perthes disease

80 %
20 %
Information about perthes disease

Published on January 27, 2010

Author: drakkashmiri


Perthes disease : Perthes disease By Dr. Abdul Karim Postgraduate Resident Orthopedic Surgery PGMI/LGH. LAHORE; PAKISTAN. Slide 2: FIRST DESCRIBED BY LEGG, AND WALDENSTORM IN 1909, AND BY PERTHES AND CALVE IN 1910 DEFINITION : DEFINITION Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) is the name given to idiopathic osteonecrosis of the capital femoral epiphysis in a child. Slide 4: Increased Joint space Smaller head Denser head Normal joint Epidemiology : Epidemiology Prevalence: Epidemiology : Epidemiology Race: Caucasians are affected more frequently than persons of other races. Sex: Males are affected 4-5 times more often than females. Age: LCPD most commonly is seen in persons aged 3-12 years, with a median age of 7 years. BLOOD SUPPLY : BLOOD SUPPLY Causes : Causes Exact cause unknown. Proposed theories. Inherited protein C and/or S deficiency. Venous thrombosis Arterial occlusion Raised intra osseous pressure Causes : Causes Proposed theories. Excessive femoral antiversion. Synovitis. Generalized skeletal disorder. Arterial anomalies. Causes : Causes Pathophysiology : Pathophysiology The capital femoral epiphysis always is involved. In 15-20% of patients with LCPD, involvement is bilateral. The blood supply to the capital femoral epiphysis is interrupted. Bone infarction occurs, especially in the subchondral cortical bone, while articular cartilage continues to grow. (Articular cartilage grows because its nutrients come from the synovial fluid.) Revascularization occurs, and new bone ossification starts. Pathophysiology : Pathophysiology At this point, a percentage of patients develop LCPD, while other patients have normal bone growth and development. LCPD is present when a subchondral fracture occurs. This is usually the result of normal physical activity, not direct trauma to the area Changes to the epiphyseal growth plate occur secondary to the subchondral fracture. Pathogenesis : Pathogenesis Avascular necrosis Temporary cessation of growth Revascularization from periphery Resumption of ossification and trauma Pathological fracture Resorption of underlying bone Replacement of biologically plastic bone Sublaxation Deformity Clinical : Clinical History: Symptoms usually have been present for weeks. Hip or groin pain, which may be referred to the thigh Mild or intermittent pain in anterior thigh or knee Limp Usually no history of trauma Clinical : Clinical Physical: Painful gait Decreased range of motion (ROM), particularly with internal rotation and abduction Atrophy of thigh muscles secondary to disuse Muscle spasm Leg length inequality due to collapse Clinical : Clinical Short stature: Children with LCPD often have delayed bone age. Roll test With patient lying in the supine position, the examiner rolls the hip of the affected extremity into external and internal rotation. This test should invoke guarding or spasm, especially with internal rotation. Differentials : Differentials Unilateral Septic hip Toxic synovitis Slipped femoral capital epiphysis Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia Metaphyseal dysplasia Lymphoma Bilateral Hypothyroidism Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia Sickle cell disease Workup : Workup Lab Studies: CBC Erythrocyte sedimentation rate - May be elevated if infection present Workup : Workup Imaging Studies: Plain x-rays of the hip are extremely useful in establishing the diagnosis. Frog leg views of the affected hip are very helpful. Plain radiographs have a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 78% in the detection of LCPD Multiple radiographic classification systems exist, based on the extent of abnormality of the capital femoral epiphysis. Waldenstrom, Catterall, Salter and Thompson, and Herring are the 4 most common classification systems. No agreement has been reached as to the best classification system. Radiographic stages : Radiographic stages Five radiographic stages can be seen by plain x-ray. In sequence, they are as follows: Radiographic stages : Radiographic stages Cessation of growth at the capital femoral epiphysis; smaller femoral head epiphysis and widening of articular space on affected side. Radiographic stages : Radiographic stages 2. Subchondral fracture; linear radiolucency within the femoral head epiphysis Radiographic stages : Radiographic stages 3. Resorption of bone Radiographic stages : Radiographic stages 4. Re-ossification of new bone Radiographic stages : Radiographic stages 5. Healed stage Catterall classification : Catterall classification Catterall Group I: Involvement only of the anterior epiphysis (therefore seen only on the frog lateral film) Catterall Group II: Central segment fragmentation and collapse. However the lateral rim is intact and thus protects the central involved area. Catterall Group III: The lateral head is also involved or fragmented and only the medial portion is spared. The loss of lateral support worsens the prognosis. Catterall Group IV: The entire head is involved. Catterall's classification has a significant inter and intra observer error. Catterall classification : Catterall classification Groups I and II had a good prognosis (in 90%) and required no intervention. Groups III and IV had a poor prognosis (in 90 %) and required treatment. The classification is applied to the frog lateral and AP film during the fragmentation phase Salter and Thompson Classification : Salter and Thompson Classification Salter and Thompson recognized that Catterall's first two groups and second two groups were distinct and therefore proposed a two part classification. Salter & Thompson Group A: Less than 1/2 head involved. Salter & Thompson Group B: More than 1/2 head involved. Again the main difference between these two groups is the integrity of the lateral pillar. (Herring) Lateral Pillar Classification : (Herring) Lateral Pillar Classification Lateral Pillar Group A: There is no loss in height of the lateral 1/3 of the head and minimal density change. Fragmentation occurs in the central segment of the head. Lateral Pillar Group B: There is lucency and loss of height in the lateral pillar but not more that 50% of the original (contralateral) pillar height. there may be some lateral extrusion of the head. Lateral Pillar Group C: There is greater than 50% loss in the height of the lateral pillar. The lateral pillar is lower than the central segment early on. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of Catterall, Herring, Salter-Thompson and Stulberg classification systems in Perthes. : Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of Catterall, Herring, Salter-Thompson and Stulberg classification systems in Perthes. Conclusions: The results of our study suggest the use of Catterall and Salter-Thompson systems prior to treatment and the Stulberg system at the end of the treatment at skeletal maturity. However, evaluation of the patients during the treatment period is still a dilemma and necessitates a new more reliable classification system. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B. 13(3):166-169, May 2004.Agus, Haluk a; Kalenderer, Onder a; Eryanlmaz, Gurkan b[latin dotless i]; Ozcalabi, Isa Turkay a Slide 35: Unilateral Perthes with entire head involvement and fragmentation. The reossification phase has not yet begun. Slide 36: Unilateral Perthes disease with widening of the medial joint space, blurring of the physis, increased density of the head and lucency between the medial and central 1/3's of the head corresponding to early fragmentation phase. Slide 37: Unilateral Perthes in the reossification phase with a visible subchondral line similar to Waldenstrom's sign. However Waldenstrom's subchondral fracture is seen very early in the disease process, before fragmentation. In this case the lateral pillar has maintained some integrity. “Head at risk signs” : “Head at risk signs” 1. Gage's sign. a V shaped lucency in the lateral epiphysis. 2. lateral calcification (lateral to the epiphysis) (implies loss of lateral support) 3. lateral subluxation of the head.(implies loss of lateral support) 4. A horizontal growth plate.(implies a growth arrest phenomenon and deformity) Workup : Workup Technetium 99 bone scan - Helpful in delineating the extent of avascular changes before they are evident on plain radiographs. The sensitivity of radionuclide scanning in the diagnosis of LPD is 98%, and the specificity is 95%. Dynamic arthrography - Assesses sphericity of the head of the femur. Ultrasonography in transient synovitis and early Perthes' disease : Ultrasonography in transient synovitis and early Perthes' disease Ultrasonography may provide significant diagnostic clues to differentiate early Perthes' from transient synovitis. T Futami, Y Kasahara, S Suzuki, S Ushikubo, and T Tsuchiya Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 73-B, Issue 4, 635-639 CT Scan : CT Scan Staging determined by using plain radiographic findings is upgraded in 30% of patients. Not as sensitive as nuclear medicine or MRI. CT may be used for follow-up imaging in patients with LPD. MRI : MRI It allows more precise localization of involvement than conventional radiography. MRI is preferred for evaluating the position, form, and size of the femoral head and surrounding soft tissues. MRI is as sensitive as isotopic bone scanning. Outcome variables : Outcome variables Age Extent of involvement Duration Remodeling potential Premature physeal closure Type of treatment Stage of disease at treatment. Treatment : Treatment Goals of treatment Achieve and maintain ROM Relieve weight bearing Containment of the femoral epiphysis within the confines of the acetabulum Traction Rational behind "containment" : Rational behind "containment" Salter has demonstrated the" biologic plasticity" of the femoral head in pigs following a vascular insult. Containment of the head within the acetabulum is reported to encourage spherical remodelling during the reossification and subsequent phases. However if there is total head involvement and the lateral pillar collapses then the effect of containment is probably less. Therefore it seems that the extent of involvement of the head is the critical factor and containment simply optimizes the situation. Medications : Medications Medical treatment does not stop or reverse the bony changes. Appropriate analgesic medication should be given. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs Ibuprofen Adult dose: 200-400 mg PO q4-6h; not to exceed 3.2 g/d. Pediatric dose: 6 months to 12 years: 20-40 mg/kg/d PO divided tid or qid; start at lower end of dosing range and titrate upward; not to exceed 2.4 g/d>12 years: Administer as in adults. Non surgical containment : Non surgical containment Slide 48: Scotish Rite abduction brace Slide 49: Japenes modification of petrie abduction cast Surgical containment : Surgical containment Greater trochanteric overgrowth : Greater trochanteric overgrowth The trochanteric overgrowth can be dramatic on radiographs but several studies have shown that a Trendelenberg gait does not always occur. If it does occur, and is significant, then trochanteric advancement may improve the gait. An alternative is to perform a trochanteric arrest at an earlier date but this assumes that the first statement will not apply to the particular child. RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY : RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY INDICATIONS: Hinge abduction. valgus subtrochanteric osteotomy. Malformed femoral head in late group III or residual group IV. Garceau’s cheilectomy. Coxa magna. shelf augmentation A large malformed femoral head with lateral sublaxation. Chiari’s pelvic osteotomy. Capital femoral physeal arrest. trochanteric advancement or arrest. A STUDY AT CINCINNATI INSTITUTE : A STUDY AT CINCINNATI INSTITUTE Hinge abduction and joint stiffness in perthes disease: Effect of medial soft tissue release and petrie casting prior to femoral head containment. Hypothesis: Correct hinge abduction Improve motion Normalization of femoral head and acetabulum relationships C.T Mehlman, D.O.MPH D.R.Roy M.D A.H.Crawford M.D CONCLUSION : CONCLUSION Medial capsulotomy and dynamic positiong effectively corrects hinged abduction. ROM was improved in all parameters. High degree of patient and parent satisfaction. SUMMARY : SUMMARY For patients less that 6 years old the prognosis is good for the majority. If they are stiff or painful they respond to bed rest, traction and pain relieving anti-inflammatory medication. There is no evidence that abduction splints or surgical intervention is warranted in the majority of these younger patients. SUMMARY : SUMMARY For patients between 6 and 8 years but with a bone age less than 6 and an intact lateral pillar (Herring A and B) the prognosis is similar to that for the first group and observation is as good as surgical intervention for the majority. If they have bone ages greater than 6 years and Herring lateral pillar classification B then "containment" of the head within the acetabulum seems to be warranted. This may be done by abduction bracing, femoral varus osteotomy or a pelvic osteotomy. SUMMARY : SUMMARY If they are between 6 and 8 and are in lateral pillar group C then the result of intervention are equivocal. Children presenting with Perthes disease at age 9 or older often have lateral pillar B or C and a poor prognosis. The trend is towards early containment of these hips although stiffness can be a problem following early pelvic (Salter's) osteotomy. Follow-up : Follow-up Initially, close follow-up is required to determine the extent of necrosis. Once the healing phase has been entered, follow-up can be every 6 months. Long-term follow-up is necessary to determine the final outcome. Complications : Complications Femoral Shortening stiffness Malrotation Limp Positive trendelenburg Pelvic Lenghtening Stiffness Chondrolysis Failure of containment Prognosis : Prognosis The younger the age of onset of LCPD, the better the prognosis. Children older than 10 years have a very high risk of developing osteoarthritis. Most patients have a favorable outcome. Prognosis is proportional to the degree of radiologic involvement. Slide 68: THANKS

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

Perthes | What is Perthes disease?

What is Perthes disease? Perthes disease (also known as Legg-Calve-Perthes disease, or Calve Perthes disease, or avascular necrosis) is a childhood ...
Read more

Legg–Calvé–Perthes disease - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Legg–Calvé–Perthes disease (LCPD) is a childhood hip disorder initiated by a disruption of blood flow to the ball of the femur called the femoral head.
Read more

Morbus Perthes – Wikipedia

Der Morbus Perthes ist eine orthopädische Kinderkrankheit. Die Ursache ist eine Durchblutungsstörung und Absterben von Knochengewebe im Hüftkopf.
Read more

Perthes Disease-OrthoInfo - AAOS

Perthes disease — also known as Legg-Calve-Perthes, named for the three individual doctors who first described the condition — typically occurs in ...
Read more

Perthes | Perthes disease – a place for parents and ...

Perthes disease - a place for parents and professionals ... Dear Members and friends, Firstly, I would like to say a big thank you all for your continued ...
Read more

Perthes – Wikipedia

Perthes ist der Name folgender Orte, Persönlichkeiten, ... Morbus Perthes (Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease), einer orthopädischen Kinderkrankheit; Perthes-Test;
Read more

Perthes' disease - Better Health Channel

Perthes' disease is a disease of the hip joint that tends to affect children between the ages of three and 11 years. The femoral head deteriorates because ...
Read more

[Perthes disease]. - National Center for Biotechnology ...

1. Z Orthop Unfall. 2014 Dec;152(6):617-33; quiz 634-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1382865. Epub 2014 Dec 22. [Perthes disease]. [Article in German]
Read more

International Perthes Study Group

About Perthes Disease Perthes disease is a childhood hip disorder caused by a disruption of blood flow to the ball (called femoral head) of the hip joint.
Read more - hinweis Navigation überspringen: zu den Inhalten. Start. Impressum. Immobilien. Verlagsgeschichte seit 1785. 404 - Hinweis. Die ...
Read more