Indian acts governing different IPRs

54 %
46 %
Information about Indian acts governing different IPRs

Published on February 4, 2014

Author: karanppt



Indian act on IPRs, CBD, Copyright Act, 1957
The Patents Act, 1970 
The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999
The Trade Marks Act, 1999
The Designs Act, 2000
The Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout-Design Act, 2000
Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001
Biological Diversity Act, 2002

Indian Acts governing different IPRs • Copyright Act, 1957 • The Patents Act, 1970 • The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 • The Trade Marks Act, 1999 • The Designs Act, 2000 • The Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout-Design Act, 2000 • Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001 • Biological Diversity Act, 2002

The Protection of Plant Varieties & Farmers Rights Act, 2001 (PPV&FR Act, 2001) • Act – 2001 – 11 Chapters – 97 clauses • • • • Rules – 2003 Regulations – 2006 Notifications – from time to time Case laws – as and when these will appear.

Administration / Enforcement of PPV&FRA

Convention on Biology Diversity Adopted on 5 June 1992; Enforced on 29 Dec. 1993; 190 Countries Parties • • • • Objective & Goals Conservation of Biological Diversity Sustainable use of its components Fair & equitable sharing of benefits arising out of utilization of genetic resources & appropriate transfer of relevant technology. • Appropriate funding

Contnd. • Facilitated Access based on Prior Informed Consent on Mutually Agreed Terms. • Access to Biological resources vis-à-vis Technology • Right over resources & technology Cartagena Protocol on Bio-safety: Sept. 2003; 139 parties

CBD & IPR • IPR in the context of biodiversity are important for • Regulating access to genetic resources (Art.15) • Also, for access to technology for the use of genetic resources (Art, 16, 19) • Development of measures to ensure fair and equitable benefit sharing with • States (Sovereign Rights), and • Communities (Holders of traditional knowledge) (Art. 8j) • Web page and clearing house mechanism:

Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge in relation to patents Act • Disclosure for source and geographical origin biological materials is compulsory (Sec 10(d)) • To deposit* samples of biological material mentioned in the specifications with a notified repository. • To give particulars of deposit made in the application • Non disclosure or wrong disclosure of source or geographical origin of a biological material used in the invention and anticipation of the invention through prior knowledge oral or otherwise within any local or indigenous community constitute additional grounds for opposition (Sec.25).

Contnd. • * The microbial type culture collection and gene bank (MTCC) [IMTECH, Chandigarh] is a notified Authorized Depository Institution in India that receives Deposits for Biological samples of patentable subject matter (microbes).

BIOPIRACY • Appropriation of sovereign GR of nations & TK of farming communities and seeking exclusive IPR over these resources & knowledge by others 1. Patents may be wrongly granted due to – Oversight during the examination – Lack of access to TK because of inadequate search tools

Contnd. 2. Patents may be granted where national laws does not recognize as prior art – some form of public disclosure of TK – disclosure in other countries 3. Patent has been granted on genuine invention but – the PIC of communities providing the GR/TK not obtained 4. The TKDL initiative is historical and proactive.

List of “bad patents” submitted to TRIPS Council by developing countries S.N. Bioresource Patent no. 1 Turmeric US 5,40,504 2 Bringal, Karela, Jamun, Gurmar US 5,900,240 3 Arhar (Pigeonpea/ Cajanus) US 6,410,596, US 6,541,522 4 Pepper US 5,536,506,US,5,744,161, US 5,972, 382 5 Amla US 5,529,778 6 Basmati rice** US 5,663,484 7 Neem** (Azadirachta) US 5,124,349 ** Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, India & Pakistan ** Patents not included in the list submitted

Biological Diversity Act, 2002 (18 of 2003) MoEF NBA Committee on Agrobiodiversity •Access for Indian Biodiversity to foreigners / Indians. •National Biodiversity Authority •State Biodiversity Boards •Local Biodiversity Committees •Biodiversity Registers •Equitable benefit sharing •Conservation of biodiversity –in situ, & –ex situ

Management of Sovereign Biodiversity in India Some key Functionaries of Central Government • MoEF/NBA – Nodal agency for Indian Biodiversity – Biological Diversity Act 2002 (No. 18 of 2003). • DAC/DARE/ICAR – Protection of plant varieties & farmers’ Rights Act,2001 – Multilateral access to PGRFA and benefit sharing • DBT – Supplementary function for bioresources/ biotechnology. • DISM (Department of Indian System of Medicine) – Supplementary function for biodiversity patents • Others: DST/DSIR/CSIR/DRDO/BARC

Regulation of access to biodiversity in India Chapter – II of the Biological Diversity Act, 2002. Certain persons not to undertake biodiversity relayed activities without approval of NBA. Sec. 3 (1&2)  No person* shall, without previous approval of the National Biodiversity Authority, obtain any biological resource occurring in India or knowledge associated thereto for research or for commercial utilization or for biosurvey and bio utilization. * = Any foreigner , NRI, foreign company or Indian company with foreign participation.

Results of research not to be transferred to certain person without approval of NBA  Sec .4: No person shall, without prior approval of NBA, transfer the results of any research relating to any bioresources occurring in, or obtained from, India for monetary consideration ot otherwise to any person as defined in sec.3(2).  Explanation – Here, “transfer” does not include publication of research papers or dissemination of knowledge in any seminar or workshop, if such publication is as per the guidelines issued by the Central Government.

Cont. • Section 3 & 4 not to apply to certain collaborative research projects. • No application can be made without approval of NBA • Prior Intimation to state Biological Board for obtaining biological resources for certain purposes.

Benefit sharing under the Biological Diversity Act, 2002  Sec. 21(2):- NBA shall determine the benefit sharing in all or any of the following manner:- a) Grant of joint ownership of IPR b) Transfer of technology

Cont. a) Location of production, research and development units in such areas which will facilitate better living standards to the benefit claimers; b) Association of Indian scientists, benefit claimers & the local people with R&D in bio-resources/ GR, biosurvey, bioutilization c) Setting up of venture capital fund for aiding the cause of benefit claimers;

Cont. • Payment of monetary compensation / non monetary benefits to the benefit claimers as the NBA may deem fit.

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

The Indian Performing Right Society Limited - Home

The Indian Performing Right Society ... about the functioning of IPRS. ... Limited by Guarantee and Registered under the Companies Act, ...
Read more

Iprs | LinkedIn

View 662 Iprs posts, presentations, experts, and more. Get the professional knowledge you need on LinkedIn. LinkedIn Home What is LinkedIn? Join Today
Read more

Intellectual Property Rights

1.2 Legislations Covering IPRS in INDIA ... Intellectual Property Rights: ... Farmers Rights Act, 2001. India has put in place a law to grant Plant Breeders
Read more

Acts/Rules | National Portal of India

... you can access full text of all the Central Acts passed by the Indian Parliament since 1834 by searching the ... All Acts/Rules 3820 Act/Rule ...
Read more

IPRs Protection and South Asia | arvind singh -

... international laws governing the IPRs and ... to protect its IPRs like Indian Patent Act, ... medicine by adopting different process ...
Read more

The Indian Act - University of British Columbia

The Act also severely restricted the governing powers ... and contrast different versions of the Indian Act, ... Indian Chiefs, The Indian Act and ...
Read more

Government of India Act 1935 - Wikipedia, the free ...

... although the Government of India Act 1935 was ... the gradual development of self-governing ... encompassing units of such hugely different ...
Read more

Did the big music companies on IPRS & PPL collude to deny ...

... of affairs at the Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. (IPRS). ... PPL and IPRS are completely different. ... changes in the governing structure of IPRS.
Read more

Almost two years later, India’s new copyright law makes ...

... India’s new copyright law makes no difference to ... the Copyright (Amendment) Act, ... The governing council of IPRS is ruled by the same ...
Read more