advertisement

Critical Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials1

60 %
40 %
advertisement
Information about Critical Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials1
Education

Published on February 14, 2014

Author: dhiwahar1

Source: authorstream.com

advertisement

Critical Appraisal of Randomized Controlled Trials : Critical Appraisal of Randomized Controlled Trials Done By K.H. Dhiwahar . MPT (sports) P. Saba kannan raja .MPT (sports ) INTRODUCTION : INTRODUCTION The skill of critical appraisal that allows the reader to identify inconsistencies, assumptions, in the research process, and then balance these against the outcome of the research . Critical appraisal is the process of carefully and systematically examining research to judge its trustworthiness, and its value and relevance in a particular context. In order to decide whether the outcome has value and reliability, and can underpin a clinical decision . PowerPoint Presentation: CLINICAL EXPERIENCE PATIENT PREFERENCE EVIDENCE Critical appraisal is an important element of evidence-based medicine. The five steps of evidence-based medicine are: : Critical appraisal is an important element of evidence-based medicine. The five steps of evidence-based medicine are: Comparison outcomes Hierarchy of evidence : Hierarchy of evidence RCT Randomized Controlled Trials ( RCTs ) : Randomized Controlled Trials ( RCTs ) RCT is a specific type of scientific experiment, and the gold standard for a clinical trial. RCT are often used to test the efficacy and/or effectiveness of various types of medical intervention within a patient population. Population is randomly allocated to two groups One group is given a specific treatment or intervention On average the groups are identical because they are randomized and therefore any difference in the measured outcome is due to the intervention Critical appraisal of RCTs : Critical appraisal of RCTs Factors to look for : sample size (power calculation ); Eligibility criteria Base line characteristics allocation (randomization, stratification, confounders); blinding; follow up of participants (intention to treat); data collection (bias); presentation of results (clear, precise); applicability to local population. Sample size calculation (Power calculation) : Sample size calculation (Power calculation) A trial should be big enough to have a high chance of detecting a worthwhile effect if it exists. Statisticians can work out before the trial begins how large the sample size should be in order to have a good chance of detecting a true difference between the intervention and control groups Population Sample Eligibility criteria : Eligibility criteria This criterion is satisfied if the report describes the source of subjects and a list of criteria used to determine who was eligible to participate in the study. inclusion and exclusion criteria should be relevant for the study method and question — i.e., a study shouldn’t exclude people with certain weight or height, if this is not relevant to the study outcomes or question posed Baseline characteristics : Baseline characteristics Both the control group and the intervention group should be broadly similar in factors like age, sex distribution and level of illness. :  Randomization Blinding : Blinding Keep one or more of the people involved in the trial unaware of the intervention that is being evaluated Purpose: decrease risk of bias Blinding can be implemented in at least 6 levels in RCT Participants Investigators who administer interventions Investigators taking care of the participants Investigators assessing the outcomes Data analyst Investigators who write results of the trial Blinding : Blinding Intention to treat : Intention to treat Some participants would not complete the study because of misdiagnosis, non-compliance, or withdrawal When such patients excluded from analysis, we can no longer be sure that important prognostic factors in the 2 groups are similar which lead to potential bias To reduce this bias, results should be analyzed on an ‘intention to treat’ basis Intention to treat : Intention to treat Out comes : Out comes This requires your judgment — look at what outcomes were reported, and how these answer the question posed by the study applicability to local population. : applicability to local population. Is our patient so different from those in the study that the results can’t apply? Is the treatment feasible in our setting? What are our patient’s potential benefits and harms from the therapy? What are the patient’s values and expectations for both the outcome we are trying to prevent and the treatment we are offering? Population Advantages & disadvantages of critical appraisal and RCT : Advantages & disadvantages of critical appraisal and RCT Advantages systematic way of assessing validity, results & usefulness of research contributes to improving practice (quality) encourages objective assessment of information not difficult to develop skills Tries to disprove the null hypothesis Tries to eradicate bias because the two groups are identical Disadvantages time consuming not always any easy answers or what you hoped to find dispiriting if ‘good’ evidence is lacking i.e. little / poor research done Summary : Summary Relationship between PICO & study design is important Assessing quality of studies & justification of outcomes is cornerstone of critical appraisal Use of checklists provides consistency of approach & ensures relevant questions are asked. Different study designs need different questions to be asked so we use different critical appraisal checklists Reference : Reference The PEDro scale is based on the Delphi list developed by Verhagen and colleagues at the Department of Epidemiology, University of Maastricht ( Verhagen AP et al (1998) 2010; 90:880-894.PHYS THER. Fitzgerald Anthony M. DiGioia III, Timothy J. Levison and G. Kelley Sara R. Piva, Alexandra B. Gil, Gustavo J.M. Almeida, Randomized Clinical Trial Function for Patients With Total Knee Arthroplasty: A A Balance Exercise Program Appears to Improve Appraisal of an RCT using a critical appraisal checklist Spink MJ, et al. Critical appraisal of a journal article CASP www.sph.nhs.uk/what-we-do/public-health-workforce/resources; PowerPoint Presentation: Thank u

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

The effect of goal-directed therapy on mortality in ...

... a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. ... meta-analysis, evidence-based medicine, critical ... A randomized and controlled trial of ...
Read more

How to perform a critical analysis of a randomised ...

How to perform a critical analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Estellat C(1), Torgerson DJ, ... Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods*
Read more

Critical Care | Full text | The effect of goal-directed ...

The effect of goal-directed therapy on mortality in ... a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. ... Critical Care and American Journal of ...
Read more

Analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Analysis of randomized controlled trials. Peduzzi P(1), Henderson W, Hartigan P, ... Inevitably, such trials will have to deal with more missing data ...
Read more

Critical Care | Full text | Effect of initial calorie ...

... to improve clinical outcomes in critical ... calorie intake via enteral nutrition in ... analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Read more

A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of ...

Original Article. A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care. Paul C. Hébert, M.D., George Wells ...
Read more

Evaluation of Randomized Controlled Trials - Circulation

Although randomized controlled trials ... analysis, for example, may ... obtained from proceedings and abstracts typically undergo no critical scientific ...
Read more

Journal of Critical Care

Mortality benefit of vasopressor and inotropic agents in septic shock: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials☆ Yuji Oba, MD ...
Read more

[inserm-00434403, v1] How to perform a critical analysis ...

How to perform a critical analysis of a randomized controlled trial Candice Estellat MD,* David J. Torgerson 1, PhDPhilippe Ravaud MD, PhD
Read more

Randomized controlled trial - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A randomized controlled trial (or randomized ... The term randomized controlled clinical trials is a ... Randomized controlled trial; Sequential analysis;
Read more