BlueScape Air Modeling for Non-Modelers: What's Up with the New Ambient Standards Webinar 10-12-10

45 %
55 %
Information about BlueScape Air Modeling for Non-Modelers: What's Up with the New Ambient...
Business & Mgmt

Published on October 12, 2010

Author: BlueScape



James A. Westbrook, CCM of BlueScape discusses challenges companies will face with the new 1-hour NO2 and SO2 national ambient air quality standards, and implementation of the PM2.5 standards. He provides strategies to avoid modeling requirements, or pass the stringent standards. For questions or support, Mr. Westbrook can be reached at 877-486-9257 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              877-486-9257      end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              877-486-9257      end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              877-486-9257      end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              877-486-9257      end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              877-486-9257      end_of_the_skype_highlighting.

Air Modeling for Non-Modelers: What’s Up with the New Ambient Standards? James A. Westbrook October 12, 2010

Agenda: New Ambient Standards • Compliance with ambient standards • Ne ambient standards New • Strategies to pass the standards: – Challenges you may face – Quick refinement techniques to consider – More advanced techniques • Example for the 1-hour NO2 standard p • Conclusions

BlueScape, Inc. • 20 years experience • M More than 100 modeling projects th d li j t • National Experience with AERMOD, CALPUFF, th CALPUFF other models d l • Solve tough air quality modeling issues: - A id modeling requirements Avoid d li i t - Develop meteorological data and monitoring data - Refinement strategies for problem impacts - Agency negotiations and protocols

What is Air Quality Modeling Used For? • Compliance with criteria pollutant ambient standards – Permits, minor source NSR, PSD major source – Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) • Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessments • Accidental chemical spills • Long-range visibility impacts • Toxic tort litigation • AERMOD is the regulatory workhorse g y

Typical Air Quality Modeling Study • Need a Project • Triggered by exceeding emissions significance levels • Modeling against significant impact levels (SILs), or the full standard • Hourly meteorological data and terrain data • Full impact modeling to meet standards PSD: standards, - Project impacts + - Other facility sources + - Nearby facilities + - Monitored background concentrations

Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards or NAAQS NAAQS* Averaging Value Pollutant Period (g (g/m3)** ) PM10 24-hour 150 PM2.5 24-hour 35 NO2 1-hour 1 hour 188 NO2 Annual 100 SO2 1-hour 196 SO2 24-hour 367 CO 1-hour 10,000 CO 8-hour 40,000 , * Partial List ** Equiv. units; state agencies may have different standards See: for standards

New Ambient Standards • EPA has released three policy memos:* – New NO2, 1-hour average, 100 ppb or 188 g/m3 – New SO2, 1-hour average, 75 ppb or 196 g/m3 – Justify PM10 as a surrogate for PM2.5 or model PM2 5 24-hour average of 35 g/m3 PM2.5, 24 hour • EPA’s unfinished business – PSD SILs increments monitoring thresholds SILs, increments, – Background monitoring data availability – Secondary PM2.5 formation, condensibles p y

New Air Modeling Challenges • C b i sources Combustion - Relatively high NO2 emissions - PM10=PM2.5 • Short engine or vehicle stacks, mean higher impacts • Low significance levels require full modeling • P j t in next 1-2 years? Project i t12 ? - Due diligence modeling - St t i design process Strategic d i - Stay close on EPA / state agency developments

“Quick Fix” Modeling Strategies to Pass g g • Project design changes j g g • Emission limitations - Limit fuel or material throughput - Limit hours of operation - Limit hourly engine testing engine phasing testing, - Voluntary control technology installation • Stack height increases • Increase gas flow rate and temperature

Advanced Strategies to Pass • PVMRM, OLM and ARM for NO2, as limited by ozone • Source Test for in-stack NO2/NOx ratios • Modify the PM2.5 fraction in PM10, if relevant • Review / adjust meteorological data • Spatial / temporal modeling - Show project does not cause or contribute to significant impacts - Consider only periods that contribute to high values • Monitoring at Point of Maximum Impact • Agency negotiation

Modeling Example • Large gas-fired boiler and emergency g diesel engine • Baseline, all NOx = NO2; high max. 1- hour modeling + max background max. • Refinements: a) H8H of daily maximum 1 hour values 1-hour b) PVMRM with hourly ozone data, in-stack NO2/NOx = 0.2 c) Source test for in-stack NO2/NOx ratio d) Stack height increase, reduce emissions


Baseline 1-hour NO2 Run Impact = 1,132 + 88 = 1,220 g/m3 = FAIL!! 13

Modeling Refinements Impact = 78 + 88 = 166 g/m3 = PASS!! 14

Model Run Summary Baseline H8H Pull the Stops Max. 1-Hour Avg. g 1,132 g/m3 , g 636 g/m3 g 78.3 g/m3 g NOx Concentration w/background 1,220 g/m3 724 g/m3 166 g/m3 88 g/m3 g Form of Result H1H H8H H8H PVMRM Used? No No Yes In-Stack NO2 Ratio -- 0.20 0.10 Engine Stack Height g g 12 feet 12 feet 25 feet % of Max Hour 100% 100% 50% Engine Emission Rate Advanced refinements were needed to pass …. 15

Conclusions • New NO2, SO2 and PM2.5 ambient standards will cause new challenges • E Expect (but confirm) that complicated f ll i t (b t fi ) th t li t d full impact t modeling may be required • Conduct modeling due diligence early to troubleshoot problems • Hire an expert modeling consultant - Experience with the latest tools and guidance - Experience passing the standards using advanced techniques - Interact with state agencies, come with a strategy - Stay on top of developing EPA and state guidance

Next Webinar EPA’s EPA’ GHG R Reporting P ti Program i 2011 in 2011: Are You Ready? - What do I need to do to prepare? - Key reporting timelines - What are the roles and responsibilities? - Comparison and overlaps with state requirements - EPA software preview, reporting needs and data gap-filling - Alternative calculation methodologies Tuesday, December 7, 9 AM p g g g

Contact with Questions James A. Westbrook, President BlueScape, Inc. 858-774-2009 (cell) p The Webinar presentation will be p p posted on Slideshare and Scribd (search for BlueScape)

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

BlueScape Air Modeling for Non-Modelers: What's Up with ...

BlueScape Air Modeling for Non-Modelers: What's Up with the New Ambient Standards Webinar 10-12-10 - Free download as PDF File (.pdf) or read online for free.
Read more

BlueScape Air Modeling for Non-Modelers: What's Up with ...

Share BlueScape Air Modeling for Non-Modelers: What's Up with the New Ambient Standards Webinar 10-12-10. ... Air Modeling for Non-Modelers: What’s Up ...
Read more

BlueScape New Tribal Rules Webinar 9-29-11 - Environment

BlueScape Air Modeling for Non-Modelers: What's Up with the New Ambient Standards Webinar 10-12-10
Read more

BlueScape GHG Tailoring Rule Webinar 9-9-10 -

This webinar by James Westbrook at BlueScape and Joe Ritter at MotivEarth discusses EPA's pending implementation of GHG permitting under the PSD and Title ...
Read more

Webinars, Environmental Consulting ... -

Air Dispersion Modeling; ... BlueScape Training Institute. BlueScape Training Institute ... Air Permitting for New/Modified Equipment
Read more