Published on March 7, 2014
Developing an effective serious harm event review process for Residential Care Quality Forum, 2014 February 27, 2014 Elizabeth Finlay, RN, MEd, Clinical Director, Residential Care & Assisted Living Larry Gustafson, MD, Program Medical Director, Residential Care & Assisted Living Michelle Merkel, RN, MSc, Project Leader, Residential Care & Assisted Living Karim Suleman, MBA, Managing Consultant, Patient Care Quality Office Warren D. Hill, PhD, Consultant, Quality Improvement and Patient Safety firstname.lastname@example.org 1 1
The Issue Avalanche of safety reports Event follow-up isolated & inconsistent Siloed learnings Review processes are fragmentary 2
Why is this an issue? Lack of standardized follow-up leads to practice variability Learnings are not aggregated in PSLS Learnings are not widely disseminated 3
Improvement Aims To build a sustainable monthly, multidisciplinary team review process To develop tools to support improving the efficiency and quality of the review process and follow-up actions 4
Change Concept Monthly review of all PSLS serious harm events by a multidisciplinary panel (QRC) Develop review tool to collate event info Follow-up queries and actions to handlers made within the PSLS system Each event remains “open” until follow-up is completed and panel closes event 5
Review Process: Serious Harm Events 6
Results to Review Committee & Leadership Group Tertiary Critical Patient Safety Review Follow-up with Review Committee Seconda ry Review/ Actions Monthly Review Moderate & Serious Harm Events Organization-wide Learning 7
The RCAL Experience: Initial Process Excel spreadsheet created from PSLS reports that listed event details and description Event ID# was cut and pasted from spreadsheet as a new search in PSLS The event was then loaded (live) in PSLS and the follow-up was reviewed by the committee 8
The Tool: Questions to Consider How can we review this data? How can we see, at a glance, the follow up plans to mitigate risk? How do we know if and what actions are being taken? How do we take the learnings and make quality improvements? 9
The PSLS Review Tool 10
Results RCAL average number of events reviewed increased by 64%: Mar thru Sept meetings (1st meeting): Sept(2nd meeting) thru Nov meetings: 21 events 33 events Participants like having all event information on one page Follow-up was recorded in PSLS, reducing follow-up on email or by phone (i.e. one stop shopping) Request to handlers for additional information decreased after several months as follow-up became standardized 12
Events Presented at RCAL QRC 40 35 30 New review tool implemented 25 ONGOING 20 CLOSED 15 10 5 0 MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE SEPT (1ST) SEPT (2ND) OCT NOV 13
Sustainment and Spread RCAL uses tool for each QRC meeting Medicine Program began using tool Oct 2013 Other programs being trained on process and tool, with goal to spread to all programs 14
Challenges and Lessons Learned Review process & tool provided consistency and standardization of learning Improved follow-up increased number of events reviewed and closed Event volume in acute care programs presents some challenges 15
Calcification Inhibitors in CKD and Dialysis Patients
Home; Health & Medicine; Developing an Effective Serious Harm Event Review Process for Residential Care
1 1 email@example.com Quality Forum, 2014 February 27, 2014 . Elizabeth Finlay, RN, MEd, Clinical Director, Residential Care & Assisted Living
Developing an Effective Serious Harm Event Review Process for Residential Care. Posted March 7, 2014 by kurt & filed under Uncategorized. Download this ...
Sample Risk Management Plan for a Community ... of care or treatment, disease process, ... carry a significant chance of a serious adverse event.
are at risk of serious harm. 3. ... children in residential care are at ... and issues facing children missing from home or care and to review ...
Care proceedings; Serious case ... LSCBs should use available research evidence when considering whether serious harm has ... For the review process, ...
Identifying where and when in the care process ... care. Originally, the intention of developing a ... of serious reportable events, an event ...
Turnitin provides instructors with the tools to engage students in the writing process, ... Turnitin applications ... Strategies for Developing Effective ...
Serious case reviews. ... A serious case review (SCR) must be carried out in the event of the death of or reported serious harm to a child in England.