Blueprint Jordan River

33 %
67 %
Information about Blueprint Jordan River

Published on October 15, 2013

Author: emfranti



The Blueprint Jordan River visioning process was completed in December of 2008. Close to 3,000 residents and stakeholder participated in drafting a public vision for the river.

Blueprint Jordan River

Acknowledgements Bl u e p rin t Jo rda n R ive r Par t n e rs George S. and Dolores Doré Eccles Foundation • • Dav is Count y • Jordan Va l ley Water Conser vanc y District • • • • • ii Blueprint Jordan River Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Foundation • • Photos Courtesy of: American Express Center for Communit y Development Kennecott Land Company • • • • • • • • • • • • R io Tinto Federa l Highway Administration Depar tment of Transpor tation Lehi Cit y Marriner S. Eccles Foundation Murray Cit y Questar Rock y Mountain Power Sa lt La ke Cit y Cor poration Sa lt La ke Count y Sa ndy Cit y Sout h Jordan Cit y The Cit y of Sout h Sa lt La ke Cit y of Taylorsv i l le The Fieldstone Foundation Uta h Count y Uta h Depar tment of Transpor tation West Va l ley Cit y B lu e p r i n t Jo rd a n R i ve r S t e e ri n g C o m m i t t e M e m b e r s Andrew Aagard Riverton City Erick Allen EDCUtah Jerry Benson Utah Transit Authority Kimberly Hersey Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Scott Hess Davis County Doug Hill Murray City Dan Bergenthal Salt Lake City Christie Hutchings Lehi City Dan Boles Draper City Eric Hutchings Utah House of Representatives Adrian Boogaard S.L. Engineering Tom Burdett West Jordan City Paul Dremann Blue Ribbon Fisheries Advisory Council Jack Elizondo Questar Larry Ellertson Utah County Michael Florence South Salt Lake Russell Fox Kennecott Land Blaine Gehring North Salt Lake Chris Gilbert West Jordan City Val Halford Wasatch Front Regional Council Steve Jensen Salt Lake County Travis Jones Rocky Mountain Power Mark McGrath Taylorsville City Brian Tucker Midvale City Michael Meldrum Taylorsville City Lorna Vogt Salt Lake County Joseph Moore West Valley City Michael C. Weland Utah Mitigation & Conservation Commission Barry Nash Trust for Public Lands Ann Ober Salt Lake County Steve Pastorik West Valley City Jennifer Wiglama Utah Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands Vaughn Pickell Bluffdale City Ted Wilson Utah Rivers Tara Poelzing Bend-In-The-River Edward Woolford Federal Highway Administration Rex Judson Saratoga Springs Natalie Rees Salt Lake County Lynn Larsen Salt Lake County Daniel Snarr Murray City Nancy Lord Bluffdale City Tham Soekotjo Neighborworks Vaughnn Lovejoy Tree Utah Emy Storheim Salt Lake City Todd Marti Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District Doug Thom Salt Lake Community College Eric McCulley Legacy Nature Preserve Don Tingey South Jordan City Jim McCulty Saratoga Springs Brandon Weston Utah Department of Transportation Edie Trimmer Barry Tripp Utah Division of Forestry In-Kind Ad Support KUER Radio Salt Lake Tribune Deseret News Envision Utah thanks Rio Tinto for funding this publication.

B l u e pr i nt Jord an Ri ver Table of Contents I. Bac kg ro und a nd Na tura l Histo r y 1 II. P ub lic Pro c ess 3 • Collected Data • Committees • Map Analysis III. Vi s io n • Vision Statement • Common Themes • Vision Map 7 IV. Vi s io n Princ iples 15 • Guiding Principles • Theme Maps V. Act io n Pla n • Part 1: Restoring the River • Part 2: Connecting and Building Communities 41 Natural canopy provides shade for the Jordan River VI. Im p lementa tio n Fra mewo rk 51 • Background • Case Studies • Long-Term and Short-Term Implementation • Conclusion Table of Contents iii

Background and Natural History I . B a c k g ro u n d a n d Na t u ral H i s t or y Background C HAP TER I Blueprint Jordan River is essentially a public vision for the Jordan River corridor’s future. Key community leaders worked for several years to organize and obtain the resources to initiate this process. Salt Lake County was the central player in this effort, while mayors and staff from the 15 cities and 3 counties through which the Jordan River flows contributed political and financial support to get the Blueprint underway. Numerous studies have been completed in the past, outlining environmental opportunities, measuring water quality and other river profile indicators, identifying recreational needs and much more. Many of these studies are still valid and their recommendations were useful throughout the Blueprint process. A main objective of the Blueprint Jordan River process was to review the existing studies and incorporate those ideas which are most valid for future development and restoration of the Jordan River corridor. In addition to past planning efforts and studies, Salt Lake County completed three other studies in tandem with the Blueprint process, which informed our efforts: • The Jordan River Trail Master Plan • The Water Quality Stewardship Plan • The Open Space Acquisition Plan 1 Blueprint Jordan River 1971 Master Plan for The Jordan River The Blueprint is not meant to serve as a clearinghouse for scientific studies, nor is it meant as a comprehensive guide to all Jordan River issues. In fact, it recommends an in-depth study of the river’s ecosystem to better inform future management of the corridor. Rather than a system-wide inventory of ecological assets and management recommendations, the Blueprint was designed as a public visioning effort to capture the collective imagination of residents to build an appreciation for the important environmental, social and economic role the river has played and can play in our region. The Blueprint conveys the “Big Ideas” that are possible and lays out a framework for how those may be implemented over the coming decades. No small ideas were included, only the bold and ambitious. Some of those “Big Ideas” include: • A 50-plus mile, unobstructed “blue-green” trail from the Utah Lake to the Great Salt Lake for boaters, cyclists, pedestrians and wildlife enthusiasts • A 7,300-acre linear nature preserve with premier wildlife viewing tours • A return to a more historic river corridor with meanders, wetlands, improved water quality and water flow, and rich biodiversity • Regional transportation access to the corridor, including east-west connecting • trails and several new TRAX and frontrunner stops that bring recreational users to the trail for day-long excursions Several new “river centers” with recreational-support facilities and dining opportunities in previously industrial areas

The possibilities really are endless, but we must start somewhere. All good things begin with a vision of what may come and the Blueprint is the impetus for accomplishing what some consider impossible -- transforming the Jordan River into a oneof-a-kind quality-of-life amenity for the region’s citizens for generations to come. Natural History Context The Jordan River flows over 50 miles from Utah Lake north to the Great Salt Lake wetlands. The water in the Jordan River comes from its headwaters at Utah Lake and the many springs and mountain tributaries that feed the river throughout the corridor. The river flows through three counties -- Utah, Salt Lake and Davis -- and 15 cities, all of which have had different uses and visions for the river. The Jordan River is centrally located between the Wasatch and Oquirrh Mountain Ranges, whose mountain streams and creeks feed the Jordan River. For any improvements to water quality and flow to be successful, these tributaries need to be taken into account and managed so that waters feeding the Jordan River will not be impaired. Resources as the single most important habitat type in the State of Utah for birds. In 1847, settlers entered the Salt Lake Valley. Since then, the Jordan River has been degraded by human impacts. Dredging and straightening have deepened and narrowed the river channel, reducing the historic floodplain. Developments have encroached into areas that once were prime and diverse habitat. Domestic, industrial and agricultural discharges have polluted the river. Recent years have brought a new public appreciation for the river’s value, inspiring restoration efforts. Today, we must accelerate those efforts and create a beautiful, vibrant and sustainable river corridor which will further distinguish Utah as a world-class destination for outdoor activity. SOURCES The Jordan River Natural Areas Forum 2003 Strategic Plan. The Jordan River Natural Conservation Corridor Report (2001) What was once a meandering wildlife corridor, rich with biodiversity and a source of food and materials for Native Americans and early settlers, has been compromised. Population growth has led to numerous demands on the Jordan River. These demands have caused the degradation of the natural environment. In many places the river has been channelized and straightened. Land uses near the river have displaced numerous wetlands and the native vegetation necessary to support a healthy river system, in turn diminishing regional quality of life. History Approximately 16,000 years ago, the Salt Lake Valley and much of Utah was covered by the ancient Lake Bonneville. As Lake Bonneville water levels receded, Utah Lake and the Great Salt Lake remained behind as remnants. The Jordan River emerged by winding through old unconsolidated Lake Bonneville sediments traveling toward the Great Salt Lake. Eventually, the Jordan River established a riparian habitat complete with oxbows, wetlands, ponds and abundant wildlife. Historically, the Jordan River was a meandering stream that crossed a wide floodplain. This floodplain provided approximately 12,500 acres of wetland habitat for wildlife and fish. Willow trees dominated the landscape and provided nesting, resting and feeding for a variety of birds. This type of lowland riparian environment is of critical importance and has been identified by the Utah Division of Wildlife The Jordan River corridor in Murray in 1937 (left) and in 1990 (right) Background & Natural History 2

Public Process I I . P u b l i c P roc e s s Public involvement was a critical component to the Blueprint Jordan River visioning process. Interested citizens, who outlined their vision for the Jordan River corridor, joined in a shared mission with technical planning staff, steering committee members and policy makers. It is imperative that the public “buy-in” to the Blueprint Jordan River Vision, and that the project’s sponsors know the community’s values to create a corridor that meets community needs and has the political support necessary for implementation. Public involvement is important so that the planners can narrow the field of alternatives. In addition, through the process the public comes to understand the tradeoffs and compromises inherent in project development, so many sectors of the community are satisfied with the project outcome. Most importantly, the public is an endless source of passion and creative ideas that lead to the best ultimate solutions. Envision Utah, a non-profit, non-partisan entity with extensive experience in grassroots planning, facilitated the Blueprint public process, leading committee meetings, running workshops, analyzing input and survey results and, ultimately, drafting the Blueprint Report. C HAP TER II Steering Committee 3 Blueprint Jordan River A Steering Committee composed of planners, state legislators, county commissioners, community development directors, leaders from private, non-profit, and governmental organizations, and other community leaders from Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah Counties guided the Blueprint Jordan River process. The Committee represented 16 different cities and environmental, recreational, economic development, transportation, and other interests relating to the Jordan River and its trails. Workshops and Online Surveys Between May and June, 2008, 258 people participated in six workshops, 150 in several focus groups, and 880 in an online survey. An additional 800 people participated in four open houses and a web survey in September 2008. These outlets allowed participants to voice their preferences for river and trail vision scenarios, future economic development opportunities, recreational possibilities, and environmental restoration. At each workshop, participants completed the survey using key pads that displayed real-time results on a screen. Participants were randomly assigned to tables with maps of relevant sections of the river. Each participant identified preferred areas of nature preservation, along with areas for regional activity center development, recreation and trail improvement, and civic and educational expansion. Citizens and community leaders participate in a Salt Lake City workshop The Blueprint Jordan River website featured the workshop surveys, in both English and Spanish, for visitors to complete outside of the formal workshops. The survey was also administered to focus groups with different areas of interest, including transportation, economic development, and landowner issues. We found a shared vision among focus groups, workshop attendees, and online participants. Survey Analysis The Blueprint Jordan River survey captured public preference and vision for how the river should be used. The following results are categorized by question type. Survey participants were most likely to be Caucasian, between 45 and 60 years old, residents of their community for more than 20 years, living further than two miles from the river, and using the river a few times per year or less. Eight percent of participants identified themselves as Hispanic/Latino, reflecting our targeted effort to reach out to this constituency.

Proximity of Residence to Jordan River I own prop er t y along the river I live fur ther than t wo miles from the river I live within a few blo cks of the river When asked to define a vision for the river, residents touted a future green corridor. In support of this vision, participants were most concerned about the quality of the water and health of the river system, and preferred large buffers between the river and development along the entire river and its tributaries. Participants even identified a preserved natural corridor as the best long-term economic use of the river. Vision Scenarios for the Jordan River What do you think? Jordan River Utilization for Long-Term Economic Development Preserve as Natural Area 66% I live within one mile of the river I live within t wo miles of the river 57% G re e n Co rrid o r 10% Co mmunit y Co rrid o r 3% Promote Tourism & Recreation Age of Survey Participants O ver 65 Provide More Shopping 19% Under 18 Encourage Job Growth 19 to 29 5% Other 30 to 44 45 to 60 7% 9% Ur ba n D evelo p ment Co rrid o r 23% R e c re a t i o n Co rrid o r Nature and the Environment Survey participants were very clear about the importance of natural habitat and environmental protection along the river corridor. Residents identified river and wildlife habitat as the two most important components of the river corridor. Habitat preservation, restoration, and other components of wildlife-compatibility, including river crossings and wildlife viewing facilities, were all seen as important components of the Jordan River. Public Process 4

Recreation Survey participants focused on recreational uses of the river and its trail. Participants identified multi-use trails -- including facilities for pedestrians, bikes, equestrian uses, and non-motorized watercraft -- as the most important recreational activities that the river corridor should support. Respondents pointedly discouraged allowing motorized vehicles on the river trails and promoted better accommodations for bikes and pedestrians. One specific accommodation mentioned was using trailheads and perpendicular trails to draw people to the river and better connect it with nearby neighborhoods and commercial developments. Another accommodation focused on increasing the safety of using the trail through increased patrolling, though a majority of participants reported feeling safe using the river and its facilities. Important Recreational Activities Tra ils Wildlife Viewing A reas 43% 5 Blueprint Jordan River Other Unsure Yes No 34% Cano eing & K aya k ing 9% Do You Feel Safe Using the Jordan River Parkway? Pa rks 6% Fishing 5% G olf Cou rses 2% S p o r ts Fie ld s 1% Participants Discuss the Jordan River Vision

Map Analysis During the workshops, 258 participants produced 39 maps consisting of almost 600 drawn symbols and written notes. Envision Utah staff counted and considered each notation. The most indicated items among all of the maps were areas outlined for nature preservation. Participants placed nature preserve symbols on almost every region along the river. Nature preserves were found on 35 of the 39 maps and comprised 32% of all mapped items. Wildlife viewing areas (18 of 39 maps, 6% of mapped items) and nature centers (15 of 39 maps, 5% of mapped items) were also prevalent among the maps. Participants stated strong support for recreational activities. Boat launch symbols, represented on 19 of the 39 maps, were drawn in strategic places along the entire river corridor. Participants also recommended trail completion and connections. Twenty-three maps contained references to connecting either specific portions of the Jordan River Parkway or making a concerted effort to complete a continuous trail from Utah Lake to the Great Salt Lake. Many references were also made to connecting other regional trails to the parkway. Nine percent of all mapped items were related to trail recreation. Only 7 of the 39 maps mentioned trail crime and safety as significant concerns. Discussion Brings the Group to a Consensus Regional activity centers, or areas of economic activity relating to river recreation and tourism, was a third area of prominence. Regional activity centers were often indicated at major roads that intersect the river and on sites along the river that have potential for redevelopment. Activity centers were outlined on 27 maps and encompassed 10% of all mapped items. Many Cities along the corridor participated in workshops Workshop Maps Serve as the Basis for the Blueprint Public Process 6

Vision V i s i o n S t a t e m e n t fo r the Jo rd an R i ve r C orri d o r The Jo rdan River Corridor will become recognize d a s a valued regio nal am enity that brings p eo p l e t og et her and links them with the natural wo rld, providing unique and memorable experiences f o r residents and visitor s alike . With the Jordan R i ve r a s it s h ear t, this 50-m ile-long greenway will conne ct t he freshwater Utah Lake with the mar shlands and s a l i n e wa t er s of the vast and scenic Great Salt Lake . For the Jordan River vision to become a reality, local, state, and federal government partners, with the help of community members and organizations, must cooperate to integrate stormwater management, flood control, water quality improvements, habitat restoration, and appropriate recreation amenities into a comprehensive package of best management practices. The public envisions this lake-to-lake greenway as a system of wildlife areas, parks, and trails for biking, boating, jogging, strolling, and learning. Capitalizing on this shared vision, the Jordan River corridor will be treasured as a very special place that greatly enhances our shared quality of life for generations to come. C HAP TER III Meandering through the center of the highly urbanized Salt Lake Valley, the Jordan River co r r i d o r w ill b e a co ntinuo us system of natural areas , recreation and nature trails , and parks , providi n g a wealth of oppor tunities for people to experi e n c e a n d learn abo ut the natural world and enjoy th e ou t d oor s . W ith its rich com p lex o f rip arian, w e t l and, and upland habitats , the greenway will provide an abundance of impor tant and diver se habita t s su ppor ting a wide variety o f wildlif e . Thro ugh prot ection, enhancem ent, and restoration of its diver se habitats , the greenway will function as a n impor tant migration corridor for wildlife and p rov i d e unique oppor tunities for people to view, study, a n d en joy wildlif e in an urban area. Through extensive surveys, workshops and open houses, the public has expressed a strong desire to preserve the remaining undeveloped areas along the Jordan River and rehabilitate the river’s natural functions. Residents support a healthier and more natural river system that provides diverse, high-quality habitat for native plants and animals and places for people to view wildlife, learn about nature, recreate, gather for community activities and events, and contemplate the beauty and wonder of this amazing and unique resource. Ru n d own industrial areas will be rebo rn into w elcoming river center s where residents can en j oy a mea l overlooking the river, take a rejuvenati ng wa lk during the lunch ho ur or rent recreational equipment. These “center s” will become places f o r community gathering and neighbo rho o d renewa l . 7 Blueprint Jordan River Natural Features Comprise the Core of the Vision

Visual Simulation 1: Nature Preserves E nv i sion Ut a h st a f f a na ly z e d maps a nd su r ve y d at a to ident i f y com mon t heme s . T he fol low i ng t heme s g ive a cle a r pic t u re of t he pr ior it ie s a nd preferenc e s of work shop a nd su r ve y pa r t ic ipa nt s . Environment In both the mapping exercises and the surveys, participants identified environmental and natural components of the river as very significant issues. Nature preserves and wildlife areas dominated the maps, while wildlife-compatibility and ecosystem health and preservation were quite prominent in the survey results. Based on this public priority, environmental and wildlife impacts should be carefully considered when thinking about other aspects of use for the Jordan River. Undeveloped river corridor.... Be for e .... Becomes a nature preserve A 20-plus mile nature preserve Com m o n Th e me s After E n v i r o n m e n t R e s e a r c h Te a m : B en Blo o dwor t h Jo e D on a ld s on B oyd M i l ler R ay W he e ler Adriaan Boogaard S a ge Fit c h Nat a l ie R e e s E d Wo ol ford L au r a Br ie fer K i m Her s e y E my Storhe i m S c ot t Z e id ler M a rc y DeMillion E r ic Mc Cu l le y L or n a Vog t Vision 8

Multi-use regional trail system Visual Simulation 2: Recreational Amenities An underutilized section of the river .... Be for e Recreation Another common public theme was a preference for recreational activities. The maps featured boat launches, trail connections, and other references that promoted developing the river corridor for pedestrians, bikers, equestrians, and aquatic recreation. The survey results also showed a significant preference for developing a multiuse trail along the corridor, connected with the rest of the region through a network of trails. There was also agreement that the public feels safe using the river and trail. .... Becomes a destination for kayakers R e c r e a t i o n R e s e a r c h Te a m : Dan Bergenthal Roch Horton Tammy Robinson Jennifer Wiglama Dan Fazzini Lynn Larson Susie Schoer Sonia Witte Margie Gendler Scott Peters Bronson Tatton Equestrian 9 Blueprint Jordan River After Kayak Rowing Hiking

Build in g Co mmu n i t y Finally, the maps and the survey results bring to light the public’s vision of utilizing the river’s natural assets as a regional quality-of-life amenity. Participants felt that preserving the river corridor would best support long-term community and economic development. Residents strongly supported regional activity centers along the river that take advantage of natural resource and wildlife appreciation and recreational opportunities to increase the area’s economic base. Economic development may be the by-product of environmental preservation and support of recreational activities, key areas of focus for the Jordan River’s future. B u i l d i n g C o m m u n i t y R e s e a r c h Te a m : Erick Allen Jared Gerber Chris Liechty Keith Snarr Dan Boles Chris Gilbert Doug Meldrum Tham Soekotjo Tom Burdett John Hilke Jim McNulty Sue Stahle Bob Farrington Christie Hutchings Steve Pastorik Brian Tucker Mike Florence Ralph Lee Brian Preece Visual Simulation 3: Urban Renewal .... Becomes a revegetated, mixed-use development with transportation enhancements Be for e A FTER R edevelopment Nodes A degraded stretch of the river .... Vision 10

The Vision Northern Section Great Salt Lake Wetlands Legacy Nature Preserve Historic Fisher Mansion Legend Jordan River Major Stream Minor Stream Meander Corridor (Historical) Canal Regional Trails (Existing and Proposed) Lakes Wetlands (Existing & Historical) Floodplains (100 Year) TRAX Station (Existing & Proposed) FrontRunner Station (Existing & Proposed) TRAX (Existing) TRAX (Proposed) FrontRunner (Existing) FrontRunner (Proposed) Street/Highway Interstate Continuous “Blue-Green” Trail Photo courtesy of Tara Poelzing Sc ale 1” = 1 Mi le Photo courtesy of Bernshaw Photography 11 Blueprint Jordan River Preservation & Restoration Silver Opportunity Areas Preservation & Restoration Bronze Opportunity Areas

Utah Cultural Celebration Center & Market Historic Fisher Mansion Rowing in the Canal Utah Cultural Celebration Center & Marketplace Kennecott Nature Center of Murray City Kennecott Nature Center of M urray C ity Jordan Valle Conservatio Public Transportation & TODs MAP SYMBOLOGY MAP SYMBOLOGY Photo courtesy of Murray School District Photo courtesy of Utah Transit Authority Vision 12

Jordan Valley Water Conservation District Conservation Garden Park at Jordan Valley Galena Property Regional “River Centers” Linear Nature Preserve Courtesy of Bernshaw Photography Regional Center 13 Blueprint Jordan River MAP SYMBOLOGY MAP SYMBOLOGY MAP SYMBOLOGY Courtesy of Jordan Valley Water Conservation District Equestrian Trails Courtesy of Bernshaw Photography

The Vision Southern Section Utah Lake Jordan Narrows Legend Jordan River Major Stream Minor Stream Meander Corridor (Historical) Canal Regional Trails (Existing and Proposed) Lakes Wetlands (Existing & Historical) Floodplains (100 Year) TRAX Station (Existing & Proposed) FrontRunner Station (Existing & Proposed) TRAX (Existing) TRAX (Proposed) FrontRunner (Existing) FrontRunner (Proposed) Street/Highway Interstate Kayaking in the Jordan Narrows Preservation & Restoration Gold Opportunity Areas Regional Trails Photo courtesy of Tara Poelzing Sc ale MAP SYMBOLOGY 1” = 1 Mi le Courtesy of Bernshaw Photography MAP SYMBOLOGY Vision 14

Vision Principles V.2 G u i d i n g P ri n c i p l e s T he Gu id i n g P r i nc iple s a re a s e t of t en s t at ement s t h at enc ap s u l at e t he Blue pr i nt Jord a n R i ver Vi sion : R e sto re r i p a r i a n a n d i n - stre a m h a b i ta ts 4. R e p l a c e str u c tu r a l w a te r c o nvey a n c e dev i c e s wi t h a l t e r n a t i ve s t h a t a l l ow fo r f l o o d m a n a g e m e n t p l u s i m p rove m e n t s fo r w a t e r q u a l i t y, re c re a t i o n , a n d h a b i ta t 5. R e du c e th e u se o f h a rdsc ap e s a n d i m p e r m e a b l e su r f a c e s i n a n d n e a r th e c o rr i do r 6. Ma n a g e sto r m w a te r o n si te 7. B a l a n c e n e e d s fo r d eve l o p m e n t , re c re a t i o n , a n d p u b l i c a c c e ss w i th r i ve r p ro te c ti o n 8. I n c o r p o r a t e t h e r i ve r ’s n a t u r a l a n d c u l t u r a l h i s t o r y i n to de si g n s fo r r i ve r f ro n t fe a tu re s, p u b l i c a r t, e du c a ti o n , a n d si g n a g e 9. A p p ly d e s i g n s t a n d a rd s fo r c o m p l e m e n t a r y deve l o p m e n t a n d re deve l o p m e n t i n th e c o rr i do r t o s u p p o r t i n c re a s e d v i s i b i l i t y a n d re c re a t i o n a l u s e o f th e r i ve r 10. C HAP TER E s t a b l i s h b u f fe r s b e t we e n t h e r i ve r a n d t h e b u i l t e nv i ro n m e n t 3. 15 Blueprint Jordan River P re s e r ve a n d re h a b i l i t a t e n a t u r a l r i ve r fe a t u re s a n d f u n c ti o n s to th e g re a te st e x te n t p o ssi b l e 2. IV 1. E n c o u r a g e re g i o n a l tr a n sp o r ta ti o n p l a n n i n g to c o n n e c t c o m mu n i ti e s to th e r i ve r c o rr i do r, e m p h a si z i n g n o n - a u to m o b i l e tr ave l The Blueprint allows flexible implementation

The Jordan River Natural Corridor TE RM I N O L O G Y Illustration Courtesy of Salt Lake County An illustration of the Blueprint’s three levels of environmental opportunity ( as shown in visio n m ap s) Building on the 2002 Salt Lake City Winter Olympics, lands within the greenway are classified into three general levels of environmental opportunity: Gold, Silver, and Bronze. Lands classified as Gold have the greatest potential for providing high quality habitat and valuable opportunities for ecological restoration. Each category has an associated list of species which either currently inhabit or could soon inhabit the river corridor in a given area, and a set of policy recommendations to ensure the stability and enhancement of each. Level s of Env i ronmental Oppor tu nity The centerpiece of the Blueprint is the Jordan River natural corridor, a linear nature preserve stretching over 20 miles and encompassing thousands of acres of open space and natural area parks. Connecting Utah Lake to the Great Salt Lake, the greenway will feature unique and varied environmental opportunities along its entire length. This linear preserve would represent a monumental achievement and be a natural wonder that would rival the Wasatch Mountains in drawing people for recreation, relaxation, and enjoyment of Utah’s natural beauty. The Blueprint recommends a flexible framework for environmental policies that take those varying conditions into account. “Best Management P ract i ce s ” D e velopment “B est Management Prac tices” (BMPs): For de velopment near the River, including transpor tation and utilit y inf rastr uc ture, desig n standard s (or BMPs) can mitigate the impac t of hard s capes and building s on water qualit y and natural aesthetics. Reducing stor mwater r unoff into the r iver or other s ensitive water bodies i s the main pur pos e of most BMPs. BMP techniques include: per meable pavements, bioeng ineered pond s and wetland s, bioswales, oil s eparators, g reenroofs, and rain gardens/planters that capture and process r unoff. Vision Principles 16

Case Study S a lt L a k e C o u n t y Clean-up and Restoration Project 3900 South Jordan River G u i d i n g P r i n c i p l e 1: P re s er ve and rehabilitate natural river fea t u res an d fu n cti o n s to th e greatest ext en t p o ssi bl e Restore a more Natural river Flow The Blueprint calls for river flow that more closely resembles a natural flow regime. This means studying and developing a flow management strategy for releases from Utah Lake and diversions to the surplus canal to more closely mimic natural flows while respecting existing water rights. Improving river flow brings more opportunities for habitat and recreation and supports water quality goals. Before restoration During debris removal After restoration Native vegetation returns 17 Blueprint Jordan River It’s All One Watershed The Jordan River’s future health relies on proper upstream water management. Stormwater guidelines and erosion controls affect the water quality of every tributary which, in turn, affects water quality of the Jordan River. Improving the water quality of each of the tributaries and managing the confluences where tributaries meet the Jordan is an important part of the vision. The Jordan River has been altered by dams, stream channelization, and other flood control structures. While fully restoring the ecological functions and features of the Jordan River may, in some locations, be impossible, there are many opportunities to repair or preserve critical areas which would support a more naturally functioning and ecologically diverse river. By planning and implementing the steps outlined below, many sensitive natural river features of the Jordan River can be protected and restored. Many urban rivers retain or redevelop river banks that are full of ecologically friendly features. Retaining or restoring features such as wetlands and vegetated banks will reduce the negative impacts of the built environment. Poorly planned development near a river can degrade a river’s natural processes and fragment wildlife habitat. For example, when impervious surfaces are increased, the amount and velocity of stormwater entering the river enlarges it and erodes the stream banks. This erosion and increase in sedimentation, in turn, disturbs wildlife habitat and the stream’s natural functions. The following approaches will help rehabilitate and preserve natural river features and functions: 1.1 Remove or partially remove floodwalls, rip rap, and other concrete structures wherever possible. These hard surfaces do not allow the natural meander of the stream or the natural filtration that organic materials provide. 1.2 Regrade river banks to more natural and functional slopes. A more natural slope helps to absorb and slow run-off before it reaches the river. This provides for natural filtration and helps to reduce the sedimentation that would otherwise occur in the river. 1.3 Create a more naturally meandering stream alignment. A meandering stream bed slows the river and creates habitat that supports a healthier ecosystem. 1.4 Create and maintain wetlands. Wetlands provide flood water storage and habitat and filter water returning to the water table 1.5 Stabilize stream banks. Plant material, carefully designed and limited rock toe protection, and rootwad revetment can be used to stabilize the stream banks, which, in turn, reduces the sediment that washes into the river. 1.6 Reestablish floodplains. Floodplains provide for flood water storage (protecting downstream property), are prime areas for wildlife habitat and urban forests, and accommodate recreational greenways. 1.7 Control the river grade with a step-pool grade control system. A step-pool control grade system allows the grade of the river bed to be controlled through a series of drops and pools that help slow erosion plus provide water aeration. 1.8 Control the type of plants that grow in the river corridor through vegetation management. Removing exotic and invasive species and planting native and adapted species provides habitat, promotes healthy stream function, and beautifies the corridor.

Guiding Principle 2: Es t a bl i s h b u f fer s b e t we en th e r i ver an d th e bu i l t e nv iro n m en t Buffers Matter Buffer recommendations accompany each of the environmental opportunity areas: Gold, Silver, and Bronze. Gold opportunity areas enable humans to observe river systems and wildlife from a distance. Trails are well off the river, with a 300-foot buffer enabling environmental systems to develop and thrive without the stress of human encroachment. In silver areas, the buffer may ebb and f low, ranging from 100-200 feet, depending on the environmental characteristics or opportunities present, as well as the history of human land use along the river. The trail may move in and out along the river, sensitive to environmental and developmental constraints and opportunities. Bronze areas are heavily inf luenced by residential growth along the river, but they would be well served by creating buffers that stabilize the stream bed and banks, provide layback areas, and support native vegetation. TE RM I N O L O G Y G ener a l ly, t he s t e e p er t he s lop e le a d i ng up to t he r i ver, t he w id er t he bu f fer s hou ld b e b e c au s e s t e e p er s lop e s h ave f a s t er r u nof f . Wid er bu f fer s w i l l s low a nd c ont rol r u nof f b e fore it ero d e s l a nd a nd ent er s t he s t re a m . T he s e s u g ge s t e d bu f fer s s hou ld b e m a x i m i z e d i n c r it ic a l a re a s a nd m ay b e n a r rower a long r i ver s t re t c he s t h at e x t end t h rou g h h i g h ly u r b a n i z e d a re a s . Pl a n n i ng ord i n a nc e s w i l l ne e d to out l i ne prop er bu f fer w idt h s for e a c h s e c t ion of t he r i ver, a nd re - d e ve lopment pl a n s s hou ld t a k e i nto a c c ou nt w id en i ng t he bu f fer w hene ver a nd w here ver p o s sible . T h e B l u e p r i n t i d e n t i f i e s b u f f e r s a s G o l d , S i l ve r o r B ro n z e : • G old re pre s ent s a 3 0 0 -fo ot bu f fer. A 3 0 0 -fo ot bu f fer on e a c h sid e of t he r i ver i s c omp at ible w it h w i ld l i fe h a bit at . • Si l ver re pre s ent s a 10 0 to 2 0 0 -fo ot bu f fer. A 10 0 to 2 0 0 - “ B uf f e r ” Buffers s er ve as natural boundar ies bet ween local water ways and exi sting de velopment. The y help protec t water qualit y by f ilter ing pollutants, s ediment, and nutr ients f rom r unoff. O ther benef its of buffers include f lood control, stream bank stabiliz ation, stream temperature control, and room for lateral movement of the stream channel. G ood aquatic buffer ordinances specif y the siz e and management of the stream buffer and are a specif ic planning tool to protec t stream qualit y and aquatic habitat (S ource: EPA 2006). fo ot bu f fer on e a c h sid e of t he r i ver f i lt er s p ol lut a nt s t h at ot her w i s e wou ld f low i nto t he r i ver. T he Si l ver z one c a n gener a l ly a c c om mo d at e low-i mp a c t hu m a n a c t i v it ie s , but prov id e s s ome a d d it ion a l prot e c t ion for t he r i ver. • Bron z e re pre s ent s a 5 0 to 10 0 -fo ot bu f fer. A 5 0 to 10 0 -fo ot bu f fer on e a c h sid e of t he r i ver prov id e s b a n k s t a bi l i z at ion a nd ero sion c ont rol . T he f i r s t 25 to 5 0 fe e t of bu f fer a re gener a l ly c on sid ere d t he mo s t i mp or t a nt b e c au s e t h i s s t re a m sid e z one gener a l ly i nc lud e s a c a nopy of t re e s a nd ve ge t at ion t h at overh a ng t he r i ver. Id e a l ly, t he c a nopy i s a m at u re r ip a r i a n fore s t . T h i s z one s hou ld a lw ay s b e k e pt f re e of d e ve lopment . Buffers are inconsistent along the river Example of stream buffer Vision Principles 18

TE RM I N O L O G Y “ M i t i ga t ion B a n kin g” Mitigation areas become env ironmental oppor tunities. Mitigation sites are locations where de velopers, cities, and transpor tation author ities offs et damage f rom constr uc tion by improv ing other areas. Along the r iver, s e veral projec ts rang ing in siz e f rom the 2,225 acre L egac y Nature Pres er ve to the 35-acre UD OT site at 12300 S outh pres ent oppor tunities to rehabilitate deg raded r iver areas tur ning them into w ildlife and recreational oas es. G u i d i n g P r i n c i p l e 3: R e s t ore riparian and in-stream habita ts R e h a bi l it at i ng r ip a r i a n a nd i n- s t re a m h a bit at s w i l l he lp e s t a bl i s h a nd m a i nt a i n he a lt hy w at er qu a l it y a nd hyd rolog ic a l c yc le s a nd i mprove s t re a m sid e h a bit at t h at le a d s to e x p a nd e d re c re at ion a l op p or t u n it ie s a nd e c onom ic b ene f it s . R e s tor i ng h a bit at w i l l at t r a c t w i ld l i fe a nd t he re c re at ion a l ent hu si a s t s w ho w i l l , i n t u r n , s upp or t prot e c t i ng a nd m a n a g i ng t he r i ver c or r idor. A n i mp or t a nt c omp onent of r ip a r i a n h a bit at i s t he u r b a n fore s t . Fore s t c a nopie s s h a d e a nd c o ol t he r i ver a nd prov id e h a bit at p a r t icu l a rly for Ne ot ropic a l s ong bi rd s , m i g r at i ng av i a n s p e c ie s , a nd ne s ti ng bi rd s . A he a lt hy c a nopy s t r uc t u re w it h u nd er a nd upp er s tor y t re e s s upp or t s a rem a rk a ble d i ver sit y of pl a nt a nd a n i m a l s p e c ie s , a nd t he c a nopy s upp or t s he a lt h ier a qu at ic h a bit at t h at i s e s s ent i a l b ot h for w at er qu a l it y a nd for hu m a n enjoy ment of t he r i ver. Pa r k s M a ny p a rk s e x i s t w it h i n t he r i ver c or r idor, a nd t he i r pu r p o s e s r a nge f rom a re a s s p e c i f ic a l ly d e si g ne d to s upp or t a nd enc ou r a ge n at i ve h a bit at to a re a s t h at s upp or t e x t en si ve re c re at ion l i k e gol f c ou r s e s a nd b a l l f ie ld s . T he Blue pr i nt enc ou r a ge s a l l p a rk s i n t he c or r idor to i mprove m a n a gement pr a c t ic e s w here p o s sible to enh a nc e t he v i a bi l it y of env i ron ment a l f u nc t ion s w it h i n a nd a long t he r i ver. Boardwalk and interpretive signs in riparian area Wetland restoration in Midvale (Old Sharon Steel Site) 19 Blueprint Jordan River Snail crossing paved trail Yellow-breasted Chat Natural vegetation buffers near a park or golf course

Guiding Principle 4: R e p l a c e s t r u c t u r a l w a t er conveyance d ev i c e s w i t h a l t e r n a t i ves that allow for f l ood m a n age m en t p lu s i m p rovem en ts fo r w a t e r q u a lit y, rec re a t ion , an d h ab i tat Si nc e t he t i me t he S a lt L a k e Va l le y w a s s e t t le d , t he Jord a n R i ver a nd it s t r ibut a r ie s h ave b e en d i ver t e d , d a m me d , d it c he d , a nd d r a i ne d . T h i s appro a c h to m a n a g i ng t he w at er re s ou rc e w a s i nt end e d pr i m a r i ly to c ont rol f lo o d i ng but h a s re s u lt e d i n h a bit at lo s s a nd d e g r a d e d w at er qu a l it y. T h rou g hout t he c ou nt r y, m a ny u r b a n r i ver c or r idor s a re u nd er goi ng a t r a n s for m at ion f rom “ h a rd ” eng i ne er i ng s olut ion s to “s of t ” eng i ne er i ng s olut ion s . T h rou g hout t he v a l le y, a v a r ie t y of non- s t r uc t u r a l s tor mw at er t e c h n ique s c ou ld b e u s e d to re duc e , re t a i n , s low dow n , a nd f i lt er f lo o d w at er a nd s tor mw at er b e fore it re a c he s t he Jord a n R i ver. Engineering a N at u r a l river a s s t r ic t ly w at er c onve y a nc e s t r uc t u re s . E ng i ne er s , biolog i s t s , a nd c it y pl a n ner s a re i nc or p or at i ng i n nov at i ve a s we l l a s a ge - old bio eng i ne er i ng t e c h n ique s to c re at e n at u r a l r i ver s t r uc t u re s t h at s upp or t he a lt hy f u nc t ion . T he r i ver c h a n ne l c a n b e re c on f i g u re d ; logs , b ou ld er s a nd ot her m at er i a l s c a n b e a d d e d to s low or s p e e d up t he f low of t he r i ver ; a nd p ond s c a n b e i nc or p or at e d to c apt u re f lo o d w at er s . A l l re s tor at ion proje c t s a long t he r i ver s hou ld u s e t e s t e d ‘ b e s t m a n a gement pr a c t ic e s’ to m a n a ge f low s a s we l l a s c re at e b e t t er h a bit at w it h i n a nd a longsid e t he r i ver. Suc c e s s f u l u s e of nons t r uc t u r a l bio eng i ne ere d w at er m a n a gement t e c h n ique s re qu i re s t he c o op er at ion of a n i mplement at ion t e a m t h at i nc lud e s eng i ne er s , pl a n ner s , l a nd s c ap e a rc h it e c t s , a nd hyd rolog i s t s to prop erly i mplement a m a n a gement s t r at e g y. M a i nt en a nc e c o s t s of non- s t r uc t u r a l w at er m a n a gement t e c h n ique s c a n a l s o b e le s s e x p en si ve t h a n t y pic a l h a rd m a n a gement t e c h n ique s . Ve ge t at ion s uc h a s t re e s , bu s he s a nd g r a s s e s m at u re over t i me , b e c om i ng more s t a ble r at her t h a n d e t er ior at i ng . I n t he long t er m t h i s c a n s ave c om mu n it ie s a si g n i f ic a nt a mou nt of mone y. Cit ie s a nd c ou nt ie s a rou nd t he n at ion a re re - eng i ne er i ng r i ver s t h at were c h a n ne l i z e d , s t r a i g ht ene d , a nd ot her w i s e c ont rol le d FASCINE BANK STABILIZATION BIOFILTRATION BASIN BIOSWALE BIOFILTRATION TERRACES BRUSH LAYERS INTERPRETIVE BOARDWALKS Conceptual river cross section utilizing natural water conveyance techniques Eroding bank along the river Vision Principles 20

Environmental Opportunities Northern Section Great Salt Lake Wetlands Legacy Nature Preserve Historic Fisher Mansion Legend Jordan River Major Stream Minor Stream Meander Corridor (Historical) Canal Regional Trails (Existing and Proposed) Lakes Wetlands (Existing & Historical) Floodplains (100 Year) TRAX Station (Existing & Proposed) FrontRunner Station (Existing & Proposed) TRAX (Existing) TRAX (Proposed) FrontRunner (Existing) FrontRunner (Proposed) Street/Highway Interstate Preservation & Restoration Silver Opportunity Areas Sc ale 1” = 1 Mi le 21 Blueprint Jordan River Photo courtesy of Tara Poelzing Preservation & Restoration Bronze Opportunity Areas

Utah Cultural Celebration Center & Market Historic Fisher Mansion Encourage Public Transportation It’s All One Watershed Kennecott Nature Center of Murray City Jordan Valle Conservatio Parks MAP SYMBOLOGY MAP SYMBOLOGY Courtesy of Bernshaw Photography Photo courtesy of Utah Transit Authority Vision Principles 22

Jordan Valley Water Conservation District Mitigation Sites Galena Property Buffers Matter Linear Nature Preserve MAP SYMBOLOGY Before Restoration Courtesy of Bernshaw Photography MAP SYMBOLOGY 23 Blueprint Jordan River After Restoration

Environmental Opportunities Southern Section Utah Lake Jordan Narrows Legend Jordan River Major Stream Minor Stream Meander Corridor (Historical) Canal Regional Trails (Existing and Proposed) Lakes Wetlands (Existing & Historical) Floodplains (100 Year) TRAX Station (Existing & Proposed) FrontRunner Station (Existing & Proposed) TRAX (Existing) TRAX (Proposed) FrontRunner (Existing) FrontRunner (Proposed) Street/Highway Interstate River Flows Preservation & Restoration Gold Opportunity Areas Photo courtesy of Tara Poelzing Sc ale 1” = 1 Mi le Vision Principles 24

G u i d i n g P r i n c i p l e 5: R e d u ce the use of hardscapes and i m p e rmeable surfaces in and near the c o rr id o r R i ver-f r iend ly d e ve lopment d e si g n i nc lud e s m i n i m i z i ng t he tot a l i mp er v iou s a re a a nd u si ng p er me a ble s u r f a c e s w here ver p o s sible . W hen d e ve lopi ng or re d e ve lopi ng , t he fol low i ng t e c h n ique s c ou ld b e u s e d to m i n i m i z e t he i mp a c t s of h a rd s c ap e s: A h a rd s c ap e c a n b e d e f i ne d a s a ro of top, d r i ve w ay, sid e w a l k , p a rk i ng lot , or ro a d . T he s e s u r f a c e s pre vent r a i n or snow me lt f rom f i lt er i ng i nto t he g rou ndw at er a nd re plen i s h i ng s t re a m s or r i ver s i n a s low a nd he a lt hy m a n ner. Ha rd s u r f a c e s a l s o d e g r a d e r i ver s by i nc re a si ng t he a mou nt , ve lo c it y, a nd t emp er at u re of w at er r u nof f i nto t he r i ver. Pave d s u r f a c e s a d d to t he p ol lut ion problem w hen s tor mw at er w a s he s fer t i l i z er s , ro a dw ay p ol lut a nt s , a nd ot her c ont a m i n a nt s i nto t he r i ver. 5 .1 E mploy r i ver-f r iend ly d e ve lopment d e si g n t h at re duc e s t he tot a l a mou nt of p ave d s u r f a c e s . D e si g n i ng ro a d s , p a rk i ng lot s a nd d r i ve w ay s to m i n i m i z e t he u n ne c e s s a r y p avement a l low s a sit e to h ave more p er me a ble s u r f a c e s t h at c a n f i lt er s tor mw at er. R i ver-f r iend ly d e ve lopment s s e e k to m a n a ge s tor mw at er by i nt e g r at i ng t he bu i lt env i ron ment w it h t he n at u r a l s y s t em . Te c h n ique s s uc h a s i n f i lt r at ion , s tor a ge , a nd e v ap or at ion a re u s e d to m i m ic t he n at u r a l hyd rolog y of t he d e ve lopment sit e . Per me a ble p aver s , r a i n ga rd en s , a nd bu f fer z one s a re e x a mple s of eng i ne er i ng t e c h nolog ie s t h at wou ld he lp to m a i nt a i n a prop er e c olog ic a l b a l a nc e w h i le m a n a g i ng r u nof f f rom i mp er v iou s s u r f a c e s . IMPERVIOUS PARKING LOT STEEP SLOPE PERVIOUS PAVEMENT MINIMAL VEGETATION LIMITED INFILTRATION 25 Blueprint Jordan River UN-DESIRABLE: Hard surfaces and minimal vegetation increase potential for polluted run-off into the river BANK VEGETATION 5 . 2 R emove ob s ole t e bu i ld i ngs f rom t he r i ver f lo o dpl a i n to he lp t he r i ver re ga i n s ome of it s n at u r a l r i ver f u nc t ion s . 5 . 3 Us e g re en (ve ge t at e d) ro of s to m it i gat e t he e f fe c t s of s tor mw at er by f i lt er i ng a nd a b s or bi ng r a i n f a l l t h at wou ld h ave ot her w i s e r u n of f a n i mp er v iou s ro of . 5 .4 C h a nge z on i ng to re duc e t he nu mb er of p a rk i ng s p a c e s w here pu bl ic t r a n s p or t at ion i s av a i l a ble . 5 . 5 D i re c t i mp er v iou s ro of top r u n of f to p ene t r a ble a re a s s uc h a s y a rd s , pl a nt er s , r a i n ga rd en s or ot her ve ge t at e d a re a s . 5 . 6 Us e p er me a ble p avement , a n a lt er n at i ve for m of p av i ng t h at a l low s for w at er to i n f i lt r at e t h rou g h t he s u r f a c e . D e p end i ng on t he a re a c ond it ion s , t h i s t e c h n ique c ou ld re pl a c e c onc re t e or a s ph a lt w it h BIOSWALES GREEN g r id blo c k s , p orou s c onc re t e or one of ROOF t he m a ny a lt er n at i ve opt ion s av a i l a ble . INTERPRETIVE BOARDRain Storage DESIRABLE: Vegetation, porous surfaces, green roofs, and underwater storage tanks improve water quality

Guiding Principle 6: Ma nage s t o r m w a t e r o n si te Stormwater degrades water quality by conveying pollutants from developed areas to the Jordan River. Generally, stormwater runoff contains pollutants in the form of fertilizers, pesticides, sediments, oils, pet waste, and just about anything that runs from sidewalks, streets, and gutters into storm drains. In addition to carrying pollutants to the river, stormwater pouring from drains into the river increases stream velocities that result in sedimentation and erosion. Managing stormwater on-site allows a more ecologically-friendly riverfront design. In the past, it was not uncommon for untreated stormwater to be sent directly into the river system. Managing stormwater on-site involves capturing, filtering, and slowly releasing stormwater to the system. Stormwater management sites serve the added purpose of providing space for vegetation and trees. A good stormwater management plan heavily depends on good site design. Each site will need to be studied to determine the best strategy for the conditions. Buildings, landscaping, soils, hydrology, and location are all important factors that need to be taken into account when designing a site. In most cases, permeable surfaces are integrated into the site and take into account parking and landscaping requirements. Creative on-site stormwater management systems can benefit the owner of the development through positive publicity and a more attractive facility. Some of the practices in use for on-site stormwater management include the following: 6.1 Green (vegetated) roofs that absorb and hold stormwater in their growing and drainage layers. 6.2 Bioretention ponds are constructed wetlands that utilize layers of sand, soil and plant material to filter pollutants from the water. 6.3 Filtration trenches and rain gardens are engineered areas around built structures and in parking lots that capture, filter, and slowly release stormwater. Other low-cost techniques include swales to direct water to low-lying areas where it filters through the soil. Implementation Tools Best Practices in Stormwater Management Installation Techniques Biofiltration Swales and Strips Extended Detention Basins Continuous Deflection Separators (CDS) Media Filters Infiltration Basins Oil/Water Separators Wet Basins Bioretention ponds filter water before it enters the river Bioswales absorb water from paved surfaces Vision Principles 26

G u i d i n g P r i n c i p l e 7: B a la n ce n eed s fo r d evel o p m en t, recreation, a n d pu bl i c access wi th r i ver p ro tecti o n Increasing recreational use of the river and trails is somewhat of a “catch 22.” The more use the river gets, the better the funding and support for preserving and managing it. On the flip side, too much use, or uses that are too intensive, will ruin the experience for many and degrade the river’s habitat and ecosystem functions. Given this balancing act, the Blueprint strongly discourages any motor vehicles on or near the river and encourages non-automobile access of the river by east-west connecting trails, bike lanes, bicycle-pedestrian bridges, and improved access to the river from future UTA bus, TRAX, and Frontrunner stops. The following are “Big Ideas” for recreational use of the Jordan River corridor: Continuous “Blue-Green” Trail from Utah Lake to the Great Salt Lake The Blueprint strongly endorses the completion of the multi-use surface trail for pedestrians, cyclists, and equestrian, and for the removal of the remaining barriers to lake-to-lake boating for kayaks, canoes, and other non-motor boats. Discontinuous trail segments, fractured by hazards and impassable elements within the river corridor, prevent water trail users from enjoying a continuous trip on the Jordan River. One of the most important keys to improving the functional level of the water trail corridor is to eliminate obstacles by negotiating hazard removal, negotiating and developing appropriate portage facilities around the hazards, and improving safety and awareness through signage and education efforts. Most of these recommendations are detailed in Salt Lake County’s Trails Master Plan (http://www.recreation. Mountain Bike Park Strategically located in West Jordan, and with great regional accessibility by trails and public transportation, a mountain bike park would be similar to a skate park with ramps, obstacles, etc. Recreational facilities that support greater non-motorized vehicle use of our natural resources are beneficial to the river’s profile and popularity. A mountain bike park near the river will emphasize the connection between river and mountains that is a theme of the Blueprint. R aging Waters This regional water park is probably the most used recreational facility near the river 27 Blueprint Jordan River Boaters and Tubers Enjoy the River in the summer. Expanding the park and opening up its eastern boundary to greater interaction with the river could promote mainstream visibility and water use of the river. Imagine riding the “Lazy River” parallel to the real river. This represents a fun way to increase visibility of the river and grow its constituency. River Play Areas The Outdoor Retailer’s annual conference is in need of an on-the-water venue for its summer show. Should recreational plans for the Jordan River provide such a venue, it would go a very long way toward securing the continued selection of Salt Lake City as host for the Outdoor Retailer’s shows. This is a major opportunity uniquely available to the Wasatch Front region. Wildlife Viewing The Great Salt Lake and Jordan River are part of a major migratory flyway for a substantial number of bird species. The habitats along this flyway offer unique opportunities for birders. The Jordan River is literally a desert oasis for many shorebirds

and raptors (birds of prey). Wildlife viewing, and birding in particular, is a popular national pastime with a significant presence and economic impact (it is a strong and growing industry, bringing hundreds of millions of dollars into the state annually). Supporting and enhancing wildlife viewing opportunities may be the river’s best hope for long-term viability before it is “loved-to-death.” Nature Centers and Tours provide the infrastructure, education, and interpretation needed for wildlife viewing to succeed. Cycling Tour Supported and promoted cycling events are an excellent way to introduce people to the river. With targeted brochures and support facilities, a Lake-to-Lake tour could be promoted through the Visitor’s Bureau via national recreational publications. Someday soon, those individuals who come to Utah for cycling trips may add the Jordan River to their list of trails to ride. Boating - K ayaking, Rowing, Canoeing Launches and portages need to be developed with safe, flexible, functional, and ADA accessible designs that meet water trail user needs at different flow levels of the river and that accommodate boating parties of varying sizes and skill levels. A comprehensive water trail map should be incorporated as part of the Salt Lake County standard trailhead sign design. In addition, the County should make mapping available online and in a printed format that water trail users can employ to plan trips to the river. These maps could take the form of a guide booklet or large foldout map and include information on the history of the river, flora and fauna found along the river, and cultural information. The Blueprint promotes trails for people of all abilities and ages to enjoy Equestrian Trails Equestrian trails accommodate equestrians and their horses, but also serve as an alternative path for pedestrians and cyclists on mountain bikes. Equestrian trails are always unpaved, soft-surface trails, and therefore restrict the use by in-line skaters and bicyclists. Equestrian trailheads have similar requirements as the multipurpose trailheads, with the additional needs for parking to accommodate horse trailers and the trucks that pull them. Other desired facilities are loading/unloading platforms and ramps, tie-up areas, access to fresh water for horses, and small corrals (as site constraints allow). Signage should clearly indicate trailheads that accommodate equestrian use. The Jordan River offers many places for quiet solitude Vision Principles 28

Recreation & Tourism Opportunities Northern Section Legend Jordan River Major Stream Minor Stream Meander Corridor (Historical) Canal Regional Trails (Existing and Proposed) Lakes Wetlands (Existing & Historical) TRAX Station (Existing & Proposed) FrontRunner Station (Existing & Proposed) TRAX (Existing) TRAX (Proposed) FrontRunner (Existing) FrontRunner (Proposed) Street/Highway Interstate Trail Connectivity Sc ale 1” = 1 Mi le MAP SYMBOLOGY 29 Blueprint Jordan River History/Cultural Tours

Rowing in the Canal Regional “River Centers” Raging Waters Cycling Tours MAP SYMBOLOGY MAP SYMBOLOGY MAP SYMBOLOGY MAP SYMBOLOGY ! G Regional Center Vision Principles 30

Mountain Bike Park Regional Trails Community Fisheries Equestrian Trails MAP SYMBOLOGY MAP SYMBOLOGY MAP SYMBOLOGY MAP SYMBOLOGY ! l 31 Blueprint Jordan River Courtesy of Bernshaw Photography

Recreation & Tourism Opportunities Southern Section Legend Jordan River Major Stream Minor Stream Meander Corridor (Historical) Canal Regional Trails (Existing and Proposed) Lakes Wetlands (Existing & Historical) TRAX Station (Existing & Proposed) FrontRunner Station (Existing & Proposed) TRAX (Existing) TRAX (Proposed) FrontRunner (Existing) FrontRunner (Proposed) Street/Highway Interstate River Play Areas Wildlife Viewing Sc ale 1” = 1 Mi le MAP SYMBOLOGY MAP SYMBOLOGY ! [ Chapter Title 32

TE RM I N O L O G Y “ P l a c e - Ba sed E d u c a t i on ” “ The process of u sing the local communit y and env ironment as a star ting point to teach concepts in lang uage ar ts, mathematics, s ocial studies, s cience, and other subjec ts across the cur r iculum. Emphasizing hand s-on, real-world lear ning exper iences, thi s approach to education increas es academic achie vement, helps students de velop stronger ties to their communit y, enhances students’ appreciation for the natural world, and creates a heig htened commitment to s er v ing as ac tive, contr ibuting citiz ens. C ommunit y v italit y and env ironmental qualit y are improved throug h the ac tive engagement of local citiz ens, communit y organiz ations, and env ironmental res ources in the life of the s chool.” - D av id S obel 33 Blueprint Jordan River Guiding Principle 8: I n c o rporate the river’s natural and cultural h is t o r y i n to d esi gn s fo r r i ver fro n t feature s , p u blic ar t, ed u cati o n , an d si gn age The Jordan River corridor provides residents throughout the region opportunities to experience a living river and learn how its waters and shores relate to human and ecosystem health and quality of life. Positive experiences will lead to individual, institutional, and political behavior changes that, in turn, support the river. Educating neighboring communities to the river’s importance will help build the constituency necessary to achieve the long-term vision of the corridor as a healthy, functioning ecosystem. Building an appreciation for the river’s environmental benefits will increase public support for the Blueprint and develop a new sense of community-stewardship. Enhancing awareness and local stewardship will contribute to the health of the river through clean-up programs and political support for water quality improvements and habitat preservation and restoration. Environmental educational programs will foster stronger student achievement and better schools through place-based application of concepts taught both in school and along the river. These programs incorporate civic responsibility through a grassroots approach to community involvement, which will contribute to community growth and strength. Improvements to the river’s ecosystem and surrounding communities will bear direct economic benefits to those neighborhoods and the larger region as property values increase and social problems diminish. In essence, strengthening ties between the community and the river will help revitalize neighborhoods, enhance quality of life, and spur an economic renaissance in under-valued communities, while achieving the broader goal of restoring the river’s ecosystem. Murray City/Kennecott Nature Center - This public/private facility brings together education and conservation practices. Corporate sponsorships represent a key opportunity in protecting and revitalizing the Jordan River. The Kennecott Nature Center of Murray provides opportunities for thousands of children from the Murray School District and selected Granite fourth-grade classes to enjoy observing and learning about nature up close and hands on. It enriches our community through an appreciation of nature and fosters stewardship of our natural resources. The 1,600 square foot center is located on the river’s second largest wetland site and overlooks a beautiful bend in the river. Through a generous initial donation from the Kennecott Utah Copper Corporation, the efforts of the Murray Education Foundation, and the assistance of many community donors, the dream for this environmental education center was realized. It is a unique partnership with the Murray School District, Murray City and Kennecott Utah Copper Corporation working together to manage the costs of upkeep, staff and operation History/Culture Tour - The river has a long and mixed history. From a place of shelter and source of food for Native Americans, then an industrial pipeline, to its current state, the river tells the story of Western expansion and our relationship with the land. Guided (or audio) tours for boaters or hikers could follow interpretive signs and visit distinct sites along the course of the river, including archeological artifacts, old irrigation diversions, Gardner Village, water reclamation facilities, Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District, Murray Nature Center and other key points along the river’s length. Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District’s Conservation Garden (Demonstration Garden & Facilities) - Located next to the Jordan River in West Jordan, the Conservation Garden embodies the placebased, environmental education philosophy advocated through the Blueprint. This strategic center educates citizens about their watershed, the nexus between the built and natural environments, and the importance of water conservation, water quality, and sustainable practices for living. This facility provides critical education about water-wise landscaping and other water management practices that affect our longterm survival as a mountain-desert metropolitan area. Illustration of possible outdoor classroom near the river

Guiding Principle 9: A p p ly d e s i g n s t a n d a rd s for complementar y d eve l o p m e n t a n d re d evelopment in the c o rr i d o r t o s u p p o r t i n c reased visibility and re c re a t io n a l u s e o f t h e r i ver Improving development standards near the river will benefit the region and the surrounding neighborhoods through greater river health, enhanced property values, and improved quality of life. Good development practices can mit

Add a comment

Related presentations