Judges Manifesto for the Right to Decide

67 %
33 %
Information about Judges Manifesto for the Right to Decide
News & Politics

Published on February 24, 2014

Author: miquimel

Source: slideshare.net


Judges Manifesto for the Right to Decide

Source: Judges in Catalonia.

Date: 06.02.2014.

Judges' Manifesto for the Right to Decide The undersigned—judges and magistrates who practice in Catalonia—as legal scholars and public servants—believe that we should share our perspective with Catalan civil society with respect to the legitimacy and/or legality of the so-called right to decide, and its possible consequences. Right now there is a broad and intense debate going on, in Catalonia but also in the rest of the State, about the so-called right to decide. And from various positions or viewpoints, the idea has been spread that the recognition or exercise of this right to decide is completely outside our Constitution and even outside international jurisprudence, and therefore enjoys no legitimacy whatsoever. The key question in this debate, however, in our understanding, depends on accepting or not the national reality of Catalonia, and therefore its full sovereignty for deciding its future. One must start with—we believe—a fact that is undeniable: Catalonia is a nation. This reality is determined by having a history, a culture, a shared language, and—above all—a repeated and persistent will to be recognized as a differentiated national society, which is not contradicted by its fully open and integrating character, evidenced by recent history. This fact—the national reality of Catalonia—is evident in the foundation of the Constitution of 1978, and in the Statutes of Autonomy of 1979 and 2006. If recognition was not, at the time more explicit, that is due to readily known reasons, basically the model of transition to a democratic regime, and the danger of reverting to an authoritarian threat, confirmed in 1981. This undeniable national reality of Catalonia brings with it, without question, the recognition of its right to decide: the so-called 'democratic principle' is inherent in all international and EU jurisprudence and one of its most elemental consequences is the right of peoples and nations to decide their own future. Therefore, a denial of the right to decide can only be understood and sustained by a strictly ideological and political criteria of negating the national reality of Catalonia. Indeed, it can be understood that Catalonia has exercised this right on several occasions: when submitting the Constitution and successive Statutes of Autonomy in 1979 and 2006 to referendum. But its latest decision, the Statute of 2006, was—in essential aspects of national identity and self-governance—completely weakened by the ruling of the Constitutional Court on June 28, 2010. This rejection generated the current political situation: the public demonstrations in 2010, 2012, and 2013, the public polls and repeated pronouncements by social, syndicate, and political organizations make it clear that a large part of the Catalan people—given the rejection of its last decision (the Statute of Autonomy)—wants to take another look at its relationship with the Spanish state, and to do so by contemplating all options, including independence. In contrast with what some particular sectors affirm, and as legal scholars, we believe that this right to decide can be exercised in the current constitutional framework, from a dynamic, living, and not sacramental, perspective of the Constitution, as is necessary in a social and democratic state that—as is defined in its first article—promotes values that are superior to its jurisprudence like liberty, justice, equality and political pluralism. And in any case, any Constitution, as an essential tool for democratic coexistence, must allow a continuous process of discussion and evolution, and the consequent acceptance of any legitimate project that seeks to modify the Constitution. As is proclaimed in Article 9.2 of the Constitution, it is the public institutions which must promote the conditions under which these rights of freedom and equality of the individual and of collectives of which it is comprised be real and effective, and also remove the obstacles that prevent the same and to facilitate the participation of all the citizens in the

political, cultural, and social fabric. This fundamental right of all citizens to participate in public affairs is consecrated in article 23 and more concretely, in article 92, the possibility of a poll by way of a referendum is anticipated with respect to particularly important political decisions. Finally, it's important to remember that—according to article 10.2—the precepts of the Constitution relative to fundamental rights and freedoms must be interpreted according to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the treaties and international accords ratified by the Spanish State that are based on the 'democratic principle' in the consideration that the will of the people is the basis for the authority of government (article 21 of the Universal Declaration) and in the right of the peoples to their free determination (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). The right to self-determination, according to the most recent criteria (and in relation to the case of Canada), is not limited only to peoples who are governed or subjected to foreign powers but is also extended to those peoples who, despite forming part of a democratic state, suffer limits to their right to self-government. In conclusion, we believe that in the current constitutional framework, interpreted in light of international jurisprudence and the fundamental principles and rights that inspired it, it is possible to legitimately exercise the right to referendum that is currently being demanded by a majority of the Catalan people. Barcelona, February 6, 2014

Add a comment

Related presentations

Cfbp barometre octobre

Cfbp barometre octobre

November 10, 2014

VITOGAZ vous présente: CFBP baromètre gpl carburant

Ata Escrita da 16ª Sessão Ordinária realizada em 16/10/2014 pela Câmara de Vereado...

Ata Escrita da 10ª Sessão Extraordinária realizada em 16/10/2014 pela Câmara de Ve...

Rx1 nasil kullanilir

Rx1 nasil kullanilir

November 8, 2014

Rx1 zayiflama hapi, kullanimi nasildir, yan etkileri var mi? yan etkiler var ise h...

Esposto del MoVimento 5 Stelle sul Patto del Nazareno

Slide Servizi postali

Slide Servizi postali

November 7, 2014

Slides per i servizi postali presentati in occasione dell'incontro azienda e organ...

Related pages

Ticking-off for pro-right to decide judges | J.Panyella/M ...

Ticking-off for pro-right to decide judges Promoter of Disciplinary Action reproaches unethical conduct of 33 judges who signed manifesto
Read more

Prison sentences: Should judges or politicians decide?

... Should judges or politicians decide? ... they would have to hand out the right sentences every time in order to ... (this was not a manifesto ...
Read more

Judges say that Catalonia’s self-determination fits within ...

Barcelona (ACN).- 33 Catalan judges have signed a manifesto in favour of Catalonia’s right to self-determination. According to these law experts ...
Read more

Judges supporting Catalonia’s self-determination denounce ...

judges-supporting-catalonia-s-self-determination ... In their manifesto, the judges, ... They concluded that the Catalan people’s right to decide on ...
Read more

Human Rights (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Examples of human rights are the right to ... And see Feinberg 1973 for the idea of “manifesto rights”). A human rights norm ... The judges ...
Read more

Judges or Legislators: Who should rule? - Gresham College

Judges or Legislators: Who should ... Rights Act gives us the right to decide how the balance should ... Party's 2005 Election Manifesto, to, and ...
Read more

Court rules publishing photos of pro-referendum judges was ...

Madrid’s High Court has dismissed the last appeal filed by the judges who signed a manifesto in support of Catalonia’s right to decide back in...
Read more

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dred Scott v. Sandford, ... colonies and American states to decide if federal law could recognize ... on their right to own slaves and to ...
Read more

Judges have no right to decide if hospitals are closed ...

Judges have no right to decide if hospitals are closed. ... is a member of a government elected in 2010 on the strength of its manifesto.
Read more