Published on February 20, 2014
Lawyer Scams and How to Avoid Them: Dan Pinnington’s Show notes Ride the Lightning podcast Feb 4, 2014
Europe UK: 43 Germany: 43 France: 14 Spain: 10 Holland:16 Italy: 17 Croatia:2 Bulgaria:3 Ukraine:7 Turkey:4 Slovakia:5 Finland: 7 Norway:3 Sweden:3 Poland: 6 Portugal: 9 Czech:3 Cyprus: 5 Hungary: 3 Romania: 6 Iceland:2 Belgium: 8 Denmark:2 Russia:1 Macedonia:1 Lithuania:2 Austria: 3 Switzerland: 9 Greece:1 Serbia: 2 Bosnia:1 Ireland: 7 Luxembourg: 4 Estonia: 1 Monaco: 1 Latvia: 1 The Americas Mexico: 15 Argentina: 9 Panama: 2 Barbados: 3 Bahamas: 5 Virg. Isles: 5 Puerto Rico: 21 Chile:3 Costa Rica:4 Uruguay: 6 West Indies: 6 Venezuela: 4 Dominican: 6 Trinidad:2 Jamaica:1 Ecuador: 4 Bolivia: 2 Colombia: 2 St. Maarten:2 Caymans:1 Brazil: 4 Nicaragua: 2 Guatemala: 2 Honduras: 1 Belize: 1 Middle East & Asia Fr. Polynesia:2 Bali:1 Malaysia: 4 Hong Kong:1 India: 4 Fiji: 2 Nepal:1 Philippines: 5 Japan: 2 Indonesia:1 Pakistan: 2 UAE:1 Micronesia:1 Lebanon:1 Saudi Arabia:1 Thailand:1 Israel: 3 Nepal: 1 Guam: 1 Cambodia: 1 Egypt: 1 Africa Nigeria:1 Congo: 2 Egypt:1 Zimbabwe:1 South Africa: 3 Malawi: 1 Ethiopia: 1 Antipodes Australia: 30 New Zealand: 4 Where emails to email@example.com originate* *based on approximately 6,800 reports emailed to us from January 2011 to December 2013 8 2 (41% Ontario, 5% rest-of-Canada, 48% USA, 6% overseas) 2 3 96 57 8 79 23 2,858 101 44 10 19 37 16 7 40 604 72 Hawaii: 26 46 8 20 58 34 6 62 3 31 30 8 114 (NJ) 45 (DC) 3 118 144 62 31 101 20 62 229 105 8 50 88 35 16 36 110 297 2 4 53 314 102 (MA) 17 (NH) 33 (CT) 10 (ME) 5 (DE) 51 (MD) 11 (VT) 16 (RI)
Sample fake ID documents
Sample fake passports
Sample fake documents w
Sample documents • A huge collection of fake IDs, documents and cheques given to lawyers by fraudsters: http://avoidaclaim.com/?page_id=2395 • Collaborative Law Participation Agreement fraud documents – Collaborative law participation agreement: http://avoidaclaim.com/wpcontent/uploads/2011/08/Masaru-Collaborative-Agreement.pdf – Divorce decree: http://avoidaclaim.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/MasaruDivorce-Decree.pdf – Settlement agreement: http://avoidaclaim.com/wpcontent/uploads/2011/08/Masaru-Settlement-Agreement.pdf – “I’m sorry, I’m paying” letter http://avoidaclaim.com/wpcontent/uploads/2012/02/Brewer-cheque-cover.jpg
Sample documents (cont.) • • • • • • • • Payment receipts http://avoidaclaim.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/ChaoPHILIP-RECEIPT1.jpg Verifications of identity http://avoidaclaim.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/DLCSolicitors.jpg Company registrations http://avoidaclaim.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/DVTTRADING-LTD.-REGISTRATION.jpg Invoices http://avoidaclaim.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Liu-Lankominvoice.jpg Bank statements http://avoidaclaim.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Kazuhiroproof-of-funds.jpg Powers of attorney http://avoidaclaim.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/LiuLankom-POA.jpg Commercial letter of agreement: http://avoidaclaim.com/wpcontent/uploads/2012/06/Burger-agreement.jpg Signed retainer agreement: http://avoidaclaim.com/wpcontent/uploads/2012/04/Zimmerman-retainer.jpg
Sample fake checks
Examples of multiple contacts • Sample of a long, detailed back and forth email conversation with a fraudster http://avoidaclaim.com/?p=3052 • Another ongoing fraud conversation, this one with a voice recording http://avoidaclaim.com/?p=1780
The common red flags • Initial contact email is generically addressed (e.g., “Dear attorney”) and BCC’d to many people. • The name in the sender email address and name in the body of the email are different. • Sender email address is different from email address mentioned in body of the email. • Client uses one or more email addresses from a free email service (e.g., Gmail,MSN, Yahoo!), even when the matter is on behalf of a business entity.
The common red flags (cont.) • Client raises issues of conflicts or payment of a retainer. • Domain name used in personalized email address or website was recently registered (check at WhoIs.net). • IP address in metadata of email indicates sender is in a geographic location that is different from where he/she claims to be. • Client is new to your firm. • Client is in a distant jurisdiction.
The common red flags (cont.) • Client shows up and wants the matter completed around banking holidays. • Client says they prefer email communication due to time zone differences. • Client provides only a cell number. • Client is in a rush – and pressures you to “do the deal” quickly. • Client and others involved don’t seem concerned if shortcuts are taken.
The common red flags (cont.) • Client is willing to pay higher-than-usual fees on a contingent basis from (bogus) funds you are to receive. • Despite the client stating a lawyer is needed to help push for payment, the debtor pays without any hassle. • Cheque or bank draft arrives at your office in plain envelope and/or without covering letter. • Cheque is drawn from the account of an entity that appears to be unrelated (i.e., a spousal arrears payment from a business entity).
The common red flags (cont.) • Payment amounts are different than expected or change without explanation. • Client instructs you to quickly wire the funds to an offshore bank account based on changed or urgent circumstances – E.g., health issues, sick child • Some or all of the payment is going to third party that appears unrelated to the matters.
Due diligence on a fraudster • Google – Crosscheck/verify names, telephone numbers, email addresses, message text, URLs etc. – Search text with double quotes – Check addresses on Google Maps – Google image search • Verify ID is legitimate – Local lawyer, online search or pixelization • Visit property • Check domain registrations (whois.net)
More information on fraud • Check confirmed names of fraudsters and see samples of real messages and documents from fraudsters on the AvoidAClaim.com blog • Use LAWPRO’s Fraud Fact sheet to educate your firm staff and lawyers about these frauds and the red flags to watch for • Report suspicious matters to firstname.lastname@example.org • See more info on fraud at www.practicepro.ca/fraud
Contact info Dan Pinnington Vice President, Claims Prevention & Stakeholder Relations LAWPRO, Toronto, Ontario (416) 598-5863 or 1-800-410-1013 email@example.com LinkedIn: Dan Pinnington Twitter: danpinnington Google+: Dan Pinnington
For more info: lawpro.ca titleplus.ca LAWPRO TitlePLUS Home Buying Guide lawpro.ca/excess @lawpro @practicepro @titlepluscanada practicepro.ca LAWPRO LAWPRO staff
bad check fraud: Dan PinningtonPinnington s’s Show Notes Digital Edge Podcast ... Microsoft PowerPoint - Avoiding Bad Cheque Frauds Digital Edge Show Notes
Avoiding Bad Checks. Remember that a check is not legal tender. ... San Jose Police Department, 201 W. Mission Street, San Jose, CA 95110 ...
57th Edition: Avoid Bad Check Frauds By Jim Calloway and Sharon Nelson. ... Avoiding Bad Cheque Frauds (Including Map of Reported Frauds) Fraud Fact Sheet.
5 Ways to Avoid Being a Check-Fraud Victim ... and college professor while passing $2.5 million in bad checks in every U.S. state and 26 countries.
smarts” when it comes to recognizing and avoiding bad cheque frauds. ... Could this happen to you? Getting duped on a bad cheque scam N NEW < PREVIOUS NEXT >
National Check Fraud Center Check Fraud Prevention All you want to know about Check Fraud. ... Below are several signs which may indicate a bad check.
This OCC Consumer Advisory on Avoiding Cashier’s Check Fraud gives you information on some common scams and some steps you can take to avoid becoming a ...
Get familiar with the most common red flags, and you’ll greatly improve your chances of avoiding fraud. Safety and Cashier’s Check Fraud.
• Avoiding bad cheque frauds • Administrative dismissals • Professionalism, practice and technology tips • Resources • Questions Practising Safely: