation Treatment, Nuclear Medicine 9

Biological Effects of Radiation • Somatic – Affects cells originally exposed (cancer) – Affects blood, tissues, organs, possibly entire body – Effects range from slight skin reddening to death (acute radiation poisoning) • Genetic – Affects cells of future generations – Reproductive cells most sensitive 10

EFFECTS • Effects of low level radiation in diagnostic imaging is presumptive and continue to be debated • No large clinical trials • Data collected from the atomic bomb survivors

RISKS • Based on linear/no lower threshold model and extrapolated • Indicates that no dose, however small, is entirely without risk • Average lifetime risk of induction of fatal cancer from exposure to 5msv is 1 in 4000 and to 20msv is 1 in 1000 • Risk is considerably great in children and young adults • Hence, all imaging procedures should be justified

TISSUE WEIGHTING FACTOR Gonads Red Bone Marrow Colon Lung Stomach Bladder Breast Liver Oesophagus Thyroid Skin Bone Surface 0.20 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.01

PLAIN RADIOGRAPHY INVESTIGATION DOSE(msv) EQUIVALENT NATURAL BACKGROUND RADIATION Extremities 0.01 1.5 days Chest 0.02 3 days Skull 0.07 11 days C spine 0.1 15 days T spine 0.7 4 months L spine 1.3 7 months Hip 0.3 7 weeks Pelvis 0.7 4 months Abdomen 1.0 6 months

CT and NM Head 2.3 1 year C spine 1.5 8 months T spine 6.0 2.5 years Chest 8.0 3.6 years L spine 3.3 1.4 years Abdomen 10.0 4.5 years Pelvis 10.0 4.5 years Bone scan 4.0 1.6 years V/Q 1.3 7 months

RISKS • Risk is a defered risk that may occur 5 to 15 years after exposure • Use of medical imaging is rising • Population exposure to ionizing radiation is increasing and majority of them is from CT scans • Risk is cumulative

• Radium was discovered in Marie Curie and Pierre Curie in 1898 • Highly radioactive and its decay product radon gas is also radioactive • Marie Curie died secondary to aplastic anaemia, believed to be induced by the long term exposure to radiation • Carried test tubes with radioactive isotopes in her pocket and stored them in her desk drawer

APPROPRIATE REQUESTING • Cannot ignore the increasing use of ionizing radiation • All requests should be subject to Justification and Optimisation • Radiologist has the knowledge and experience to determine the radiation risks and consider alternative investigations • Referring doctor who has seen the patient can best assess the potential benefits • Justification should be a joint responsibility • Optimisation is to achieve diagnostic quality images by using low radiation dose

RESPONSIBILITIES OF REFERRING DOCTOR • Avoid unnecessary duplication of tests • Ensure that test could potentially change management • Provide adequate clinical details • Be aware that many imaging tests have risks • Consult with imaging colleagues if appropriate • Consider the use of US or MRI (non ionizing) when appropriate

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION • Raising the awareness of patients for the need to inform the possibility of pregnancy • 28 day rule. In a young patient who has missed a period, pregnancy should be excluded • If appropriate employ tests that do not use ionizing radiation • Foetus more sensitive during 3 to 8 weeks and 1st trimester

EFFECTS ON FOETUS • • • • Miscarriage and foetal death in the first few weeks Malformations within first 8 weeks of implantation CNS abnormalities during weeks 8 to 25 Carcinogenesis • IV contrast can be used in exceptional circumstances • Contrast induced foetal hypothyroidism is not validated • Current guidelines recommend neonatal thyroid function testing

PE IN PREGNANCY • Risks of missing PE in pregnancy far outweighs the risks of exposing the foetus to radiation • CXR is useful to exclude conditions that mimic PE • D-Dimer is less useful in pregnancy, however low probability and negative D-Dimer excludes PE • Doppler of both lower limbs should be considered first and treatment commenced if positive

PE IN PREGNANCY • CTPA and V/Q scan have equal diagnostic quality • CTPA recommended in first 2 trimesters • Phantom studies have shown less foetal dose with CTPA in first two trimesters • MRI is a promising new option but availability and expertise are the main limitations

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

Radiation Exposure: MedlinePlus - National Library of ...

Radiation is energy that travels in the form of waves or high ... Cell Phones and Cancer Risk ... Get Radiation Exposure updates by email What's ...
Read more

Radiation and Risk - Physics Department

Risk. How is risk determined? Risk estimates for radiation were first evaluated by scientific committees in the starting in the 1950s. The most ...
Read more

Radiation Risk From Medical Imaging - National Center for ...

This review provides a practical overview of the excess cancer risks related to radiation from medical imaging. Primary care physicians should have a basic ...
Read more

Radiation - NHS Choices - NHSChoices Home Page

Radiation is a general term that refers to any sort of energy that can travel through space either as a wave or a particle.
Read more

XrayRisk.com : Radiation Risk Calculator -- Calculate ...

Together, dedicated to improving the understanding of radiation risks from medical imaging. Calculate your dose and estimate cancer risk from studies ...
Read more

Benefits and Risks of Radiation - Understanding Medical ...

Benefits and Risks of Radiation. It’s a natural conundrum! Being exposed to too much radiation can be harmful, if not lethal. On the other hand, without ...
Read more

Radiation Risks in Perspective: ebook jetzt bei weltbild.de

eBook Shop: Radiation Risks in Perspective von Kenneth L. Mossman als Download. Jetzt eBook herunterladen & bequem mit Ihrem Tablet oder eBook Reader lesen.
Read more

Risk Factors: Radiation - National Cancer Institute

Radiation of certain wavelengths, called ionizing radiation, has enough energy to damage DNA and cause cancer. Ionizing radiation includes radon, x-rays ...
Read more

Radiation Health Risks : Oceanus Magazine

The ability to gauge radiation at vanishingly low concentrations gives scientists a powerful tool for understanding ocean processes. “We can measure down ...
Read more

Nuclear Radiation and Health Effects

Nuclear Radiation and Health Effects (Updated May 2016) Natural sources account for most of the radiation we all receive each year. The nuclear fuel cycle ...
Read more