Marinier Laird Cogsci 2008 Emotionrl Pres

50 %
50 %
Information about Marinier Laird Cogsci 2008 Emotionrl Pres

Published on March 13, 2009

Author: guru122

Source: slideshare.net

Emotion-Driven Reinforcement Learning Bob Marinier & John Laird University of Michigan, Computer Science and Engineering CogSci’08

2 Introduction • Interested in the functional benefits of emotion for a cognitive agent ▫ Appraisal theories of emotion ▫ PEACTIDM theory of cognitive control • Use emotion as a reward signal to a reinforcement learning agent ▫ Demonstrates a functional benefit of emotion ▫ Provides a theory of the origin of intrinsic reward

3 Outline • Background ▫ Integration of emotion and cognition ▫ Integration of emotion and reinforcement learning ▫ Implementation in Soar • Learning task • Results

4 Appraisal Theories of Emotion • A situation is evaluated along a number of appraisal dimensions, many of which relate the situation to current goals ▫ Novelty, goal relevance, goal conduciveness, expectedness, causal agency, etc. • Appraisals influence emotion • Emotion can then be coped with (via internal or external actions) Situation Goals Coping Appraisals Emotion

5 Appraisals to Emotions (Scherer 2001) Joy Fear Anger High/medium High High Suddenness High High High Unpredictability Low Intrinsic pleasantness High High High Goal/need relevance Other/nature Other Cause: agent Chance/intentional Intentional Cause: motive Very high High Very high Outcome probability Discrepancy from High High expectation Very high Low Low Conduciveness High Control Very low High Power

6 Cognitive Control: PEACTIDM (Newell 1990) Perceive Obtain raw perception Encode Create domain-independent representation Attend Choose stimulus to process Comprehend Generate structures that relate stimulus to tasks and can be used to inform behavior Task Perform task maintenance Intend Choose an action, create prediction Decode Decompose action into motor commands Motor Execute motor commands

7 Unification of PEACTIDM and Appraisal Theories Perceive Environmental Raw Perceptual Change Information Motor Encode Suddenness Stimulus Unpredictability Motor Relevance Goal Relevance Commands Intrinsic Pleasantness Prediction Outcome Decode Attend Probability Causal Agent/Motive Action Stimulus chosen Discrepancy for processing Conduciveness Control/Power Intend Comprehend Current Situation Assessment

8 Distinction between emotion, mood, and feeling (Marinier & Laird 2007) • Emotion: Result of appraisals ▫ Is about the current situation • Mood: “Average” over recent emotions ▫ Provides historical context • Feeling: Emotion “+” Mood ▫ What agent actually perceives

10 Intrinsically Motivated Reinforcement Learning (Sutton & Barto 1998; Singh et al. 2004) External Environment Environment Actions Sensations Critic Internal Environment Appraisal Actions Rewards States Critic Process +/- Feeling Decisions Rewards States Intensity Agent Agent “Organism” • Reward = Intensity * Valence

11 Extending Soar with Emotion (Marinier & Laird 2007) Symbolic Long-Term Memories Procedural Episodic Semantic Reinforcement Chunking Episodic Semantic Learning Learning Learning Short-Term Memory Appraisal Detector Decision Procedure Situation, Goals Visual Perception Action Imagery Body

12 Extending Soar with Emotion (Marinier & Laird 2007) Symbolic Long-Term Memories Procedural Episodic Semantic Reinforcement Chunking Episodic Semantic Learning Learning Learning Appraisal Detector Feeling .9,.6,.5,-.1,.8,… Short-Term Memory Decision Feelings Procedure Situation, Goals Emotion Mood .5,.7,0,-.4,.3,… .7,-.2,.8,.3,.6,… Visual Perception Action Imagery Body Knowledge Architecture

13 Learning task Start Goal

14 Learning task: Encoding North Passable: false On path: false Progress: true East West Passable: false Passable: false On path: true On path: false Progress: true Progress: true South Passable: true On path: true Progress: true

15 Learning task: Encoding & Appraisal North Intrinsic Pleasantness: Low Goal Relevance: Low Unpredictability: High East West Intrinsic Pleasantness: Low Intrinsic Pleasantness: Low Goal Relevance: High Goal Relevance: Low Unpredictability: High Unpredictability: High South Intrinsic Pleasantness: Neutral Goal Relevance: High Unpredictability: Low

16 Learning task: Attending, Comprehending & Appraisal South Intrinsic Pleasantness: Neutral Goal Relevance: High Unpredictability: Low Conduciveness: High Control: High …

17 Learning task: Tasking

18 Learning task: Tasking Optimal Subtasks

19 What is being learned? • When to Attend vs Task • If Attending, what to Attend to • If Tasking, which subtask to create • When to Intend vs. Ignore

20 Learning Results 12000 Median Processing Cycles 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Episode Standard RL Feeling=Emotion Feeling=Emotion+Mood

21 Results: With and without mood 300 Median Processing Cycles 290 280 270 260 250 240 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Episode Feeling=Emotion Feeling=Emotion+Mood Optimal

22 Discussion • Agent learns both internal (tasking) and external (movement) actions • Emotion allows for more frequent rewards, and thus learns faster than standard RL • Mood “fills in the gaps” allowing for even faster learning and less variability

23 Conclusion & Future Work • Demonstrated computational model that integrates emotion and cognitive control • Confirmed emotion can drive reinforcement learning • We have already successfully demonstrated similar learning in a more complex domain • Would like to explore multi-agent scenarios

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

Emotion-Driven Reinforcement Learning - University of Michigan

Emotion-Driven Reinforcement Learning Robert P. Marinier III, John E. Laird ({rmarinie,laird}@umich.edu) ... (Marinier & Laird, 2006) (see Table 3).
Read more

Marinier !!!! | LinkedIn

Marinier Laird Cogsci 2008 Emotionrl Pres. 278 Views. gueste9cbbf. Marinier Laird Cogsci 2008 Emotionrl Pres. 165 Views. guru91. Marinier Laird Cogsci 2008 ...
Read more

John E. Laird's Home Page - Artificial Intelligence Lab

Marinier, R. and Laird, J. E. (2008). ... CogSci 2008, Washington, D.C. Marinier, R., Laird, ... AAAI Press. Wintermute, S. ...
Read more

Ppt External-constraints-on-emotions | Powerpoint ...

External Constraints on Emotions OB Applications of Understanding ... http://sitemaker.umich.edu/marinier/files/marinier_laird_cogsci_2008_emotionrl_pres ...
Read more

Centenary College PSY 1022 - Ace Recommendation Platform

Improve your grade in Centenary College PSY 1022 with videos, ... in_press___Beer ... cornelius00; 2011 McRae SCAN; marinier_laird_cogsci_2008_emotionrl ...
Read more

Reinforcement Learning Intrinsic Motivation

Reinforcement Learning Intrinsic Motivation ... Marinier, R. and Laird, J. E. CogSci 2008 I Simple Algorithmic Theory of Subjective Beauty, Novelty,
Read more