psy203s authoritarian

50 %
50 %
Information about psy203s authoritarian
Product-Training-Manuals

Published on August 30, 2007

Author: Clown

Source: authorstream.com

The Authoritarian Personality:  The Authoritarian Personality Perspectives from Adorno et al., Altemeyer and Sidanius andamp; Pratto PSY2003S Setting the scene:  Setting the scene Late 1940s and early 1950s Europe – recovering from WWII. First details of the holocaust are made public (1946) SA – National Party comes to power; installs apartheid policy (1948) USA – Anti-communist and anti-labour sentiments peak in the McCarthy hearings (1953) Right about that time…:  Right about that time… A problem in psychology theory Had theories to explain prejudice (eg. Freud’s stuff) BUT: all individual based How do these explain an entire political party showing this behaviour? Triggers a concerted effort to look at this phenomenon Especially from Jewish psychologists in Europe Interesting evidence:  Interesting evidence Research from the time shows a link between prejudice for different groups Fink (1947): Correlations between prejudice for various groups Adorno at al. (1950): Correlation between anti- semitic and anti-Negro prejudice And, uh-oh… Hadley (1947): Correlations between prejudice for imaginary groups One possible conclusion: some people are more prone to the process of prejudice than others How do we explain this?:  How do we explain this? Prothro (1952): Not that some people are more negative/evil; rather, they are more receptive to prejudiced beliefs. Possibilities: frustration poor psychological adjustment political conservatism religious fundamentalism The Authoritarian Personality:  The Authoritarian Personality Proposed by Theodore Adorno, Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel Levinson and Nevitt Sanford (1950) Very detailed, based on empirical research A syndrome - determines susceptibility to prejudice and patterns of belief and ideology display behaviour which follows a coherent pattern defines a ‘type of person’ who is more likely to show prejudiced behaviour Authoritarian traits:  Authoritarian traits Authoritarians display most of: Conventionalism Submission to authority figures Authoritarian Aggression Anti-intraception Superstition and stereotypy Concern with power and toughness Destructiveness and cynicism Projectivity Concern with sexual goings-on Examples from Adorno et al.:  Examples from Adorno et al. High scorers M352 (pg. 760-761) ('Authoritarian' syndrome) 5057 (pg. 757) ('Conventional' syndrome) As opposed to low scorers M711 (pg. 779-781) ('Easy-going' syndrome) F515 (pg. 782-783) (Genuine liberal) How much authoritarianism could a fascist chuck…:  How much authoritarianism could a fascist chuck… The F-scale measures authoritarianism Agreement based Likert-type scale http://www.anesi.com/fscale.htm A person who has bad manners, habits, and breeding can hardly expect to get along with decent people. (CON) Young people sometimes get rebellious ideas, but as they grow up they ought to get over them and settle down. (SUB) There is hardly anything lower than a person who does not feel a great love, gratitude, and respect for his parents. (AGR) Nowadays more and more people are prying into matters that should remain personal and private. (INTR) Example items from the F-scale & (supposedly) high F-scorers:  Example items from the F-scale andamp; (supposedly) high F-scorers Some day it will probably be shown that astrology can explain a lot of things. (Sandamp;S) The true American way of life is disappearing so fast that force may be necessary to preserve it. (Pandamp;T) Human nature being what it is, there will always be war and conflict. (CYN) Most people don't realize how much our lives are controlled by plots hatched in secret places. (PROJ) Sex crimes, such as rape and attacks on children, deserve more than mere imprisonment; such criminals ought to be publicly whipped, or worse. (SEX) How to become an authoritarian personality:  How to become an authoritarian personality Adorno et al. explain the development of the personality in childhood Freudian style – their theoretical basis Psychodynamic analysis of early family life Mostly come from strict household / authoritarian parents Tension: hate v. fear of reprisal Causes and effects:  Causes and effects Adorno et al’s (1950) psychodynamic theory of the development of authoritarianism Discussion of the theory:  Discussion of the theory How was the theory built (what methodology was adopted)? Straightforward social science project Interviewed people, looked for common patterns in both histories and attitudes/behaviours Once this was done, built scales (F-scale, etc). Found the psychometric properties of the scales. Validated and refined the F-scale by various means (discriminant validation, confirmatory methods, etc.) The F-scale was then used to further the theory and select people for further interviews Here comes the error…:  Here comes the error… Serious error in the F-scale: Acquiescence bias All items worded in the same direction (agreement = authoritarianism) What about people who naturally tend to agree (acquiescent subjects) ? Does a high F-score mean high authoritarianism or high acquiescence? No way to know Acquiescence is a 'third variable' Other criticisms:  Other criticisms Freudian basis is highly suspect (shaky foundations) Extensive use of projective tests (e.g. TAT) – known to be of low reliability and suspect validity Was it research or a criticism of a particular political system? Cannot predict prejudice in societies were prejudice is the norm (e.g. South Africa) Recommended Show me the money – empirical evidence:  Show me the money – empirical evidence Several relational studies How strongly is prejudice related to authoritarianism? Look at normatively prejudiced societies AND normatively non-prejudiced ones Not very impressive correlations: Strongest: Ray (1980) r = 0.59 (R2 = 0.34) Weakest: Orpen andamp; van der Schyff (1972) r = 0.05 (R2 = 0.0025) Uncorrected average over 25 studies: r = 0.28 (R2 = 0.0784) Is Authoritarianism useless?:  Is Authoritarianism useless? Should we drop the notion of a personality trait which predicts prejudice? Criticisms mostly aimed at specifics of Adorno et al’s theory, rather than the concept Still useful in societies where prejudice is not normative Rephrase: Personality variables affect prejudice in certain social climates The concept overhauled: RWA:  The concept overhauled: RWA 1980’s: Authoritarianism re-done by Bob Altemeyer (Uni. Winnipeg) Looked at all the research on Authoritarian personality, re-analyzed it Replaces Freudian notions with more modern ideas such as attitudes and cognition Comes up with a simplified version of Authoritarianism: RWA (right-wing authoritarianism) Features of RWAs:  Features of RWAs Altemeyer reduces authoritarianism to three dimensions only (Adorno et al had 9) Submit to established authorities [Authoritarian submission] Tend to be punitive, harsh [Authoritarian aggression] Conform to conventional standards [Conventionalism] Makes a shift from personality to personality dimension Typical RWA attitudes:  Typical RWA attitudes Attitudes found in RWAs include: High in prejudice (gay, minorities, environmentalists, feminists) Politically conservative High in religiosity (exaggerated piety/zeal; emphasis on sentiment rather than behaviour) and fundamentalism Perceive the world as being very dangerous. Typical RWA cognitive styles:  Typical RWA cognitive styles High RWAs have a cognitive style which leads to: Trouble at spotting false inferences ('yea-saying'). Prone to self-contradiction Difficulty disengaging critical thought from religious beliefs More prone to fundamental attribution error (overestimate individual factors and underestimate group factors) Difficulty in dealing with ambiguities Implication of RWA cognitive style (don’t copy down!!):  Implication of RWA cognitive style (don’t copy down!!) 'The amount of money universities have to carry out their leftwing mission is mind-boggling. Whereas conservative and pro-American intellectual sources (such as the Heritage Foundation and the American Enterprise Institute) and conservative journals may have budgets of a few million dollars, universities have billions of dollars. A great portion is taxpayers' money (through research grants and student- financed tuition), and in addition the leftists control most student activity assessments.' (Eagle Forum Collegiate) Can RWA theory helps us gain an insight into why this statement would be convincing? Measuring RWA & examples:  Measuring RWA andamp; examples Also uses a Likert-type agreement scale, but with half of the items reversed Our country will be destroyed someday if we do not end the perversions eating away at out moral fibre and moral beliefs [A] Our prisons are a shocking disgrace. Criminals are unfortunate people who deserve much better care, instead of so much punishment. [A - reversed item] What our country needs is more discipline, with everyone following our leaders in unity [S] There is no 'One Right Way' to live life; everybody has to create their own way [C - reversed item] One good way to teach certain people right from wrong is to give them a good stiff punishment when they get out of line. [C] A 'woman's place' should be wherever she wants to be. The days when women are submissive to their husbands and social convention belong strictly in the past. [C – reversed item] Development of RWA:  Development of RWA Altemeyer: Cognitive style is learnt at home Early socialization is important Parents/guardians play a large role No displaced aggression – plain old learned behaviour The child learns about hierarchy, submission, etc. by observation, punishment andamp; reward Cognitive style follows as a consequence Conservatism is passed down from parents (no unconscious stuff at work) So, choose your parents carefully! The Authoritarian gene?:  The Authoritarian gene? McCourt et al (1999) Study of monozygotic / dizygotic twins raised apart/together Found 50% variance due to genetic factors; 35% only for unshared environment Conclusion – genes more important than upbringing in RWA Katz andamp; Barrett (1997) As young as 6 months, can distinguish ‘high-bias’ and ‘low-bias’ children ‘high-bias’ children paid more attention to race of adults entering the room Too young for parental influence to be a major factor Another perspective: SDT:  Another perspective: SDT Social Dominance Theory (Sidanius andamp; Pratto, 1999) Another explanation of the role of personality in prejudice Extremely simple, elegant view One single personality dimension: Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) Takes into account not only the individual (as Adorno et al andamp; Altemyer do), but also the divisions which exist in society Basics of SDT:  Societies create hierarchies based on three features: Age Gender [these two exist in all societies] 'empty set' (arbitrary stuff - race, wealth, political party, religion) [only in societies producing economic surplus] Hierarchies according to these groups are kept at particular levels by legitimizing myths The interesting question: What importance does a particular person give to these hierarchies? (what is their level of social dominance orientation - SDO?) Basics of SDT Legitimizing myths:  Legitimizing myths The degree to which societies emphasize hierarchies is controlled by legitimizing myths Hierarchy Emphasizing myths (HE) – racism, sexism, nationalism Hierarchy Attenuating myths (HA) – socialism, multiculturalism, universal rights The degree to which HE and HA myths prevail in a society sets how important hierarchies are for that society Measuring the myths – SDO scale:  Measuring the myths – SDO scale Likert-type questionnaire; HA and HE items (emphasis on measuring the focus on hierarchies) HA items examples: Some groups of people are simply inferior to others If certain groups stayed in their place, we would have fewer problems Sometimes other groups must be kept in their place HE items examples: It would be good if all groups could be equal Group equality should be our ideal All groups should be given an equal chance in life Development of SDO & Maintenance of hierarchies:  Development of SDO andamp; Maintenance of hierarchies

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

The Authoritarian Personality Perspectives from Adorno et ...

The Authoritarian Personality Perspectives from Adorno et al. and Altemeyer PSY203S. Published byVictoria Hart Modified about 1 year ago
Read more

PPT – The Authoritarian Personality PowerPoint ...

Title: The Authoritarian Personality 1 The Authoritarian Personality. Perspectives from Adorno et al. and Altemeyer ; PSY203S; 2 Setting the scene. Late ...
Read more

Martial Arts Cults: Authoritarian Personality

The authoritarian personality is characterized ... The goal of authoritarian personalities is not ... http://people.cs.uct.ac.za/~dnunez/psy203s/auth ...
Read more

The Authoritarian Personality Tuesday, October 1st, 2002 ...

The Authoritarian Personality Tuesday, October 1st, 2002 Joyce S. Pang. Published byNoel Daniel Modified 8 months ago
Read more

Authoritarian Personality T. Adorno, E. Frenkel-Brunswik ...

Authoritarian Personality T. Adorno, E. Frenkel-Brunswik, D. Levinson, R. Nevitt Sanford 1950.
Read more

Critical Theory of the Frankfurt School: An Interdisciplinar

Transcript of Critical Theory of the Frankfurt School: An Interdisciplinar. Late 40s, early 50s Europe recovering from WWII Anti-communist sentiments in US
Read more

Starter 1 write on the whiteboards 5 questions you could ...

Starter 1 write on the whiteboards 5 questions you could use to measure obedience Use a likert/rating scale Strongly disagree………..Agree Very ...
Read more