bis update

53 %
47 %
Information about bis update

Published on April 30, 2008

Author: Jeremiah


Slide1:  The new bis Why rewrite the specification?:  Why rewrite the specification? IESG said so RFC2543 was never the model of clarity to begin with Bis got worse with micro-editing Symptoms Repitition of material in many places No overview of operations Structure not obvious Decision made at August IETF to move forward full steam with a rewrite Goal: Preserve bis-04 normative content How was it done?:  How was it done? Recruited a bis rewrite team Jonathan, Henning editors Added four co-authors to help write Gonzalo Camarillo (Ericsson) Jon Peterson (Neustar) Alan Johnston (Worldcom) Robert Sparks (dynamicsoft) Coaching from Dean Willis, Brian Rosen Project Management from Rakesh Shah Technical writing from Jean Mahoney Jonathan prepared new outline and defines mapping of existing text to new outline (early Sep.) Sections assigned to each writer How was it done?:  How was it done? Iterative approach utilizing bugzilla and cvs First rewrite of each section done mid-September Several cycles of cross section review and revision Detailed verification of preservation of MUST/MAY/SHOULD Brutally painful! Deviations captured in changes section bis-05 complete and submitted 10/26/01 New Structure:  New Structure Semantically oriented Present SIP as a layered protocol Message layer Transport layer Transaction layer Transaction users Message layer Self explanatory – message formats Transport layer Manages persistent connections Listens for requests and responses Via rules for sending responses, inserting received param New Structure:  New Structure Transaction Layer Reliability Request/Response Matching ACK generation for non-INVITE Transaction Users Manage dialog/session semantics INVITE-200 Outline:  Outline Intro Overview of Functionality Terminology Overview of Operation Structure of the Protocol Definitions SIP Messages General UA Behavior Canceling Requests Registrations Querying for Capabilities Dialogs Initiating a Session Modifying a Session Terminating a Session Proxy Behavior Transactions Transport Security Common Message Components Headers Response Codes SRV Examples BNF Transport Layer Changes:  Transport Layer Changes ACK-200 is officially a different transaction ACK non-200 is part of the transaction Same EXACT transaction machine for proxies and UA Handling for INVITE 2xx response *NOT* part of the transaction layer!! UA state machinery retransmits 2xx and ACK Allows transaction machines to die instantly when 2xx received Transitions based on timeouts, not # of retransmits, to unify machine between UDP, TCP More aggressive transaction timeouts defined for TCP Proper RTT estimation defined Actual diagrams for non-INVITE transactions included INVITE Client FSM:  INVITE Client FSM |INVITE from TU Timer A fires |INVITE sent Reset A, V Timer B fires INVITE sent +-----------+ t.o. to TU +---------| |---------------+ | | Calling | | +-------->| |-------------->| +-----------+ 2xx | 300-699 | | 2xx to TU | ACK sent | |1xx | +---------------+ |1xx to TU | | | | | 1xx V Timer C fires | | 1xx to TU -----------+ t.o. to TU | | +---------| |-------------->| | | |Proceeding | | | +-------->| |-------------->| | +-----------+ 2xx | | 300-699 | 2xx to TU | | ACK sent, | | | resp. to TU| | | | | NOTE: | 300-699 V | | ACK sent +-----------+ | transitions | +---------| | | labeled with | | | Completed | | the event | +-------->| | | over the action | +-----------+ | to take | ^ | | | | | Timer D fires | +--------------+ | - | | | V | +-----------+ | | | | | Terminated|<--------------+ | | +-----------+ INVITE Server FSM:  INVITE Server FSM |INVITE |pass to TU, send 100 INVITE V send response+-----------+ +--------| |--------+101-199 from TU | | Proceeding| |send response +------->| |<-------+ +-----------+ 300-699 from TU | |2xx from TU send response | |send response | +-------------------+ | | INVITE V Timer G fires | send response+-----------+ send response | +--------| |--------+ | | | Completed | | | +------->| |<-------+ | +-----------+ | | | | ACK | | | - | +------------------>+ | Timer H fires | V fail to TU | +-----------+ | | | | | Confirmed | | | | | +-----------+ | | | |Timer I fires | |- | | | V | +-----------+ | | | | | Terminated|<---------------+ | | +-----------+ Dialogs:  Dialogs Equivalent to call-leg from bis-04 Call leg has been eradicated from the spec Generalization, presence Dialog procedures are no longer INVITE specific Maintenance of CSeq, Route sets Construction of mid-dialog requests General construction guidelines Other changes:  Other changes Collected BNF BNF now uses explicit LWS Responses no longer need to transmitted over TCP for server transactions! Does NOT include INV-2xx CANCEL can’t be sent until 1xx received BYE can’t be sent by UAS until ACK received CR or LF alone deprecated 3xx to re-INVITE allowed and specified Radical surgery on multicast No special treatment at ALL except deciding where to send the messages Assumes only a single respondent If there are more than one, responses look like retransmits Still needs more refinement in spec Proxies no longer forward 6xx on receipt CANCEL first, then 6xx after all responses Merged requests detected only at endpoints Serverfeatures integrated 100rel will be integrated SDP extracted to a separate I-D Big changes to –05 (so far):  Big changes to –05 (so far) CANCEL and ACK contain the same Route header fields as their associated request. What’s not stable?:  What’s not stable? SRV functionality will change Under discussion with IESG Likely to be much simplified (no merging of transports) Route/Record-Route Loose routing Additional rigor and explanatory text needed Registration section Security section Next steps:  Next steps Closing open issues Explicitly called out in bis-05 where possible Currently all being tracked in Bugzilla 49 open issues, vast majority are minor Major open issues: Loose source routing, proxy route processing Multicast operation Maximum messages sizes SRV Target completion to send to IESG before 2002 Information Resource:  Information Resource Robert Sparks +1.972.473.5467

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

Bios Update: Schritt für Schritt zum neuen Bios - CHIP

Wir zeigen Ihnen, wie einfach ein Bios Update sein kann - und leisten Erste Hilfe, falls der PC nicht mehr hochfährt.
Read more

Bios-Update in 10 Schritten - gefahrlos und schnell - PC-WELT

Neue CPU und Grafikkarte – ohne BIOS-Update läuft oft nichts. Wir verraten, wie Sie Ihr Bios in zehn Schritten sicher auf den neuesten Stand bringen.
Read more

CPU-Z: Gratis-Helfer beim Update - Bios Update: Schritt ...

1 Bios Update: Schritt für Schritt zum neuen Bios; 2 PC zusammenstellen: So bauen Sie Ihren Traum-Rechner; 3 Mini PC Test: Kompakte Rechner bis etwa 500 ...
Read more

Bios-update-anleitung - Schritt für Schritt zum ...

Schritt für Schritt zum erfolgreichen BIOS-Update ... Also das ist das Board: -Asus P5N-E SLI verbaut in einem Packard Bell X9094.....
Read more

So geht's - BIOS-Update - com! professional

Ein BIOS-Update behebt PC-Probleme und erhöht die Kompatibilität zu neuer Hardware, etwa wenn Sie die CPU wechseln. Ein Update sollte man aber nur ...
Read more

BIOS Update Utility for Windows 10 (64-bit), Windows 8.1 ...

This package updates the UEFI BIOS (including system program and Embedded Controller program) stored in the ThinkPad computer to fix problems, add new ...
Read more

BIOS-Update im Detail - Rund um BIOS und EFI - MSI Forum

Das BIOS-Update ist ein Eingriff in die Rechnerhardware und fällt nicht unter die Garantie. Bei einem stabilen Rechner ist in der Regel kein BIOS-Update ...
Read more

Bios-Update risikolos - PC-WELT

Ein Bios-Update ist nicht ganz ungefährlich - manchmal jedoch unumgänglich. PC-WELT zeigt Schritt für Schritt, wie Sie Ihr Bios auf den neuesten Stand ...
Read more

BIOS-Update durchführen - COMPUTER BILD

BIOS-Rhythmus 122Profi-Ecke: BIOS-Einstellungen ... 1. Am Beispiel der Hauptplatine „P5B Deluxe/WiFi-AP“ von Asus zeigt Ihnen die Redaktion, wie Sie ...
Read more

Bios-update-methode - DOS, Windows oder per Boardmittel ...

BIOS-Update mittels DOS, Windows oder per Boardmittel?
Read more