advertisement

Oil Tanker Outlook

50 %
50 %
advertisement
Information about Oil Tanker Outlook
Education

Published on January 23, 2008

Author: Candelora

Source: authorstream.com

advertisement

Slide1:  Oil Tanker Outlook and Newbuilding Demand in a Changing Environment Fallout from the Prestige Incident Changing Environment Post Prestige Pressure to Accelerate the Phase-out of SH Oil Tankers :  Changing Environment Post Prestige Pressure to Accelerate the Phase-out of SH Oil Tankers The current IMO Reg. 13g required phase-out schedule for Single Hull (SH) oil tankers stretches to 2015 MV Prestige incident has intensified the pressure to accelerate the phase-out and increase surveillance of older SH oil tankers, & place limitations on the carriage of heavy Fuel Oil The EU1 will most likely be implementing several new measures to address these issues, including a phase-out acceleration scheme that is similar to their original proposal to IMO EU Member states are requested to pressure IMO to adopt similar measures globally 1 – Already recommended by the European Commission and Council Definitions:  Definitions PL/SBT – Protectively located segregated ballast tanks Dirty oil – heavy diesel, fuel and lube oil Oil – clarified, crude, dirty, aromatic (except vegetable), distillates, gas oil, gasoline, jet fuel, naptha, asphalt solutions CAS – Condition Assessment Scheme – a hull structure survey scheme focusing on planning diligence and greater reporting transparency, required by 2005 for Cat 1, by 2010 for Cat 2 1 – Already recommended by the European Commission and Council IMO Oil Tanker Categories:  IMO Oil Tanker Categories Category 1 – non-double hull (pre PL/SBT), 20 K dwt and above carrying crude and dirty oils, OR 30 K dwt and above carrying other oil cargoes Category 2 – non-double hull (PL/SBT), 20 K dwt and above crude and dirty oils, OR 30 K dwt and above carrying other oil cargoes Category 3 – non-double hull, 5 K – 19,999 dwt carrying crude and dirty oils OR 5 K – 29,999 dwt carrying other oil cargoes IMO MARPOL 13G Phase Out:  IMO MARPOL 13G Phase Out Slide6:  EU Member States are requested to: Reject single hull tankers carrying heavy FO Accelerate implementation & enhance the PSC Directive 1/1/03 Establish plans to designate safe refuge by 1 July 2003 Develop double hull protection for bunker tanks at IMO Adopt measures to control the tanker traffic Ratify EU liability supplementary fund Accelerate phase-out of single hull oil tankers- adopt by 1 Jul 03 Cat. 1 ships - age 23+ yrs starting in 2003 & all by 2005 (pre Marpol) Cat. 2 ships - age 28+ yrs starting in 2003 & all by 2010 ( PL/SBT) Cat. 3 ships - age 28+yrs starting in 2003 & all by 2015 (5K-20/30KDwt) Apply CAS to all tankers at 15 years of age Limit transport of heavy FO in single hulls in EEZ of EU members EU Council 6 Dec 2002 Conclusions Impacting Oil Tankers EEZ = Exclusive Economic Zone Impact of EU Proposed Phase-out Acceleration Will IMO also adopt it?:  Impact of EU Proposed Phase-out Acceleration Will IMO also adopt it? Near term impact on Supply / Demand balance could be significant, and degree varies by size of oil tanker Immediate impact would affect applicable tankers that trade to EU If EU proposal adopted by IMO impact would be worldwide 2 Phase-out scenarios were considered for comparison: Scenario 1: Current IMO Reg. 13g phase out scheme Scenario 2: EU Proposal - assumed to apply to entire fleet [ If adopted by IMO earliest would be 2004, & most likely 2005 ] Impact of EU Proposed Phase-out Acceleration:  Impact of EU Proposed Phase-out Acceleration Approach - Side-by-side comparison of Supply / Demand balance for each year to 2015 for current IMO and proposed EU phase-out schemes Demand = Current fleet size (+ or -) forecast annual demand growth Demand growth: estimated crude & product oil seaborne transport based on the US Dept of Energy Oil Demand Forecast to 2020 Large tankers - crude oil only, Smaller tankers - crude & product Supply = Fleet - Removals (both phase-out & scrapping*) + Newbuilding deliveries (current orderbook) Future Deliveries needed = Supply shortfall to meet Demand * scrapping based on historical avg. by age and ship type, and considered after Phase-outs have been accounted for. VLCC Delivery Requirements Regulatory Phase-out Scenario Comparison:  VLCC Delivery Requirements Regulatory Phase-out Scenario Comparison IMO Reg 13g Surplus Deliveries Phase-outs New Demand Additions Needed Scrapping Scheduled Deliveries Jan 2003 Orderbook Accelerated Phase-out would likely spread if IMO adopts in 2004 or 2005 (-) Shortfall + Surplus Fleet Data Source: INTERTANKO & Clarkson Demand Outlook based on US Dept of Energy Oil demand Forecast EU Proposal Assumed adopted worldwide Size: 200+ KDwt Replacem’t & New Growth Needs Fleet Additions Largest Annual Delivery Over Past 5 yrs: 41 Cumm. Suezmax Delivery Requirements Regulatory Phase-out Scenario Comparison:  Suezmax Delivery Requirements Regulatory Phase-out Scenario Comparison IMO Reg 13g Phase-outs New Demand Additions Needed Scrapping Scheduled Deliveries Jan 2003 Orderbook (-) Shortfall + Surplus Size: 120-200 KDwt Fleet Data Source: INTERTANKO & Clarkson Demand Outlook based on US Dept of Energy Oil demand Forecast EU Proposal Assumed adopted worldwide Accelerated Phase-out would likely spread if IMO adopts in 2004 or 2005 Largest Annual Delivery Over Past 5 yrs: 28 Cumm. Aframax Delivery Requirements Regulatory Phase-out Scenario Comparison:  Aframax Delivery Requirements Regulatory Phase-out Scenario Comparison Surplus Deliveries IMO Reg 13g Phase-outs New Demand Additions Needed Scrapping Scheduled Deliveries Jan 2003 Orderbook Size: 80 -120 KDwt (-) Shortfall + Surplus Fleet Data Source: INTERTANKO & Clarkson Demand Outlook based on US Dept of Energy Oil demand Forecast EU Proposal Assumed adopted worldwide Accelerated Phase-out would likely spread if IMO adopts in 2004 or 2005 Largest Annual Delivery Over Past 5 yrs: 70 Cumm. Panamax Delivery Requirements Regulatory Phase-out Scenario Comparison:  Panamax Delivery Requirements Regulatory Phase-out Scenario Comparison Surplus Deliveries IMO Reg 13g Phase-outs New Demand Additions Needed Scrapping Scheduled Deliveries Jan 2003 Orderbook Size: 60 -80 KDwt (-) Shortfall + Surplus Fleet Data Source: INTERTANKO & Clarkson Demand Outlook based on US Dept of Energy Oil demand Forecast EU Proposal Assumed adopted worldwide Accelerated Phase-out would likely spread if IMO adopts in 2004 or 2005 Largest Annual Delivery Over Past 5 yrs: 32 Cumm. Products Delivery Requirements Regulatory Phase-out Scenario Comparison:  Products Delivery Requirements Regulatory Phase-out Scenario Comparison Surplus Deliveries Size: 20 -60 KDwt IMO Reg 13g Phase-outs New Demand Additions Needed Scheduled Deliveries Jan 2003 Orderbook (-) Large Shortfall Small Shortfall Fleet Data Source: INTERTANKO & Clarkson Demand Outlook based on US Dept of Energy Oil demand Forecast EU Proposal Assumed adopted worldwide Accelerated Phase-out would likely spread if IMO adopts in 2004 or 2005 Largest Annual Delivery Over Past 5 yrs: 95 Cumm. Impact Summary :  Impact Summary Prestige incident has prompted the EU to act to accelerate the current IMO phase-out schedule for single hull oil tankers Accelerating both the age schedule and complete fleet removal dates While there is time to meet the anticipated replace-ment challenge for 2010 and beyond, there will likely be a near term supply shortfall, particularly for smaller oil tankers if: If IMO adopts the EU accelerated phase-out schedule If positive future fleet growth is needed to meet oil transportation requirements Other Issues – Comments? :  Other Issues – Comments? Additional “Incidents” US Environmental Issues (design impact) Jones Act Alternate Energy Sources World Tensions/Maritime Security

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

Tanker Market Outlook: 2011–2015 - Maritime News ...

Tanker Market Outlook: 2011–2015. Thursday, January 20, 2011. ... Tanker demand recovered in 2010 and will increase on the back of increased oil demand.
Read more

Tanker Market Outlook - Baltic Exchange Shipping Market ...

Tanker Market Outlook | Tanker Derivatives Forum Oil Products Tanker Historical Worldscale RatesOil Products Tanker Historical Worldscale Rates
Read more

No Slide Title - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Oil Tanker Outlook and Newbuilding Demand in a Changing Environment Fallout from the Prestige Incident Changing Environment Post Prestige Pressure to ...
Read more

Oil and Tanker Trade Outlook - Clarkson Research Services ...

Oil & Tanker Trades Outlook presents the oil trade the way the shipowners see it, combining tanker demand with a detailed monthly analysis of the tanker fleet.
Read more

The outlook for oil tanker new construction - KOREAN REGISTER

Page 1 of 7 TSCF 2007 Shipbuilders Meeting The outlook for oil tanker new construction Graham Marshall ABS, Houston, USA, gmarshall@eagle.org
Read more

Why crude oil tanker shipping rates are treading above 0 ...

Must-know crude oil tanker outlook: Some good news and bad news (Part 1 of 10) Why crude oil tanker shipping rates are treading above 0 growth.
Read more

Shifting Sands: A Tanker Market Outlook - Intertanko

Shifting Sands: A Tanker Market Outlook Roger Bartlett Managing Director, Maritime Strategies International Asia Intertanko Asia Panel Meeting th- 8 April ...
Read more

Research and Markets: Crude Oil Tanker Industry Outlook ...

Research and Markets: Crude Oil Tanker Industry Outlook Globally to 2013 - Capacity and Specifications of All Operating and Planned Crude Oil Tankers ...
Read more

Oil Tanker Outlook - CNBC Video Gallery

Omar Nokta, of Dahlman Rose, sees an improved outlook for oil tanker companies this year.
Read more

BIMCO

Related links. Members' WebDialog: Market Overview and Outlook on 23 Oct 2014; Tanker Shipping - Crude oil tankers out-perform their oil product peers in a ...
Read more