Post primary sse november 2012 0

33 %
67 %
Information about Post primary sse november 2012 0
Education

Published on March 8, 2014

Author: brownm7

Source: slideshare.net

School Self-Evaluation Seminar for Post-Primary School Principals 2012 Session 1

Overview of seminar Session 1 9.15 – 11.00 SSE : Context and rationale Introduction and overview of School Self-evaluation Guidelines The school self evaluation process ; an overview Reflection - Where are we now? 11.00 – 11.15 Coffee Session 2 SSE through the lens of Literacy – working through the process Spotlight on Target Setting Reflection – The process in action 11.15 – 12.45 12.45 – 1.45 Lunch Session 3 SSE through the lens of Numeracy – working through the process Reflection – where to next? 1.45 – 3.15 The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Session 1 objectives • To introduce the School Self –Evaluation Guidelines for Post-Primary Schools • To provide a rationale for school self evaluation • To set the context for school self-evaluation • To outline the school self-evaluation process The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Reflection.. What questions do you currently have about planning for and implementing the Self - Evaluation process in your school? The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

What is in it for your school? Affirms good practices Inclusive of all voices Trusts teachers’ professionalism Improvements in learning Acknowledges school context Evidence based judgements The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

School Selfevaluation External Evaluation School Improvement The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

A reframing of the SDP process 4. Implementation and monitoring 5. Evaluation Gather solid evidence Analyse it 1. Review Make judgements 3. Action Plan 2. Prioritise and set target(s) The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Introducing the Guidelines The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Key Messages • The primary purpose of school self-evaluation is to improve the quality of learner outcomes • School self-evaluation is an internal, reflective process of school review which requires schools to examine their practice honestly and critically • The gathering of evidence to justify and to inform action planning for improvement is a fundamental principle of school self-evaluation The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

To summarise… The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Broad requirements • build on the existing SDP process • evaluate the quality of teaching and learning in literacy, numeracy and at least one other aspect of T & L over the four year period from 2012/13 to 2015/16 • write a short SSE report for the area examined • devise a SIP for aspects of practice identified for improvement in the area examined • First SIP to be in place by June 2013 • subject departments set targets to improve outcomes for students in the subject and to support and improve the acquisition of literacy and numeracy skills The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

The Teaching and Learning Quality Framework Theme Teaching & Learning Learner outcomes Learner experiences The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013 Teachers’ practices 12

Getting started; using the teaching and learning framework Page 24 / 25

The Teaching and Learning Quality Framework Sub-themes Theme Teaching & Learning Learner outcomes • Attainment of curriculum objectives Learning experiences • Learning environment • Engagement in learning • Learning to learn Teachers’ practices • • • • The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013 Preparation for teaching Teaching approaches Management of students Assessment 14

Towards the Six-Step Process : a recap  Engage in collaborative staff reflection using Fig 3.3 P. 25  Consider questions on pg. 12 to guide discussion  Consult readily available assessment records and results of standardised tests  Select subthemes to be evaluated using the evaluation criteria (Chapter 4)  Begin the six-step school self-evaluation process through the lens of the subthemes selected The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Key steps in the SSE Process Gather evidence Implement and monitor improvement plan Devise a 3-year school improvement plan Analyse the evidence Make judgments about strengths and areas for development Write school selfevaluation report The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Considerations Mixture of data • Quantitative • Qualitative Triangulation of data Teachers Students Parents BOM DES & SEC SC & HSCL NEPS Other agencies Gather enough that is relevant and sufficiently informs the line of enquiry in order to avoid overload and facilitate effective analysis

The Teaching and Learning Quality Framework Theme Learner outcomes Evidence Teaching & Learning Learning experiences Standardised/ STen scores, CAT, SEC, copies, class tests, attitudinal survey •Questionnaires •Learning log •Observation Teachers’ practices • Focus group • Questionnaires The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013 18

• What is this evidence telling us ? • What are our findings? • Any clear areas of strength/areas in need of improvement emerging? • How do our findings fit with our current views? Analyse evidence using evaluation criteria/quality statements The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

• Under the subthemes selected, use the relevant evaluation criteria/quality statement based on identified strengths and areas for improvement • Judge overall quality by indicating the school’s current position along the continuum Judgements made against the criteria or quality statements must be based on the information or evidence gathered The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Page 63 SSE Reports should be no longer than 2 / 3 pages The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

P 68 Page 68 SSE must result in the setting of specific targets towards action for improvement – keep plans short! The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Who? What? When? How? Building in time for monitoring and review allows for adjustments to be made and ensures SSE is a living process The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Provides direction Provides focus

Inclusive Schools : fundamental principles • Inclusion • Differentiation • Team Teaching The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

One school’s story The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Reflection Take time now to consider your school’s current position with regard to SSE. Discuss and share where you are at and share your experiences or plans. The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Key Messages • The primary purpose of school self-evaluation is to improve the quality of learner outcomes • School self-evaluation is an internal, reflective process of school review which requires schools to examine their practice honestly and critically • The gathering of evidence to justify and to inform action planning for improvement is a fundamental principle of school self-evaluation The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

School Self-Evaluation Seminar for Post-Primary School Principals 2012 Session 2

Objectives Session 2 • To illustrate the 6 step SSE process through the lens of a literacy example • To provide specific guidance in the area of Target Setting The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Literacy Literacy includes the capacity to read, understand and critically appreciate various forms of communication including spoken language, printed text, broadcast media, and digital media. (Literacy & Numeracy for Learning and Life 2011, p.8) The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Literacy Worked example School Biography • • • • • • • All girls voluntary secondary school Under the trusteeship of CEIST 700 students 45 teachers Urban 20 feeder-schools Literacy core team in place The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Link Model WHOLE STAFF SUBJECT DEPARTMENTS Modern Foreign Languages Business Science Careers & SEN History & Geography Maths Practical Subjects & PE SSE Core Team Senior Link Teacher Management LiteracyPDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills Training The SSE Training under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013 English & Irish

Literacy example Attainment of curriculum objectives Engagement in learning Teaching approaches The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

What do you want to find out? THEME Learner Outcomes Learning experience SUB-THEME Attainment of curriculum objectives Engagement in Learning Teaching Approaches QUESTIONS BASED ON EVALUATION CRITERIA Attainment? Progress? Literacy skills? Attitude to literacy? Active? Motivated? Collaborative? Independent? Methods? Resources? ICT? TOOLS 1. STen scores 2. JC & LC results 3. Students work 4. Questionnaire 5. Questionnaire The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013 Teachers’ Practice

Guiding staff reflection Learner outcomes  Students’ overall attainment, with regard to knowledge, understanding and skills in subjects and programmes, has improved significantly in line with targets; and expected outcomes have been achieved  Students enjoy learning the subject and have developed appropriate attitudes and dispositions Learning experiences  Learning settings are safe, well maintained, visually stimulating and supportive of literacy and numeracy  Students have access to appropriate materials, including ICT, to support learning  Students are enabled to engage actively in a range of suitably challenging, relevant and interesting learning opportunities  Students can meet the literacy and numeracy challenges of the subject  Students are given support as needed  Students at risk of underachieving have made good progress  Students are equipped with tools and skills for learning now and in the future.  Students’ uptake levels and performance in state examinations compares favourably with national norms, within the school context. Teachers’ practice  Teachers prepare thoroughly for lessons; expected learning outcomes including literacy and numeracy development are clearly stated; and necessary resources are in place  Expected learning outcomes are clearly communicated; lessons are suitably paced to enable progression in development of knowledge and skills  Teaching is focused, stimulating and relevant. All aspects of the subject, including subjectspecific language, are thoroughly taught  All students are respected; high but realistic expectations are communicated; and efforts and achievements are affirmed  A range of assessment methods is used effectively to assess progress.

6th class report cards The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

2012 1st Year Reading Sten Score Analysis 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% School 15% National 10% 5% 0% 1 to 3 (well below average) 4 5 to 6 (average) 7 8 to 10 (well above average) The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Well below average below av average average above av well above average School National

Other Assessment Data • What most schools are doing? • Click here for an overview of information on standardised testing in primary & postprimary schools in Ireland. • Link to presentation ……………… The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Analysis of State Exams The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Analysis of JC & LC Subject X 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% School 30% National 20% 10% 0% JC taking higher JC obtaining LC taking higher LC Obtaining level paper honours grade level paper honours grade The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Scanning 6th class report cards • Screen shot of report card • Link to circular The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

SEC Chief Examiners Report JC Geography 2011 • Ensure that students are aware of the difference between description, explanation & effects. • To this end students could be encouraged to develop descriptions & explanations both in their class work & homework. The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Sample editing/writing checklist devised by the whole staff Satisfactory Spelling – fewer than 3 errors Punctuation & Grammar – fewer than 3 errors Sequencing (new paragraphs/bullet point used for new ideas in correct order) Vocabulary (general & subject specific) Clearly used Structure of sentence/answer – full sentences used/answers developed to the standard required by the question. The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013 Not satisfactory

Samples of student’s work from a range of subjects The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Analysis of students’ written work from a sample across the curriculum 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% Satisfactory 20% Not Satisfactory 10% 0% The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Sample questionnaire for students Click here for survey

The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Student Survey • • • • Strengths 50% read for more than 1 hr. 60% reading fiction & magazines Students experience a variety of variety of methodologies. Students are confident working in pairs & groups Priorities for improvement • Very few students believe that their writing is legible & even fewer edit their own work. • More students prefer to write on facebook than other genres. • A general lack of confidence in speaking in class discussions.

Sample questionnaire for teachers Click here for survey

Teachers Survey • • • • Strengths 54% of teachers are using comprehension strategies Cooperative learning strategies being used. Use of multiple text types i.e. broadcast & digital media. Clear focused feedback is given to students Priorities for improvement • Further use of comprehension strategies by all teachers • Agreed success criteria shared with students for improving writing process is clearly needed. • Questioning techniques to improve verbal & written answers.

Activity • Identify strengths and areas for improvement from the evidence you have been allocated • Collate strengths and areas for improvement using the diagnostic window The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Consult appropriate evaluation criteria to support your analysis THEME Learner Outcomes Learning Experiences Teachers’ Practice SUBTHEME Attainment of curriculum objectives Engagement in learning Teaching approaches Evaluation criteria p. 30 p. 34 p. 40 The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Checking In • Recording findings, strengths and areas for improvement • Benchmarking the findings for the identified themes/subthemes with the relevant evaluation criteria/quality statement The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Targets Improvement targets may relate to any aspect of pupils’ achievement, including their knowledge, skills and their attitudes. ( SSE Guidelines p.61 ) The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

SMART Targets • Specific - focus on student learning outcomes • Measurable –clear and precise • Attainable - reflect ability and needs of studentsappropriately challenging / ambitious • Realistic – to both school context, baseline data and specific actions • Timed - allowing time for planned actions to be implemented

Language of targets To increase To cut To expand To decrease To meet To raise To reduce To complete The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

A useful formula … Verb Thing affected From (baseline) Level intended By (date) An example: To increase (verb) the percentage of pupils taking higher level english(thing effected) from 60% (baseline) to 65% (level intended) by the end of year 1 (date), 70% by the end of year 2 and 75% by the end of year 3. TARGETS NEED TO REFLECT A SCHOOLS INTENTION TO IMPROVE ON ITS PREVIOUS BEST The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Baseline Target . Action Success Criteria .

School Improvement Plan • Image of report The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Who? What? When? How? The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

One school’s story The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Reflect and discuss In what way has this activity developed your understanding of • use of evaluation methods/tools • data analysis and interpretation • writing an SSE report • devising a school improvement plan to include targets? The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Key Messages • The primary purpose of school self-evaluation is to improve the quality of learner outcomes • School self-evaluation is an internal, reflective process of school review which requires schools to examine their practice honestly and critically • The gathering of evidence to justify and to inform action planning for improvement is a fundamental principle of school self-evaluation The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

School Self-Evaluation Seminar for Post-Primary School Principals 2012 Session 3

Objectives Session 3 • To consolidate the six step SSE process through the lens of a numeracy example • To provide participants with an opportunity to reflect on and consider next steps The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Numeracy Numeracy encompasses the ability to use mathematical understanding and skills to solve problems and meet the demands of day-to-day living in complex social settings. (Literacy & Numeracy for Learning and Life 2011, p.8) The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Numeracy worked example School Biography • • • • • • DEIS Mixed Urban 300 students 15% EAL students TY & LCA The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Link Model WHOLE STAFF SUBJECT DEPARTMENTS Modern Foreign Languages Business Science Careers & SEN History & Geography Maths Practical Subjects SSE Core Team Link Teacher Senior Management The PDST is funded Numeracy Training by the Department of Education Training SSE and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013 English & Irish

Numeracy example Attainment of curriculum objectives Engagement in learning Teaching approaches The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

What do you want to find out? THEME Learner Outcomes Learning experience SUB-THEME Attainment of curriculum objectives Engagement in Learning Teaching Approaches QUESTIONS BASED ON EVALUATION CRITERIA Attainment? Progress? Numeracy skills? Attitude to numeracy? Active? Motivated? Collaborative? Independent? Methods? Consistency? Whole school approach? TOOLS 1. CAT scores 2. JC & LC results 3. Maths CRT 4. Questionnaire 5. Focus group with numeracy schedule prompt question The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013 Teachers’ Practice

Guiding Staff Reflection Learner outcomes  Students’ overall attainment, with regard to knowledge, understanding and skills in subjects and programmes, has improved significantly in line with targets; and expected outcomes have been achieved  Students enjoy learning the subject and have developed appropriate attitudes and dispositions Learning experiences  Learning settings are safe, well maintained, visually stimulating and supportive of literacy and numeracy  Students have access to appropriate materials, including ICT, to support learning  Students are enabled to engage actively in a range of suitably challenging, relevant and interesting learning opportunities  Students can meet the literacy and numeracy challenges of the subject  Students are given support as needed  Students at risk of underachieving have made good progress  Students are equipped with tools and skills for learning now and in the future.  Students’ uptake levels and performance in state examinations compares favourably with national norms, within the school context. Teachers’ practice  Teachers prepare thoroughly for lessons; expected learning outcomes including literacy and numeracy development are clearly stated; and necessary resources are in place  Expected learning outcomes are clearly communicated; lessons are suitably paced to enable progression in development of knowledge and skills  Teaching is focused, stimulating and relevant. All aspects of the subject, including subjectspecific language, are thoroughly taught  All students are respected; high but realistic expectations are communicated; and efforts and achievements are affirmed  A range of assessment methods is used effectively to assess progress.

Analysis of CAT scores 30% 25% 20% 15% School National 10% 5% 0% <74 74 to 82 to 89 to 97 to 104 to 12 to 19 to 126+ 81 88 96 103 111 118 126 The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Well below average…………………………….average….…………………………… well above average School National

Analysis of State Exams The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Analysis of JC & LC Maths 90% 82% 79% 80% 70% 60% 48% 50% 50% 50% School 40% 30% 20% 10% 22% 22% 7% 0% JC taking higher JC obtaining LC taking higher LC obtaining level paper honours grade level paper honours grade The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013 National

Maths Criterion Referenced Test Bar chart showing the percentage of students who answered questions correctly 120% 100% 80% Target: 80% of cohort to achieve proficiency Target: 60% of cohort to achieve proficiency 60% 40% 20% 0% The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Sample questionnaire for students Click here for survey

Student Survey Strengths • 52% of students like maths • 57% of students check their answers • 79% said there was usually more than one way to work out a problem • Students are engaging in independent & cooperative learning • 81% believe they need maths after school Priorities for improvement • Only 15% of students felt that teachers had a positive attitude to maths • Only 11% of students said they are good at figuring out questions they have not seen before • 29% of students said they are not good at explaining maths in their own words

Activity • Identify strengths and areas for improvement from the evidence you have been allocated • Collate strengths and areas for improvement using the diagnostic window The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Consult appropriate evaluation criteria to support your analysis THEME Learner Outcomes Learner Experiences Teachers’ Practice SUBTHEME Attainment of curriculum objectives Engagement in learning Teaching approaches Evaluation criteria p. 30 p. 34 p. 40 The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Checking In • Recording findings, strengths and areas for improvement • Identifying themes/subthemes emerging from the findings • Benchmarking the findings for the identified themes/subthemes with the relevant evaluation criteria/quality statement The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

1. Introduction 1.1 The focus of the evaluation 1.2 School context 2. The findings 3. Progress made on previously-identified improvement targets 4. Summary of school self-evaluation findings 4.1 Our school has strengths in the following areas: (List the main strengths of the school with regard to teaching and learning)) 4.2 Thefollowing areas are prioritised for improvement: (Specify the aspects of teaching and learning that need to be improved) 4.3 The following legislative and regulatory requirements need to be addressed. (Specify the aspects that need to be addressed) SSE Reports should be no longer than 2 / 3 pages The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

School Improvement Plan • Image of report The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Who? What? When? How? The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Broad requirements • build on the existing SDP process • evaluate the quality of teaching and learning in literacy, numeracy and at least one other aspect of T & L over the four year period from 2012/13 to 2015/16 • write a short SSE report for the area examined • devise a SIP for aspects of practice identified for improvement in the area examined • First SIP to be in place by June 2013 • subject departments set targets to improve outcomes for students in the subject and to support and improve the acquisition of literacy and numeracy skills The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

A roadmap for the next 4 years Year 1 2012/13 Year 2 2013/14 Literacy Implement SIP for Gather evidence Literacy SIP in place by June 2013 Numeracy Gather evidence SIP in place by June 2014 Year 3 2014/15 Year 4 2015/16 Implement SIP for Numeracy Implement SIP for other area Continue to implement and monitor SIP for Literacy Continue to implement and monitor SIP for Literacy and SIP for Numeracy Other Area Gather evidence SIP in place by June 2015 The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

One school’s story The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Reflect … what next? In light of today’s seminar what actions do you need consider in the • short term • medium term • long term? The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Remaining Questions The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Link Teacher Seminar The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

SSE: Support for schools Department of Education and Skills: Inspectorate www.schoolself-evaluation.ie www.pdst.ie The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Support yourselves • Plan for SSE – link it to your existing school improvement agenda • Integrate SSE into the day to day life of your school • Allow time • Share the tasks • Acknowledge your context The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

SSE: What’s in it for schools? • SSE affirms what is already working • SSE ensures that plans for improvement are rooted in evidence • SSE trusts and supports teachers as professionals • SSE acknowledges school context • SSE provides schools with a logical review framework • SSE is inclusive of all voices • SSE can significantly improve student learning “Self –evaluation is the crucial mechanism for achieving any kind of school improvement” (MacBeath, 1999:153) The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Key Messages • The primary purpose of school self-evaluation is to improve the quality of learner outcomes • School self-evaluation is an internal, reflective process of school review which requires schools to examine their practice honestly and critically • The gathering of evidence to justify and to inform action planning for improvement is a fundamental principle of school self-evaluation The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

LINKS TO CIRCULARS & DOCUMENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. National Strategy for Literacy & Numeracy Summary of Strategy Department Circular 0056/2011 (re: transfer of data) Department Circular 0025/2012 (re: implementation of L & N strategy) Report Card Templates (primary school) NCCA Information re analysing standardised tests NEPS resource pack for PP teachers DES approved post-primary assessments The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

United States presidential election in Pennsylvania, 2012 ...

November 6, 2012 → 2016 ... 0: Popular vote: 2,990,274: 2,680,434: ... See also. Republican Party presidential debates, 2012;
Read more

United States House of Representatives elections in Hawaii ...

±0: Republican: 137,531: 32 ... 100.00%: 2: 2 ±0: District 1. United States House of Representatives District 1; 2010 ← November 6, 2012 ... 2012 ...
Read more

Oracle Applications, SQL, PL/SQL: November 2012

Posted 29th November 2012 by Srinivas Velumuri. ... See the screenshot below. ... This post explains how do we create a Primary Ledger
Read more

2012 November General Election Turnout Rates

2012 November General Election Turnout Rates. ... Please see the FAQ. Direct link to ... A '0' indicates that either a state does not disfranchise a class ...
Read more

Review of Mathematics in Post- Primary Education

Employer 0 0 Other 16 6.2 Not ... They see it as important that students at post-primary ... Review of mathematics in post-primary education ...
Read more

Cannot backup primary DPM 2012 server's Hyper-V backups ...

Cannot backup primary DPM 2012 server's ... Data Protection Manager. 0 0 ... a new one primary DPM, you will have to see with Microsoft ...
Read more

United States Senate elections in Missouri, 2012 - Ballotpedia

November 6, 2012: Primary: ... Missouri Republican Primary, 2012; Candidate: Vote % Votes: Todd Akin: 36%: ... 2012: $0.00: $250,000.00 $(0.00)
Read more

User Device Affinity - single primary user to primary ...

... please search for your answer in these forums and the TechNet documentation. 0 3. ... 2012 supports single primary user ... November 01 ...
Read more

United States presidential election, 2012 - Simple English ...

November 6, 2012: Nominee: Barack Obama: Mitt Romney: Party: ... 51.0%: 47.3%: Presidential ... with only 11 (primary) victories to Romney's 23, ...
Read more