Cascao Evora Sharing Transboundary Waters Power Mena Region

40 %
60 %
Information about Cascao Evora Sharing Transboundary Waters Power Mena Region

Published on July 2, 2009

Author: ana.cascao


Sharing transboundary waters in the context of asymmetrical power relations: lessons from the MENA region ANA ELISA CASCÃO UNESCO-IHP HELP PROGRAM SEMINAR KCL /London Water Research Group Évora, 24-26 June 2009

MENA region: 3 major transboundary river basins NILE BASIN 10 riparian states JORDAN BASIN Nile 5 riparian states Jordan Tigris-Euphrates TIGRIS-EUPHRATES BASIN 3 riparian states COMPLEX COMPLEX [HYDRO] HYDROLOGY POLITICS

MENA river basins: Power Asymmetries 4 PILLARS OF POWER Material Bargaining Ideational Geography power power power Zeitoun and Warner, 2006 London Water Research Group

MENA river basins: Asymmetric power relations Nile Basin ETHIOPIA SUDAN EGYPT Material Ideational Ideational Geography power power power Bargaining Material Bargaining Geography power power power Material Bargaining Ideational Geography power power power Tigris-Euphrates Basin TURKEY SYRIA IRAQ Material Ideational Material Bargaining Ideational Geography power power power power power Bargaining Geography power Material Bargaining Ideational Geography power power power

MENA Basins: Hydropolitics vs. IWRMA Strong power asymmetries  Asymmetric water control, distribution and allocation  Political conflicts/volatility  Militarisation/Securitisation of water resources  “Resource capture” strategies  Basin-wide water negotiations and agreements  Inter-riparian confidence and dialogue  Comprehensive transboundary water cooperation  Integrated Water Resources Management and Allocation (IWRMA) 

MENA Basins: Hydropolitics and Knowledge Knowledge, information and institutional [wide] gap  Integration and harmonisation of knowledge and information  Information sharing and exchange across borders  Sanctioning of knowledge, discourse and agenda  Multiple stakeholders involvement  Scientific collaboration across borders  Politicisation of science, models and decision support tools  Decision-making controlled by politicians, not scientists or technicians  Basin-wide, integrated knowledge and decision-making systems 


Some conclusions... POWER OVER- ASYMMETRIES POLITICISATION Strong obstacles to:  Meaningful and effective cooperation  Sound science, policies, and management  Information and data sharing systems  Development of dialogue and linkages between epistemic and decision-making groups  Comprehensive stakeholders involvement  Fair negotiations of legal agreements based on international water law principles

Thanks for your attention!

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

Land Acquisitions: How will they Impact Transboundary Waters?

... How will they Impact Transboundary Waters ... water availability in the MENA region, ... between parties sharing transboundary waters was not ...
Read more

Transboundary water interaction II: the influence of ...

This paper seeks to broaden the analysis of transboundary water interaction, ... Cascao, A. E. (2009a). Changing power ... Transboundary water interaction ...
Read more

Water Integrity MENA - Water Governance Facility

Water Integrity Capacity Building Programme in MENA ... Water scarcity in the MENA region is not only a result of physical ... transboundary waters, ...
Read more

Power, Hegemony and Critical Hydropolitics

Power, Hegemony and Critical ... developed from examination of three MENA transboundary water ... Transboundary Water Management for the MENA Region
Read more

Anders Jägerskog | LinkedIn

... you’ll join 400 million other professionals who are sharing ... Training Programmes on transboundary water in the MENA region ... power and law. A ...
Read more

Publications | Stockholm International Water Institute

Publications SIWI generates, shares ... Region. Central Asia. ... Transboundary Water Management and poverty: ...
Read more