Published on May 7, 2014
Framework for RecognitionThe Development of Quality Criteria for the Professional Doctorate in Education Presented at October 2013 Convening at Rutgers University 1
Committee Members • Chris Ray, North Dakota State, Chair • Kathleen Haywood, Missouri – St. Louis • Colleen MacKinnon, Vermont • Deanna Sands, Seattle (formerly UC-Denver) • Amy Wells Dolan, Mississippi • Jill Perry, CPED • Michael Learn, North Dakota State, GA 2
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Distinguishand Improve the Professional Doctorate in Education Consortium Activity Consortium begins Working Principles Design Concepts FIPSE Site Visits DiP Award Transition to 503(c) Research Focus Scholarly Practitioner & Laboratory of Practice Capstone Design, Signature Pedagogy Rubric of EdD Candidates CPED Networks & Critical Friends CPED Framework & Mentorship Network Improvement Communities Improvement Science Members & Recognition 25 Members First Re-Design Programs Expanding the concepts Phase II 25 New Members Future of CPED Recognition Focus
Recognition Objectives • Articulates the nature and function of the doctorate of education for scholarly leaders in practice-based settings • Demonstrates effectiveness that adheres to the CPED Design Concepts (2009) and Working Principles (2010) • Provides a framework for continuous program improvement • Recognizes differing phases of program development • Expects active participation and contributions to CPED organizational activities and initiatives 4
Framework Process • Recognition Committee • Bi-weekly Meetings since June convening • Reviewed Example Criteria • e.g., CAEP, CACREP, UCEA, National Board, DNP, DSW, PSM, Carnegie Community Engagement, Baldrige • Drafted “Guidelines” Document • Numerous Rounds of Committee Edits • Edits Based Upon Initial External Feedback • Disseminated “Framework” to Consortium 5
What Recognition Is • A way to demonstrate program quality to others (both internally and externally) • A way to distinguish those who have made substantial progress • An understanding that different institutions have achieved different levels of implementation CPED Working Principles and Design Concepts • A way to demonstrate impact of CPED • A marketing strategy 6
What Recognition Is Not • Accreditation, but it is a possible resource to support accreditation • Mandatory • Overly Rigid / Formal • Criteria will be aspirational but broad • Sources of evidence will largely be determined by institution • Time-Consuming 7
Benefits of Recognition • Clear Statement and Demonstration of Quality to Internal and External Constituencies • Better Marketing to Students and Education Professionals • Enhanced Development of New CPED Members • Improved Access to Grant Funding through Demonstrated Quality and Collaboration • Stepped Benefits to Institutions 8
Development of Criteria • A process of fully unpacking the Framework • Criteria and forms of measurement will be identified as we move forward • Similar developmental process to Framework • Draft Criteria • Pilot Feedback (Internal & External) • Distributed to Consortium • Pilot Criteria / Recognition Process 9
Small Group Discussion • Brainstorm how might CPED measure the 8 components? • Individually brainstorm what you are already doing related to the 8 components? • Share and discuss ideas at your table. • Group Discussion: What measures are needed? 10
Discussion / Q&A 11
Private Company Decision-Making Framework. ... to provide alternative recognition ... Company Decision-Making Framework: April 10, 2013:
THE COMMITTEE OF THE CONVENTION ON THE RECOGNITION OF QUALIFICATIONS ... have or intend to develop a National Qualifications Framework; ... 7/10/2013 12:58 ...
Agenda Item 6: Conceptual Framework ... Conceptual Framework for ... to review further components of the draft final chapter on Elements and Recognition
The Australian Curriculum . ... them to develop a wider recognition and ... revisions before the final Framework is submitted to
There are three avenues for the mutual recognition of qualifications in the EU: automatic recognition, the general system and recognition of professional ...
Framework: Elements and Recognition ... develop the final chapter ... 12/10/2013 10:44:18 AM ...
RECOGNITION & ENRICHMENT WORK GROUP CHARTER ... Jan 10, 2013 2. Design and develop framework and ... Jan 10, 2013 3. Plan Phase II of recognition and ...
... 20 November 2013 amending Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of ... of Directive 2005/36/EC) 30.10.2013 ... Legal Framework for the ...
... the Commission will propose an integrated framework for the development ... quality labels for mutual recognition. 24/10/2013 ... Final deliverable ...
Mutual evaluation of regulated professions ... Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications1, ... 676 final, 2.10.2013. 2