B O E 12112007

50 %
50 %
Information about B O E 12112007

Published on December 12, 2007

Author: millerjtx

Source: slideshare.net

Description

Board presentation on school accountability reports December 11, 2007

School Accountability Reports (SAR) Presentation to BOE December 11, 2007

Colorado Accountability Systems Are you closing the achievement gap? (AYP)

Colorado Accountability Systems Are you providing a well- rounded educational experience? (Accreditation)

Colorado Accountability Systems Are you succeeding in core academic subjects? (SAR)

Colorado Accountability Systems

Colorado Accountability Systems

Colorado Accountability Systems

Colorado Accountability Systems

Colorado Accountability Systems

Colorado Accountability Systems

Colorado Accountability Systems

2 Key Metrics

#1 Overall Academic Performance on State Assessments

Excellent High Average Low Unsatisfactory

#2 Academic Growth of Students

Significant Improvement Improvement Stable Decline Significant Decline

School Growth What percentage of students are making adequate growth in a school?

a year’s growth in a year’s time

Previous Method for Calculating “Improvement” Year 1 Year 2 Science (all grades) Science (all grades) Math (all grades) Math (all grades) Writing Eng/Sp (all grades) Writing Eng/Sp (all grades) Reading Eng/Sp (all grades) Reading Eng/Sp (all grades) All scores are used to calculate one rating. Year 1 rating is compared to year 2 rating to measure growth. SAR SAR

Change from “Academic Improvement” to “Academic Growth” Problems with this method: Students in year #2 were not the same as year #1.

Comparing Apples to Oranges Apples Year 1 Year 2

Is it fair to compare one year’s students to the next year’s if they are not the same students?

How to calculate for a student… Step#1: Figure out individual student % rank based on scale score for year #1. Step#2: Based on % ranking obtain student’s target score range for year #2. Step #3: Determine whether student made more than a year’s growth, made a year’s growth, or made less than a year’s growth.

How to calculate for a student… Step#1: Figure out individual student rank based on scale score for year #1. 75% 4th grade CSAP overall score is 626 in year #1

How to calculate for a student… Step#2: Based on % ranking obtain student’s target score range for year #2. 75% in year #2 (grade 5) is 656

873 906 th th Reading: 4 to 5 grade 687- 626 625 75% 180 220

How to calculate for a student… Step #3: Determine whether student made more than a year’s growth, made a year’s growth, or made less than a year’s growth. 5th grade CSAP is 676…between 625 and 687 year’s growth

How to calculate for a school… Step #1: Calculate growth for all students in all relevant subjects (no science). Step #2: Determine the proportion of scores that are more than a year’s growth, a year’s growth, or less than a year’s growth. Step #3: Subtract the proportion less than a year’s growth from the proportion of more than a year’s growth. Step #4: Use the result to determine “Academic Growth of Students”

Step #1: Calculate growth for all students in all relevant subjects (no science).

Step #2: Determine the proportion of scores that are more than a year’s growth, a year’s growth, or less than a year’s growth. 33 students 5 gains (15%) 9 loss (27%) 19 stable (58%)

Step #3: Subtract the proportion less than a year’s growth from the proportion of more than a year’s growth. 15%-27%=-12%

Step #4: Use the result to determine “Academic Growth of Students” Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline

a year’s growth in a year’s time

Excellent High Average Low Unsatisfactory

Significant Improvement Improvement Stable Decline Significant Decline

5 “Average”, 9 “Low”, and 1 “Unsatisfactory” 11 “Low” Schools

Average and Improvement Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to – 5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline

Low and Significant Improvement Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to – 5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline

Low and Significant Decline (CLA)(3-5) Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline

Average and Decline Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline

Low and Stable (3-5) Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline

Average and Significant Improvement Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to – 5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline

Average and Significant Improvement Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to – 5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline

Low and Decline Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline

Low and Decline

Low and Decline (CLA)(6-8) Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline

Average and Stable (6-7) Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline

Low and Stable Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline

Low and Decline Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to - 14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline

Low and Decline Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline

Unsatisfactory and Significant Decline Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline

2007 Highlights Kemp Elementary School moves to “Average” Hanson (6-7) is “Average” in its first year. Monaco and Alsup maintain three straight years of “Improvement” or “Significant Improvement”.

High Expectations

Standards-based Classrooms

Focused Professional Development

Data

Add a comment

Related pages

B E | LinkedIn

View 63591 B E posts, presentations, experts, and more. Get the professional knowledge you need on LinkedIn.
Read more

M ah fie- W st r ld - olatheks.org

b o r n e hu nti g o pl s y c a m o r e r a m s g a t e t ro o s t no rthvi ew o o p e r 123rd 12 5t ht er w a b a s h c i r c o h re l l c u r t i s lak ...
Read more

L A N C ED B A CIT A Y DNI L A I J O I N T M E E T I N G O ...

I n o b s e r v a n c e o f t h e h o l i d a y s , C i t y H a l l w i l l b e c l o s e d o n M o n d a y , D e c e m b e r 2 4 , T u e s d a y , ...
Read more

Bioorganic Chemistry exam 1 Answers - SvBMT Protagoras

2 2 Lipids, Terpenes, Steroids a,b) N + OH H3C H3C CH3 OH HO OH P O HO OH OH O OH CH3 H H H H choline glycerol fosforzuur linolzuur Any natural fatty acid ...
Read more

De TAS

d e l e e r l i n g e n i n d e B o v e n b o u w 12-11-2007 De TAS Week 46 Jaargang 8 Nr. 9 (228) In dit nummer: St. Nicolaas 2 2 Laveloos in Delft 2 CKV ...
Read more

Qualitätsbericht 2006 Wegweiser zur besten Klinik?

B-10 Zulassung zum Durchgangsarztverfahren der Berufsgenossenschaften . B-11 Apparative Ausstattung. B-12 Personelle Ausstattung • Qualifikation der Ärzte
Read more

Pressekonferenz final - klinikum.uni-heidelberg.de

He.zkatl.eteluntelsucl.'ll.o und -behandlung: Entscheidung fi_jr die Herzkatheter- Untersuchung Herzkatheteruntersuchung und -behandlung: ...
Read more