Published on March 13, 2014
14th century. Islam was brought by Muslim traders. Spread in Malacca during the reign of Parameswara who married a muslim princess from Pasai in 1414. He changed his name to Iskandar Shah.
Other sultans of Malacca (Sultan Mansur Shah and Sultan Mohammad) adhered strictly to Islam. 15th century. Malacca became the centre for Islamic missionary work in the region.
1. Hukum Kanun Melaka (Laws or Malacca) 2. Undang-undang Laut Melaka (Maritime Laws of Malacca)
Was prepared during the reign of Sultan Muzaffar Shah (1446-1459) Contains 44 chapters, 18 of which had Islamic elements.
Chapters on marriage and divorce On wali, witnesses to marriage, rules on talad Were based on writings by Abu Shuja in “Al-Taqrib” Chapters on commercial transactions Weight and measure, prohibition of riba, sale of land etc Based on writings by Abu Shuja (in Al-Taqrib), Ibn Al- Qassim Al-Ghazzi (in Fath al-Qarib) and Ibrahim Al- Baijuri (in Hashiya ala al-Fath al-Qarib)
Chapters on evidence and procedure Chapters on criminal offences Punishment for killing, zina, sodomy, bestiality, slander, drinking liquor.
Prepared during reign of Sultan AbdulGhafur (1592-1614) Was modelled on Hukum Kanun Melaka Contained provisions on qisas, fines, zina, sodomy, theft, robbery, apostasy, omission of prayers, jihad, witness and oath.
Also modelled on Hukum Kanun Melaka Johor Constitution 1895 -- during the reign of Sultan Abu Bakar. The translation of Majallat al-Ahkam al- Adliyyah (the Ottoman Civil Code 1876) into Malay, which was named as MajalahAhkam Johore. Hanafi Code of Qadri Pasha in Egypt was adopted and translated into Malay as the Ahkam Shariyyah Johore.
“There can be no doubt that Muslim law would have ended by becoming the law of the Malays had not British law stepped to check it”
“Before the first treaty [the PangkorTreaty 1874] the population of these State [FMS] consisted almost solely of Mohammedan Malays with a large industrial and mining Chinese community in their midst. The only laws at that time applicable to Malays was Mohammedan modified by local custom”
“Muslim law is not foreign law, it is the law of the land and the local law is a matter of which the court must take judicial notice.” (Note: “judicial notice” means matters which are so notorious and well known. S 56 Evidence Act 1950: “No facts of which the court will take judicial notice need to be proved”).
Islamic law was not recognised by the courts in the following cases: In theGoods of Abdullah Fatimah v Logan Courts recognised Islamic law in the following cases: Chulas v Kolson Sahrip v Mitchell
Ainan v Syed Abu Bakar  MLJ 209 PP vWhite  MLJ 214 Attorney General of Ceylon v Reid  2 MLJ 34 (PC) Martin v Umi Kelsom  MLJ 1 Re Maria Hertogh  MLJ 214
S 112 Evidence Enactment was enforced on Muslims. Court held: “The Evidence Enactment is a statute of general application and that all the inhabitants of the Federated Malay States are subject to its provisions whatever may be their race or religion. In questions of legitimacy in the case of Muhammadans section 112 of the Evidence Enactment applies to the exclusion of the rule of Muhammadan Law.”
S 122 Evidence Enactment provides that the birth of a child during a valid marriage or within 280 days after its dissolution, is conclusive proof of legitimacy, unless it can be shown that the parties to the marriage had no access to each other at any time when the child could have been begotten.
Islamic law: The shortest period of gestation in the human species is six months. A child born before six months is considered illegitimate. In this case, the child was born 3 months after the marriage. The court applied the Evidence Enactment and held that the child is a legitimate child.
The accused married a Christian lady at Taiping, Federated Malay States, in 1918 according to the rites and ceremonies of the Church of England. In 1936 while his wife was still alive, the accused married another Christian lady according to Mohammedan law after they had been converted to the Mohammedan religion. In a prosecution instituted at the instance of the first wife for bigamy.
Bigamy in an offence under S 494 of the Penal Code: "Whoever, having a husband or wife living, marries in any case in which such marriage is void by reason of its taking place during the life of such husband or wife, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, shall also be liable to fine.”
Court held that the first marriage being a monogamous one, the accused had committed the offence of bigamy. A person who enters into a marriage relationship with a woman according to monogamous rites takes upon himself all the obligations springing from a monogamous relationship and acquires by law the status of "husband" in a monogamous marriage and he cannot, whatever his religion may be, during the subsistence of that monogamous marriage marry or go through a legally recognised form of marriage with another woman.
Issue:Whether the second marriage was void by reason of its taking place during the life of the respondent's first wife.
Held: Ceylon is a country of many races and creeds and has a number of Marriage Ordinances and Acts. In matrimonial matters there is no one law which applies to all locally domiciled persons; they are governed by their personal laws. A Christian monogamous marriage does not prohibit for all time during the subsistence of that marriage a change of faith and personal law on the part of a husband resident and domiciled there.
In such countries there is an inherent right in the inhabitants domiciled to change their religion and personal law and so to contract a valid polygamous marriage if recognised by the laws of the country notwithstanding an earlier marriage. If such inherent right is to be abrogated it must be done by statute; but there was none in the case of Ceylon and therefore the appeal must fail.
Martin and Umi Kelsom got married under the Christian Marriage Enactment on February 25 1950. At that time, Martin was a Christian domiciled in England and Umi was a Malay Muslim domiciled in Selangor. Issue: Whether the marriage was void on the ground that at the time of its solemnisation he was a Christian and she was a Muslim and therefore by reason of her personal law incapable of inter-marrying with him.
Court held that since the marriage was solemnised according to the law of the husband's domicile, it is therefore according to that law that the validity of that marriage must be judged by thisCourt. So determined, the marriage was valid.
Validity of marriage between Natra (who was 13 years old) and MansurAdabi. Marriage was declared void because Natra was below 16 following Dutch Law.
Article 3(1) “Islam is the religion of the Federation; but other religions may be practiced in peace and harmony in any part of the Federation.”
The interpretation of that provision can be found in the official Report of the Legislative Council Debate, 1 May 1958. Tengku Abdul Rahman , the first Prime Minister of Malaysia: “I would like to make it clear that this country is not an Islamic state as it is generally understood, we merely provide that Islam shall be the official religion of the state.”
The interpretation was reaffirmed in this case. Mandatory death penalty for drug trafficking offences and Firearms (Increased Penalties) Act 1974 were held valid despite not being compatible with Islamic law. It was argued that the death penalty was unislamic and therefore contrary to Article 3 of the Constitution.
The Supreme Court rejected this argument. Held that Islamic law was to be confined to the areas of personal law such as marriage, divorce and inheritance for Muslims. “Was (Islam as the way of life) the meaning intended by the framers of the Constitution? For this purpose, it is necessary to trace the history of Islam in this country after the British intervention in the affairs of the Malay States at the close of the last century”.
Article 3(1) according to the Supreme Court: “It means only such acts as related to rituals and ceremonies. If it had been otherwise, there would have been another provision in the Constitution which would have the effect that any law contrary to the injunction of Islam will be void”.
Article 160: “law” includes written law, the common law in so far as it is in operation in the Federation or any part thereof, and any custom or usage having the force of law in the Federation or any part thereof;”
Article 11 (1) Every person has the right to profess and practice his religion and, subject to Clause (4), to propagate it (4) State law and in respect of the Federal territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan and Putrajaya, federal law may control or restrict the propagation of any religious doctrine or belief among persons professing the religion of Islam
Article 4: This Constitution is the supreme law of the Federation and any law passed after Merdeka Day which is inconsistent with this Constitution shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be void.
Article 75 If any State law is inconsistent with a federal law, the federal law shall prevail and the State law shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be void.
List I – Federal list List II – State list List III – Concurrent list
1. Except with respect to the Federal territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan and Putrajaya, Islamic law and personal and family law of persons professing the religion of Islam, including the Islamic law relating to succession, testate and intestate, betrothal, marriage, divorce, dower, maintenance, adoption, legitimacy, guardianship, gifts, partitions and non-charitable trusts; Wakafs and the definition and regulation of charitable and religious trusts, the appointment of trustees and the incorporation of persons in respect of islamic religious and charitable endowments, institutions, trusts, charities and charitable institutions operating wholly within the State;
Malay customs; Zakat, Fitrah and baitulmal or similar Islamic religious revenue; mosques or any Islamic public place of worship, creation and punishment of offences by persons professing the religion of Islam against precepts of that religion, except in regard to matters included in the Federal List; the constitution, organization and procedure of Syariah courts, which shall have jurisdiction only over persons professing the religion of Islam and in respect only of any of the matters included in this paragraph…”
The law of Malaysia is mainly ... Islamic law refers to sharia law ... Malaysian Bar Council responded by saying that common law is part of Malaysian legal ...
The Sources Of Malaysian Legal System. ... Islamic law. Malaysia’s legal system ... law legal system. The sources of Malaysian Law can be ...
Explain the sources of Malaysian legal system. ... Malaysia practices the mixed legal system which consists of the Customary Law, Islamic Law and Common ...
Seth Ward IMPLEMENTING ISLAMIC LAW Quran: Basic source of Islamic law Revealed over 22 years. Earlier sections poetic, after 622 more legal SOURCES AND.
... Researching Islamic Law; Malaysian Sources . ... that has been enacted in the States of Malaysia has developed into an independent legal system, ...
... Introduction to the Malaysian Legal System and Sources of Law ... The Position of Islamic Law ... The secular basis of the Malaysian legal system ...
THE ISLAMIC LEGAL SYSTEM IN MALAYSIA ... role of Islamic law in the Malaysian legal system. ... Early sources tend to describe the court system in
BUSINESS LAW (LAW 416) MALAYSIAN LEGAL SYSTEM Objective To enable students to understand the sources of law, the Court’s system and the administration of ...