Published on January 9, 2008
Author: ShawnHoke
Source: slideshare.net
Colorectal cancer screening: overview & background January 8,2007 David A. Haggstrom, MD, MAS LEADERS SYMPOSIUM “ Strategic Planning to Inform a Funded Project on how to Achieve Workflow Integration in Developing and Implementing CDS for CRC Screening”
Outline CRC screening practice guidelines Competing clinical demands for CRC screening Applied research for screening Clinical decision support Facilitators & barriers Practice-based interventions
CRC screening practice guidelines
Competing clinical demands for CRC screening
Applied research for screening
Clinical decision support
Facilitators & barriers
Practice-based interventions
Colorectal cancer screening Clinical practice guidelines Target population : men & women 50 years of age & older at average risk for colorectal cancer Caveat (VA/DoD) : providers should discuss screening with patients ages 80 & older, taking into account estimated life expectancy & presence of co-morbid disease
Target population : men & women 50 years of age & older at average risk for colorectal cancer
Caveat (VA/DoD) : providers should discuss screening with patients ages 80 & older, taking into account estimated life expectancy & presence of co-morbid disease
Colorectal cancer screening Clinical practice guidelines (USPSTF) Test Interval Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) 3 cards done at home Annually Flexible sigmoidoscopy Every 5 years Colonoscopy Every 10 years Double-contrast barium enema Every 5 years
Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT)
3 cards done at home
Competing clinical demands Most clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) did not address their applicability for older patients with multiple comorbidities Most didn’t discuss burden, short- & long-term goals give guidance for incorporating patient preferences into treatment plans (Boyd, Wu, JAMA , 2005) To fully satisfy all USPSTF recommendations 7.4 hrs/working day is needed for the provision of preventive services by physicians (Yarnall et al., AJPH , 2003)
Most clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) did not address their applicability for older patients with multiple comorbidities
Most didn’t discuss
burden, short- & long-term goals
give guidance for incorporating patient preferences into treatment plans (Boyd, Wu, JAMA , 2005)
To fully satisfy all USPSTF recommendations
7.4 hrs/working day is needed for the provision of preventive services by physicians
Computer reminders – Regenstrief Institute Clinical focus : FOBT, mammography, & Pap testing Study design : 6-mo. RCT Population : 31 GIM faculty & 145 residents at Indiana University Intervention : “directed reminders” vs. routine reminders 1) done/order today 3) patient refused 2) NA to patient 4) next visit Primary outcome : compliance with reminder “ directed reminders” overall (46% vs. 38%, p = 0.002) FOBT (61% vs. 49%, p = 0.0007) Secondary outcomes : 21% of time : NA to patient - due to inadequate data in pt’s EMR 10% of time : patient refused Conclusions : Requiring MDs to respond to computer-generated reminders improved their compliance However, 100% compliance with cancer screening reminders will be unattainable due to clinical appropriateness & patient refusal (Litzelman, Tierney, JGIM , 1993)
Clinical focus : FOBT, mammography, & Pap testing
Study design : 6-mo. RCT
Population : 31 GIM faculty & 145 residents at Indiana University
Intervention : “directed reminders” vs. routine reminders
1) done/order today 3) patient refused
2) NA to patient 4) next visit
Primary outcome : compliance with reminder
“ directed reminders” overall (46% vs. 38%, p = 0.002)
FOBT (61% vs. 49%, p = 0.0007)
Secondary outcomes :
21% of time : NA to patient - due to inadequate data in pt’s EMR
10% of time : patient refused
Conclusions :
Requiring MDs to respond to computer-generated reminders improved their compliance
However, 100% compliance with cancer screening reminders will be unattainable due to clinical appropriateness & patient refusal
Electronic health record – Partners HealthCare Barriers to use 24% of physicians “never/sometimes” used any EHR functionality during patient visit Barriers to EHR use: Loss of eye contact with patients (62%) Falling behind schedule (52%) Computers being too slow (49%) Inability to type quickly enough (32%) Using computer in front of patient is rude (31%) Preferring to write long prose notes (28%) (Linder, AMIA Annu Symp Proc , 2006)
24% of physicians “never/sometimes” used any EHR functionality during patient visit
Barriers to EHR use:
Loss of eye contact with patients (62%)
Falling behind schedule (52%)
Computers being too slow (49%)
Inability to type quickly enough (32%)
Using computer in front of patient is rude (31%)
Preferring to write long prose notes (28%)
Computer reminders - VA Facilitators to adherence In VA, overall adherence rate to 15 CRs: 86% (67% - 97%) Variation by clinic, individual clinician, & individual CR Positive influence upon reminder completion rate: full utilization of support staff in completion process receiving frequent individual feedback on completion No influence: provider demographics provider attitudes towards reminders (Mayo-Smith, Abha Agrawal, 2004 & 2006)
In VA, overall adherence rate to 15 CRs:
86% (67% - 97%)
Variation by clinic, individual clinician, & individual CR
Positive influence upon reminder completion rate:
full utilization of support staff in completion process
receiving frequent individual feedback on completion
No influence:
provider demographics
provider attitudes towards reminders
Computer reminders - VA Barriers to reminders HIV clinical reminders Design: ethnographic observations & semi-structured interviews Barriers to effective use: Workload Time to remove inapplicable reminders False alarms Reduced eye contact Use of paper forms rather than software (Patterson, Doebbeling, Asch et al., J Biomed Inform , 2005)
HIV clinical reminders
Design: ethnographic observations & semi-structured interviews
Barriers to effective use:
Workload
Time to remove inapplicable reminders
False alarms
Reduced eye contact
Use of paper forms rather than software
Colorectal cancer screening Primary care-based interventions Practice-individualized facilitation of implementation of tools: Group randomized clinical trial 77 community family practices Intervention: 1-day practice assessment - nurse facilitator observed practice MDs & staff 1.5 hour meeting with practice day after frequent visits thereafter (unknown dose effect) Outcomes at 12 months Summary scores of preventive service delivery rates: Intervention: 42% vs. 31% Control: 37% vs. 35% (p=0.015) Screening services, (p=0.048), not immunization services Sustained after 24 months (STEP-UP - Study to Enhance Prevention by Understanding Practice) (Stange, Goodwin, Am J Prev Med , 2001 & 2003)
Practice-individualized facilitation of implementation of tools:
Group randomized clinical trial
77 community family practices
Intervention:
1-day practice assessment - nurse facilitator observed practice MDs & staff
1.5 hour meeting with practice day after
frequent visits thereafter (unknown dose effect)
Outcomes at 12 months
Summary scores of preventive service delivery rates:
Intervention: 42% vs. 31%
Control: 37% vs. 35% (p=0.015)
Screening services, (p=0.048), not immunization services
Sustained after 24 months
CRC screening in primary care practices Most CRC screening interventions focus on either patients or individual clinicians without examining the office context Methods: chart review (795 pts eligible for CRC screening) practice surveys (22 family medicine practices) Factors associated with higher CRC screening: Using nursing or health educator staff to provide behavioral counseling Reminder system use (Hudson & Crabtree, Can Det Prev , 2007)
Most CRC screening interventions focus on either
patients or individual clinicians
without examining the office context
Methods:
chart review (795 pts eligible for CRC screening)
practice surveys (22 family medicine practices)
Factors associated with higher CRC screening:
Using nursing or health educator staff to provide behavioral counseling
Reminder system use
Conclusions Generally positive, but sometimes mixed, results for clinical, computer reminders Direct observation & qualitative methods provide opportunity to understand potential pathways for effectiveness of clinical reminders Computer reminders Need not only to incorporate evidence base, but address patient preferences & comorbidities Prior positive experience with practice change Computer reminder often key component Team-based approach also important, particularly to help address competing time demands
Generally positive, but sometimes mixed, results for clinical, computer reminders
Direct observation & qualitative methods provide opportunity to understand potential pathways for effectiveness of clinical reminders
Computer reminders
Need not only to incorporate evidence base, but address patient preferences & comorbidities
Prior positive experience with practice change
Computer reminder often key component
Team-based approach also important, particularly to help address competing time demands
Questions or comments?
Questions or comments?
Systems engineering framework Identify system of interest Choose appropriate performance measure Select best modeling tool Study model properties & behavior under variety of scenarios Make design & operation decisions for implementation previous applications in hemodialysis, radiation therapy, & patient flow modeling (Kopach-Konrad, Doebbeling et al., JGIM , 2007)
Identify system of interest
Choose appropriate performance measure
Select best modeling tool
Study model properties & behavior under variety of scenarios
Make design & operation decisions for implementation
previous applications in hemodialysis, radiation therapy, & patient flow modeling
... Duke Anesthesiology’s Dr. Richard ... It’s another step toward global health as Duke Anesthesiology helped kick off this ... David S . Warner, MD ...
Read more
"Preparing High-Quality Serious Adverse Event Narratives for Clinical Study Reports" ... (AHRQ): www.ahrq.gov (rvw), 2010;25(2) ... "AMWA Publications: ...
Read more
Site Archive for Tuesday, 02 Oct 2012. ... AHRQ's Clancy to deliver keynote at URAC's 2012 Quality Summit 2:31PM UTC. ... State Event on Nov. 3; ...
Read more
prompted us to build a patient EHR the real kick off was that our ... as David’s I think, that ... I’m going to just quickly go through these slides ...
Read more
Yossi Vardi: http://su-etherpad.com/event-Jul29-Yossi-Vardi-The traits of the person you want to invest in: - Top expert: ... Slides: https: //docs.google ...
Read more
1 MEDICARE PAYMENT ADVISORY COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING The Horizon Ballroom Ronald Reagan Building International Trade Center 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W ...
Read more
Conference Guide for the 2012 AER Conference, December 4-6, in San Diego, CA. | Issuu is a digital publishing platform that makes it simple to publish ...
Read more
Run for the Money events kick off with auction ... The auction is part of the annual Run for the Money event to raise funds for the nonprofit ...
Read more
Site Archive for Tuesday, 27 Jan 2015. ... Biggest Entertainment and Philanthropy Event of 2015 1 ... Larry David's Broadway play sets advance ticket sales ...
Read more
Add a comment