44 %
56 %
Information about johns

Published on January 7, 2008

Author: Mikhail


Semileptonic Charm Decays:  Semileptonic Charm Decays Will E. Johns (for the FOCUS Collaboration) Vanderbilt University, BEACH 2004, July 1 Slide2:  Subjects Covered Data from 96-97 run of FOCUS:  Data from 96-97 run of FOCUS Over 1,000,000 Reco’d. Charm -Vertex Resolution -Particle ID -Mass Resolution Very Good Lots of Pubs Semileptonic Charm Decays:  Semileptonic Charm Decays (D decay, No form factors, V decays to spin 0 particles) Neutrino is left handed Prefers W spin along muon,e V products spinless Prefer LZ=0 Form Factors Scalar Resonance? CP? More than just CKM measurement tools… FOCUS saw discrepancies in the data:  FOCUS saw discrepancies in the data Phys.Lett.B535:43-51, 2002 hep-ex/0203031 Yield 31,254 Data MC Focus “K*” signal Slide6:  FOCUS added a term, things got better L=0 ansatz Signal Events weighted by avg(cosqV): No added term FOCUS Semileptonic cuts description:  FOCUS Semileptonic cuts description Look for N bodies with a muon L/s – L sp ss ISO1 – CL DK’s in prim DCL – CL of DK vertex MuCL – CL for Muon ID Cuts on P(m) for m’s Cerenkov for p’s and K’s (from ~ 4-60 GeV/c) Vertexing cuts: ISO2 – No Xtra trks in DK OOM – No DK’s in stuff Particle ID cuts: TRKFITcl – Muon P consistency MISIDMCS Radius, Decay Prob (Ask me offline for all the detailed cut values!) FOCUS Form Factors:  FOCUS Form Factors Tried in fit, no sensitivity (E791?) (common – vary generated parameters in Montecarlo by using agreement with reconstructed distributions and data) Pioneered by D.M. Schmidt for E691 K*ev analysis: NIM A 328 (1993) S-wave term Breaks symmetry S-wave term and r’s essentially decouple FOCUS Form Factors:  FOCUS Form Factors Cuts similar to previous, some change to get uniform acceptance, one extra Cut on q2 < 0.2 GeV2/c2 r’s are flat, feeling mμ? Goodness of fit issue Right sign – Wrong sign Charm Background Systematic Checks S-wave – varied cuts 35 fits – Sample Variance Form Factor (3 sources) Varied Cuts Split sample Vary MC input Charm Backgrounds Phys.Lett.B544:89-96, 2002 hep-ex/0207049 Very Clean Data Slide10:  Form Factors Comparison S-Wave effects apparent only with high statistics Lattice Gauge! Experiment Models A more detailed look at the Kp line shape:  A more detailed look at the Kp line shape Take advantage of the very clean signal Previous best K* parameters Lass (1988) Kp scattering Spectra is complicated Mass range limit in fit More Blatt-Weisskopf radius info away from pole FOCUS sees S-wave effects primarily Below K* Slide12:  Using LASS parameters for ER model of d Constant d FOCUS PRELIMINARY K* Mass K* Width BL-WK radius #K* events Scalar Fraction Mass and Width Don’t change Careful studies of resolution effects too Slide13:  FOCUS PRELIMINARY Systematics by varying cuts, background contribution, shapes Slide14:  FOCUS Form Factors - Event by Event version of discrete transform method - No evidence for S - wave Phys.Lett.B586:183-190, 2004 hep-ex/0401001 - Backgrounds higher (cut on M(f)) Ds  fmn form factor enigma:  Ds  fmn form factor enigma Theoretically the Dsfln form factor should be within 10% of D+ K*ln . The rV values were consistent but r2 for Dsfln was  2 higher than D+ K*ln . Ds  fmn versus D+ K*ln Slide16:  Backgrounds Make a difference! Biggest Players: Signal, ~400 events (red and dots) Combinatoric Background, ~750 events (pink hatch) Muon Misid, ~300 events (faint black histogram) A peek at: Search for Cabibbo Suppressed Ds semileptonic decay:  Search for Cabibbo Suppressed Ds semileptonic decay Note kaon and muon have same sign K+ K- mass in KKm events K p mass in Kp m events What’s this? Preliminary results of the search:  Preliminary results of the search In the loosely cut sample, the MC was a poor match to the observed WS Kp spectrum. Large non-charm contribution? With tight cuts, the MC matched the data away from the K* peak. We saw a 3.9s excess in K* yield in data over MC We compared the WS Kp spectrum to a MC that incorporated all known charm decay and normalize the MC to the D+K*mn yield observed in the data If this K* excess were interpreted as DsK*mn , we would obtain... MKp (GeV/c2) MKp (GeV/c2) This BR is very consistent with (10 ±1.3)% predicted by R.J. Oakes et al. (1997) (hep-ph/9708277) FOCUS BR Measurements:  FOCUS BR Measurements events / 5 MeV/c2 Includes S-wave interference Phys.Lett.B540:25-32, 2002 hep-ex/0206013 events / 10 MeV/c2 BR Comparisons to Exp. & Models:  BR Comparisons to Exp. & Models BR relative to Kpp …not so good Slide21:  What about ? Could resolve lepton ID issues Topological trouble though > need an extra particle for K* Most Experiments measure ~0.5 (E687 too!) (some use rates though…compare D+ D0) But CLEO2 Reported Using the From the PDG But using PDG values we also find: Isospin Violation? Slide22:  FOCUS In the FOCUS silicon Reconstruct both Drawback: Only about 10% of Ks>p+p- Decays occur in the FOCUS silicon Find Background Dominated by D>KsXmn Slide23:  FOCUS is world’s best Correct for S-Wave: hep-ex/0406060 Submitted to PLB Measure: Use Focus K*mn and PDG Kpp, compare to D0: Isospin OK again ?=1.03=? Long standing “difference” for D0 is in “wrong” direction Slide24:  Other Exp’s Models Comparison to other Experiments and Theory Focus measurements suggest little “missing” Semileptonic rate PDG Sum of PDG CA e modes Focus m’s as e’s Hard to believe PDG for PS electron is correct Slide25:  Preview of other FOCUS analysis -Plot of pseudo D*-D mass difference -Will repeat Vector analysis (tough to see S-wave) -measure q2 shape and BR for pmn and Kmn (expect dBR/BR<10%) Conclusions::  Conclusions: Resolved some outstanding enigmas (f ff’s, V/PS Ratio, PDG rates) Raised some new ones (low q2 in K*, proper S-wave description We’ve gotten a lot of physics out of the careful analysis of the Vector decays (S-wave, B(K*,f), M(K*), r’s, W(K*), CS(K*)… Looking at new things

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

Johns-Autoteile GmbH & Co KG

Johns, Hamburg, Autoersatzteile, Automotiv, Karosserie, Blechteile, Stoßstangen, Stoßstangenverstärkung, Motorhaub, Kotflügel, Fontverkleidung ...
Read more

Johns – Wikipedia

Johns ist ein Familienname. Herkunft und Bedeutung. Der im englischen Sprachraum gebräuchliche, ursprünglich patronymisch gebildete Name leitet sich von ...
Read more

Johns Autoteile GmbH & Co KG /// Online-Shop

Johns, Hamburg, Autoersatzteile, Automotiv, Karosserie, Blechteile, Stoßstangen, Stoßstangenverstärkung, Motorhaub, Kotflügel, Fontverkleidung ...
Read more

St. John’s (Neufundland) – Wikipedia

The Telegram ist die einzige große Tageszeitung in St. Johns. Weitere lokale Zeitungen, die wöchentlich oder monatlich erscheinen, sind The Muse, ...
Read more

Papa John's Pizza | Order for Delivery or Carryout

Each Papa John’s pizza is carefully crafted with flavorful, superior-quality ingredients and toppings. Order pizza online for delivery or carryout.
Read more

Johns Hopkins University - Wikipedia

The Johns Hopkins University (commonly referred to as Johns Hopkins, JHU, or simply Hopkins) is an American private research university in ...
Read more - google

Wir freuen uns , Sie in unserem Lokal begrüßen zu dürfen. Wir werden stets bemüht sein , Sie zu Jhrer vollsten Zufriedenheit zu bewirten und Jhnen ...
Read more

Johns & Roepke - Home

Das Autohaus Johns & Roepke Automobile GmbH & Co. KG in Schwarzenbek bietet eine großes Angebot an Neu- und Gebrauchtwagen, umfangreiche Service- und ...
Read more

Home | Johns Hopkins University

We’re America’s first research university. Johns Hopkins was founded on the principle that by pursuing big ideas and sharing what we learn, we make the ...
Read more

St. Johns, Michigan - Wikipedia

Location of St. Johns, Michigan: Coordinates: Coordinates: Country: United States: State: Michigan: County: Clinton: Area • Total: 3.87 sq mi (10.02 km 2
Read more