6 presentation

50 %
50 %
Information about 6 presentation
Education

Published on January 7, 2008

Author: Dennison

Source: authorstream.com

Evaluation Methods for Human-System Performance of Intelligent Systems :  Evaluation Methods for Human-System Performance of Intelligent Systems Jean Scholtz Information Access Division National Institute of Standards and Technology jean.scholtz@nist.gov “The System”:  “The System” User Interface Human performance Robot performance Usability and utility of interaction devices HCI compared to HRI:  HCI compared to HRI Autonomy of systems Operate in changing Real-world environment Users have other demanding tasks Interaction with >1 system >1 users interacting with a given system Systems are command driven Deterministic Operates in virtual world In many cases, the computer IS the task One user/one system User Interfaces:  User Interfaces It’s not just the GUI - It’s the information And the interaction….. The “interface” can’t be done “at the end” It has to be designed along with the architecture of the system And to do that, we need to determine what information and what interactions are needed Usability versus Utility:  Usability versus Utility Usability - whether the user can figure out how to do a task with a given user interface Utility- whether the tasks supported in the software and accessed via the user interface provide the user with the functionality appropriate for her task User Interfaces that provide utility MAY be used even if they lack a certain level of usability Usability user interfaces that have little utility will NOT be used Interaction Roles:  Interaction Roles Why distinguish? different interactions needs different information needs Proposed roles supervisor oversees a number of heterogeneous robots mixed-initiative: either human or robots can see a problem and request or give help operator “inside” robot, takes over and moves robot mechanic “outside” robot, actually performs physical adjustments team mate human and robot are jointly performing a mission; need to be aware of each other’s actions bystander occasional user; needs to understand robot’s actions well enough to co-exist in same environment Interaction Centric Design/ Evaluation:  Interaction Centric Design/ Evaluation Is necessary information present for human/ robot to intervene? Is information presented appropriately? Is interaction language efficient for human/robot? Are interactions efficient and effective? Do interactions scale to multiple robots? Do interactions support robot evolution? Framework for Research:  Framework for Research Then user interfaces are constructed by -deciding which roles are going to be supported -incorporating that information and interactions into the interface Information Presence and Presentation Evaluation:  Information Presence and Presentation Evaluation Situational awareness assessment Level one: perception of cues Level two: comprehension of cues Level three: ability to predict what will happen next Direct experimentation using queries freeze task SAGAT methodology Interaction Performance:  Interaction Performance Measure the ability of the user to formulate the correct interaction and the robot to understand and carry out Typical HCI evaluation construct a set of tasks give representative users the tasks compute measures of effectiveness, efficiency, user satisfaction, accuracy PLUS robot performance time and accuracy of robot performance Scalability and Evolution Evaluation:  Scalability and Evolution Evaluation Support for 1:n and n:1 evaluations use the information presence and presentation with tasks which include 1:n and n:1 interactions Support for evolution evaluate the appropriateness of the interaction language, including the level of abstractions evaluate the information needs Case Study: Situational Awareness Assessment Tool:  Case Study: Situational Awareness Assessment Tool Supervisory role, driving domain, urban terrain Steps: construct various scenarios and informational needs in the domain construct user interface develop assessment queries for these scenarios collect data from representative set of users validate by having users also use driving simulator and note scores Deliverables: baseline UI with situational awareness metrics for a set of scenarios assessment tool Status Currently under development Case Study: ByStander Role:  Case Study: ByStander Role Exploratory study on the effects of consistency and expectness of behaviors on ability to construct mental models Used Sony Aibo, programmed with 4 sets of behaviors consistent, expected consistent, unexpected inconsistent, expected inconsistent, unexpected Experiment asked subjects how they thought they could interact explained interactions modalities and asked subjects to interact for 10 minutes asked subjects what the various interaction modalities did Slide14:  Results: Interaction Expectations Slide15:  Results: Mental Model Accuracies Results:  Results Consistent, expected behaviors resulted in higher recall Unexpected but consistent and expected but inconsistent were lower but were about the same Unexpected, inconsistent behaviors has lots of variance Subjects expressed frustration with unexpected behaviors, tried to rationalize inconsistent behaviors Subjects found it difficult to tell when behaviors ended and tried to interrupt with new command playing with ball long action (dancing) Voice recognition errors tolerated like real dog Conclusions:  Conclusions Performance of the “system” is more than hardware/software performance human-robot team performance needs to be measured HRI interaction roles and issues constitute a framework for the development of evaluation methodologies that address the information centric aspects of the human-robot system

Add a comment

Related presentations

Related pages

Presentation Software | Online Presentation Tools | Prezi

Welcome to Prezi, the presentation software that uses motion, zoom, and spatial relationships to bring your ideas to life and make you a great presenter.
Read more

Apple - Live - September 2014 Special Event

Streaming via Apple TV requires second- or third-generation Apple TV with software 6.2 or later. Apple Watch has not been authorized as required by the ...
Read more

Presentation On Nylon 6 - Yola

Presentation On PolyamidesNylon - 6. Presentation By. Mr. Devang Mehta (80) Mr. Ranjit Makwana (79) Mr. Harsad Kothiya (78) Guided By. Department Of ...
Read more

Citrix XenApp – Wikipedia

Citrix XenApp (vormals Presentation Server, davor MetaFrame) ist eine Thin Client-Lösung der Firma Citrix und Marktführer in diesem Bereich. Die Software ...
Read more

Where can I find Presentation VM 6.8 for VMWare? | DocuWare

Hello, Does anyone have a link for the 6.8 presentation VM? I only see links to 6.9, which is buggy and not working. Thanks!
Read more

Analyst Presentation 6M 2013 - Fraport

Slide 6 Analyst Presentation 6M 2013 . Slide 7 . Business Development Update Bulgaria (Varna & Burgas Airport) Analyst Presentation 6M 2013 .
Read more

YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.
Read more

Presentation layer - Wikipedia

6. Presentation layer. MIME; XDR; 5. Session layer. Named pipe; ... An example of a presentation service would be the conversion of an EBCDIC-coded text ...
Read more

6 Presentation Styles | The Creative Group - Robert Half

6 Presentation Styles. Posted by Gavin McMahon on Tuesday, April 1, 2014 - 11:00. To effectively sell an idea you need to present yourself with polish.
Read more