District Performance Report2009

50 %
50 %
Information about District Performance Report2009

Published on July 16, 2009

Author: erobertson11746

Source: slideshare.net

District Performance Report April 20, 2009 Dr . Pat rick Harrigan Assistant Superintendent for Research, Assessment and Special Services Administrative Interns: Kathy Levy Valerie Geiler

District Profile 2007-2008  Enrollment K-12: 10,142  Free-Reduced Lunch: 8%  Limited English Proficient: 2%  Special Education: 13.5%  Racial/Ethnic Origin  American Indian/Alaskan Native: <1%  Black or African American: 13%  Hispanic or Latino: 5%  Asian/Pacific Islander: 11%  White: 71%  Multiracial: <1%  Annual Attendance Rate: 95%

District Accountability  English-Language Arts: Good Standing  Mathematics: Good Standing  Science: Good Standing Highest Status  Graduation Rate: Good Standing Granted  All Half Hollow Hills Schools achieved a rating of Good Standing for accountability purposes on Federal and State Measures.

State Assessments  English Language Arts Grades 3-8 (4,841 Students Tested)  Mathematics Grades 3-8 (4,853 Students Tested)  Science grades 4 & 8 (1,247 Students Tested)  English HS 2004 Cohort (836 Students Tested)  Mathematics HS 2004 Cohort (836 Students Tested)

Total State Assessments… 12,613 Sunil John, Lori VanStry, MIS State Assessments were prepared for administered, taken, graded, and reported to the Regional Information Center for Accountability purposes.

English / Language-Arts Accountability

Performance Index 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Al lS tu de nt s 188 131 Di sa ble d 146 AMO Am 128 er ica n Ind i an Bl ac k 177 Size Group 129 Hi As sp an ian ic 173 or P 125 ac ific Is la nd er 192 128 Lim W ite h it d e 190 En ELA Grades 3-8 Performance Index 131 gli sh Ec Pr on of om ici en ica t 158 ll y 123 Di sa dv an tag ed 165 128

ELA Grades 3-5 Performance Levels School Performance AMO P e 194 190 196 197 195 r 200 181 182 f I o n 150 r d 127 127 127 127 127 127 127 m e 100 a x n c 50 e ll o lt m ll k rk Hi eg Hi bi o ua Pa an er ts al ut nq um nd gn O st tn Su re Va Si es Pa Fo Ch NYS Effective AMO (Effective Annual Measurable Objective).

Historical Comparison Grade-3 District Summary ELA Grade 3 80% Percent of Total Population Increased 60% Level-4 40% 20% 0% LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 Levels DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-3 100% 93% 86% 95% 94% 90% 84% 80% 70% 60% 55% 53% Percentage Level 3 and 50% Above 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% All Students Disabilities Black Small Group Asian/Pacific White Lim English Eco Student Groups Islander Disadvantaged Grade 3

Historical Comparison Grade-4 80% 60% Percent of Total Population 40% 20% 0% LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 Levels DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-4 100% 90% 88% 93% 90% 79% 81% 80% 69% 70% 55% 60% 60% Percentage Level 3 and 50% 40% Above 30% 20% 10% 0% All Students Disabilities Black Small Group Asian/Pacific White Lim English Eco Islander Disadvantaged Student Groups Grade 4

Historical Comparison Grade-5 80% Percent of Total Population 60% 40% 20% 0% LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 Levels DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-5 100% 92% 86% 96% 93% 90% 75% 80% 74% 70% 60% 55% 50% Percentage Level 3 and 50% Above 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% All Students Disabilities Black Small GroupAsian/Pacific White Lim English Eco Student Groups Islander Disadvantaged Grade 5

ELA Grades 6-8 Performance Levels School Performance AMO P 200 186 186 e r f I 150 o n r d 130 130 m e a x 100 n c e 50 Candlewood West Hollow NYS Effective AMO (Effective Annual Measurable Objective).

Historical Comparison Grade-6 80% 60% Percentage of Total Population 40% 20% 0% LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 Levels DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-6 100% 91% 86% 88% 90% 78% 80% 70% 56% 60% 52% Percentage of Level 3 and Above 50% 41% 40% 30% 17% 20% 10% 0% All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific White Limited English Econ. Islander Disadvantaged Subgroups Grade 6

Historical Comparison Grade-7 District Summary ELA 7 80% Percentage of Total Population Increased 60% Proficiency 40% 20% 0% LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 Levels DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-7 100% 91% 92% 93% 90% 85% 82% 79% 80% 70% 62% 60% 50% 43% Percentage of Level 3 and Above 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacif ic White Limited English Econ. Islander Disadvantaged Subgroups Grade 7

Historical Comparison Grade-8 80% Pe rc e n t o f To t a l Po p u la t io n 60% 40% 20% 0% LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 Le ve ls DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-8 100% 91% 90% 81% 84% 80% 69% 70% 57% 54% 60% 50% 40% Percentage of Level 3 and 23% Above 30% 20% 10% 0% All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacif ic White Limited English Econ. Islander Disadvantaged Subgroups Grade 8

ELA by Gender / Grade Level 100% 95% 93% 91% 94% 92% 92% 88% 89% 88% 83% 84% Percentage Level 3 and Above 78% 80% Female 60% Male 40% 20% 0%

Secondary English Performance Index Secondary English Performance Index 191 195 194 200 183 175 178 Performance Index 180 161 156 160 150 155 150 154 152 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 All Students American Hispanic White Economically Good News Indian Disadvantaged from SED

NY STATE REGENTS ENGLISH 97 96 95 100 90 80 67 70 60 59 60 Passing 50 Distinction 40 30 20 10 0 2007-08 2006-07 2005-06 85% or Better

Mathematics Accountability

Math 3-8 Performance Index Math Performance Index - 2008 194 198 196 200 185 183 187 177 164 150 Performance Index 100 97 98 97 100 97 94 92 100 50 0 All Students Disabled American Indian Black Hispanic Asian or Pacific White Limited English Economically Islander Proficient Disadvantaged

Math Performance Grades 3-5 School Performance AMO P e 199 197 200 199 199 192 200 189 r f I o n 150 r d m e 100 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 a x n 50 c e o ll lt m ll k rk Hi eg Hi bi o ua Pa an er ts al ut nq um nd gn O st tn Su re Va Si es Pa Fo Ch

Historical Comparison Grade-3 G rade 3 Math D IS TR IC T 05-06 D IS TR IC T 06-07 D IS TR IC T 07-08 60% P erc entag e of T otal P opulation 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% L E VE L 1 L E VE L 2 L E VE L 3 L E VE L 4 L e ve l

Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-3 99% 100% 100% 99% 98% 100% 96% 94% 90% 87% 80% 70% Percentage of Levels 3 and Above 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific White Limited English Economically Islander Disadvantaged Student Groups Grade 3

Historical Comparison Grade-4 Grade 4 Math DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08 80% Percentage of Total Population 60% 40% 20% 0% LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 Level

Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-4 100% 96% 97% 97% 90% 86% 87% 81% 80% 73% Percentage of Levels 3 and Above 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific White Limited Economically Islander English Disadvantaged Student Groups Grade 4

Historical Comparison Grade-5 Grade 5 Math DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08 Level-4! 60% Percentage of Total Population 40% 20% 0% LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 Level

Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-5 97% 100% 98% 100% 93% 90% 86% 80% 77% 75% 70% Percentage of Levels 3 and Above 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific White Limited English Economically Islander Disadvantaged Student Groups Grade 5

Math Performance Grades 6-8 School Performance AMO 193 192 P 200 e r f I 150 o n r d m e a x 100 99 99 n c e 50 Candlewood West Hollow

Historical Comparison Grade-6 6th G rade Math D IS T R IC T 05-06 D IS T R IC T 06-07 D IS T R IC T 07-08 60% P erc entag e of T otal P opulation 40% 20% 0% L E VE L 1 L E VE L 2 L E VE L 3 L E VE L 4

Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-6 100% 91% 98% 93% 90% 84% 80% 68% 70% 57% 60% 53% 50% and Above Percentage of Levels 3 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific White Limited English Islander Proficient Student Groups Grade 6

Historical Comparison Grade-7 Grade 7 Math Level-4! DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08 70% 60% Percent of Total Population 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 Levels

Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-7 100% 95% 89% 89% 100% 96% 90% 80% 71% 75% 70% 60% 50% 40% and Above 30% Percentage of Levels 3 20% 10% 0% All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific White Limited English Islander Proficient Student Groups Grade 7

Historical Comparison Grade-8 Grade 8 Math DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08 60% 50% Percentage of Total Population 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 Levels

Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-8 100% 92% 88% 97% 95% 90% 80% 75% 70% 60% 60% 50% 40% Percentage of Levels 3 and Above 30% 20% 10% 0% All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific White Limited English Islander Proficient Student Groups Grade 8

Math by Gender / Grade Level 99% 99% 100% 96% 95% 96% 97% 97% 94% 95% 93% 90% 90% 80% Percentage Level 3 and Above 60% Female Male 40% 20% 0% Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade Level

Secondary Math Performance Index Secondary Math Performance Index 192 194 195 200 183 180 178 180 155 155 149 154 160 150 148 146 144 Performance Index 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 All Students American Hispanic White Economically Indian Disadvantaged

NY STATE REGENTS MATHEMATICS A Passing Distinction 100 94 95 94 90 78 80 70 57 60 52 50 40 30 20 10 0 2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

NY STATE REGENTS MATHEMATICS B Passing Distinction 100 95 92 89 90 80 70 60 52 46 47 50 40 30 20 10 0 2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

NY STATE REGENTS Integrated Algebra First Year 96 100 90 80 70 46 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Passing Distinction

Science Accountability

Science Elementary and Intermediate Performance Index 200 196 188 192 198 198 184 178 150 Performance Index 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 50 0 All Students Disabled American Indian Black Hispanic Asian or Pacific White Limited English Economically Islander Proficient Disadvantaged

Science Grade-4 School Performance AMO P e 200 197 200 200 200 190 191 r 200 f I o n 150 r d m e 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 a x n c 50 e go ll m lt k ll rk Hi bi o Hi se ua Pa an er al Ot ut nq um nd gn st tn Su re Va Si es Pa Fo Ch

Science Grade-8 School Performance AMO 195 196 P 200 e r f I 150 o n r d m e a x 100 100 100 n c e 50 Candlewood West Hollow

NY STATE REGENTS LIVING ENVIRONMENT Passing Distinction 98 97 96 100 90 80 69 70 60 50 49 50 40 30 20 10 0 2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

NY STATE REGENTS EARTH SCIENCE Passing Distinction 100 93 90 92 90 80 70 58 55 60 49 50 40 30 20 10 0 2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

NY STATE REGENTS CHEMISTRY Passing Distinction 100 91 91 87 90 80 70 60 50 45 40 32 27 30 20 10 0 2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

NY STATE REGENTS PHYSICS Passing Distinction 97 98 100 90 83 80 70 59 56 60 50 45 40 30 20 10 0 2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Social Studies Results

NYS 5TH GRADE SOCIAL STUDIES 66% 66% 60% 55% 42% PERCENTAGE 40% 32% 32% 20% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 0% LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

NY STATE REGENTS GLOBAL HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY Passing Distinction 100 95 90 90 90 80 70 62 58 60 54 50 40 30 20 10 0 2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

NY STATE REGENTS U.S. HISTORY AND GOVERNMENT Passing Distinction 98 97 95 100 90 81 76 80 71 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Foreign Language Results

SECOND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY Passing 100 98 100 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 French Italian Spanish

NY STATE REGENTS FRENCH Passing Distinction 100 100 100 100 92 88 86 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

NY STATE REGENTS ITALIAN Passing Distinction 100 100 100 100 88 86 90 80 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

NY STATE REGENTS SPANISH Passing Distinction 99 99 99 100 90 74 76 74 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Spanish Regents Students with Disabilities Passing Distinction 100 100 95 92 90 80 70 60 54 50 44 40 33 30 20 10 0 2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Graduation Rate Accountability

Performance Index A 0 20 40 60 80 100 ll St u de nt s 92 55 D is ab le d 70 A m 55 er ic an In di an B la ck 86 55 H is A pa ni si c 83 an or 55 Pa ci fi c Is la nd er 96 55 Li W m hi ite te 94 graduates are not d E ng considered graduates 55 lis h IEP Diplomas and 5-year Pr Ec of on ic ie om nt ic al ly D is ad va Graduation Rate by Percentage nt ag ed 85 55

High School Completers Change in formula Regents Diploma Regents with Advanced Designation 94 97 100 93 90 80 66 66 67 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Post-Secondary Plans 94% 2 or 4 year College 4-year College 2-year College Other Post-secondary Military Employment Adult Services Other Known Plans

The End!

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

Mid-Year Performance Report

Mopani District Municipality Mid-year performance report 2009/2010 3)Projects/Initiatives and Quarterly Deliverables – Budget and Treasury ...
Read more

School District Performance Report 2009 - issuu

School District Performance Report 2009 | Issuu is a digital publishing platform that makes it simple to publish magazines, catalogs, newspapers, books ...
Read more

District of Columbia Narrative Report 2009 2010

District of Columbia Narrative Report 2009‐2010 District of Columbia Annual Performance Report 2009‐2010 Submitted by the Office of the ...
Read more

Klein Independent School District Annual Performance ...

Department of Accountability and School Improvement January 2011 Klein Independent School District Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 ...
Read more

arksped.k12.ar.us

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2009/10 School Year Publication Date: May 2011 LEA: 0101 - DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT Each State ...
Read more

Capitol Hill - Ballpark District Performance-based Parking ...

Columbia Heights Performance-based Parking Report 2009; ... Capitol Hill - Ballpark District Performance-based Parking Report 2009. Tuesday, December 1, 2009.
Read more

DOC: Publications - Connecticut

Publications. Forms and some of ... Unified School District 1 Annual Performance Reports. ... Unified School District 1 Annual Performance Report 2009-2010 ...
Read more

Annual Health Sector Performance Report

DDHS District Director of Health Services DOTS Directly Observed Treatment ... 1.3 The Annual Health Sector Performance Report FY 2006/07
Read more

DOC: Education Services - Connecticut

Education Services 24 Wolcott Hill Road Wethersfield, CT 06109 Phone: (860) ... Unified School District 1 Annual Performance Report 2009-10 (PDF, 354 KB)
Read more