Chp 1 Was There Singapore Before 1819

50 %
50 %
Information about Chp 1 Was There Singapore Before 1819

Published on June 26, 2007

Author: donaldleo

Source: slideshare.net

Was there Singapore before 1819? 3 sources to determine the answer 1. Sejarah Melayu 2. Wang Dayuan’s account 3. Archaeological discoveries

3 sources to determine the answer

1. Sejarah Melayu

2. Wang Dayuan’s account

3. Archaeological discoveries

Sejarah Melayu Malay Annals written in 16 th Century Singapore was a thriving trading centre under Sang Utama Attracted the attention of Majapahit War ensued. Destroyed by the Javanese and ruler fled and founded Melaka. THINK!!! Who wrote it? Was it really history as its main purpose was just to trace the origins and descent of Malay royalty? Was it legend? Are we relying on it just for convenience sake to establish or create history in Singapore?

Malay Annals written in 16 th Century

Singapore was a thriving trading centre under Sang Utama

Attracted the attention of Majapahit

War ensued.

Destroyed by the Javanese and ruler fled and founded Melaka.

THINK!!! Who wrote it? Was it really history as its main purpose was just to trace the origins and descent of Malay royalty? Was it legend? Are we relying on it just for convenience sake to establish or create history in Singapore?

Wang Dayuan Chinese merchant from Yuan China Dao Yi Zhi Lue (Description of the Barbarians of the Isles) Invaluable record of Chinese overseas Reported on Longyamen (Dragon’s Teeth Gate) and Dan-ma-xi (Temasek) Exotic, famous, frequently visited by traders, Chinese settlers and piracy So, Wang’s records agree with Sejarah Melayu

Chinese merchant from Yuan China

Dao Yi Zhi Lue (Description of the Barbarians of the Isles)

Invaluable record of Chinese overseas

Reported on Longyamen (Dragon’s Teeth Gate) and Dan-ma-xi (Temasek)

Exotic, famous, frequently visited by traders, Chinese settlers and piracy

So, Wang’s records agree with Sejarah Melayu

 

But… Sources for the history of Singapore are so scanty and ambiguous!!! Lack of confirmation!!! Why was there no mention of Temasek after 14 th century? Room for debate whether Temasek and Singapore refer to the same place Was the mapping accurate? What if it was another place in the Singapore-Riau area?

Sources for the history of Singapore are so scanty and ambiguous!!!

Lack of confirmation!!!

Why was there no mention of Temasek after 14 th century?

Room for debate whether Temasek and Singapore refer to the same place

Was the mapping accurate? What if it was another place in the Singapore-Riau area?

Archaeological Evidence Archaeological findings testified that Singapore was a vibrant trading city as early as the 14 th century. Who brought these things over? Where were they commonly found? Why? Implications? Why was Singapore always described to be a sleeping fishing village before Raffles’ arrival? What happened from 14 th to 18 th century?

Archaeological findings testified that Singapore was a vibrant trading city as early as the 14 th century.

Who brought these things over?

Where were they commonly found? Why?

Implications?

Why was Singapore always described to be a sleeping fishing village before Raffles’ arrival?

What happened from 14 th to 18 th century?

Main Archaeological Sites Fort Canning Hill – Site of religious activities and craftsmen’s workshops used for recycling of glass Parliament House – Site of commercial activities and metal working Empress Place – dumping area for people living there

Fort Canning Hill – Site of religious activities and craftsmen’s workshops used for recycling of glass

Parliament House – Site of commercial activities and metal working

Empress Place – dumping area for people living there

Archaeological Discoveries

Archaeological Discoveries

Istana Kampong Glam

Fort Canning Excavation

Singapore Padang

Fort Canning

Conclusion: Did Singapore exist as a port of trade? Yes, because… It was autonomous, specialized town, city or small state intended by policy for trade. It only paid occasional tribute too. It was usually a trans-shipment point between different ecological regions, i.e. China and India. It was often a deliberately neutral buffer zone. It did not belong to China, India nor Siam.

Yes, because…

It was autonomous, specialized town, city or small state intended by policy for trade. It only paid occasional tribute too.

It was usually a trans-shipment point between different ecological regions, i.e. China and India.

It was often a deliberately neutral buffer zone. It did not belong to China, India nor Siam.

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

history is fun: Chapter 1- Was there a Singapore before 1819?

... there was a Singapore before 1819? We all know the account of Raffles stumbling upon a sleepy fishing village and before ... 1 History Of ...
Read more

Was there Singapore before 1819? - mrschoo-sec1ih2013 - home

‐Why was there no mention of Temasek after 14th ... Was there Singapore before 1819? ... 1/23/2013 3:40:52 PM ...
Read more

HISTORY OF SINGAPORE BEFORE 1819 - Quia

HISTORY OF SINGAPORE BEFORE 1819 Author: Bennett Tan Last modified by: Bennett Tan Created Date: 9/9/2001 9:36:34 AM Document presentation format:
Read more

Was there Singapore before 1819? - WordPress.com

Was there Singapore before 1819? ...
Read more

Sec1HCI-history-2013 - Was there a Singapore before 1819?

... and historical interpretations of early travellers that refers to the existence of Singapore before 1819. ... Chapter 1: Was there Singapore before 1819?
Read more