Blake Lapthorn's Rural Breakfast Slides 2014

50 %
50 %
Information about Blake Lapthorn's Rural Breakfast Slides 2014

Published on March 12, 2014

Author: BlakeLapthorn



On 4 and 11 March 2014 Blake Lapthorn's Rural team hosted a rural professionals breakfast briefing.

Mark Charter Agricultural Law Update MarkCharter

Regulatory issues CAP reform NVZs Red Tape Agricultural Holdings - units of production Seasonal workers

Recent Cases Nugent v Nugent [2013] EWHC 4095 (Ch) R (on the application of Imogen Bickford- Smith) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs [2013] EWHC 3371 (Admin) Troutbeck SA v (1) Gary White (2) Katy Victoria Todd [2013] EWCA Civ 1171

Recent Cases Ham v Ham and another [2013] EWCA Civ 1301 (1) Mohit Dutta (2) A Queiroz v Thomas Hayes [2013] Ch D Brady v Environmental Protection Agency C-113/12 Cramaso LLP v Ogilvie-Grant, Earl of Seafield and Others [2014] UKSC 9

Rachel Brooks Succession and planning for farms and estates RachelDBrooks

Considerations to maximising the use of the reliefs Check who owns what APR and BPR – is this fully available? – Review tenancy agreements – Review grazing agreements and contract farming and share farming agreements – Is the land let or “in hand”? – Look at woodland – can it be a business activity?

Succession issues Who wants or needs to inherit? Is there any prospect of other provision for those who will not inherit the farming business? Should the gifts be outright or in trust?

Other issues to consider Trusts – are they fit for purpose Powers of attorney – who will run the farm if the owner lacks the capacity to do so

In Conclusion Are the assets held in the best way to maximise the reliefs Consider who is to have what and what is the best structure Check existing trusts are fit for purpose Get a power of attorney

Keith Lancaster Planning Update March 2014

Flexible Uses – Town & Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (Amendment) (England) Order 2013 – TCP (GPD) Order 1995 Sch 2 Part 3 (Changes of Use) – Inserts new Class M – Into force 30 May 2013 – Relates to: – Change of use of any building (or land within its curtilage) Permitted Development Changes

Flexible Uses (cont) – Allows change: – From: use as an agricultural building – To: use within use classes A1 (shops) A2 (financial) A3 restaurants & cafes) B1 (business offices) B8 (storage) C1 (hotels) D2 (assembly / leisure) – Can change between flexi uses Permitted Development Changes

Flexible Uses (cont) – Main limitations: – Building must have been solely in agri use since 3 July 2012; or – If use began after 3 July 2012 must have been in agri use for at least 10 years beforehand – No more than 500sqm of floor space of buildings can benefit within an original agri unit – Listed buildings – Extent: England only – Not curtilage* Permitted Development Changes

Flexible Uses (cont) – Main limitations (cont): – What is curtilage? – The area of land (enclosed or not) immediately beside or around the building closely associated with and serving the purposes of the building – If difficult to discern, an area immediately beside or around the building no larger than the floor space of the building Permitted Development Changes

Flexible Uses (cont) – Conditions: – Whether on first or any subsequent change before changing must either: – Submit info to LPA if cumulative floor space to change < 150sqm; or if >150sqm – Apply for a determination whether LPA prior approval necessary for impacts relating to: Transport / highway Noise Contamination risk Flood risk Permitted Development Changes

Flexible Uses (cont) – Conditions (cont): – Prior approval process Submit info to LPA (description of proposals, plan, fee) LPA has to consult depending on why prior approval required (e.g. flood risk = EA) LPA must give consultees at least 21 days LPA must erect site notice for at least 21 days and notify adjoining owner/occupiers LPA may ask for further reasonable info LPA must have regard to the NPPF and Environmental Protection Act 1990 (if contamination issue) Permitted Development Changes

Flexible Uses (cont) – Conditions (cont): – When can you start? Written notice prior approval not needed Written notice prior approval granted Expiry of 56 days from date application received and no grant or refusal received – What you build must be in accordance with approved or submitted info Permitted Development Changes

Flexible Uses (cont) – Conditions (cont): – Effect of a use change under Class M means the site will be classified with a sui generis use class (even if a clear B8 planning unit has formed through the nature and character of the ongoing use!) – Other PD rules allowing the provision of a hard surface for parking use will apply (Sch 2 Pt 41 Class B) Permitted Development Changes

Flexible Uses (cont) – Points to note: – The 500sqm limitation relates to cumulative internal floor space. Note the use of “within” in the drafting and reference only to “building”. This leaves the curtilage free for an ancillary use related to the new use (e.g. parking) Permitted Development Changes

Flexible Uses (cont) – Points to note (cont): – Curtilage is determined on a case by case basis and is a subjective concept. Beware of being liberal! BUT – If curtilage difficult to discern, the floor area limit seems to be linked to the whole building not just the cumulative area of change Permitted Development Changes

Flexible Uses (cont) – Points to note (cont): – Prior approval process is planning permission by another means…but overstretched authorities scanning applications can validly do nothing and let the 56 day period expire – Due to the use class of a site becoming sui generis you may subsequently need formal planning permission to move from it. Permitted Development Changes

Under resourced Under financed Increases in responsibility (Localism, Prior Approval) Targets to perform – Carrot driven (Target determination > grants) – Stick driven (Under performers > PINS) Effect – Greater variability in efficiencies, competency, priorities (e.g. policy) (LPA / officer) – Beware shortcuts (Comfort letters, UU over S106) The state of local planning offices

Office (B1a) to residential (C3) PD rules. New Class J to Sch 2 Part 3 Temporary Use of Buildings PD rules. New Class D to Sch 2 Part 4. Forthcoming PD proposals to allow barn conversions to resi (C3). An amendment order is expected in the next few weeks Other noteworthy developments

Add a comment

Related pages

Law Firms | Solicitor Firm | Blake Morgan

Real estate Regulatory risk and compliance Residential property Restructuring and insolvency Rural and ... View our 2014 Corporate ... Blake Morgan LLP ...
Read more

Farm Real Estate |

Find farm real estate listings, agriculture property and farms for sale in Canada and the USA, quickly and easily at Forgot your password? Bare ...
Read more

home - Rural Poverty Portal

Home > Region & country > Americas > Brazil > Rural poverty in Brazil . Home; ... In 2014 Brazil managed to exit FAO's world map of malnutrition. In ...
Read more

Top Funny Commercials 2014 - YouTube

Top funny commercials 2013,Top funny commercials 2014,Top funny commercials 2013, funny ads, intellectual, marketing, innovation,
Read more

Naraka Chaturdashi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2014 date: 22 October, ... annual: Naraka Nivaran Chaturdashi (popularly known as Naraka Chaturdashi) ... A large breakfast is enjoyed with relatives and ...
Read more

US B&Bs and Inns |

USA Bed and Breakfasts. Show all destinations. World ... Gracious Service & Champagne Breakfast Daily. ... Voted 8th Best B&B in the US by Trip Advisor! 2014.
Read more

Top B&Bs, Inns, & Romantic Hotels |

Asheville Bed and Breakfast Inns; Gift Cards. Give the gift of getaway. Follow Facebook; Twitter; Google+; Pinterest; Home; Inns For ...
Read more

The Things You Can Do – But What Should You Do ...

... 2014 11:50 AM » COWBOYRON NEWS() ... Breakfast Daily News() Pingback: The Top 10 Worst College Majors, Definitively Ranked | My Website() ...
Read more