powerpoint colorado

100 %
0 %
Information about powerpoint colorado
Entertainment

Published on October 30, 2007

Author: Jeremiah

Source: authorstream.com

Instant Runoff Voting and Proportional Voting:  Instant Runoff Voting and Proportional Voting Rob Richie Executive Director, FairVote www.fairvote.org FairVote:  FairVote Researches and develops innovative reform policies Board chairman is John B. Anderson, former Congressman and presidential candidate Non-partisan and non-profit, but advocacy-oriented Widely recognized as leading national organization backing proportional voting and instant runoff voting Today’s Presentation:  Today’s Presentation General discussion of voting methods Instant runoff voting What it is and where used in the USA How it fares with task force criteria Your questions and concerns Proportional voting Candidate-based systems in U.S. citie; party based systems in many nations How systems fare with task force criteria Your questions and concerns Instant Runoff Voting: Summary:  Instant Runoff Voting: Summary What is an instant runoff ballot Its use for overseas/military voters Comparison with runoff elections Comparison with plurality voting What Is Instant Runoff Voting:  What Is Instant Runoff Voting A ranked choice ballot pioneered for national elections in Australia & Ireland: Voters rank 1, 2, 3 Requires a majority to elect a candidate (typically) Eliminate weak candidates. Allocate those voters’ ballots to next choices until a majority winner Has earned support of John McCain, Barack Obama, several state League of Women Voters. Robert’s Rules of Order recommends for mail elections. Success on the Ballot and In City Councils and Legislatures:  Success on the Ballot and In City Councils and Legislatures Record on City Ballots, 2004-2006: 8 wins, 0 losses Average Victory Share : 68% Used in San Francisco (CA), Burlington (VT) and Takoma Park (MD). Soon in Minneapolis (MN), Pierce County (WA), Berkeley & Oakland (CA), Cary and Hendersonville (NC) Legislation: 2006 law in North Carolina to establish pilots in cities and counties. 2007 bill in Vermont to use IRV for Congress passes state senate. Overseas voters: Arkansas, So. Carolina, Louisiana How IRV Works:  How IRV Works Retally Ballots Is there a majority winner? IRV Ballots:  IRV Ballots The voter is presented with a list of all candidates and has option to rank them The voter may choose to give just a first preference instead of ranking choices. An Example of Why IRV Matters:  An Example of Why IRV Matters Contrasting majority rule when 2 candidates run and more than 2 candidates run Plurality: Two Candidates:  Plurality: Two Candidates Winner Candidate A 55% Candidate B 45% Loser Plurality: Three Candidates:  Plurality: Three Candidates Winner But majority prefer A over B Siphons-off more votes from A than B What Happened without IRV?:  What Happened without IRV? If Candidate A were running against Candidate B, Candidate A would win by 10%: 55% to 45%. But then you add Candidate C to the mix, with similar views to Candidate A. Candidate B now wins by 7%-- even though a loser with the same voters in a head to head race. What IRV is Not: “Bucklin” Voting:  What IRV is Not: “Bucklin” Voting In Bucklin voting (named after CO-based inventor), voters can indicate a 2nd choice. If no majority winner, all 2nd choices are added to all 1st choices. System was used a century ago in major Colorado cities like Denver, Fort Collins, Pueblo, Colorado Spring and Grand Junction. Also used for several major statewide primaries in the South. Voters increasingly chose not to rank 2nd choices because that ranking counted against their 1st choice (similar to approval voting). In one hotly contested Alabama gubernatorial race, nearly 90% of voters did not indicate a 2nd choice. IRV in Practice: San Francisco:  IRV in Practice: San Francisco 2004 Election: Seven city council races Majority winners identified despite big fields Studies show all racial and ethnic groups handle IRV effectively – very low error rates Exit polls show only 14% want old runoffs 2005 Election: Three citywide offices Valid ballots in most contested race: 99.6% Turnout 3 times higher than in old runoffs IRV in Practice: Burlington:  IRV in Practice: Burlington 2006 Mayoral Election Five candidates in open seat election First place finisher wins 39% of first choices, then wins in instant runoff count Valid ballots: 99.9%. Lowest-income ward: - Of 1200 ballots, only 2 invalid. - 93% ranked one of final 2 candidates IRV preferred to runoffs by 4 to 1 in exit poll Low cost of implementation IRV Ballots and Military Voters:  IRV Ballots and Military Voters Tested solution to protect overseas voters in all state and federal election runoffs in Louisiana, Arkansas, South Carolina Addresses problem of short turnaround time between first round and second round. Voter receives an IRV ballot or a regular ballot with an IRV ballot. The IRV ballot is counted in the runoff toward the runoff candidate ranked highest IRV Ballots vs. Delayed Runoffs:  IRV Ballots vs. Delayed Runoffs Instant runoff voting can determine a majority winner in one election. As a result, IRV: saves money eliminates hassle for voters and administrators maximizes voter turnout in decisive election reduces money in politics reduces concern about “wasting” votes IRV vs. Plurality Voting:  IRV vs. Plurality Voting Protects majority rule when more than two candidates seek a one-winner office Vacancies are a good example Primary elections for open seats, such as the upcoming presidential primaries General elections with third parties and independents Addresses controversy of “spoilers” leading to election of candidates opposed by majority Tends to reduce mud-slinging campaigns among certain candidates pursuing the same voters IRV & Task Force Criteria, Page 1:  IRV & Task Force Criteria, Page 1 Provides voters with real choices / addresses spoiler effect / minimizes wasted votes? – Yes (qualified) Is simple/easy for voters to understand and easy for government to administer – Yes (qualified) Increases voter turnout/participation? – Yes (qualified) Fair party representation? – No impact IRV & Task Force Criteria, Page 2:  IRV & Task Force Criteria, Page 2 Positive/high quality campaigning – Yes (qualified) Resists voter fraud/manipulation – Yes (qualified) Balanced gender and ethnic representation – No Impact Balanced geographic /cultural representation – No Impact Your questions and concerns?:  Your questions and concerns? Proportional Voting: Overview:  Proportional Voting: Overview The international norm: Of 40 largest democracies with high human rights ratings, only the United States and Canada do not use a proportional system for at least one national election. Canadian provinces debating “PR” seriously – Ontario to vote in October. The principle: Like-minded voters earn representation in proportion to their share of the popular vote. An important history of use in American cities and the Illinois state legislature Examples of Approaches:  Examples of Approaches “Super districts”: Multi-seat districts with 3-to-5 seats, using a proportional system like choice voting or cumulative voting “Single-member district plus”: Combination of one-seat districts and compensatory seats Choice Voting in Super Districts:  Choice Voting in Super Districts Used in Ireland & all Scottish cities In Model City charter as option American history See other Powerpoint Proportional Voting & Task Force Criteria, Page 1:  Proportional Voting & Task Force Criteria, Page 1 Provides voters with real choices / addresses spoiler effect / minimizes wasted votes? – Yes (qualified) Is simple/easy for voters to understand and easy for government to administer – Yes (qualified) Increases voter turnout/participation? – Yes Fair party representation? – No impact Proportional Voting & Task Force Criteria, Page 2:  Proportional Voting & Task Force Criteria, Page 2 Positive/high quality campaigning – Yes (qualified) Resists voter fraud/manipulation – Yes (qualified) Balanced gender and ethnic representation – Yes (qualified) Balanced geographical & cultural representation – Yes Three Potential Steps to Reform :  Three Potential Steps to Reform Citizens assemblies: Canadian model Pilot programs: North Carolina and United Kingdom Voting equipment requirements: Put flexibility for alternative voting methods into equipment standards FairVote:  FairVote Rob Richie RR@fairvote.org (301) 270-4616 www.fairvote.org

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

PowerPoint Templates - Colorado - Indezine

Colorado PowerPoint Templates and Backgrounds. ... Template Index → Download this template, plus more (25 in all) Colorado PowerPoint Templates and ...
Read more

PowerPoint Landkarte Colorado Counties (USA ...

Stellen Sie Standorte, regionale Eigenschaften oder Marketing- und Vertriebsgebiete mit Hilfe der PowerPoint Landkarte Colorado Counties dar.
Read more

PowerPoint Map Colorado Counties (USA) | PresentationLoad

Get the Federal State Colorado Counties as a detailed PowerPoint-template. The map can easily be adapted and edited in PowerPoint.
Read more

5,000+ COLORADO PowerPoint PPTs on PowerShow.com

View Colorado presentations online, safely and virus-free! Many are downloadable. Learn new and interesting things. Get ideas for your own presentations.
Read more

PowerPoint Presentation - colorado.gov

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Peace Last modified by: Admin Created Date: 3/28/2011 2:40:35 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3)
Read more

US State Colorado County Map Template for Microsoft ...

Premium PowerPoint Map of US State Colorado. This detailed PowerPoint Map Template shows Colorado counties, county names and biggest cities including the ...
Read more

Free PowerPoint Presentations about State Study: Colorado ...

Pete's PowerPoint Station is your destination for free PowerPoint presentations for kids and teachers about State Study: Colorado, and so much more.
Read more