Published on March 10, 2014
DDA 2.0: Evidence-Based Selection of E-Books Galadriel Chilton University of Connecticut email@example.com Photo Credit: Redfishingboat (Mick O) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
UConn Libraries PDA program is quite successful from an acquisitions perspective, but access to DRM-encased e- books is a less than ideal user experience. This presentation describes how UConn Libraries worked is working to provide access to thousands of DRM-free e- books while only purchasing titles with highest use.
Photo Credit: neurollero Where have we been? Why DDA 2.0?
66,685 Accessible Titles Out of 15,013 Titles Used… - 14,596 Short Term Loans - 417 Purchases
Photo Credit: Darren Tunnifliff
“Thanks very much for these links. However, I must share my feedback that this e-reader format is quite possibly the worst publication format that I have yet come across. In printing off the full chapters I wanted, some suddenly were truncated and every one had many page duplications, probably a result of subsections being defined part way through the page. I’m sure that this affected the number of pages I was allowed to print off too. The normal SpringerLink format would have been a thousand times better. I take what I can get, of course.” Assistant Professor Jonathan L Klassen Molecular and Cell Biology February 21, 2014
Photo Credit: Melanie O.
Photo Credit: BlueRobot
Photo Credit: Romain BIHORE
Photo Credit: Rusty Clark
Photo Credit: Novartis AG
Current Profile Specs: Books Over $100 Imprint of 3 Years to Present Excludes Textbooks 3 Short Term Loans, 4th Triggers Purchase Percent Use by Publisher July 2011 – December 2013 Taylor & Francis 29% Wiley 16% Springer 10% Elsevier 7% Cambridge Univ. Press 4% Oxford Univ. Press 3% ABC-CLIO 2%
Taylor and Francis 24% Wiley 23% Elsevier 11% Springer 6% Cambridge Univ. Press 5% Oxford Univ. Press 4% De Gruyter 3% Current Profile Specs: Books Over $100 Imprint of 3 Years to Present Excludes Textbooks 3 Short Term Loans, 4th Triggers Purchase Percent $pend by Publisher July 2011 – December 2013
Current Profile Specs: Books up to $99.99 Imprint of 3 Years to Present Excludes Textbooks 3 Short Term Loans, 4th Triggers Purchase Wiley 17% Palgrave Macmillan 9% Cambridge Univ. Press 6% Princeton Univ. Press 5% Elsevier 4% Univ. of Chicago Press 4% Oxford Univ. Press 3% Percent of Use by Publisher July 2011 – December 2013
Photo Credit: zetson
DDA 2.0 Evidence-Based Acquisition of E-Books • Library pays a minimal deposit for 12-months of access to all of a publisher’s DRM-free e- books on the publisher’s platform • Library and publisher negotiate a minimum spend to be paid at end of 12 months • Library activates access to e-books (loads MARC records, etc.) • Library analyzes use at end of 12 months and purchases e-books with highest use to meet or exceed minimum spend. • Access to unpurchased e-books ends. • Library applies usage statistics gathered to help inform next fiscal year’s budget allocations. Photo Credit: Sepehr Ehsani
Photo Credit: W & J
Photo Credit: Mark Forman
Licensing Woes Funding determined / Price negotiated Faculty request curricular and/or research need Does vendor accept required CT contract terms? Need for e-resource confirmed Yes and under $3,000 Resource not acquired Forward license agreement and justification of need for acquisition to CT Attorney General / UConn Office of General Council for AG Review Proceed with license negotiation* Successful negotiating complete? Vendor signs documents • License Agreement • Ethics Forms+ • Signature Authority UConn countersigns license agreement per signature authority designation policy No Invoice received and payment processed Resource access activated Hard copies filed and to AG/OGC if AG/OGC reviewed (Records Retention: term of license +7 years) Signed documents added to CORAL AG/OGC signature if AG/OGC reviewed license November 12, 2013 Yes and over $3,000 Signed documents added to KFS +Greater than $50,000, Less than $500,000: OPM 1 and 5 Form C +Greater $500,000: OPM 1, 5,6, and 7 Form C g. chilton / d. sanfordPhoto Credit: NASA
Photo Credit: Salim Virji
Photo Credit: jacquesh63
Photo from www.geekologie.com
Photo by subscircle
Photo Credit: cellar_door_films
Photo Credit: Ed Callow
or e-book Photo by Betsy Weber
Galadriel Chilton firstname.lastname@example.org @gchilton slideshare.net/gchilton Thank you! 2014
ER&L 2014 Session Evaluations ... DDA 2.0: Evidence-Based Selection of E-Books Comments (What did you like, specifically? How could this session be ...
View 752 Erl posts, ... ER&L 2014 Never Mind I'll Just Buy It: ... DDA 2.0 Evidence-Based Selection of E-Books. 481 Views.
... ER&L Online Conference Attendees!" blog post for the troubleshooting details & ER&L 2014 downloads. ER&L values Twitter as a tool to connect people ...
Thank you for your interest in ER&L 2014! If you are interested in purchasing the archive, please click here to register. ER&L Archive Consumers: Please ...
–Register for ER&L 2014, ... DDA 2.0: Evidenced-Based Selection of E-Books Deselecting, ... 2013 ER&L Sessions by Track;
Electronic Resources and Libraries: 2014 ... ER&L 2014 in Review,” a ... Why Users Won’t Jump Through Your Hoops” and “DDA 2.0: Evidence-Based ...
BOBCATSSS 2014 Proceedings Open Journal Systems. ... Home > 2014 > Urbano. Patron-Driven Acquisitions ... Cataloguing e-books in UK higher education ...
Charleston 2014 According to Carol: Kanopy and E-Books. by Carol. ... After starting DDA, ... For e-books, Big Deal purchases ...
View 1170 Dd&a posts, presentations, experts, and more. Get the professional knowledge you need on LinkedIn.
... what do users think? In Catalogue 2.0: ... A comparative study of print book and DDA ebook ... Evidence Based Library and Information ...