Bill draft judicial appointment

50 %
50 %
Information about Bill draft judicial appointment

Published on October 29, 2018

Author: shubhamsoni8

Source: slideshare.net

1. JUDICIAL APPOINTMENT BILL, 2017 LEGISLATIVE DRAFTING MARCH 01, 2017 PRESENTED BY: SHUBHAM, RIDHVICK, SACHIN, AKHAIRAJ, LAVISH.,

2. 02 1. Backdrop: From 1951 to 2017 2. JAC, 2017: Need and Introduction 3. Bill Overview 4. Features and Changes 5. Analyses and Conclusion CONTENT OUTLINE " T o b r i n g a b o u t t r a n s p a r e n c y , a c c o u n t a b i l i t y , a n d e f f i c i e n c y i n t h e J u d i c i a l S y s t e m "  

3. AKHAIRAJ SINGH RATHORE| 14BBL004 BACKDROP: FROM 1951 TO 2017 JUDGES CASES THE HISTORY 1ST JUDGES (1981) CJI recommendations may be be refused for "Cogent Reasons" 2ND JUDGES (1993) "Consultation" shrinks to a mini form. 3RD JUDGES (1998) SC Lays down 9 Guidelines in response. The word “consultation” is significant because in 1993, in the so-called Second Judges case, the SC decided that the CJI must agree to all judicial appointments—a concept known as “concurrence”. This created the collegium system, wherein the three seniormost Supreme Court judges decided on who would be a high court or Supreme Court judge.

4. AKHAIRAJ SINGH RATHORE|  14BBL004 BACKDROP: FROM 1951 TO 2017 J U D G E S C A S E S 1 2 1 S T L A W C O M M I S S I O N R E P O R T ( 1 9 8 7 ) 2 1 4 L A W C O M M I S S I O N R E P O R T ( 2 0 0 8 ) N J A C I N T R O D U C E D ( A U G 1 1 , 2 0 1 4 ) N J A C U N C O N S T I T U T I O N A L ( O C T O B E R 1 6 , 2 0 1 4 ) LEADING TO THE NJAC

5. SACHIN PATEL|  14BBL043 JAC, 2017: NEED AND INTRODUCTION. V I O L A T E S B A S I C S T R U C T U R E D O C T R I N E . H A M P E R S T H E ' S A C R O S A N C T ' I N D E P E N D E N C E O F J U D I C I A R Y . GROUNDS FOR STRIKING DOWN  NJAC REASONS FOR BRINGING NJAC B R I N G A B O U T T R A N S P A R E N C Y I N J U D I C I A L A P P O I N T M E N T S . A D D E D C H E C K S A N D B A L A N C E S . S P I R I T O F D E M O C R A C Y .

6. SACHIN PATEL|  14BBL043 JAC, 2017: NEED AND INTRODUCTION. "IT IS TIME THE ORIGINAL BALANCE OF POWER IS RESTORED." I N T R O D U C I N G J U D I C I A L A P P O I N T M E N T B I L L , 2 0 1 7

7. SACHIN PATEL|  14BBL043 JAC, 2017: NEED AND INTRODUCTION. A B i l l   t o r e g u l a t e t h e p r o c e d u r e t o b e f o l l o w e d b y t h e J u d i c i a l A p p o i n t m e n t s C o m m i s s i o n f o r r e c o m m e n d i n g p e r s o n s f o r a p p o i n t m e n t a s t h e C h i e f J u s t i c e o f I n d i a a n d o t h e r J u d g e s o f t h e S u p r e m e C o u r t a n d C h i e f J u s t i c e s a n d o t h e r J u d g e s o f H i g h C o u r t s a n d f o r t h e i r t r a n s f e r s s o a s t o b r i n g t r a n s p a r e n c y i n t h e j u d i c i a l a p p o i n t m e n t a n d t o e f f i c i e n t l y d i s p e n s e j u s t i c e a n d f o r m a t t e r s c o n n e c t e d t h e r e w i t h o r i n c i d e n t a l t h e r e t o . P R E A M B L E

8. LAVISH JAIN|  14BBL064 BILL OVERVIEW. J U D I C I A L A P P O I N T M E N T C O M M I S S I O N B I L L , 2 0 1 7 7 M e m b e r J u d i c i a l a p p o i n t m e n t c o m m i s s i o n A J u d i c i a l R e s e a r c h a n d S u p p o r t B o d y . A n J u d i c i a l A p p o i n t m e n t s Y e a r l y R e p o r t . P r o c e d u r e f o r s e l e c t i o n o f J u d g e o f S C a n d H C , f o r t r a n s f e r s a n d t o m a k e r u l e s a n d r e g u l a t i o n s . P o w e r o f p r e s i d e n t t o r e q u i r e r e c o n s i d e r a t i o n . O f f i c e r s a n d E m p l o y e e s o f C o m m i s s i o n . R u l e s a n d R e g u l a t i o n s t o b e l a i d b e f o r e p a r l i a m e n t . P o w e r t o r e m o v e d i f f i c u l t y . B I L L O V E R V I E W .

9. RIDHVICK DOSI|  14BBL019 FEATURES AND CHANGES. 7 M e m b e r J u d i c i a l a p p o i n t m e n t c o m m i s s i o n A J u d i c i a l R e s e a r c h a n d S u p p o r t B o d y ( w i t h a f o c u s o n e f f i c i e n c y . ) A n d a J u d i c i a l A p p o i n t m e n t s Y e a r l y R e p o r t . A C C O U N T A B I L I T Y . T R A N S P A R E N C Y . E F F I C I E N C Y .

10. SHUBHAM SONI|  14BBL055 ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION. "a retired SC judge in his entire life as a judge in various HCs did not dispose of more than 100 cases, but was still appointed to the Supreme Court. He is a now a member of a Commission."- Mukul Rohatgi "To hold that it (government) should be totally excluded from the process of appointing judges would be wholly illogical and inconsistent with the foundations of the theory of democracy and a doctrinal heresy," Justice Chelameshwar.

11. SHUBHAM SONI|  14BBL055 ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION A C C O U N T A B I L I T Y . T R A N S P A R E N C Y . E F F I C I E N C Y . A C H I E V E D W I T H J U D I C I A L I N D E P E N D E N C E . L E T T H I S P A S S . F O R T H E S P I R I T O F D E M O C R A C Y . A N D T R A N S P A R E N C Y .

Add a comment