GMC Conference workshop: Professionalism post Francis and Berwick

67 %
33 %
Information about GMC Conference workshop: Professionalism post Francis and Berwick
Health & Medicine

Published on December 19, 2013

Author: GMCUK



Our first annual conference in Manchester brought together doctors, medical students and patient groups to consider and debate the challenges affecting medical professionalism in the 21st century.

This workshop explored different themes around professionalism. It featured a panel consisting of Professor Mike Pringle, President RCGP; Nigel Acheson, Regional Medical Director (South NHS England); Professor Wendy Reid, Medical Director Health Education England; Maureen Edmondson, Chair of the Patient and Client Council for Northern Ireland and Niall Dickson, Chief Executive and Registrar of the GMC,

Medical Professionalism – whose job is it anyway?

Introducing our panel  Professor Mike Pringle – President, Royal College of General Practitioners  Nigel Acheson – Regional Medical Director (South), NHS England  Professor Wendy Reid – Medical Director at Health Education England  Maureen Edmondson – Chair of the Patient and Client Council for Northern Ireland  Niall Dickson – Chief Executive and Registrar, General Medical Council

Setting the scene: who’s in the room? 1. Student 2. Educator 3. Doctor 4. Patient 5. Employer 6. Professional body 7. Other

Place in order of importance these levers to improve/enable professionalism?  Education and training  More regulation / legal powers  Organisational culture and leadership  Greater patient involvement in care and care design  More resources

Theme 1 – Accountability or Improvement? Francis • • • • • • Fundamental standards Legal duty of candour Criminal sanctions Regulation Healthcare leadership Authoritative information Berwick • Ethic of learning • Patients and carers involved at all levels • Quality and patient safety sciences • Regulation to be sensitive • Recourse to sanctions rare

Time to vote: Accountability or Improvement? 1. Francis……..accountability 2. Berwick ……improvement

Theme 2 – Raising Concerns

Raising Concerns – a familiar challenge  ‘(We)…..should not seem over-anxious to be at work since the spreading abroad of the shortcomings of any erring members of our honourable profession is a proceeding to be carefully restrained within precise limit.’ John Marshall, GMC President, 1887-1891  ‘The system for the investigation … has not proved capable of reconciling the diverse objectives that have to be achieved. X not unreasonably felt that he had to take his complaint outside ‘the system’’. Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Ely Hospital 1969  ‘A combination of inadequate systems and poor culture meant that staff were not encouraged to … speak openly. Those who tried to raise concerns found it hard to have their voices heard.’ Bristol Royal Infirmary Enquiry 2001  ‘Staff witnesses described an atmosphere of fear … and a forceful style of management (perceived by some as bullying). There was also evidence of a worrying acceptance of poor care, of poor behaviour among colleagues being condoned.’ Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Inquiry 2010

Raising Concerns – a problem on the wane?  Complaints from all sources to GMC are up - 8,109 in 2012 up 24% since 2011 and 104% since 2007  Complaints from doctors to the GMC have risen by 113% over the last five years  GMC Confidential Helpline - 881 calls from Doctors (66 investigations) in the last 12 months  GMC NTS results: ~16% of doctors in training raised a concern in the last year  Evidence in practice:  Julie Bailey  Helene Donnelly  Colchester ‘whistle-blower’ on Cancer Care Pathway

Place these barriers to raising concerns in order of significance  Systems/routes to complain are not clear  Fear of recrimination from employers, colleagues or doctor about whom complaint is made  Feeling nothing will change

Theme 3 – The Good Doctor

Place these characteristics of a doctor in order of importance to you  Knowledge/expertise  Compassion/empathy  Listens and responds in partnership  Communicates well  Confidence they are up to date  Integrity

What patients and the public told us (GMP Consultation 2011)

What doctors told us (Sample of 90 doctors – 2013)

Closing question Will, in the long run, the last year have been good or bad for the future of medical professionalism? 1. Good – from crisis….renewal 2. Bad – its all downhill from here 3. Neither - it won’t make a blind bit of difference

Lunch and exhibition Upper foyer and Exchange hall

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

GMC | Medical professionalism: whose job is it anyway ...

Summary of the medical professionalism conference. ... first GMC wide conference, Medical professionalism: ... Professionalism post Francis and Berwick, ...
Read more

GMC conference: Medical professionalism: whose job is it ...

GMC conference: Medical professionalism: ... , GMC 1100–1230 Workshops ... professionalism post Francis and Berwick
Read more

GMC conference, Medical professionalism: whose job is it ...

GMC conference, Medical professionalism: ... include panel discussions and workshops on issues ... means in a world post-Francis and Berwick ...
Read more

Social media as part of a new professionalism : #GMCConf

Social media as part of a new professionalism : ... Two years ago I attended a GMC education conference in the London. The conference had no ...
Read more

About the Francis Inquiry | The Health Foundation

Following the Report of the Francis Inquiry and the Berwick Review into Patient Safety, ... In October 2013, the GMC published ...
Read more

Education for a safety culture | General Medical Council

A year and a half ago Don Berwick’s review on patient ... Tags: #GMCconf, GMC conference, medical ... Get every new post delivered to ...
Read more