Preservation Challenge Radioactive Waste Ian Upshall

64 %
36 %
Information about Preservation Challenge Radioactive Waste Ian Upshall

Published on November 7, 2008

Author: DigitalPreservationEurope

Source: slideshare.net

Description

3rd Annual WePreserve Conference Nice 2008

Long Term Access to Digital Records – The Challenge Facing Managers of Radioactive Waste Ian Upshall Information & Data Recording Manager

Radioactive Waste

Radioactive Waste

Radioactive Waste

The Need for Waste Records Strategic Needs • societal expectations • regulatory expectations • international reporting obligations • government requirements • national decision making Operational Needs • management of a hazardous material • safety and quality assurance • informing stakeholders • operational decision making

How Long is ‘Long Term’? Factors affecting record retention time: • radiological impact of the waste • repository oversight period • regulatory requirements • societal expectations Potential record retention times: • LLW: 50+ years after repository closure? • ILW/HLW: 100-1000+ years after repository closure?

Recorded Information Documents contain a combination of: • metadata • contextual information • tabulated data • descriptive text • references to other records • photographic images and diagrams • mathematic and scientific formulae Other records, including: • databases, spreadsheets, macros, software code, programmes (e.g. MS Project files), CAD engineering drawings

Records Currently in Use • Hard copy records • paper (all qualities and types), microform • Digital records • removable (magnetic and optical), online and offline (a typical waste package record will comprise a combination of these) • Other record media • material samples (rock, metals, concretes, polymers)

Status of Current Records • waste records are generally co-located with the waste on the nuclear site • few records are stored in recognised, managed ‘archive’ facilities • some additional (contextual) records are held by non-waste management stakeholders • some records are already up to 50 years old and may already be inaccessible using ‘conventional’ tools • records directly associated with a specific item or activity may employ different media and file formats

Guidance for Records Managers • IAEA Guidance Reports: • data requirements, media, management systems • Regulator Guidance: • based upon IAEA guidance, UK specific • Consultancies and SMEs • Suppliers • archives, materials & equipment • Nuclear Decommissioning Authority • policy, best practise, guidance

Generic Challenges Generic • timescales • profligacy of records – particularly digital • maintenance of provenance and authenticity • transfer of responsibilities over time • changing status – operational/historic/public • ‘physical’ access – security considerations • ‘informatic’ access: • readability, intelligibility, usability • changes in language and terminology

Digital Record Challenges Specific • transferable and sustainable file formats • managing explicit digital links • accurate transfer of complex objects: • CAD drawings, photographs, video • quantity of recorded information • impact on search and find • post-creation digitization • potential loss of provenance and links • digital record media management • quality, validation, change control

CAD Example Historic • 2D based repository design application • e.g. use of AutoCAD Contemporary • Building Information Management (BIM) • 3D object-based • multiple interconnected supporting databases • change control and ‘audit trail’ • maintaining the links ‘up and down’

What is Needed • internationally recognised ‘digitisation standards’ for strategies and file formats • recognition of long term implications • guidance on best practise • guidance on ‘what not to do’ • ‘simple’ and ‘complex’ digital record strategies • cooperation and support that transcends time and organisational structures (national and international)

Current Projects • development of regulator guidance on records management • development of a National Nuclear Archive (NNA) • consideration of the merits and potential difficulties associated with the implementation of a National Nuclear Network (a UK WAN)

Thank You

Add a comment

Related pages

Knowledge management for radioactive waste management ...

Ian Upshall is the Information and Data Recording ... radioactive waste management ... a serious challenge when considering the timescales ...
Read more

The International Journal of Digital Curation - ijdc.net

The International Journal of Digital Curation ... preservation challenge. ... facing managers of radioactive waste, ...
Read more

The British Radwaste Information Management ... - ASME DC

Ian Upshall. United Kingdom Nirex ... is widely accepted as a vital component of a national radioactive waste management ... The British Radwaste ...
Read more

For the record - Nuclear Engineering International

For the record 13 October 2005 ... may be acceptable but the preservation of radioactive waste data does not fall ... Cumbria CA20 1P, UK. Ian Upshall, UK ...
Read more

The British Radwaste Information Management System (BRIMS ...

Ian Upshall. DOI: 10.1115/ICEM2003-4808 ... ASME 2003 9th International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management and Environmental Remediation
Read more

Associates

Dr Russell Alexander has been involved in radioactive waste disposal for ... Ian Upshall Associate. Ian Upshall ... for the recording and preservation of ...
Read more

INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL INTERNATIONAL ...

international council on archives conseil international des archives radioactive waste information: ... australia, and ian upshall, ...
Read more

Radioactive Waste... | LinkedIn

View 881 Radioactive Waste... posts, presentations, experts, and more. Get the professional knowledge you need on LinkedIn. LinkedIn Home What is LinkedIn?
Read more