Published on February 18, 2014
American Conference Institute 2013 Duty to Defend – Consequences for Breach Arnold Levinson Pillsbury & Levinson LLP San Francisco, CA firstname.lastname@example.org (888) 433-8335 Timothy E. Delahunt Kenney Shelton Liptak Nowak LLP Buffalo, NY TEDelahunt@kslnlaw.com (716) 853-3801
Defense • Duty to pay for an attorney to defend action against the insured • Determined at the beginning of the case • Duty to defend is much broader than duty to indemnify • Attaches if there as any possibility that there will eventually be coverage
Essential Elements - Duty to Defend • Issue of fact mandates defense coverage • Any possibility of coverage triggers defense obligation • Unless summary judgment can be granted for the insurer, there s a duty to defend
Consequences of Breach • Duty to Defend • Attorneys fees • Amount of the judgment regardless of whether there is coverage if the judgment was the result of the failure to defend • Uncontested trial is binding • Insurance company has no right to re-litigate underlying action to attempt to prove that it should have been a smaller judgment
What is the Difference Between a Stipulated Judgment and an Uncontested Judgment? • Stipulated Judgment is By Agreement • Settlement Agreement • Parties stipulate to one issue (such as liability, agency, scope of employment, comparative negligence) • Parties stipulate as to the amount of damages, or • Parties stipulate to the amount of the judgment
What is the Difference Between a Stipulated Judgment and an Uncontested Judgment? • Judgment after uncontested trial is in nature of default in which judge hears evidence and enters a judgment • Judge determines all legal and factual issues, including liability and damages • Evidence is submitted • Judge enters judgment based on evidence and argument
Uncontested Judgment Is Enforceable “These circumstances necessarily involve significant independent adjudicatory action by the court, thus mitigating the risk of a fraudulent or collusive settlement between an insured and the claimant. Final judgments entered under either of these circumstances are binding on the insurer [which] has wrongfully abandoned its insured . . .” Pruyn v. Agricultural Ins. Co. (1995) 36 Cal. 4th 500, 517
Insurer Cannot Relitigate Underlying Action “Transamerica officials were aware of the lawsuit, had notice of Transamerica’s potential liability, and chose to stay out of the lawsuit. Transamerica is bound by the result of that lawsuit as fully as if it had participated in it from the start.” Samson v. Transamerica Ins. Co. (1981) 30 Cal.2d 220, 229
“An insurer which has breached its contract [to defend] is properly bound by the result of such [uncontested] trial proceedings”. Pruyn v. Agricultural Ins. Co. (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 500, 517
• The insurer “knew or should have known that judgment against its insured would form the basis for a later claim against it... Instead of protecting itself... it chose to remain silent, resting on its claim of noncoverage. Having failed to pursue remedies thus available to it, it cannot now claim prejudice or lack of opportunity to litigate damages.” Clemmer v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1979) 22 Cal.2d 865, 886
• “He need not indulge in financial masochism, however. Whatever may be his obligation to the carrier, it does not demand that he bare his breast to the continued danger of personal liability. By executing the assignment, he attempts only to shield himself from the danger to which the company has exposed him.” Pruyn v. Agricultural Ins. Co. (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 500, 519, n.19
Rights Of Parties After Uncontested Trial • Insurance company cannot re-litigate underlying action • No discovery directed at re-litigation the underlying action • Policy and statutory requirements for an “actual trial” are satisfied • Insured no longer required to cooperate “Need not commit financial Masochism”
Les changements sur le marché du distressed aux Etats-Unis et en Europe
Main Sections of the Report 1) Nifty Technical View 2) 4 Large Cap Trade Ide...
This presentation consits the yearly results of Kinepolis Group
Bad faith litigation is becoming more common as the insurance industry continues to engage in the bad faith insurance practices we've all heard about ...
Insurance bad faith is a legal term of art unique to the law of the United States (but with parallels elsewhere, particularly Canada) that describes a tort ...
Bad Faith. The fraudulent deception of another person; the intentional or malicious refusal to perform some duty or contractual obligation. Bad faith is ...
Bad faith disputes continue to generate a significant amount of litigation. The claims are costly, huge verdicts are being handed down every day, and more ...
24th National Advanced Forum on Bad Faith Litigation The essential forum that shapes the future of bad faith litigation strategies for leading outside ...
1 BAD FAITH DURING LITIGATION BY: JAY BARRY HARRIS FINEMAN KREKSTEIN & HARRIS, P.C. 30 S. 17th Street, Suite 1800 Philadelphia, PA 19103 215-893-9300
Victims of bad faith practices by insurance companies may be eligible to file a lawsuit and seek compensation.
Bad Faith Litigation. Lewis Brisbois lawyers across the country have extensive experience in defending suits involving alleged breaches of the implied ...
Bad Faith Insurance Litigation at The Lanier Law Firm: We work to help people get what they deserve from their insurance company.
ELEMENTS OF BAD FAITH 1. The terms of policy obligated the insurance company to pay the claim; 2. The absence of a reasonable basis for denying benefits ...