AERMOD CHANGES AND UPDATES

50 %
50 %
Information about AERMOD CHANGES AND UPDATES
Education

Published on February 26, 2014

Author: sergioalain

Source: slideshare.net

Description

Presentation includes information related to gently sloping terrain, AERMINUTE, and EPA formula height.
Presented at the 27th Annual Conference on the Environment on November 13, 2012.

AERMOD CHANGES AND UPDATES Sergio Guerra 27th Annual Conference on the Environment November 13, 2012

What does AERMOD have in common with a crystal ball?

Both are used to predict the future

What is an Air Quality Model? An attempt to predict or simulate the ambient concentrations of contaminants in an area of interest An Air Quality Model can be as simple as an algebraic equation or more complex

AERMOD • AERMOD is a steady-state plume model that incorporates air dispersion based on planetary boundary layer turbulence structure and scaling concepts, including treatment of both surface and elevated sources, and both simple and complex terrain • AERMOD replaced the Industrial Source Complex (ISCST3) model as EPA’s regulatory model on December 9, 2006 • Preprocessors include: AERMET, AERMINUTE, AERSURFACE, AERMAP, BPIP

Outline 1. Gently Sloping Terrain 2. AERMINUTE 3. EPA Formula Height

Gibson Generating Station • Review of IDEM’s AERMOD Evaluation for the Gibson Generating Station • Robert Paine and Carlos Szembek (AECOM)

Gibson Generating Station • The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) conducted an evaluation of AERMOD • Gibson is an isolated source with 4 stacks and 3 nearby monitors • On-site met data and hourly SO2 emission data for 2010 • Comparison of monitored versus predicted concentrations

Gibson Generating Station

Gibson Generating Station • Low winds produced highest concentrations (~0.5 m/s) • Plume travel distance within an hour is short of the distance needed to reach maximum receptors • Formulation problem or coding error related to sigma-z (used to calculate effective mixing lid)

1. Gently Sloping Terrain Comparison of AERMOD Modeled 1-hour SO2 Concentrations to Observations at Multiple Monitoring Stations in North Dakota Paper 2012-A-353-AWMA Mary M. Kaplan, Robert Paine (AECOM)

Evaluation Opportunity in North Dakota • Mercer County: Antelope Valley Station and Great Plains • • • • • Synfuels Plant Electrical generating unit sources dominate SO2 emissions – hourly data available Five SO2 monitors in area within about 10 km of two nearby “central” sources Site‐specific PSD quality meteorological data years available (10‐m tower) Major SO2 sources within 50 km were modeled Five recent years of data were used

Dakota Gasification Co. • Allowable emissions used for all sources, assumed to be constantly at peak rates • Receptors placed at monitor sites only, using actual terrain (even though slopes are < 2%), except to characterize the spatial concentration pattern • Four of the five monitors were at elevations near local stack base, a fifth monitor was about 100 m higher

Kaplan, M.; Paine, R. (2012). “Model Evaluation of AERMOD at a Monitoring Network in North Dakota.” Presented at the 10th EPA Modeling Conference, March 15, 2012. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/10thmodconf/presentations/3-11-Evaluation_of_AERMOD_against_Monitoring_Data_in_North_Dakota_Paine.pdf

Kaplan, M.; Paine, R. (2012). “Model Evaluation of AERMOD at a Monitoring Network in North Dakota.” Presented at the 10th EPA Modeling Conference, March 15, 2012. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/10thmodconf/presentations/3-11-Evaluation_of_AERMOD_against_Monitoring_Data_in_North_Dakota_Paine.pdf

Kaplan, M.; Paine, R. (2012). “Model Evaluation of AERMOD at a Monitoring Network in North Dakota.” Presented at the 10th EPA Modeling Conference, March 15, 2012. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/10thmodconf/presentations/3-11-Evaluation_of_AERMOD_against_Monitoring_Data_in_North_Dakota_Paine.pdf

Gently Sloping Terrain Evaluation Test of generic tall stack buoyant source • Modeled both flat and very gentle terrain • Terrain case was uniformly sloped upward 1% in all directions • Modeled entire year of meteorology • Obtained peak concentration on each ring of receptors out to 50 km • Plots follow for flat and gently sloping terrain

Kaplan, M.; Paine, R. (2012). “Model Evaluation of AERMOD at a Monitoring Network in North Dakota.” Presented at the 10th EPA Modeling Conference, March 15, 2012. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/10thmodconf/presentations/3-11-Evaluation_of_AERMOD_against_Monitoring_Data_in_North_Dakota_Paine.pdf

Gently Sloping Terrain • AERMOD has unusual prediction result for very low wind, • • • • stable conditions and low slope Problem is, in part, caused by very low mixing height that leads to very compact plume Mixing height is below building obstacles, which the model does not know about Plume stays perfectly level; terrain should not be considered in these cases With terrain, result is an unexpected plume impact “hump” at point of terrain impact

2. AERMINUTE • Concentrations not calculated in AERMOD for hours with • • • • calm or missing meteorological data AERMINUTE supplements calm hours with hourly values based on two minute ASOS winds Non-regulatory component of AERMOD Purpose of AERMINUTE is not to increase conservatism but to “reclaim” data that was lost due to METAR reporting in NWS data Light wind conditions may be controlling factor in some cases due to limited dilution

2. AERMINUTE http://www.epa.gov/scram001/10thmodconf/presentations/1-7-aerminute_update.pdf

2. AERMINUTE http://www.epa.gov/scram001/10thmodconf/presentations/1-7-aerminute_update.pdf

2. AERMINUTE • Effect of AERMINUTE is also introduction of very low speed winds that can result in significantly higher concentrations • EPA pending clarification memo • 1-minute ASOS : • Data representative • More appropriate given AERMOD’s 1-hr time step • EPA recommends its use to supplement NWS data • Proposed 0.5 m/s (1 knot) threshold • AERMET update will include an option to specify wind threshold for 1-minute ASOS data.

3. EPA formula height • Good Engineering Practice (GEP) stack height • The stack height at which a plume released from a stack is not excessively affected by downwash • Hgep = Hb +1.5L • Hb = building height above stack base • L = lesser of building height and projected building width • Created a discontinuity in the dispersion profile http://www.epa.gov/apti/course422/ce1.html

3. EPA formula height Before April 2011 After April 2011 • Before AERMOD v. • Since AERMOD v. 11059 11059, building downwash effects were ignored if stack height was greater to the GEP stack height • Created a discontinuity in the dispersion profile model no longer turns off downwash above the EPA formula height • Downwash effects are included for stack higher than the GEP stack height

3. EPA formula height • EPA: GEP height does not represent height when downwash effects become negligible but 40% increase in concentrations due to downwash at GEP height • AERMOD 11059 “miscellaneous” change • AERMOD no longer turns off downwash above the EPA formula height • Issue for facilities designed with the previous downwash assumptions that if/when modeled again will experience increase in concentrations • Pending clarification memo to clarify this change

Conclusion • Compliance is a Journey • Knowing about the challenges related to gently sloping terrain, ARMINUTE, and the EPA formula height can help devise a strategy to reach your goal

Questions? Sergio A. Guerra Environmental Engineer Phone: (651) 395-5225 sguerra@wenck.com

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

AERMOD Modeling System: Status and Updates - EPA

AERMOD Modeling System: Status and Updates Roger W. Brode U.S. EPA/OAQPS Air Quality Modeling Group 9th Conference on Air Quality Modeling October 9, 2008
Read more

Preferred/Recommended Models | TTN - Support Center for ...

Preferred/Recommended Models; ... AERMOD Implementation ... Exponent will provide updates and changes as necessary for the CALPUFF modeling system on their ...
Read more

Lakes Environmental | AERMOD View - Gaussian Plume Air ...

Lakes Environmental AERMOD View is the most commonly used air dispersion model applicable to a wide range of buoyant or neutrally buoyant emissions and ...
Read more

Lakes Environmental Software

US EPA Releases AERMOD and AERMET Models Version 12345 . The U.S. EPA posted updates to the AERMOD air dispersion model ... List of Changes for AERMOD ...
Read more

AERMOD Modeling System: Status and Updates

AERMOD Modeling System: Status and Updates Roger Brode U.S. EPA/OAQPS. Air Quality Modeling Group. R/S/L Modelers Workshop. Portland, OR. May 12, 2009
Read more

AERMOD CHANGES AND UPDATES - Education

1. AERMOD CHANGES AND UPDATES Sergio Guerra 27th Annual Conference on the Environment November 13, 2012. 2. What does AERMOD have in common with a crystal ...
Read more

AERMOD Modeling System Update - cleanairinfo.com

AERMOD Modeling System Update ... AERMOD Model Changes: ... Unresolved Issues/Planned Updates Updated AERMOD Modeling System
Read more

PPT - AERMOD Update PowerPoint Presentation - ID:4442994

AERMOD Update. Roger W. Brode U.S ... AERMOD Model Changes: Recent Enhancements (cont.) ... AERMOD Model Changes:Unresolved Issues/Planned Updates .
Read more

News | BREEZE Software

News BREEZE® is the ... U.S. EPA Proposes Changes to AERMOD and ... for their 11th Modeling Conference to get the latest updates on upcoming changes to ...
Read more

Aermod Changes and Updates_Dr. Sergio Guerra - Documents

AERMOD CHANGES AND UPDATES Sergio Guerra 27th Annual Conference on the Environment November 13, 2012 What does AERMOD have in common with a crystal ball?
Read more