econ and mgnt of privatization

71 %
29 %
Information about econ and mgnt of privatization

Published on November 20, 2007

Author: Mee12



Economics & Management of Privatization:  Economics & Management of Privatization Professor Simon Hakim Lecture 1:  Lecture 1 Definition: Political Science, Economics The Concept of Public Goods: Adam Smith Characteristics of Goods that Require Intervention Techniques of Public Sector Definitions—Public Administration:  Definitions—Public Administration Relying more on private institutions of society and less on government to satisfy people’s needs. Private institutions include businesses operating in marketplace, voluntary organizations– religious, neighborhoods, civic, co-operatives and charities. Individuals, family, clan or tribe. Act of diminished role of government or increased role of private sector in an activity or in the ownership of assets. Act of transferring government enterprise or assets to the private sector Webster’s: Making private, especially changing from public to private control or ownership. Definition: Economics:  Definition: Economics A move of an asset or activity from bureaucratic government monopoly towards competitive markets. Public Goods: Adam Smith:  Public Goods: Adam Smith The need for National defense The duty of protecting every member of society from injustice or oppression of every other member of society Establish and Maintaining highly beneficial public institutions and public works which are of negative profit nature if supplied in small quantities The duty of meeting expenses of ruling powers. Public Intervention in Marketplace:  Public Intervention in Marketplace Pure Public Good: Collective consumption (non-divisible) with non-exclusion, and non-rivalry in consumption. MC=0. Motivation for free ridership. Externalities: Positive and negative; Production and Consumption. Monopolistic Power. Equity. Pure Public:  Pure Public The case of MC=0 and constant is typical for pure public good. A non-competitive provider will produce at MR=MC and eliminate a significant part of Consumers’ surplus. Example, a road without congestion. Degree of collective consumption VS. Size of relevant interacting group. Dichotomy of Goods & Services:  Dichotomy of Goods & Services Mapping of Goods:  Mapping of Goods Size Externalities:  Externalities Definition: By-product of activities that escape the price mechanism, and may be of positive or negative nature. Government role is to internalize externalities such that the price includes it. In case of negative externalities the product is over produced and at a lower price than it should (social). Positive externalities cause under production of the good at a higher price than socially desired. Natural Monopoly:  Natural Monopoly A single provider in the market. Absence of competition may result of significant economies of scale, technological superiorities, and/or asymmetric information that over time eliminated all competitors. Entry of new competitors to increase supply and thereby lower prices is usually infeasible. Gov’t intervention is Natural Monopoly (cont.):  Natural Monopoly (cont.) Is aimed to control prices through regulation. Examples include local utilities. Improved technology increase availability of close substitutes and leads to elimination of the need to regulate. Natural monopoly results of economies of scale, technological superiority, asymmetric information. Overtime, one provider prevails. Consumers’ surplus in the case of a monopoly is smaller than that results in perfect competition. Government regulation sets the price to be lower and as close as possible to that of perfect competition. Action could be on the quantity. Equity:  Equity Requires government intervention. Efficiency VS. Equity. Shortcomings of perfect competition. Voluntary activities to reduce inequity. Progressive taxation. History of Privatization:  History of Privatization Peter Drucker suggested contracting out. Milton Friedman. Thatcher elected 1979. BP (79), British Aerospace (81), National Freight Corp (82), Cable and Wireless (83), Jaguar (84), British Telecom (84), British Aerospace-final portion of holdings (85), British Gas (86), British Airways (87), Rolls Royce (87), British Airport Authority (87), water utilities (89), electric utilities (90), mandatory compulsory tendering (compet bidding) of local gov’t services (89). History of Privatization:  History of Privatization US: little privatization by sale by Fed. Few state owned enterprise. Contracting out: data processing, food services, building maintenance, guard services. Local: waste collection, street cleaning, ambulance service, park maintenance. History of Privatization:  History of Privatization World: Late 1980’s: Mexico, Brazil, Chile, Argentina elected presidents who adopted strong privat. Policies. China: Agriculture (78), eliminating state owned and collective farms and allowing private farming. In the 80’s: private sector industrial and retail operations, multi ownership, joint ventures. 89: Collapse of socialist block. Political historical Discussion:  Political historical Discussion Rise of Communism and greater state involvement in marketplace: Eastern block Rise of Socialism in Western Europe Rise of Fascist regimes in South and Central America Change of trend: Thatcher and Reagan Collapse of Eastern European block Liberalism in Western Europe and Americas The role of privatization Forms of Privatization:  Forms of Privatization Divestment: Shedding an enterprise or an asset. One time affair. Sold or given away. Free transfer: Given away to employees, users, customers, previous owners, or the public at large Sale: to joint venture, private buyer, the public, employees, users or customers. Forms of Privatization:  Forms of Privatization Delegation: Requires a continuing active role for gov’t. Remains responsible for overseeing the results. Contract: for part of service, for total management. Solid waste collection, street repair, street cleaning, snow removal, tree maintenance, loan processing, data processing, audio visual services, food, mail and filing services. Franchise (concession): exclusive right to sell a service or product to the public. 1. Use of the public domain in the course of carrying out their commercial activities– airwaves, air space, underground space. Examples, broadcasting, airlines, bus and taxi co’s, electric, gas, water, telephone. Forms of Privatization :  Forms of Privatization (Delegation forms cont.) 2. A lease. Government owned property is used by a private lessee to engage in a commercial enterprise Grant: private entity does the work-subsidy, grants for public transit, low income housing, maritime shipping. To run a bus service, to do research, to promote the arts. Contracts are more specific. Vouchers: subsidize eligible consumers instead of producers. Used for food, housing, education, health, daycare, transportation. To eligible recipients. Purchase services at marketplace. Mandate: Gov’t requires private companies to provide services at their expense. Ex. Unemployment Compensation. Replacing Gov’t by mandatory indiv retirement accts. Forms of Privatization:  Forms of Privatization Displacement: Passive process as markets develop to satisfy needs. By default: Gradually the public looks for the private sector. Ex. Municipal tennis courts and other rec. facilities. Commercial ventures, voluntary groups like charitable, social, philanthropic and community org. Ex. Police is replaced by private guards. Gypsy cabs and other illegal trans. Providers emerge as public means are inadequate. Private co’s finance, build, operating, owning roads, bridges, prisons. Tunnel connecting England and France. Forms of Privatization :  Forms of Privatization By Withdrawal: Gov’t shuts down failing public enterprise or accommodates private sector private sector expansion. By deregulation: State monopoly vs. competition. Privatization if the private sector challenges a gov’t monopoly and even displaces it. Packages and express mail. Delegation: Contracting Out:  Delegation: Contracting Out Most common in the US (28% of all services). Mandatory for municipal services in the UK. Managed competition: bidding for contracting out that includes the gov’t agency. Goldsmith: “A city could run with its mayor, a police chief, a planning director, a purchasing agent, and a handful of contract monitors”. Steps in contracting for service: Consider the idea of contracting out. Select the service Conduct a feasibility study Foster competition Request expression of interest or qualifications Plan the employee transition Prepare bid specifications Initiate a public relations campaign Engage in “managed competition” Conduct a fair bidding process Evaluate the bids and award a contract Monitor, evaluate, and enforce contract performance Contracting Out:  Contracting Out Success in waste management: collection, disposal, extracting energy and recyclables from the waste stream, and to treat hazardous wastes. Principal-agent problem: The principal bears 1. the cost of providing incentives to encourage the agent to pursue the goals of the principal. 2. the cost of obtaining information and monitoring the agent to reduce opportunistic behavior. 3. the cost of any residual opportunistic behavior by the agent. A gov’t with budget problems is a good candidate for contracting out. Loss of hospital accreditation by the State, court’s order the closure of a municipal landfill, sudden need for a large public facility-- all necessitate contracting out. Contracting Out: Actual Process:  Contracting Out: Actual Process Wastewater treatment plants in Indianapolis, 1993. Mayor creates Review Committee (6 mayoral appointees, and 2 from City Council) Review Committee issues RFQ to 28 Cos. 7 Responses are received including one from the current managers of plant Committee reviews and cuts down to 5 City provides $15K for consultants to help existing managers: Cost estimate and preparation of RFP RFP are issued to 5 qualified teams Teams of all 5 qualifiers visit separately the plant 5 qualifiers submit proposals and prices A technical and financial consultants are hired to help the Committee 3 of 5 including existing management are rejected Each finalist briefs the Review Committee Review Committee visits plants operated under contract by 2 finalists Review Committee picks the winner Winner starts contract operation Contracting Out: 2. Select the Service Criteria:  Contracting Out: 2. Select the Service Criteria Service with no legal or contractual impediments to contracting Easy to carry out competitive contracting Hard services for which easy to write enforceable specifications Stand-alone service Can be segmented by location into 2+ contracts Services that have been successfully contracted out elsewhere “Yellow pages test”. Enough, responsible and experienced bidders Services for which part timers can be used. Significant savings since gov’t cannot readily employ part timers Services where gov’t operation is overstaffed, poorly managed or could be re-engineered. Services that are subject to public complains Services where employees and union resistance can be overcome Services where overpowering political opposition will not result Services where in-house monitoring expertise is available. Contracting Out: 3. Feasibility Study:  Contracting Out: 3. Feasibility Study Establish current cost to establish a baseline against which to compare prices Assess quality of current operation—complaints, measuring performance, conducting surveys Public cost relies on published budget. Need for ABC accounting which includes: Capital expenditures which often are not included in operating budgets Interest costs on capital expenditures Costs of supplies- fuel for vehicles that appear in a different category of budget Fringe benefits Budgetary pensions Cost of labor borrowed from other agencies or hired seasonally and are not included in the analyzed budget. E.g. hierarchical and hidden costs. Or, many attorneys budgeted by the DOJ work full time defending the Bureau of Prisons against suits brought by litigating prisoners. Foregone property tax and OC of building and land used by the activity Cost of premiums paid for liability and fire insurance Contracting Out: 4. Foster Competition:  Contracting Out: 4. Foster Competition It is best to have multiple competitors. However, when there are marginal competitors it is best to negotiate bids with handful of clearly eligible contractors after the qualifying round. Best for contractors of hospitals, prisons, social and professional services. Often due to bureaucratic behavior of gov’t there are only few bidders and/or high bids to compensate for it. To foster competition– divide the geographical area to smaller units as long as econ of scale are not adversely affected. give a long lead time to bidders publicize and use the web for the bidding provide sufficient information award enough contracts and permit a large number of bidders to get contracts. Minimize “incumbent advantage” to encourage new contractors to bid. Philadelphia did just that by including in the bid for the maintenance of street lighting detailed information on equipment and practices used by the incumbent contractor Avoid request for sensitive non-essential business information to the procurement like profits, wages of managers/employees Avoid restricted contracts for nonprofit organizations but keep it open for all. Such restrictions are often used for local political patronage (e.g. social foster care agencies) When service is site based like center for homeless, the owner of the facility has an advantage in such a bidding. It is suggested to separate the rent from the operation to encourage companies that could provide the service however do not own the (a) facility. Contracting Out: 5. Express Interest or Qualifications (RFEI):  Contracting Out: 5. Express Interest or Qualifications (RFEI) When initially considering privatization, gov’t may be unsure about the exact nature of the proposed contract. So, it announces RFEI to prospective bidders, pre-bid conference to discuss the issues, checking the submission of the firms, prepare a list of firms to which RFP or an invitation to bid is issues. Contracting Out: 6. Plan the Employee Transition:  Contracting Out: 6. Plan the Employee Transition Biggest problem is how to handle with redundant workers and the prospect of labor unrest. Surveys showed that most workers are hired by the private contractor, followed by early retirement, severance pay, attrition, redeployment in other public agencies. Only few are fired. Contracting Out: 7. Prepare bid specifications :  Contracting Out: 7. Prepare bid specifications Contract wording should be in ordinary language, accurate and unambiguously. The contract should not specify exactly how the work should be done but merely the output quantitative specifications. Gov’t should allow freedom of contractor to employ the people at salaries and in procedures that achieve the contract specified outputs. “Hard” services that involve tangible and visible physical results are easier to write specifications in output and lend themselves to contracting out. “Soft” services that involve social workers are more amenable for vouchers. Contracting Out: 8. Initiating Public Relations Campaign:  Contracting Out: 8. Initiating Public Relations Campaign Strong opposition is almost certain to surface by public employee unions, private firms that want to avoid competition, or special interest groups. Aggressive campaign in support of privatization should include a coalition of civic associations for better gov’t, neighborhood groups dissatisfied with poor services, minority businesses that see opportunity in providing such services etc. Contracting Out: 9. Managed Competition:  Contracting Out: 9. Managed Competition Effective for short term contract or where capital expenditures are required Allows the management to work with its labor force Improves employees’ morale and builds community support Reduces the possibility of collusion among private providers Induces private firms to submit better bids Mandatory competitive bidding by gov’t agencies for routine functions was introduced in the UK. Also, requirement of gov’t agencies to maintain separate accounts of income and expenditures and to achieve a prescribed rate of return on the capital equipment they employ. (Local Gov’t Act, 1988). Included refuse collection, street cleaning, cleaning of public buildings, vehicle and ground maintenance, and food services. Result: Many services were won by in-house departments with savings of 20% and reduction in manpower of 20-30%. Contracting Out: 10. Fair Bidding Process:  Contracting Out: 10. Fair Bidding Process Widely advertise the RFP Allow enough time between announcement and due date Hold a bidders’ conference to address questions Use internal team and an outside consultant to evaluate proposals using clear criteria and an agreed upon score system Avoid asking for too many bid prices. (e.g. price for year 1, year 2…) This will create favoritism. Reasons for Privatization:  Reasons for Privatization Pragmatic: Greater efficiency in the production of G & S. Dissatisfaction with gov’t performance. Ideology: Less gov’t. Gov’t plays a smaller role than the private sector. Commercial: To do more work at profit. Populist: Better society by giving people greater power through the marketplace while diminishing the power of large public bureaucracies. Keys for Success (in Declining Importance) :  Keys for Success (in Declining Importance) Having committed political leader (s) to champion the initiative. E.g. a governor, mayor, or several legislators. Flexibility in adjusting strategies when problems arise in the implementation. Maintenance of momentum. Establishing an organizational and analytical structure to implement the initiative. Enacting legislative changes and/or reducing available resources to encourage greater exposure to competition. Signaling managers and employees that the restructuring efforts are real. Developing reliable Activity Based Costing (ABC) accounting to determine performance of the gov’t agency and the feasibility of private sector provision of service. Cost data on individual activity and not the traditional agency wide accounting system. Keys for Success (Conti.):  Keys for Success (Conti.) Involving employees and local unions in the privatization process. Unions concerns and political influence led to legislation that made privatization in MA more difficult. In Indianapolis, employees involves from early stage. Workers trained in ABC and allowed to compete. Front line workers were given decision-making power. Some supervisory jobs eliminated, training to workers responding to RFP, safety net for displaced workers. A 1989 National Commission on Employment Policy survey showed that 24% of contracted out public services were transferred to other gov’t jobs. 58% went to work for the private contractor, 7% retired, and only 3% laid off. A monitoring body should be established by gov’t to assure compliance with the designated contractual terms. Public Private Partnerships (PPP):  Public Private Partnerships (PPP) Definition: PPP is an arrangement of roles and relationships in which 2+ public and private entities coordinate in a complementary way to achieve their separate objectives through the pursuit of common objectives (s). Private design, finance, construction, maintenance and operation of a project for public use for a specific period of time. When time expires, title reverts to gov’t. The private sector aids gov’t in identifying new private financed profit-making facilities, and seek out new projects that otherwise have to wait until public funding becomes available. The public sector investigates feasibility of project, execute the contract, choose the private partner, regulate prices, establish and monitor performance standards. BOT is a general term for PPP. A concession is granted to a contractor to design, finance, operate and maintain for 10-30 years. Contrcator charges tolls for the use of the facility. Forms of PPP From mostly Public to mostly private :  Forms of PPP From mostly Public to mostly private Fully public DB: Design Build DBFO: Design, Build, Finance, Operate BOT: Build. Oprate, Transfer BTO: Build, Transfer, Operate BOOT: Build, Own, Operate, Transfer BOO: Build, Own, Operate Fully Private Forms of PPP:  Forms of PPP DB: A contract with a private contractor to provide architecture/engineering design and construction services DBFO: Contractor responsible for these services and is compensated by specific service payment by gov’t during life of project. No actual tolls are collected by private contractor. Here payments by gov’t—cost to taxpayer. Still efficient since construction & operation by a private entity BOT: A concession is granted to a contractor to design, finance, operate, and maintain for 10-30 years. Contractor charges tolls for the use of facility. BTO: Build, Transfer, Operate. The gov’t then leases the facility back to developer under a long term lease. BOOT: Build, Own, Operate, Transfer. Ownership with the contractor until the end of the concession period and is transferred free to the gov’t. BOO: Outright privatization without a transfer of ownership to gov’t. At the end of the concession, the original agreement can be renegotiated. Wraparound addition: The private developer constructs an addition to an existing public facility and then operates the entire facility for a fixed period of time or until the developer recovers costs plus a reasonable return on investment. Reasons for PPP:  Reasons for PPP Greater efficiency in the use of public resources. State and local gov’ts save 10-40 percent PPP are means of increasing investment in infrastructure particularly utilities and transportation Needs for social infrastructure– hospitals, prisons, schools, housing Advantages for Gov’t of PPP:  Advantages for Gov’t of PPP Profit oriented businesses identify new projects that otherwise wait till gov’t funds are available Private sponsors and commercial lenders assures financial and tech feasibility of project Private sector can access private capital markets to substitute hard to get gov’t sources Private sector builds faster and more cost effective than gov’t. Less bureaucracy and procurement rules Private sector operates facilities more efficiently due to profit motives Private firms provide more tax revenues Private sector shares or accepts risks otherwise borne by public sector Private sector transfers technology and provides training to gov’t workers Problems with traditional Contract Out Model:  Problems with traditional Contract Out Model Infrastructure controlled by gov’t: 1. Separate contracts with private agencies 2. Labor disputes 3. Disputes between the planners and the contractor 4. Lowest bidder contractor performs low-quality workmanship 5. Concealed or unforeseen conditions 6. Huge task of renewing the public infrastructures, and insufficient funds. BOT Model:  BOT Model Usually a large project requiring consotium of designers, builders, financiers and more. Contractor enters into 4 agreements: A concession agreement with host gov’t A construction contract usually DB type. It may be a member of the bidding consortium An operation and maintenance agreement with operator of facility. It may be a member of the bidding consortium Loan agreements. Funds flow through concession co. BOT Concession Agreement:  BOT Concession Agreement Establishes concession rules and contractual rights of parties. Issues Included: Nature, length, scope of work, operation of completed facility Specification of what is provided Extent of permitted variations to specification Performance standards Tolls, prices, payments to be charged Concessionaire's rights if enabling legislation changes Provisions for termination of contract Circumstances where grantor takes over the concession. BOT: Gov’t support :  BOT: Gov’t support Creating appropriate legislation that enables effective operation Setting tolls to allow reasonable IRR given level of risk Protecting concession cos from competition at early years Helping concession co. to overcome bureaucratic opposition Develop a clear and effective program to allow public participation in the planning. BOT: Advantages:  BOT: Advantages No or little cost to taxpayers Little risk for gov’t. Sufficient bonds and letters of credit that ensure completion if private sponsor defaults Private sector can move pre and construction more rapidly tnan gov’t Sponsors must operate and maintain facility for 20+ years General taxes are unaffected and revenue bonds are unnecessary Only users of BOT facilities pay tolls. Thus, costs are borne by beneficiaries and not by public at large BOT: Risks:  BOT: Risks LDC: Long term political instability Cost overruns. Project could come to halt Currency devaluations causing payback loans with devalued revenue Drastic changes in demographics over the concession period may affect revenues. PPP in Highways:  PPP in Highways Problem: Maintenance is short $20B than Federal, State and Local spending. Accommodating expected economics growth is short short $40B than public budgeting. PPP: Highways:  PPP: Highways Impetus: Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), 1991. Expanded toll facilities eligibility for Federal aid for construction (re), resurfacing, rehabilitation, conversion to toll roads. Allowed also State funding and shared responsibility with private sector. Exception: Interstate system. PPP Highways: Principles:  PPP Highways: Principles Always PPP where ownership shifts to public entities Always existence of non-toll alternative road Rt. 91 in Ca.:  Rt. 91 in Ca. Description: 10 miles 91 express 4-lanes within the median area of SR 91. Connecting 55 Freeway near Anaheim to run east-west to the border of Riverside County. Affluent local population, 8% increase in traffic—high congestion. Rt. 91: Ca. Nature of PPP, Operation:  Rt. 91: Ca. Nature of PPP, Operation BTO. CPTC built, cedes ownership to State in exchange for 35 years lease to operate the road. Toll free and then 50% discount for 3+ people in car. Demand sensitive pricing by time of day and distance. Guaranteed 65 MPH otherwise money back Fully automated operation Immediate removal of non-operating vehicles. Results: Profitable from first year. Average occupancy 1.65 where 20% of which are carpoolers (3+) Dulles Greenway:  Dulles Greenway Built as BOT in 1995 in Virginia. 15 miles from Dullas Intern’l Airport to Leesburg. 4 lanes and 250 ft right of way. Private consortium financed, built, and operates it. Connecting the Beltway near D.C. (I 495) with Dulles Airport. Special legislation to establish prerequisites for construction & operation of a private toll road A commission was set up to regulate applicants, supervise, control operators, and approve/revise prices. Total estimated cost $326M. $68M initial investment by partners; of which $22 equity and $46M guarantee against project risk. $202M by consortium of 10 lending institutions. Greenway: Features:  Greenway: Features BOT. Transferred to State (VI) after 40 years. Subjected to utility style regulation. Targeted return 21%. Prices fixed for all day and all 7 interchanges. In 1995 price $1.75 ridership 10K vs. anticipated 30K. In 1996, price lowered to $1– ridership grew to 17K. In 1997, price increased to $1.15. Toll collection below anticipation. Lessons learned:  Lessons learned Drivers are reluctant of paying tolls that do not vary by distance and time of day. Demand sensitive pricing (discriminatory prices) also assure higher revenues, and avoidance of congestion. Private toll road companies face difficulties in land acquisition and managing environmental concerns. Rt. 91 had no land acquisition while the Greenway suffered additional cost related to delay in land purchase. DOT enjoys eminent domain provision in assembling land. Timely land acquisition added to the cost of the Greenway. Private companies unlike public entities cannot finance using tax exempt securities. Thus, private companies pay higher interest. Private companies unlike public entities do not enjoy sovereign immunity. Full liabilities for accidents adding in case of BOT additional operating cost. Toll roads should enjoy existing demand and not be subjected to induced development that will produce travel demand. The initial cost of toll roads includes high land acquisition and construction while revenues are low extending for a long period of time. Lessons learned (Continued):  Lessons learned (Continued) Metropolitan roads that serve peak time traffic (e.g. Rt. 91) are more financially viable than intercity roads (e.g. the Greenway). Most private investments have alternative use in case of failure. No alternative use for failed toll road which raises uncertainty and higher financial costs. Success requires one company to build and operate the toll road for a long period of time. Success requires no simple and immediate land acquisition Success requires a committed political champion Problems with Dulles Greenway:  Problems with Dulles Greenway Fixed price for tolls. Demand sensitive prices over distance traveled, time of day, week day-weekend Excessive regulation by State/lenders for toll restructuring, change of speed Real cost of regulation in time and expenses No tax exempt securities raising developer’s interest payments Accidents and other liabilities absent for public roads that enjoy sovereign immunity No eminent domain provision to acquire necessary land. Negotiations for land took time and additional resources adding to cost Expensive project that is contingent upon stimulation of land use or induced traffic in the remote future with high risk BOT Tunnel in Hong Kong:  BOT Tunnel in Hong Kong Feb 1988, the HK Gov’t granted a 30 year franchise to a private consortium. Longest road in HK 4 KM twin tube 4 lanes tunnel and approaching lanes. Completed 2 months ahead of schedule at TC of $276.5M Financed completely by private sector Shareholders contributed equity 1 to 2.6 debt Risk for non-completion ran for just 18 months construction period. Risk was low because the tunnel method used was well known. Good reputation of contractor, and $400K per day penalty Cost overrun risk was overcome by several guarantees of shareholders. To ensure project quality, a 10 year performance bond to address performance risk was put up by contractor Post completion risks ran for 12 year loan period. Shareholders purchased i.r. cap. Cash flow risk was mitigated by HK gov’t approval to increase tolls. PPP for public schools:  PPP for public schools PPP adopted to upgrade schools facilities at lower costs and less time than gov’t. PPP are unbounded by regulations that govern public sector bond offering, voter approval, and review of competitive bids. A PPP school in Fl was built in less than 9 months compared with 5 years by Fl gov’t. PPP for Schools:  PPP for Schools Nova Scotia 41schools constructed under Built-Lease-Transfer-Maintain (BLTM). Private sector designs, finances, and constructs. Leased back to Gov’t for predetermined period of time at a pre-agreed rent. When the lease starts, the school is operational. Advantages: speed of upgrade, and 15 percent savings on lease. The school leases the facility for 20 years at rent lower than the capitalized construction and furnishing cost. Developer uses the facility when not used; other time of the day, weekends, summer holidays. Activities are predetermined likevocational education, meeting space for civic and political groups. PPP for Public school: Pembroke Pines Charter Fl.:  PPP for Public school: Pembroke Pines Charter Fl. Haskell Educational Services (HES) designed and built the school between 22 and 34 percent less than other public schools in Fl. Public tax exempt bonds financed the building, owns it, and leases it back to HES. HES operates it as charter school and offers additionally fee-based after-school programs: daycare, enrichment, and student services. Conclusions for PPP :  Conclusions for PPP The traditional model of Gov’t contracting separately a construction co (bid) and a designer has not been successful. Often, the lower bidder uses low quality material where possible. Also, the fragmented relationship and responsibilities among the gov’t, the designer and the construction co is a source of problems where the gov’t plays a mediation role. In PPP, the construction co has vested interest in high quality construction since it will operate the facility upon completion. DB is preferred to traditional model since a single organisation exists for both avoiding conflicts. Conclusions for PPP (Continue):  Conclusions for PPP (Continue) BOT, and DBFO are used for major infrastructure projects like roads, and power generators. Attract new private investment without recourse to gov’t funding. BOT reduces the common cost overruns experienced by gov’t. Only the users of BOT facilities pay tolls and not taxpayers Users’ charges). In DBFO services charges are paid by by public sector; no user charges. Hospitals and schools use BLMT (Build, Lease, Maintain, Transfer). Facility is leased back to gov’t. PPP can be used to acquire many different types of facilities with various contractual arrangements. Privatizing Adoption @ Foster Care Services: The Problem:  Privatizing Adoption @ Foster Care Services: The Problem Higher incidents of criminal behavior when growing up without family ties and lack of permanency. 90% of Rochester NY who endured 5+ family transitions became delinquent. 17% of all local jail inmates are former foster care children. Annual pubic cost of per child foster care is $17,500 Privatizing Adoption @ Foster Care Services: Background:  Privatizing Adoption @ Foster Care Services: Background 400,000 in foster care in 1991, increasing annually by 4%. 542,000 in 2001. 1.5 million children or 2% of all children Average age 10.1 in 2001 and the average child remains in fc 44 months Special subsidy is available for special need children: Emotional and Physical problems, siblings, age, and ethnic belonging. International adoption becomes common. 20K in 2002; 40% of50K adopted in 2002. 50% of int’l adoptions are infants while only 2% from fc. Cost $7K - 25K. Private adoptions in the US include expenses for the birth mother, agency and court, and could exceed $30K. Minorities in fc and awaiting adoption comprise a greater % than their respective population. Blacks are 17% of population, 49% of adopted and 55% of those awaiting adoption. Number of children is foster care rises, length of time in pipeline is long, and few children are being adopted. Privatizing Adoption @ Foster Care Services: Objectives:  Privatizing Adoption @ Foster Care Services: Objectives Reduce the number of children in fc and increase permanency Reduce the period of time in pipeline Federal Adoption and Safe Family Act (ASFA) offers incentive payments to States that increases adoption from fc above the national standards. Incentives appeared effective in raising the rate of adoption. Privatizing Adoption @ Foster Care Services in Michigan:  Privatizing Adoption @ Foster Care Services in Michigan Six months exclusivity for the State agency or fc provider to place an eligible child in adoption. Within 3 months, the adopting parents need to be identified. If not, the child is publicly listed. Once publicized including on the Internet, the 53 licensed private agencies can compete. These companies provide both fc and adoption services. Fix P’s are paid for placing children based on outcome, time, and the difficulty of the case. The State imputes estimated cost for 8 prototype cases and adds an incentive component. The adoptive family can act as a fc family for the child for up to 150 days. Private agencies handle 60% of adoption services and the rest are managed by the state agency. Privatizing Adoption @ Foster Care Services in Michigan:  Privatizing Adoption @ Foster Care Services in Michigan No obvious success to the privatization efforts: 1991-99: total number of children adopted higher by 83%. However, number of children available for adoption increased 116%. Ranked 5 lowest among the 50 states. Advantages: introduced some competition to the process and dissemination of information on Internet. Private companies have an incentive to search for high quality and many adoptive parents. Greater choice to prospective parents now than before when a state agency ran the program. Shortcomings: Prices set by the State and are not market sensitive. The State provides identical services for the private providers that compete with it. The cost per child for the State is of no concern; thus no managed competition features. No justification for the 6 months exclusivity awarded to the company is unjustified. Immediate competition of all agencies could reduce time to adoption with no cost to the child. Privatizing Adoption @ Foster Care Services in Kansas: Description:  Privatizing Adoption @ Foster Care Services in Kansas: Description Privatization started in 1996 to benefit the children and save resources following a suit by Civil Liberties Union: Description: 1. The State was divided into 5 regions for fc. Bidding in each for 1 contractor for 4 years period and prices negotiated. Important that the child remains close to biological parents for possible visitation and reunification. 2. fc: Fixed amount per child and ranged among regions $12,860 and $15,504. Over time, prices were changed and adapted for children with special needs. 3. Adoption: Bidders compete for a statewide contract. Lutheran Social Services had 12 sub-contractors throughout the State. 4. Kansas Dept. of Social & Rehab Services established performance standards that will be used for contract renewal or subsequent bidding. FC Standards include max 3 placement moves and 65% achieve permanency within 12 months of initial referral. 5. Adoption standards require 70% are placed within 180 days of referral and 90% of adoptions be intact for 18 months from finalization. Privatizing Adoption @ Foster Care Services in Kansas: Evaluation:  Privatizing Adoption @ Foster Care Services in Kansas: Evaluation During 4 first years, Kansas paid foster care contractors $105.1M above the $178.7 contracted, and to adoption providers $31.4M above the $37.4 contracted. Adoption provider lost $5.5M in the first 2 years As a result, revision of contracts to $1,958-$2,200 a month per child for 1st year. The initial contract was unrealistic. Children in foster care more than 6 months yield loss to contractors since 32% remain in fc 1-2 years. Privatization led to better data collection of cost and performance for both fc and adoption. Quality of both services has improved with 178% rise of budget. Number of adopted children rose on the 1st year by 55% and over the 4 years by 78%. Ranked lowest 7th among the 50 states. Improved service: case workers available 24/7 and 71% of fc children were now in their own or continuous county. % children in fc home rather than group homes and institutions grew from 67 to 85%. Unsuccessful adoptions were 2.4% compared with 12% nationally. Social workers can spend more time investigating leading to an increase in finding abused childre. Privatizing Adoption @ Foster Care Services in Kansas: Conclusions:  Privatizing Adoption @ Foster Care Services in Kansas: Conclusions Fixed fee contract failed due to unknowable medical costs and delays by judicial procedures outside the contractors’ control. Changed to a per month fee which lacks incentives for prompt placement. Performance, however, is still a base for renewal of contract. Separation of the many fc providers and the one adoption provider creates inefficiency in the care of the children that experience a shift in their contact social worker. Allowing integration of both services could raise competition. Longer contracts increase incentives to compete for a contract, leading to lower bid prices and/or better service. Longer contracts leads to more resources provided by contractors to improve efficiency. However, longer contracts enable contractors to exercise monopolistic power and reduce service. Privatizing Adoption @ Foster Care Services in Illinois: Background:  Privatizing Adoption @ Foster Care Services in Illinois: Background Illinois had the highest number and rate of children in fc. Number of children in fc per 1,000 was 17.2 compared with 6.9 for the nation as a whole, 1996. Social worker’s caseload was 60 compared with 25 nationwide. The median of length of time in fc grew from 8 months in 1986 to 40 in 1996. Privatizing Adoption @ Foster Care Services in Illinois: Description:  Privatizing Adoption @ Foster Care Services in Illinois: Description Contracting started in 1997 to reduce fc population and achieve permanency. Case confined to Cook County which comprised 75% of the state cases. Private agencies paid $394 per case The private agency was expected to move 24% to permanency The 24% standard was aimed to reduce the average stay in fc from 56 to 48 months; a 25% exit from fc each year If more than 24% of its cases, paid still the same per child and receive more children. In non-Cook County, bonus of $2000 for all children adopted above standard If placement less than 24%, funding is the same for a larger number of children under the agency’s care and the State did not provide the agency additional children PPP:  PPP

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

Business Economics Stream - CUHK Business School

Decision Sciences and Managerial Economics; ... deregulation, privatization, and case studies. ECON 6010 ... MGNT 6122: Structural Equation ...
Read more

Benefits and Disadvantages Charter and Choice Schools

... Benefits and Disadvantages Charter and Choice Schools from MGNT 100 at Wilberforce. ... "The guiding idea behind privatization, ...
Read more

EGAT Bureau Telephone List Listed by Office Team Last Name ...

Malinowski Stephan Fin Mgnt Spc DC 2-4482 ... Karns Mark Sr Privatization Advisor EG/EDFM 2 ... Soule Meredith Ag and Natural Resources Econ ESP/IRB 2-1058 ...
Read more

POLS 4506 International Conflict and Conflict Management 3/0/3

... this course will explore the changing nature of violence in the international system in areas such as the privatization of ... ECON 2100 Economics for ...
Read more

Make a Refundable deposite :: Express HelpLine

Your personal information and card details are 100% secure. About Us | Recent Question | User Login | Security & Privacy Policy| Question list | Terms of ...
Read more

encourage local entrepreneurship in public schooling they ...

encourage local entrepreneurship in public schooling they get the same tax from MGNT 100 at ... "I'm convinced that further privatization is inevitable ...
Read more


An Online Academic Essays Writing Platform ... At we offer quality assistance to students by providing high quality term papers ...
Read more

Magnit boosts net profit by 54% in Q3, exceeds forecast ...

... privatization sales possible in 2017 for ... Interfax news | Magnit boosts net profit by 54% in Q3, exceeds ... (MOEX: MGNT) boosted net ...
Read more