Carbon Strategies in the U.S. 2001-2009

43 %
57 %
Information about Carbon Strategies in the U.S. 2001-2009
Education

Published on January 23, 2009

Author: rym87

Source: slideshare.net

Carbon Mitigation: The U.S. Voluntary Approach vs. the European Emissions Trading Scheme Andrew Collier Carlos Rymer Hao Zh u ang Kubilay Kavak Environmental Strategies Spring 2007

Carbon Mitigation: The U.S. Voluntary Approach vs. the European Emissions Trading Scheme

Agenda Global Climate Change The US Voluntary Approach -Overview -Advantages and Disadvantages The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme -Overview -Advantages and Disadvantages Discussion

Global Climate Change

The US Voluntary Approach

-Overview

-Advantages and Disadvantages

The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme

-Overview

-Advantages and Disadvantages

Discussion

Why Address Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHGe)? The rapid increase in the global mean temperature has been largely due to the buildup of GHGs in the atmosphere. -Projections indicate that during the 21st century, global climate change will: Raise sea levels (affecting millions) Shift ecosystems (causing major extinctions) Melt existing glaciers (affecting agriculture) Desertify arid regions Intensify rainfall in certain areas Bleach coral reefs Disrupt economic activity (significantly)

The rapid increase in the global mean temperature has been largely due to the buildup of GHGs in the atmosphere.

-Projections indicate that during the 21st century, global climate change will:

Raise sea levels (affecting millions)

Shift ecosystems (causing major extinctions)

Melt existing glaciers (affecting agriculture)

Desertify arid regions

Intensify rainfall in certain areas

Bleach coral reefs

Disrupt economic activity (significantly)

Some Strong Evidence

Some Strong Evidence

- There are many causes of global warming, but the most important of them is fossil fuels. 21 st Century Projections

Kyoto Protocol - In 1997, industrialized nations began ratifying the Kyoto Protocol. - In 2001, the U.S. pulled out of the treaty, claiming it would hurt its economy. - The United States established a policy whereby GHGe could be voluntarily reduced. - The Kyoto Protocol entered into force on February 16th, 2005.

The U.S. Voluntary Approach - The Bush Administration has set a goal of reducing the nation’s GHG intensity by 18% by the year 2012 on a voluntary basis. - The approach is based on the following: √ Established partnerships, √ Funding R&D for clean energy technologies, √ Promoting scientific research, √ Increasing fuel economy standards, √ Providing tax incentives for renewable energy and energy efficiency, and √ Establishing a voluntary GHG registry

- The approach is based on the following:

√ Established partnerships,

√ Funding R&D for clean energy technologies,

√ Promoting scientific research,

√ Increasing fuel economy standards,

√ Providing tax incentives for renewable energy

and energy efficiency, and

√ Establishing a voluntary GHG registry

Partnerships and Voluntary Programs Government agencies and the Administration have partnered with industries and companies to reduce GHG intensity. These include: √ ClimateVISION √ Climate Leaders √ SmartWay Transport √ Energy Star √ Asia-Pacific Partnership in Clean Development and Climate

Government agencies and the Administration have partnered with industries and companies to reduce GHG intensity. These include:

√ ClimateVISION

√ Climate Leaders

√ SmartWay Transport

√ Energy Star

√ Asia-Pacific Partnership in Clean Development and Climate

Carbon Offsets Market - To facilitate voluntary GHGe reductions, a voluntary market for carbon offsets has emerged. - Under this market, individuals or companies can purchase carbon credits. - Carbon credits fund the creation of additional projects that reduce GHGe.

- To facilitate voluntary GHGe reductions, a voluntary market for carbon offsets has emerged.

- Under this market, individuals or companies can purchase carbon credits.

- Carbon credits fund the creation of additional projects that reduce GHGe.

Questions to Consider What are the primary advantages of President Bush’s voluntary policy to reduce carbon emission intensity by 18%? What are the disadvantages of this approach? What kind of adjustments are needed?

What are the primary advantages of President Bush’s voluntary policy to reduce carbon emission intensity by 18%?

What are the disadvantages of this approach?

What kind of adjustments are needed?

Climate VISION From Interview with Stephen Eule, Director Office of Climate Change Policy, U.S. Department of Energy Advantages: Cost-effective Preparation & Credit Responsible Corporate Citizen

From Interview with Stephen Eule, Director Office of Climate Change Policy, U.S. Department of Energy

Advantages:

Cost-effective

Preparation & Credit

Responsible Corporate Citizen

Future Mandatory Policy? “ Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future.” (Niels Bohr) “ I’ll have to gaze into my crystal ball here…the good thing about my job is that I don’t have to gaze into a crystal ball. I’m just going to leave that question be.”

“ Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future.” (Niels Bohr)

“ I’ll have to gaze into my crystal ball here…the good thing about my job is that I don’t have to gaze into a crystal ball. I’m just going to leave that question be.”

Climate VISION, Electric Power Larry Mansueti, Federal Agency Leads, Department of Energy Advantages : Preparation & Experience May Delay Need for Mandatory Policy Research Developments & Technologic Advances

Larry Mansueti, Federal Agency Leads, Department of Energy

Advantages :

Preparation & Experience

May Delay Need for Mandatory Policy

Research Developments & Technologic Advances

Disadvantages No Guarantee It Will Work Uninterested Congress Science vs. Ethics Impact Citizens Greatly Leave Decision Up to Congress Drawbacks

Disadvantages

No Guarantee It Will Work

Uninterested Congress

Science vs. Ethics

Impact Citizens Greatly

Leave Decision Up to Congress

Climate Leaders From Interview with Jim Sullivan, Climate Leaders, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Advantages: Allows companies to look for cost effective strategies across all operations - even internationally, whereas, a mandated program would be limited to just what is mandated Freedom to create change Broader Coverage Disadvantages: “ As part of the administration, I can’t say anything about that.” Coverage: Many companies under the voluntary policy are not taking action

From Interview with Jim Sullivan, Climate Leaders, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Advantages:

Allows companies to look for cost effective strategies across all operations - even internationally, whereas, a mandated program would be limited to just what is mandated

Freedom to create change

Broader Coverage

Disadvantages:

“ As part of the administration, I can’t say anything about that.”

Coverage: Many companies under the voluntary policy are not taking action

Climate Leaders (continued) Number of Climate Leaders Partners: 109 Number of Partners with publicly announced greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction goals: 59 Number of Partners who have achieved their goal: 5 EPA estimates that GHG reductions by Climate Leaders Partners will prevent over 10 million metric tons of carbon equivalents per year. These reductions are equivalent to the annual emissions of nearly 7 million cars.

Number of Climate Leaders Partners: 109

Number of Partners with publicly announced greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction goals: 59

Number of Partners who have achieved their goal: 5

EPA estimates that GHG reductions by Climate Leaders Partners will prevent over 10 million metric tons of carbon equivalents per year. These reductions are equivalent to the annual emissions of nearly 7 million cars.

The combined U.S. annual GHG emissions of Climate Leaders Partners represent more than 8 percent of total annual U.S. GHG emissions. More than 50 percent of the organizations that partner with EPA in Climate Leaders are members of the Fortune 500. Total annual revenue of Climate Leaders Partners represents over 9 percent of the U.S. Gross Domestic Product (2005).

The combined U.S. annual GHG emissions of Climate Leaders Partners represent more than 8 percent of total annual U.S. GHG emissions.

More than 50 percent of the organizations that partner with EPA in Climate Leaders are members of the Fortune 500. Total annual revenue of Climate Leaders Partners represents over 9 percent of the U.S. Gross Domestic Product (2005).

Summary of Advantages Green Business Image National Green Stewardship & Responsibility Technological Development Tax Incentives for Renewable Energy, Hybrid Vehicles, and Deployment Partnerships USDA Incentives for Sequestration Conservation of Tropical Forests and Land-sinks

Green Business Image

National Green Stewardship & Responsibility

Technological Development

Tax Incentives for Renewable Energy, Hybrid Vehicles, and Deployment Partnerships

USDA Incentives for Sequestration

Conservation of Tropical Forests and Land-sinks

Summary of Disadvantages Emissions Are Not Actually Decreasing “ Rich-gentleman’s Club?” Lack of Regulatory Pressure Emissions to grow 11% above 2002 levels by 2012. Offsets & Land-sinks Additionality Permanence Leakage

Emissions Are Not Actually Decreasing

“ Rich-gentleman’s Club?”

Lack of Regulatory Pressure

Emissions to grow 11% above 2002 levels by 2012.

Offsets & Land-sinks

Additionality

Permanence

Leakage

What Should be the Focus? Renewable Energies? Science? Technology? Transportation? Taxation? Mandates? Government Support? Education?

European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU-ETS) 180 countries signed the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 1992 Kyoto Protocol signed 1997, come into effect in Feb. 16, 2005, and EU established ETS. EU-ETS is the first large-scale greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions trading program in the world. Covers around 12,000 installations in 25 countries and 6 major industrial sectors Represents half of total CO 2 emission from EU-25 countries

180 countries signed the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 1992

Kyoto Protocol signed 1997, come into effect in Feb. 16, 2005, and EU established ETS.

EU-ETS is the first large-scale greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions trading program in the world.

Covers around 12,000 installations in 25 countries and 6 major industrial sectors

Represents half of total CO 2 emission from EU-25 countries

Timeline for EU-ETS The first phase (2005-2007): Focuses only on CO 2 and on a range of large installations in key industrial sectors. The overall cap is made up of individual country caps set by each nation’s national allocation plan (NAP). The second phase (2008-2012) Involves tighter overall caps (in line with wide target under Kyoto Protocol) May be expanded to other GHGs, additional sources, and more sectors

The first phase (2005-2007):

Focuses only on CO 2 and on a range of large installations in key industrial sectors.

The overall cap is made up of individual country caps set by each nation’s national allocation plan (NAP).

The second phase (2008-2012)

Involves tighter overall caps (in line with wide target under Kyoto Protocol)

May be expanded to other GHGs, additional sources, and more sectors

Structure (continue) Monitoring Registry banking system exists for 25 nations Compliance fines exists for non-compliance (40 Euro/TCO2 ,2005-2007; 100Euro/TCO2 from 2008 onwards) Banking allowance Banking of excess reductions (i.e., allowances) for future years is allowed within the first compliance period

Monitoring

Registry banking system exists for 25 nations

Compliance

fines exists for non-compliance (40 Euro/TCO2 ,2005-2007; 100Euro/TCO2 from 2008 onwards)

Banking allowance

Banking of excess reductions (i.e., allowances) for future years is allowed within the first compliance period

“ F lexible Mechanisms” Under Kyoto: CDM / JI P roject-based credit-trading mechanisms P ermit Annex B countr ies to earn credits by engaging in a project that helps another party decrease its GHG emissions CDM : industrialized countries vs. developing countries JI : industrialized countries vs. industrialized countries During first phase, no limit on CDM credits For second phase, each NAP should decide how many JI and CDM credits it will be allowed

P roject-based credit-trading mechanisms

P ermit Annex B countr ies to earn credits by engaging in a project that helps another party decrease its GHG emissions

CDM : industrialized countries vs. developing countries

JI : industrialized countries vs. industrialized countries

During first phase, no limit on CDM credits

For second phase, each NAP should decide how many JI and CDM credits it will be allowed

CDM, PDDs by Volume, Mt 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 China India Brazil Korea South Africa Mexico Argentina Nigeria Chile Thailand PointCarbon. Nov. 2006

JI PDDs by Volume, MT 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Germany Russian Federation Ukraine Romania Bulgaria Czech Republic Hungary Poland New Zealand Estonia Slovakia Lithuania PointCarbon. Nov. 2006

Advantages of the ETS A trading market has some general advantages: Flexibility of pollution sources to reduce their emissions Inducing the lowest overall cost Pressure on emission quantity Adjustable to inflation or sudden fluctuation in economy Superior to pollution tax in many ways

Flexibility of pollution sources to reduce their emissions

Inducing the lowest overall cost

Pressure on emission quantity

Adjustable to inflation or sudden fluctuation in economy

Superior to pollution tax in many ways

Advantages of the ETS (Cont.) Specifically the ETS has the following advantages: Possibility for creating a low transaction cost and a high volume market Stiff penalties (much greater than permit prices) Avoiding difficulty of enforcing a tax system in the EU due to different economic structures among nations Bankable permits for CDM projects (can also be seen as a disadvantage!) The transparency in monitoring and reporting, and third-party certification

Possibility for creating a low transaction cost and a high volume market

Stiff penalties (much greater than permit prices)

Avoiding difficulty of enforcing a tax system in the EU due to different economic structures among nations

Bankable permits for CDM projects (can also be seen as a disadvantage!)

The transparency in monitoring and reporting, and third-party certification

Disadvantages of the ETS Only-CO2 coverage during first phase / potential danger of shifting to other GHGs Emissions from transportation are not covered √ Between 1990 and 2003, EU-15 GHG emissions from domestic transport increased by 24 % √ Emissions from domestic transport are projected to increase by 31 % from 1990 levels by 2010 √ The average CO 2 emissions of new passenger cars were reduced by about 12 % from 1995 to 2003, but 16 % more cars were sold in the same period and offset any efficiency gains

Only-CO2 coverage during first phase / potential danger of shifting to other GHGs

Emissions from transportation are not covered

Disadvantages of the ETS (Cont.) Complicated governmental decision-making Fear about generous initial allocations Distrust between member states for installation coverage

Complicated governmental decision-making

Fear about generous initial allocations

Distrust between member states for installation coverage

Disadvantages of the ETS (Cont.) Risk of political pressure over the national governments Allocation method: limited auctions Complex registry system to administer: Possible rise in transaction cost

Risk of political pressure over the national governments

Allocation method: limited auctions

Complex registry system to administer: Possible rise in transaction cost

Disadvantages of the ETS (Cont.) Critiques for CDM and JI : Verification, monitoring, and scientific uncertainty Limited availability of CDM projects

Critiques for CDM and JI : Verification, monitoring, and scientific uncertainty

Limited availability of CDM projects

Recommendations for ETS as a Strategy Transportation The major source of GHG emissions in Europe Vehicle sales have risen by 34% since 1990 in Europe Political opposition & economic constraints

Transportation

The major source of GHG emissions in Europe

Vehicle sales have risen by 34% since 1990 in Europe

Political opposition & economic constraints

Recommendations for ETS as a Strategy Government agreement to significantly reduce GHG emissions Government involvement in making the rules Intervention from government as supplementary approach: taxation, subsidies Governments’ Commitment

Government agreement to significantly reduce GHG emissions

Government involvement in making the rules

Intervention from government as supplementary approach: taxation, subsidies

Governments’ Commitment

Recommendation for ETS as a Strategy Secure Reporting System Science-Backed Reductions Check System on Compliance Avoidance of Countries with no Enforcement Effective Monitoring

Secure Reporting System

Science-Backed Reductions

Check System on Compliance

Avoidance of Countries with no Enforcement

Effective Monitoring

EU-ETS R educe CO2 emissions by 8% by 2012 R egistry : mandatory -based Advantages: has quantifiable impacts on GHG emissions ; providing incentives for a much faster transition to new technologies Reduce GHG intensity by 18% by 2012 R egistry : voluntary-based Advantages: receiving experience, and prepare for more stringent reduction goals Comparison of Approaches US voluntary

R educe CO2 emissions by 8% by 2012

R egistry : mandatory -based

Advantages: has quantifiable impacts on GHG emissions ; providing incentives for a much faster transition to new technologies

Reduce GHG intensity by 18% by 2012

R egistry : voluntary-based

Advantages: receiving experience, and prepare for more stringent reduction goals

Discussion Topics Cultural Differences: U.S. vs. Europe Rich Gentleman’s Club Taxation Domestic vs. International Carbon Trading

Cultural Differences: U.S. vs. Europe

Rich Gentleman’s Club

Taxation

Domestic vs. International Carbon Trading

Questions? Note : We apologize if the pictures below offend anyone in the audience.

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

Effectiveness of U.S. state policies to reduce CO2 ...

... but its ultimate success depends on the 50 U.S ... climate change, pollution, carbon. Writer: Scholars Strategy Network ... Journalist's Resource.
Read more

United States Climate Change Actions - U.S. Department of ...

United States Climate Change Actions. ... · Has developed research-based adaptation strategies, carbon sequestration models and a ... U.S. Climate Change ...
Read more

according to the U.S. Green Building Council

The commercial and residential building sector accounts for 39% of carbon ... The U.S. population ... Building green is one of the best strategies for ...
Read more

CREATING A U.S. LOW-CARBON DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY BY

In 2010 the U.S. made further international commitments to create a low-carbon development strategy ... constraints to low-carbon development in the U.S.
Read more

Ocean Acidification – Recommended Strategy for a U.S ...

– Recommended Strategy for a U.S ... • Ocean acidification is ... organizations and programs not only within the U.S. Ocean Carbon and ...
Read more

U.S. Trust Launches Carbon Reserve-Free Strategy | Bank of ...

U.S. Trust today launched a new component of its proprietary and customizable Socially Innovative Investing (S2I) strategy. The Carbon Reserve ...
Read more

Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum - U.S. Department of ...

U.S. Department of Energy ... 2005 Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum. Purpose of Initiative . The Carbon ... Develop strategies to address issues of ...
Read more

Options and Considerations for a Federal Carbon Tax ...

Establishes a target of reducing U.S. carbon dioxide emissions 80% below ... Distributional Effects of a Carbon Tax in Broader U.S. Fiscal Reform ...
Read more

Agricultural and Forestlands: U.S. Carbon Policy Strategies.

U.S. Carbon Policy Strategies. Prepared for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change by Kenneth R. Richards SCHOOLOFPUBLIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS
Read more